SLP Investor News: If You Have Suffered Losses in Simulations Plus, Inc. (NASDAQ: SLP), You Are Encouraged to Contact The Rosen Law Firm About Your Rights
WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces an investigation of potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of Simulations Plus, Inc. (NASDAQ: SLP) resulting from allegations that Simulations Plus may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public.
SO WHAT: If you purchased Simulations Plus securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action seeking recovery of investor losses.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the prospective class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=42476 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
WHAT IS THIS ABOUT: On July 15, 2025, during market hours, Benzinga published an article entitled 'Simulations Plus Sees Weaker Demand Persist, Outlook Softens.' The article stated that Simulations Plus shares had declined 'following the release of [Simulations Plus'] third-quarter 2025 earnings report.' The article stated that Simulations Plus had reported sales of $20.4 million, representing a 10% year-over-year increase, but this fell short of the consensus estimate of $20.9 million.' Further, '[t]his miss followed preliminary third-quarter sales figures released in June, which were already lower than expectations at $19 million to $20 million, compared to a consensus of $22.78 million.'
On this news, the price of Simulations Plus stock fell 25.75% on July 15, 2025.
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. At the time Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
——————————-
Contact Information:
Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827
[email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
a minute ago
- Business Upturn
Why China is pursuing Taiwan: Geopolitical objectives, potential outcomes, and public theories explained
Over the past decade, China's rhetoric, military build-up, diplomatic pressure, and policy strategy surrounding Taiwan have intensified—leading many to question whether a full-scale capture of Taiwan is inevitable. This analysis explores China's motivations, what would change if control is established, and the dominant geopolitical narratives discussing this issue. 1. Historical and ideological roots Civil War legacy: Taiwan is governed by the Republic of China (ROC), which emerged victorious in a 1912–1949 civil war. China's Communist Party established the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 1949 and has never renounced the use of force to bring Taiwan under Beijing's jurisdiction. Article 8 of China's 2005 Anti‑Secession Law formalizes this. National reunification principle: The PRC's official policy—'one China' and Xi Jinping's 'peaceful reunification' under the 'one country, two systems' framework—frames Taiwan as a breakaway province rather than a separate international entity. Political legitimacy: Taiwanese unification is a powerful domestic symbol for the CCP, often used in propagating nationalism and consolidating Xi's political mandate internal to China. 2. Strategic and economic incentives a. Strategic position and power projection Military anchoring in the First Island Chain: Taiwan sits on the so-called 'first island chain,' providing strategic depth in the Western Pacific. Controlling it would significantly extend China's naval and air capabilities, reducing US forward-operating access. Maritime chokepoint control: The Taiwanese straits are adjacent to vital shipping lanes—roughly 60 per cent of Asian maritime trade flows through nearby corridors. Chinese dominance over Taiwan would strengthen its hold over the South China Sea's commercial arteries. b. Technological and economic gain Semiconductor supremacy: Taiwan is home to TSMC, the world's largest semiconductor foundry, responsible for over 50 per cent of global chip fabrication. Full integration could accelerate China's ambitions in semiconductor independence and technological parity. Supply chain control: Taiwan plays a central role in global supply chains—particularly in electronics and green technology manufacturing. Its absorption would give China a critical advantage in these sectors. 3. What would change if China controls Taiwan? a. Shifts in global security and balances of power Decline of US strategic influence in Asia: Losing Taiwan would seriously weaken Washington's ability to project force in the Western Pacific and could unravel alliances with Japan, Korea, and Australia. Expansion of China's 'kill‑chain' reach: Models show that with Taiwan under PRC control, air-and-missile denial coverage expands, forcing US bases like Guam or the Philippines to operate at reduced effectiveness. b. Global economic fallout Unprecedented disruption: Even a brief conflict or aggressive blockade over Taiwan could cost the world economy over $10 trillion—short-term shocks similar to, or bigger than, the Ukraine war or 2008 financial crisis. Impact on capital and technology: Taiwan is a key conduit for foreign-invested capital and advanced microelectronics. Its loss could throttle foreign inflows, affecting Beijing's broader innovation-driven growth strategy. c. Political and cultural consequences Erosion of democratic autonomy: Taiwan's integration would mean dissolving its democratic institutions, curtailing civil liberties, and subsuming it under the PRC's authoritarian model—something sharply resisted by approximately 90 per cent of Taiwanese people. Continued 'political warfare': China would likely escalate its cognitive warfare campaigns—disinformation, political infiltration, propaganda—aimed at conditioning Taiwanese public opinion to accept Beijing's supremacy. 