Public comment sought for State Route 141 project
Jan. 27—The Ohio Department of Transportation District 9's Environmental Office is seeking public input for an intersection improvement project on State Route 141 and County Road 7E (Old State Route 75) in Lawrence County.
It is proposed to perform an intersection improvement project on State Route 141 at the 2.45 mile mark in Lawrence County. The project will realign the intersection of State Route 141 and County Road 7E. The project is located in a rural area of Upper Township.
The project will require approximately 0.040 acres of permanent right-of-way. The permanent right-of-way is located in a commercial parking lot. The project will require approximately 0.054 acres of temporary right-of-way. The temporary right-of-way is located in a commercial parking lot and cemetery lawn.
No homes or businesses will be removed by the project.
The roadway will be open for the duration of the project.
The funding for the project is 90% federal and 10% state funded.
The environmental commitment date is 1/1/2026. The project is currently expected to be awarded April 6.
Written comments should be submitted by Feb. 22 or the deadline date that is posted on the web site, to: Brandon Beck, ODOT District 9 Environmental Supervisor, 650 Eastern Avenue, Chillicothe, Ohio 45601 E-Mail: Brandon.Beck@dot.ohio.gov
The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried-out by ODOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated Dec. 14, 2020.
, and executed by FHWA and ODOT.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Does DOT's enforcement policy put truck safety at risk?
WASHINGTON — A new enforcement policy being considered by the U.S. Department of Transportation marks a significant change in enforcement of trucking violations, and crash-victim advocates are concerned it will make the roads less safe. In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) issued in May, the DOT is proposing several administrative changes, including how it oversees enforcement procedures by several of its modal agencies, including the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. The NPRM 'proposes updates to the Department's procedural requirements governing the review and clearance of guidance documents, and the initiation and conduct of enforcement actions, including administrative enforcement proceedings and judicial enforcement actions brought in Federal court,' the proposal states. Significantly for the trucking industry, DOT's proposal follows a trend within government to push adjudication out of the regulatory agencies and into the federal courts. Unless a statute or regulation clearly authorizes an agency such as FMCSA to enforce a legal requirement directly through an administrative enforcement proceeding, DOT's NPRM states, 'the proper forum for the enforcement action is Federal court, and the enforcement action must be initiated in court by attorneys of the Department of Justice acting in coordination with DOT counsel.' Zach Cahalan, executive director of the Truck Safety Coalition, a truck-crash victim advocacy group, believes that placing enforcement for truck industry violations in the hands of courts and judges unfamiliar with how the industry operates could result in less enforcement and riskier carriers. 'TSC is deeply concerned that these changes will severely diminish DOT's ability to enforce safety regulations against carriers,' Cahalan told FreightWaves. 'The notion that regulated entities should have their fate decided by federal judges rather than the DOT is absurd and unheard of. Make no mistake, this is a radical departure from the longstanding accepted norms and will only benefit industry. This will result in far less enforcement and more unsafe carriers operating discriminately on our roads.' Cahalan also noted DOT's plan to adopt the 'Brady rule' in all enforcement actions, including those of the FMCSA, as part of the proposed rule. The rule states that the government has a duty to disclose exculpatory information – information that could clear someone of guilt or blame – in criminal cases. Adopting the rule for enforcement actions 'will contribute to the Department's goal of open and fair investigations and administrative enforcement proceedings,' DOT stated. 'These disclosures should include any material evidence … that may be favorable to the regulated entity in the enforcement action—including evidence that tends to negate or diminish the party's responsibility for a violation or that could be relied upon to reduce the potential fine or other penalties.' But adopting such a practice, Cahalan said, 'does strike me as favorable to industry.' Brian Stansbury, who was chief counsel at FMCSA during the Biden administration, understands why safety advocates are concerned with the proposed policy shift. 'Giving members of the regulated community the ability to disqualify the enforcement official that they're dealing with gives the regulated community real power to push back on enforcement proceedings,' Stansbury, now a partner at the law firm Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, told FreightWaves in an interview. 'My concern is that it could make enforcement harder for the department if the first move every single time by a member of the regulated community is to try to disqualify the enforcement official. This could result in additional delays and wasted resources spent addressing requests to disqualify. This is an even greater concern with respect to FMCSA enforcement, where you have so many enforcement matters occurring at any given time.' Regarding adoption of the Brady rule in administrative enforcement actions, 'I believe government enforcement officials should be held to a high level of impartiality with a focus on justice, not getting a favorable result, and I am comfortable with the regulated community to have tools to ensure they get exculpatory information,' he said. 'But it also gives bad actors a tool to delay and undermine enforcement actions, and those bad actors are probably the ones most inclined to operate unsafely. It's the risk of abuse that we have to be thoughtful about.' P. Sean Garney, co-director of Scopelitis Transportation Consulting and an FMCSA regulations expert, said that while DOT's policy shift seeks to reduce regulatory red tape, it is no gift to the trucking industry. 