Small claims court: Delays cause businesses 'chaos and trauma'
Cases in Lewes are taking about 16 months to be heard, and claimants in Worthing, Hastings and Brighton wait between a year and 14 months.Mr Anthony Harman's case relates to work he did last year.He said he was "a very positive person" but his case has made him "very angry at times"."The justice system is meant to make people fear justice, but also to give them hope that justice will prevail," he said.
Mr Harman said some tradespeople need to borrow money to cover their loss of income while they wait and the costs of making a claim.He added: "You've got the interest on the loan. You've got the trauma, the stress, all that stuff that leads up for a whole year, which is damaging for your health, both physically and mentally."
'Courtroom not needed'
Mr Harman, who's been a builder for 11 years, believes reforming the system to move away from using legally trained judges to rule on civil business matters would speed up the system.He said: "I've seen people in the industry that have gone through the same path as me and they've given up after two or three months because they can't cope with that burden of the money they're owed. "And some people won't even go through the court system because they know it's that bad."Realistically it doesn't need a courtroom, it doesn't need a judge."
In a statement the Ministry of Justice said around 97% of county court cases are resolved without going to trial, and since 2024, anyone making a money claim under £10,000 must first attend free mediation before going to court.It said this helps people resolve disputes faster and keeps court time free for more complex cases.It said it was also funding 74,300 sitting days in the Civil Courts for 2025/26.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Vast majority of Afghans on ‘kill list' were bogus asylum seekers
As few as one in 16 Afghans identified in a data breach had genuine claims for asylum, defence sources have said, raising fresh questions about how many bogus claimants might have slipped through the net. More than 100,000 people were trying to get to Britain in 2022 on the grounds that they had fought alongside or helped British forces, or were related to someone who had, before the Allied withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021. Multiple sources have told The Telegraph that the 'vast majority' of them had no right to come to the UK because they had no connection to the Armed Forces. The disclosure that the Ministry of Defence (MoD) believed that only a tiny proportion of those claiming asylum were genuine helps to explain why the Home Office raised concerns on national security grounds about the scheme to bring them to the UK. A Royal Marine was trying to sift out false claimants when he emailed a list of almost 19,000 names to what he thought were trusted contacts, only for it to fall into the wrong hands. It was this that led to the government being granted a super-injunction to prevent the media or MPs from discussing the data breach. It also prevented any reporting of an emergency airlift to the UK of some of the people named on the list. The Government says that to date, 6,900 people, comprising 1,500 people who were on the leaked list plus dependants, have been brought to the UK. But the High Court was told in a previously secret hearing relating to the injunction that the true figure was 16,156, and that 42,000 people in total were eligible to be brought to the UK.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Tensions over Epstein files hamper Republican plan to vote on cuts bill
Tensions over the release of documents related to disgrace financier Jeffrey Epstein have complicated House Republicans' plans to hold a vote Thursday on legislation demanded by Donald Trump to slash government spending. The House of Representatives faces a Friday deadline to pass the rescissions package demanded by Trump and approved by the Senate in the wee hours of Thursday morning, otherwise the administration will be obligated to spend about $8bn meant for foreign assistance programs, and $1.1bn budgeted for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funds NPR and PBS. But before the House can vote on the package, it must be approved by the rules committee. Though the measure is widely expected to have the votes to pass the chamber, the committee on Thursday afternoon had yet to announce a hearing, as Republicans grapple with frustration over Democratic efforts to focus public attention on the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein case. On Monday, Democrats on the rules committee made two attempts to add language to a cryptocurrency bill that would have required the release of documents related to Epstein, who was accused of running a sex-trafficking ring catering to global elites. Republicans voted those down, and a source familiar with their plans told the Guardian that Democrats plan to propose further Epstein-related amendments when the rules committee convenes to consider the rescissions package. 'Either Republicans take a vote to release the files, or they don't,' the rules committee's top Democrat, Jim McGovern, wrote on X. The Epstein case has grown into a crisis for Trump and the GOP ever since the justice department announced last week that, after a review of US government files, it had determined the financier's 2019 death in federal custody was a suicide, and that no list of his clients existed to be made public. Trump's Maga coalition includes believers in a conspiracy theory that the 'deep state' is covering up a global pedophile ring in which Epstein was a major figure, and that files exist to prove it. The president has strenuously denied that his administration is hiding anything, and insulted those who call for the documents' release as 'weaklings' who fell for a 'radical left' hoax intended to discredit him. Democrats, relegated to the minority in both chamber of Congress, have seized on that tension with an array of legislative maneuvers intended to make public any Epstein-related documents. On Tuesday, House speaker Mike Johnson told a conservative podcaster who asked about the case: 'It's a very delicate subject, but we should put everything out there and let the people decide it.' Meanwhile, Thomas Massie, an iconoclastic Republican congressman who has repeatedly clashed with Trump, is trying to get a majority of the House to sign on to a petition that will force a vote on releasing the files, and has already received signatures from nine GOP lawmakers. The rescissions passage passed the House in June, but the chamber must vote on it again after the Senate declined to cut funding for Pepfar, a program credited with saving millions of people from infection or death from HIV that was created in 2003 under the Republican president George W Bush.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Southern Water boss scoops £1.4m pay day despite bonus ban as firm struggles with huge debt burden
Southern Water boss Lawrence Gosden has scooped a £1.4million pay day despite a bonus ban. In the year to March 31, he pocketed a £500,600 salary and an extra £691,200 payout. He also took home £111,400 worth of benefits, and £75,100 of pension-related benefits. He had earned £764,200 in the previous financial year. Regulator Ofwat banned Southern from handing out performance-linked bonuses after a sewage leak last summer fell into the most serious category. But Gosden's £691,200 extra pay was part of a long-term incentive plan. Details emerged just weeks after the utility firm, which provides water to 2.7m households in Kent, Sussex, Hampshire and the Isle of Wight, recently asked investors to cough up £1.2billion to ease its debts.