4. Public and strategic theories on Beijing's motivations Theory / Framework Key Idea Source Great Power Assertion Annexing Taiwan reinforces China's self-declared status as a leading global power, challenging the U.S.-led world order. Reddit , Wikipedia , Barron's 'Cognitive Warfare' Mastery Over time, China could annex Taiwan without force by eroding public will through propaganda and election manipulation. TIME , Wikipedia 'Anaconda Strategy' Beijing applies gradual diplomatic, economic, and military pressure to strangle Taipei's autonomy before physically seizing control. Council on Foreign Relations , Small Wars Journal Premptive Window Strategy Some Western analysts argue China might strike before U.S. internal political changes reduce deterrence or alliances weaken. Reddit , , Domestic Consolidation Taiwan serves as a rallying symbol at home, diverting attention from domestic issues and strengthening leadership legitimacy. Reddit , Small Wars Journal 5. Challenges and limits to a Taiwan takeover Massive military cost and human toll: Models show an amphibious invasion would be extraordinarily difficult—due to Taiwan's terrain, US and allied intervention, and Taiwan's own reserve mobilization plan. Economic blowback: China would face isolation from global markets, capital outflows, and loss of critical technology access—particularly in high-end semiconductors and foreign investment. Domestic risk amid PLA reforms: Xi's ongoing military leadership reshuffle raises questions about the People's Liberation Army's readiness for such a complex operation. 6. What the international community is doing US deterrence doctrine: US policymakers advocate a 'reassure and deter' framework—maintaining ambiguous support for Taiwan's defense while discouraging aggressive PRC action. Allied formation in the Indo-Pacific: Countries like Australia and Japan have pledged closer defense cooperation. A US congressional delegation is visiting Taiwan to reaffirm support. Taiwan civilian readiness: Under the 'Territorial Defense Force' model, Taiwan is enhancing its reserve system and investing in low-cost mobile defense weapons to make occupation prohibitively costly. Conclusion China views Taiwan as integral to its national identity and global power projection plan, but control requires overcoming immense global and domestic resistance. Economic gain and strategic depth are key motivators, yet the full takeover presents massive economic and geopolitical costs, including undermining Beijing's longer-term modernization strategy. Multiple scholarly frameworks—from great power theory to cognitive and political warfare—explain why China may pursue Taiwan even short of war. International deterrents and Taiwan's own resilience planning are central to preventing conflict, although no one can accurately predict Beijing's next move. Ahmedabad Plane Crash Vipul Sipani is a qualified IT professional with over eight years of active working experience. He is a trained web technologist and a certified Ethical Hacker v8 security analyst. Vipul has also been a consultant with the detection and prevention of cyber crimes, with the Cyber Crime Investigation Cell (CCIC) of Rajasthan State Police. Vipul is currently working as editor-in-chief at and he is reachable on [email protected]
Business Upturn
3 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
No new crypto ban from China in 2025: Clarifying misinformation spreading on social media
Fact Check: Viral claims about a new cryptocurrency ban in China are false. The policy referenced dates back to 2021 and remains unchanged. What's being claimed A viral message circulating online claims: 'China has officially banned cryptocurrency trading, mining, and related services, citing financial risks, capital flight concerns, and environmental impacts.' Many users on social media, including Twitter and Telegram groups, have shared this message, causing confusion among crypto investors and enthusiasts across the globe. The truth China did indeed impose a ban on cryptocurrency trading, mining, and related activities — but this happened back in September 2021. The report being circulated as 'breaking news' is actually a recycled screenshot from a Reuters article published on September 24, 2021, which clearly mentions the original date and the update timestamp (September 27, 2021). No fresh announcement has been made by Chinese regulators in 2025 regarding a new crypto crackdown. What the 2021 policy said In 2021, China's central bank and other regulators declared all crypto-related transactions illegal. The policy cited: Financial risk and market volatility Concerns about money laundering and capital flight Environmental concerns from high-energy usage of crypto mining operations These reasons were cited at the time of the original ban and have not been reiterated in any official announcement this year. Why the confusion? The misinformation appears to have originated from: Outdated screenshots of past news being reshared without context Misleading captions that present old news as a new development Viral posts designed to influence crypto market sentiment, often timed with market volatility A post featuring the 2021 Reuters headline has been making the rounds, with some users falsely claiming it is from August 2025. Official clarification Multiple sources, including Bitcoin Junkie and crypto analysts, have confirmed that no new ban has been issued by Chinese authorities in 2025. The People's Bank of China (PBoC) and Chinese state media have also made no statements or press releases regarding any additional regulatory steps this year. What the Reuters article actually says: 'China's top