DOJ investigating claims Cuomo lied about handling of Covid-19
The Justice Department is investigating New York City mayoral candidate Andrew Cuomo.
The investigation is related to Cuomo's allegedly false testimony to Congress regarding the Covid-19 pandemic.
The New York City mayoral primary election will be held on June 24, 2025.
NEW YORK - Former New York Governor and mayoral candidate Andrew Cuomo is under fire for his handling of Covid-19 once again.
The investigation was discovered a day after Cuomo released a political ad focusing on his experience navigating New York through the pandemic; the mayoral primary election is only five weeks away.
What we know
The New York Times is reporting that the Justice Department launched the criminal investigation about a month ago. The probe is reviewing allegedly false statements Cuomo made to Congress about his handling of the Covid-19 pandemic made in June 2024.
A transcription of the full interview, conducted by the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, can be found here.
An executive order made by Cuomo on March 25, 2020 that restricted nursing homes from refusing to admit or readmit residents "solely based on confirmed or suspect[ed] diagnosis of Covid-19."
Click to open this PDF in a new window.
The order directed nursing homes to admit patients carrying Covid-19.
The order was reversed not even two months later. The New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) released a report alleging nursing home staff, not the Executive Order, was the cause for excess Covid-19 deaths in nursing homes.
In January 2021, New York State Attorney General Letitia James released an investigative report claiming that Cuomo and his team undercounted the total number of nursing home deaths by as much as 50 percent.
The Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic began its investigation into New York's response to the pandemic, specifically regarding Cuomo's executive order, in 2023. The committee announced a subpoena to compel Cuomo to appear for a deposition on May 24, 2024.
Cuomo appeared for his interview on June 11, 2024.
The seven-hour testimony centered on the executive order that forced New York nursing homes and long-term care facilities to admit contagious Covid-19 patients. He testified that he did not draft, review or discuss the report with the NYSDOH, but a former assistant to Cuomo testified he was involved.
Evidence that was later uncovered by the Select Subcommittee revealed that Cuomo "reviewed, edited and even drafted portions of a purportedly independent and peer-reviewed New York State Department of Health Report."
Representative James Comer, a Kentucky Republican who chairs the House Oversight Committee, recommended Cuomo be charged with making false statements to Congress.
The full criminal referral is below:
Click to open this PDF in a new window.
The request was denied by former Attorney General Merrick Garland.
A Republican-led congressional committee sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi in April 2025 to renew the referral.
Click to open this PDF in a new window.
Cuomo's spokesperson Rich Azzopardi released a statement saying that Cuomo was unaware of any investigation.
"We have never been informed of any such matter, so why would someone leak it now? The answer is obvious: This is lawfare and election interference plain and simple — something President Trump and his top Department of Justice officials say they are against," Azzopardi said.
Newly appointed interim U.S. attorney for Washington, DC Jeanine Pirro will be handling the matter.
"Let's be clear: lying to Congress is a federal crime. Mr. Cuomo must be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law." House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Chairman James Comer
News of the investigation broke a day after Cuomo released a political ad for his mayoral campaign, advertising "his experience navigating New York through the Covid-19 pandemic."
New York City Mayor Eric Adams responded to news of the investigation, saying, "Investigations must take their course… I'm going to allow the investigation to take its course."
Assembly member and mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani also posted a statement on the situation.
House Republican Leadership Chairwoman Elise Stefanik also released a statement announcing her support of the investigation.
Cuomo's campaign has already released a new political ad about the investigation.
The New York City mayoral primary election will be held on June 24, 2025.
The Source
This article includes reporting from several press releases and statements from the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, statements made by political officials and separate reporting from The New York Times, who broke the story of the Justice Department's investigation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Federal investigators demanded details on transgender patients from at least 1 hospital
When the U.S. Justice Department sought information from doctors and clinics that provide gender-affirming care for young transgender patients, officials weren't just asking for policies. They also demanded information about individual patients. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced in a statement July 9 that the department had sent more than 20 subpoenas to doctors and clinics that provide the care. The request represented an elevation in President Donald Trump's administration's effort to halt the medical treatment for transgender youth, even in states where it's legal. Bondi said the requests were part of investigations into 'healthcare fraud, false statements, and more.' No charges have been announced so far, but the probes have had a chilling impact on the availability of care. Specifics of the requests were not made public until a court filing in a separate lawsuit this week. Advocates say the requests are invasive and unnecessary. 'It turns doctor-patient confidentiality into government surveillance,' said Jennifer Levi, GLAD Law's senior director of Transgender and Queer Rights. At least one of the requests seeks names and social security numbers of patients The subpoena sent to Children's Hospital of Philadelphia on June 11 was included in a legal filing Monday in challenges from the states of Minnesota, Oregon and Washington to the administration's attempts to bar the treatment for patients under age 19. The 18-page document demanded an expansive list of documents be provided. Among them: Documents to identify 'by name, date of birth, social security number, address and parent/guardian information' patients who were prescribed puberty blockers or hormone therapy. The requests also covered personnel files for various categories of hospital employees, information about patient intake procedures and about which insurance billing codes the hospital used for gender-affirming care. The due date listed was July 9. It's not clear whether subpoenas sent to other providers were identical. Neither the hospital nor the Department of Justices responded to requests for comment on Thursday. Gender-affirming care has emerged as part of a political and legal battle Gender-affirming care includes a range of medical and mental health services to support a person's gender