Labour refuses to say how welfare climbdown will be funded
A minister refused to say how the Government will pay for its climbdown on its flagship welfare Bill.
Stephen Kinnock, the care minister, said Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, would set out the 'whole of the fiscal position' at the autumn Budget.
Sir Keir Starmer caved in to Labour welfare rebels by agreeing that existing disability claimants can keep their benefits.
The Prime Minister has agreed that nobody currently receiving the personal independence payment (PIP) will lose out, with tighter eligibility rules now only going to apply to new claimants.
The change will cost the Treasury around £1.5 billion a year by the end of the decade, slashing the original £5 billion savings from the welfare cuts plan by a third.
Asked how the costs would be covered, Mr Kinnock told Times Radio: 'The full details around what we are laying out, what I've summarised really today, is going to be laid out in Parliament, and then the Chancellor will set out at the Budget in the autumn the whole of the fiscal position and this will be an important part of that.
'But forgive me, I'm not in a position to set those figures out now. I think that is very much the Chancellor's job as we move into the Budget in the autumn.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
13 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Student flats should be open to resident challenge says MSP
Pauline McNeill, Glasgow Labour MSP, raised the issue in the Scottish Parliament with the government. She highlighted the plans for the old 02 ABC site on Sauchiehall Street, approved this month by Glasgow City Council despite objections from the local community. READ NEXT:Get You in Town: New campaign to promote Glasgow city centre as a destination McNeill questioned the number of applications being approved and said the motivation for investors is the ability to collect high rental charges. She said: 'Scotland needs good, affordable student accommodation, but the way that planning consents are being granted in Glasgow makes it seem as if they are being handed out as an easy fix for gap sites. 'We are seeing oversaturation because purpose-built student accommodation is currently favoured by investors due to the ability to charge high rents. 'Last week, a proposed nine-storey student accommodation block was approved on the site of the former O2 ABC iconic music venue, but that is just one of many student developments that have been heavily objected to by local residents and community groups.' McNeill asked Ivan McKee, public finance minister, if there should be a right to challenge overprovision. READ NEXT:Hundreds access emergency homeless help over winter in Glasgow McKee said the council can act if there are concerns about any negative impact. He said: 'Local authorities, including Glasgow City Council, are able to identify areas of concentration where further development would undermine residential amenity. 'That power already exists. There is also a power for local communities to produce local place plans to feed into local development plans. 'We should recognise, as I think Pauline McNeill does, that students who are studying at our colleges and universities are a hugely important part of society. I welcome international students and the making of provision for them, and any PBSA provision obviously takes pressure off the private rented sector, which I think we would all agree is to be welcomed.' The plan 02 ABC site is for a House of Social nine storey block, including student accommodation, a food hall, a public courtyard, a bar, a gym, and more.
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Post-Brexit food labelling branded ‘bureaucratic madness' by M&S boss
Marks and Spencer 's chief executive has lambasted a key aspect of the Windsor Framework's final phase as "bureaucratic madness," as over 1,000 products destined for Northern Ireland will soon require "Not for EU" labelling. Stuart Machin revealed the significant operational challenge, describing the new requirement as "yet another layer of unnecessary costs and red tape for retailers." From next week, a substantial portion of M&S's product range for Northern Ireland will need these specific labels affixed. The "Not for EU" labels have been progressively introduced since the post-Brexit trading deal, known as the Windsor Framework, was agreed in 2023. This framework was negotiated between the UK and the European Union to resolve complexities arising from the Northern Ireland Protocol, which effectively maintains Northern Ireland within the EU's trade orbit. The stringent labelling rules are designed to prevent goods intended for the UK market from inadvertently entering the EU single market via the Republic of Ireland. Despite the current friction, the UK Government recently indicated its expectation for a more streamlined flow of trade once its new sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) agreement with the EU is finalised. Mr Machin indicated he was hopeful that the stickers may become unnecessary following the new deal. He took to social media on Friday to express his frustration. 'Next week sees the final phase of the Windsor Framework come into effect, adding yet another layer of unnecessary costs and red tape for food retailers like M&S. – 1000+ M&S products destined for Northern Ireland will need to have a 'Not For EU' label stuck on them,' he posted on the social media platform X. 'Another 400 will need to go through additional checks in the 'Red Lane'. 'Quite frankly it's bureaucratic madness, confusing for customers, and completely unnecessary given the UK has some of the highest food standards in the world. 'The Government's SPS deal with the EU will be game-changing, and it can't come soon enough!'
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Charities warn PM's major backdown over welfare cuts not enough
The government offered concessions on the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill to avoid a major Commons defeat, following significant opposition from Labour backbenchers. The compromises include protecting Personal Independence Payments (PIP) for all existing claimants and delaying changes to PIP eligibility for new claimants until November 2026. Despite these concessions, numerous charities and campaign groups, including Amnesty International and the Disability Benefits Consortium, continue to oppose the bill, arguing it will entrench poverty and create a two-tier benefits system. Critics warn that the revised bill remains 'fatally flawed' and will push future disabled claimants into hardship, urging MPs to continue to vote against it. While some Labour rebels view the concessions as a 'workable compromise,' others still plan to vote against the bill, believing the adjustments do not go far enough.