regulators ban crypto trading and mining, sending bitcoin tumbling' Published: September 24, 2021 — Updated: September 27, 2021 The date in the screenshot (which many users overlook) clearly proves that it's an old report. How to avoid falling for fake news in the crypto space Check the date of the article or screenshot Verify from credible financial news outlets (e.g., Reuters, Bloomberg, CNBC) Be cautious of Twitter and Telegram forwards that lack official links or timestamps Look for official regulator announcements on government portals or reputable media Claims and reality check Claim Reality 'China banned all crypto again in 2025' False — no new ban announced 'Reports are based on recent Reuters article' Partially true — article discusses policy review, not a ban 'It's new national regulation' False — the discussion was regional (Shanghai), no national decree 'Chinese regulators are considering yuan-based stablecoins' True — indirectly confirmed by company lobbying and meeting context Market impact Although the false report did create temporary panic among some retail investors, the broader crypto market has largely remained stable. Analysts believe seasoned investors quickly identified the misinformation. Conclusion China's stance on cryptocurrency remains unchanged since 2021. No new policy banning crypto trading or mining has been enacted in 2025. The message claiming 'China has officially banned crypto in 2025' is false, misleading, and should not be acted upon. Always fact-check before reacting to viral financial content. Ahmedabad Plane Crash News desk at
Business Upturn
5 hours ago
- Business Upturn
XRP Crypto Powers Ahead in Global Payments — HashJ Introduces Participation Contracts for 2025 Users
London, United Kingdom, Aug. 02, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — MGPD Finance Limited, doing business as HashJ, today announced the official rollout of its XRP participation contracts, offering users a simplified way to engage with one of the most established digital assets in global payments. This launch comes as XRP continues to demonstrate resilience and institutional appeal, buoyed by legal clarity and renewed adoption across financial sectors. At the time of publication, XRP is trading at approximately $2.74, with a market capitalization near $40 billion, according to CoinMarketCap. The asset remains within the top 10 globally by valuation. Recent developments, including a U.S. court ruling confirming that XRP is not a security when traded on exchanges, have reinforced confidence among both retail and institutional participants. HashJ's participation contracts aim to make engagement with XRP more accessible by providing short-term, fixed-return instruments that eliminate the need for technical management or high-risk trading exposure. How HashJ is Expanding Digital Asset Participation Through Simplified Contracts HashJ's XRP participation contracts mark the latest addition to its growing portfolio of structured digital asset instruments designed for mainstream users. Built for accessibility, these short-term contracts allow individuals to engage with XRP-linked performance without navigating complex trading platforms or managing technical infrastructure. Available via HashJ's mobile-based interface, each contract offers a defined term and a fixed reward structure. Participants can select from multiple durations—starting at just a few days—while benefiting from a straightforward entry process that does not require advanced financial knowledge or experience in digital asset markets. HashJ's User-Centered Design for Broader Engagement The launch reflects HashJ's commitment to creating inclusive financial tools that reduce barriers to entry. By eliminating price speculation mechanics and minimizing the decision-making overhead often associated with digital asset investing, the participation model appeals to a broad demographic of users—including those new to the space. As with its earlier BTC, DOGE, and ETH-based contracts, HashJ's XRP contracts are designed to respond to market movement while offering a predictable outcome over a fixed duration. This approach has attracted over 2 million users across more than 90 countries, many of whom cite ease of use and risk clarity as key differentiators. Welcoming First-Time Users with Platform Credits To support adoption of the XRP contract line, HashJ is offering new users a welcome package valued at $118, comprising $100 in contract trial credits and $18 in platform incentive provides first-time users an opportunity to engage with the platform at no upfront cost, and to experience the structure and flow of short-term participation firsthand. Product Expansion and Global Reach HashJ's addition of XRP contracts follows growing interest from users in Asia, Latin America, and parts of Europe, where simplified tools for accessing high-cap digital assets have seen increased demand. The platform's infrastructure is built for mobile environments and supports fast, secure, and transparent participation without requiring traditional account funding mechanisms. By enabling users to align with major asset movements through structured contracts, HashJ aims to help more individuals participate in the digital asset economy—on their own terms and timelines. About MGPD Finance Limited (HashJ) MGPD Finance Limited, doing business as HashJ, is a fintech company based in the United Kingdom. Founded in 2018, the company provides contract-based digital reward systems for BTC, ETH, DOGE, and XRP, with over 2 million users across more than 90 countries. For more information, visit: User Benefit: Register and receive $18 and $100 sign up reward. Business Inquiries: [email protected]