identity, including when it's different from the sex they were assigned at birth. It encompasses counseling, medications that block puberty and hormone therapy to produce physical changes as well as surgeries to transform chests and genitals, though those are rare for minors. Most major medical groups say access to the treatment is important for those with gender dysphoria and see gender as existing along a spectrum. While there's wide, if not universal, medical consensus, the political situation is contentious. Since 2021, at least 27 states have adopted laws restricting or banning the care for minors, and a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in June affirmed the states' right to have such policies, at least under certain conditions. Trump has signed one executive order defining sex as only male or female — and as unchangeable — and another that seeks to end federal funding of the care for patients under 19. He's also sought to bar transgender military service members and keep transgender athletes out of certain sports competitions. And the administration released a document that questions the standards of treatment for transgender youth and suggests relying solely on talk therapy rather than medical interventions. The investigation is one reason some clinics have halted the care At least eight major hospitals and hospital systems announced in July that they were stopping or restricting gender-affirming care, even though they're in states where it is not banned. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia is not among those that have announced they're curtailing care, though a place it has referred patients for surgeries — Penn Medicine — said in May that it would no longer perform them on patients under 19. A group of Democratic state officials across the country are suing the Trump administration, claiming it is intimidating healthcare providers to stop the care. GLAD Law's Levi said the investigation is just one of many factors that have led providers to change their policies. 'It's chilling,' she said. Solve the daily Crossword
Washington Post
2 hours ago
- Washington Post
Federal investigators demanded details on transgender patients from at least 1 hospital
When the U.S. Justice Department sought information from doctors and clinics that provide gender-affirming care for young transgender patients, officials weren't just asking for policies. They also demanded information about individual patients. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced in a statement July 9 that the department had sent more than 20 subpoenas to doctors and clinics that provide the care. The request represented an elevation in President Donald Trump's administration's effort to halt the medical treatment for transgender youth, even in states where it's legal.
Associated Press
2 hours ago
- Associated Press
Federal investigators demanded details on transgender patients from at least 1 hospital
When the U.S. Justice Department sought information from doctors and clinics that provide gender-affirming care for young transgender patients, officials weren't just asking for policies. They also demanded information about individual patients. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced in a statement July 9 that the department had sent more than 20 subpoenas to doctors and clinics that provide the care. The request represented an elevation in President Donald Trump's administration's effort to halt the medical treatment for transgender youth, even in states where it's legal. Bondi said the requests were part of investigations into 'healthcare fraud, false statements, and more.' No charges have been announced so far, but the probes have had a chilling impact on the availability of care. Specifics of the requests were not made public until a court filing in a separate lawsuit this week. Advocates say the requests are invasive and unnecessary. 'It turns doctor-patient confidentiality into government surveillance,' said Jennifer Levi, GLAD Law's senior director of Transgender and Queer Rights. At least one of the requests seeks names and social security numbers of patients The subpoena sent to Children's Hospital of Philadelphia on June 11 was included in a legal filing Monday in challenges from the states of Minnesota, Oregon and Washington to the administration's attempts to bar the treatment for patients under age 19. The 18-page document demanded an expansive list of documents be provided. Among them: Documents to identify 'by name, date of birth, social security number, address and parent/guardian information' patients who were prescribed puberty blockers or hormone therapy. The requests also covered personnel files for various categories of hospital employees, information about patient intake procedures and about which insurance billing codes the hospital used for gender-affirming care. The due date listed was July 9. It's not clear whether subpoenas sent to other providers were identical. Neither the hospital nor the Department of Justices responded to requests for comment on Thursday. Gender-affirming care has emerged as part of a political and legal battle Gender-affirming care includes a range of medical and mental health services to support a person's gender identity, including when it's different from the sex they were assigned at birth. It encompasses counseling, medications that block puberty and hormone therapy to produce physical changes as well as surgeries to transform chests and genitals, though those are rare for minors. Most major medical groups say access to the treatment is important for those with gender dysphoria and see gender as existing along a spectrum. While there's wide, if not universal, medical consensus, the political situation is contentious. Since 2021, at least 27 states have adopted laws restricting or banning the care for minors, and a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in June affirmed the states' right to have such policies, at least under certain conditions. Trump has signed one executive order defining sex as only male or female — and as unchangeable — and another that seeks to end federal funding of the care for patients under 19. He's also sought to bar transgender military service members and keep transgender athletes out of certain sports competitions. And the administration released a document that questions the standards of treatment for transgender youth and suggests relying solely on talk therapy rather than medical interventions. The investigation is one reason some clinics have halted the care At least eight major hospitals and hospital systems announced in July that they were stopping or restricting gender-affirming care, even though they're in states where it is not banned. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia is not among those that have announced they're curtailing care, though a place it has referred patients for surgeries — Penn Medicine — said in May that it would no longer perform them on patients under 19. A group of Democratic state officials across the country are suing the Trump administration, claiming it is intimidating healthcare providers to stop the care. GLAD Law's Levi said the investigation is just one of many factors that have led providers to change their policies. 'It's chilling,' she said.
