
South Wairarapa Council Puts Its Faith In Wai+T Water Model
All eyes are now on partner councils Masterton, Carterton, and Tararua to see whether they too will lock in the option.
South Wairarapa deputy mayor Melissa Sadler-Futter said Local Water Done Well reform was a huge piece of work for the council and community.
'The next piece of action we will watch very carefully are the votes of our neighbours over the coming weeks.'
South Wairarapa councillors were unanimously in favour of progressing the Wairarapa-Tararua council-controlled organisation, but this united front was unlikely to be seen at the table in Masterton where concerns around price standardisation were still being raised.
Without standardisation, the Wairarapa-Tararua option was the cheapest for Masterton customers.
With standardisation, it was more expensive than the 'Masterton-only' option.
Although price standardisation was not a requirement of Local Water Done Well, some Masterton councillors have previously questioned what measures would be put in place to prevent it once the new entity was set up and whether these could be overridden by the entity's directors or the Commerce Commission.
The Local Government (Water Services) Bill said councils can provide a statement of expectations to the water services entity, but 'the statement of expectations must not include any requirements or expectations that would compromise that financial independence'.
It further said that 'if a water organisation receives a statement of expectations that is inconsistent with a direction or requirement imposed by a regulator, the regulatory direction or requirement prevails to the extent of the inconsistency.'
The Commerce Commission, which would be the regulator, said it would be able to 'consider whether prices are efficient – for example, whether they appropriately signal the cost of service and support efficient demand management'.
'Generally, setting prices at a level that reflects local network costs is more efficient than harmonising prices across a water organisation.
'Once the Local Government (Water Services) Bill has been finalised and enacted the Commission will be able to make related decisions.'
The Commerce Commission's water implementation director presented to Masterton District Council in a closed workshop on Tuesday.
Price harmonisation was one of the topics covered.
A fact sheet from the Department of Internal Affairs said price harmonisation and cross-subsidisation was not a requirement of Local Water Done Well.
'Concerns about potential cross-subsidisation of neighbouring councils' infrastructure, and harmonisation of pricing for consumers, should not be barrier to councils' discussions about joint arrangements,' the document said.
'Councils entering multi-council arrangements will have a lot of flexibility in deciding among themselves if, when, and to what extent prices are harmonised across districts, services, or groups of consumers.
'They may choose to begin price harmonisations immediately, on an accelerated path, or allow prices to align naturally over time as infrastructure needs are addressed, considering the specific infrastructure and service needs of different groups and areas.'
Masterton and Carterton had hearings scheduled for next week and deliberations scheduled for the week after.
Tararua would lock in its option on June 11.
Each council must submit its Water Service Delivery Plans to the Department of Internal Affairs by September 3 and must demonstrate financial sustainability.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
Assessment of draft water plan not far off
PHOTO: ODT FILES A government assessment of a "rough working draft" of its water services delivery plan is expected soon, the Waitaki District Council says. At the latest weekly update on Tuesday, councillors and WDC staff provided further information on water service delivery plan requirements and the capital expenditure programme, needed to establish the planned ring-fenced, in-house water services unit as part of Local Water Done Well legislation. Last week the council submitted a draft plan to the Department of Internal Affairs (DIA), and is awaiting feedback. "We're expecting to be able to share some feedback next week, but we do know that we've got more work to do on our water services delivery plan before it is ready to be submitted," council chief executive Alex Parmley said. Presentations at Tuesday's workshop were made by the Local Government Finance Association (the main lender to local councils), representatives from Morrison Low, and district council infrastructure manager Joshua Rendell, together with assets planning manager Paul Hayes. There was also information on the introduction of water metering for water users in the district. That would see users move to a volume-metric charging system, based on water usage. WDC staff pointed out water metering had been shown in other areas to result in lower bills for the majority of households, excepting those with very large families. It had also resulted in a reduction of water wastage. It was also recommended that metering should be free for at least one year to help establish usage behaviour and identify any water leaks. The council will continue to work on creating a financially sustainable water services delivery plan. The deadline for providing internal affairs with a final water services delivery plan is September 3. The presentation given at the workshop is available on the council's website together with the working draft water services delivery plan. The next public workshop is scheduled from 3.30pm to 4.30pm on Tuesday, August 12 at the Council Chambers in Thames St.


Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Water model concerns raised
In a stark letter sent to the Waitaki District Council in mid July, secretary for local government Paul James warned the council it will face significant barriers to achieving financial stability through a standalone water model. The letter adds mounting pressure on the council from central government over its decision to establish an in-house water services unit, with household charges expected to more than double by 2034—topping $3000 annually for some residents. The Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) had previously advised that a joint venture with Central Otago, Clutha and Gore district councils—under the government's Local Water Done Well framework—was the only viable option. "Your council would have been significantly better placed to address these barriers as part of Southern Water Done Well," Mr James wrote, urging the council to submit a draft delivery plan for review by July 31. "To help us consider whether further advice to the Minister may be required ... I am requesting that you provide the department with a draft water services delivery plan." That draft was submitted last week, though Waitaki District Council chief executive Alex Parmley admitted further work was needed. "We're expecting to be able to share some feedback next week, but we do know that we've got more work to do on our water services delivery plan before it is ready to be submitted," he said. Over the past three weeks the council has been holding weekly workshops to find a way to overcome several difficulties in achieving the mandated government requirements for new water service entities to be financially sustainable long-term. The financial realities facing the council are sharp. According to the draft plan, average household water charges are projected to rise from $1468 in 2024-25 to $2185 by 2026-27—and escalate to $3146 by 2033-34. Over the next decade, the cost of water services is set to increase by 114%, a rise that would see charges consume 3.3% of median household income by 2034. "This is an acute shift," the draft plan states, noting the affordability strain. While DIA guidelines suggest these costs remain within acceptable affordability thresholds, they represent a dramatic rise from the current 1.7% of median income. The council has held weekly workshops in recent weeks to grapple with the financial and logistical challenges of going it alone. While maintaining a balanced budget is achievable, officials said the real challenge lies in ratepayer affordability, not access to borrowing. Most revenue under the plan would be derived from targeted property rates. Tuesday's council workshop reiterated the complexity of meeting the mandated requirements for sustainable, locally managed water services. The capital investment required is significant, and with increasing pressure from central government, Waitaki's decision to reject the joint venture path now comes with heightened scrutiny. The final plan is expected to be submitted following feedback from the DIA.

NZ Herald
3 days ago
- NZ Herald
Airports say nanny state risks stifling business but airlines say ‘monopoly' airports exploit customers
He said the airport had been 'subjected to repetitious reviews of regulatory settings over the last 15 years'. He told MBIE: 'Regulation of New Zealand airports is supposed to be light-handed.' Clarke said airports faced a 2018 MBIE review, replacement of the Airport Authorities Act with the Civil Aviation Act 2023, and a 2018 Commerce Amendment Bill. Clarke said the Commerce Commission also imposed a 'thorough interrogation' of all airport investment decisions in the past two years. 'If the Government would like to support effective infrastructure investment by airports, it should do so by supporting investor certainty and allowing airports to get on with the job.' Clarke suggested constant interference in rule-setting would corrode investor confidence. 'If investors cannot be guaranteed a stable return over the 20-to-50 year life of a project, they will simply take their capital elsewhere, likely offshore.' Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch airports are subject to information disclosure regulation under the Commerce Act. That means the Commerce Commission reviews airport pricing decisions to better understand their performance. Umbrella group NZ Airports said the current system was working well with no additional rules needed. 'It is principled, predictable, and trusted by consumers, investors, and regulators alike.' NZ Airports complained of 'discredited arguments' circulating and said a more regulated approach would undermine the Government's stated commitment to cutting red tape. But a major airline group said airports would exploit a system soft on regulation. Auckland Airport's $6.6 billion infrastructure upgrade includes a new integrated jet terminal. Photo / Michael Craig Cath O'Brien, Board of Airlines of New Zealand (Barnz) executive director, said rules were needed to stop 'monopoly' airports becoming exploitative. O'Brien today told the Herald that Auckland Airport's decision to spend $6.6 billion on infrastructure upgrades by 2032 was of huge consequence to customers. 'At the moment the airport can set their capital plan to be any amount of money, and the customers must pay, and there's no contract. And that's why you have regulation.' She said if the country wanted a chance at having cheaper domestic flights, the Government should curtail fee increases from agencies such as Airways NZ, Aviation Security, and the Civil Aviation Authority. O'Brien said Auckland, Wellington, Christchurch and Queenstown were monopoly airports. She told MBIE rules were needed to constrain the ability of airports to extract 'above normal' returns or take advantage of local or regional monopoly powers. Barnz said big airports already benefited from lenient rules. 'Once a regulated airport sets prices, airlines are then required to pay those prices as set, usually within a calendar month of prices being struck.' Barnz said the system was too soft on airports. 'It should be that the regulated airport feels the threat of further regulation, driving them to follow the commission's findings.' But the country's biggest airport took a dim view of what it called an 'ad hoc' MBIE review. Auckland Airport's chief strategic planning officer, Mary-Liz Tuck, said the company was making major investments and the MBIE process jeopardised that. In late March, Auckland Airport cut its airline charges after the Commerce Commission found airport forecast revenue was excessive and targeted returns were unreasonably high. Tuck, however, characterised the commission's report as 'highly favourable' regarding Auckland Airport's pricing and capital plans. She said it was strange for MBIE to get involved 11 days after the commission's report. 'Airlines are acting in their own self-interest, lobbying for more power to hold up airport investment.' Tuck said Auckland Airport just last year raised $2.5b in capital for new infrastructure. 'Auckland Airport can only raise that capital because investors believe we have stable regulatory settings.' Tuck said Auckland Airport charges comprised 4-6% of domestic fares. MBIE said it considered the feedback and provided advice to the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs, Scott Simpson. No law change was being pursued at this time, but MBIE said the Commerce Commission might review the information disclosure rules next year. John Weekes is a business journalist mostly covering aviation and courts. He has previously covered consumer affairs, crime, politics and courts.