'I think this is more about regulatory philosophy than an industry versus safety issue,' Garney told FreightWaves. 'Some regulations protect industry and keep bad actors out. Good actors in the industry have a vested interest in setting a reasonable standard through regulation.' Garney pointed out that a provision within the proposal that weakens the power of guidance documents could actually work against the industry. 'Without this guidance they won't know how to stay compliant and will not have a reliable foundation on which to build their operations.' The deadline for public comment on DOT's proposed enforcement changes is June 16. Trump administration wants to cut FMCSA workforce by 7% DOT's deregulation barrage raises compliance concerns for trucking Freight industry: Which regulations should DOT cut? Click for more FreightWaves articles by John Gallagher. The post Does DOT's enforcement policy put truck safety at risk? appeared first on FreightWaves.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Cathie Wood says the Musk-Trump feud reveals how much Musk's companies rely on the government
Ark Invest's Cathie Wood has weighed in on the public feud between Elon Musk and Donald Trump. Wood said the feud reveals how much Musk's companies rely on the US government. Trump said Saturday he had no desire to fix his relationship with the Tesla CEO. The public feud between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump has shown investors just how much control the US government has over Musk's companies, Ark Invest CEO Cathie Wood says. "I think the way this is evolving is Elon, Tesla, and investors are beginning to understand more and more just how much the government has control here," Wood said in a video posted to the company's YouTube channel on Friday. Many of Musk's companies have key links to the government and have received billions of dollars in federal loans, contracts, tax credits, and subsidies over the years. "Elon is involved in companies that are depending on the government," Wood said, pointing to Tesla, SpaceX, and Neuralink as examples. SpaceX's COO, Gwynne Shotwell, said last year that the company has $22 billion worth of federal contracts. Neuralink, Musk's brain chip company, is subject to FDA regulation, and a less friendly regulatory environment could impact Tesla's robotaxi rollout plans. Tesla stock fell more than 14% on Thursday after Musk and Trump became locked in a series of increasingly bitter clashes. The feud appeared to begin, at least publicly, on Tuesday, after Musk criticized Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill." He called it a "disgusting abomination" and said it would increase the national budget deficit. Tensions rose fast between the once-close allies on Thursday. Trump threatened to cut Musk's government contracts and Musk said SpaceX would immediately begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft — which returned stranded NASA astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore from the International Space Station in March. Musk later retracted that threat, which Wood said was a sign he was "beginning to walk this back." Wood said the rift with Trump could, in part, be Musk's attempt to further decouple himself from the Trump administration. Musk announced in April that he would be stepping back from his government work. "One of the hypotheses out there is that what has happened was partly — not entirely — orchestrated," Wood said. "Clearly, there has been some brand damage to Tesla, which he readily admits, and I think he's trying to disengage from the government and being associated with one party or the other." Moving forward, Wood said neither Trump nor Musk needed to get "bogged down" with a fight and that she believed both would eventually heed that reasoning. She also appeared to be confident that Musk could make the situation work for him. She said Musk "works really well under pressure" and that "he creates a lot of that chaos and pressure himself." Trump, however, signaled Saturday that he had no desire to fix his relationship with the SpaceX CEO anytime soon. "I have no intention of speaking to him," Trump told NBC News. "I think it's a very bad thing, because he's very disrespectful. You could not disrespect the office of the President," he added. Vice President JD Vance struck a somewhat friendlier tone when asked about the possibility of reconciliation during a Thursday interview with podcaster Theo Von. Vance said that while he thought it was a "huge mistake" for Musk to "go after the president," he hoped Musk "figures it out" and "comes back into the fold." Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
04-06-2025
- Yahoo
LIST: Grants for bike, pedestrian infrastructure projects
DAYTON, Ohio (WDTN) — Ohio Governor Mike DeWine announced today funding for projects recommended to occur will be dispersed over the next few fiscal years. According to DeWine, the funding is part of the state's Transportation Alternatives Program. Funding is distributed for recommended projects which boost pedestrian safety and bike infrastructure. Seven projects were recommended within the Dayton region: Fiscal Year County Name Grant ($) Overview 2028 Champaign $120,000 Update pedestrian traffic signals at Urbana intersections 2026 Greene $1,250,000 – Fairborn shared-use path on S. Broad Street: Highview Drive to Sandhill Road; – Bike lanes on S. Broad St.: Highview Drive to Central Avenue 2027 Logan $2,890,000 16-mile asphalt paving: Between Urbana and Bellefontaine on Simon Kenton Trail 2026 Montgomery $500,000 Evaluate right-of-way, direct environment work for Wolf Creek Trail future projects 2028 Montgomery $1,200,000 Remove and replace northbound curb lane on Far Hills Avenue between Dorothy Lane and Stroop Road in Kettering with shared-use path 2028 Preble $275,303 Upgrade curb ramps, sidewalks on Maple Street in Eaton 2028 Shelby $2,000,000 Improve inside and outside of Big-Four Passenger Station in Sidney 'Biking and walking are great modes of transportation that are not only fun, but foster connections, support local economies, and contribute to a healthier lifestyle,' said Pamela Boratyn, director of ODOT. Learn more about the program here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
