N.J. lawmakers consider shortening timeline to fill House vacancies
The bill comes after two sitting House members died last year, leaving their seats vacant for five months. (Photo by Shauneen Miranda/States Newsroom)
New Jersey lawmakers are considering changes to the state's special election rules after two sitting members of New Jersey's House delegation died in office last year, deaths that led each of those seats to remain vacant for five months.
The legislation, which would shorten timelines for special elections to fill House vacancies, comes as another New Jersey member of Congress could step down by next January. Reps. Josh Gottheimer and Mikie Sherrill are among six Democrats competing in June 10's gubernatorial primary, and if either is victorious in the primary and then in November, they would have to vacate their House seat.
Bill sponsor Sen. Andrew Zwicker (D-Middlesex) said the state's current rules on filling House vacancies need to be changed.
'I thought it was pretty important that we get rid of this so that the people of New Jersey have representation, and if they don't have it, make sure that gets filled as quickly as possible,' he told the New Jersey Monitor.
He added: 'We've got two members of Congress … running for governor, so there's a reasonable likelihood there will be another vacancy starting in January, whenever the transition occurs.'
Sherrill's and Gottheimer's Democratic rivals have criticized both of them for putting their seats in jeopardy of being vacant if they win the primary. Republicans have just a two-seat majority in the House.
The Senate's state government committee on Thursday briefly discussed the New Jersey bill, but it did not vote on it.
Though New Jersey law and the U.S. Constitution allow New Jersey governors to make interim appointments to fill empty Senate seats — as when Gov. Phil Murphy appointed his former chief of staff George Helmy to fill a Senate vacancy after Bob Menendez resigned — the Constitution requires House vacancies to be filled by elections, if they are filled at all.
Presently, New Jersey has three separate structures for filling House vacancies, and timing determines which is used.
If a seat becomes empty at least 70 days before a June primary for any office, the governor is required to order them filled at the next general election, with nominees decided during that primary.
If the seat becomes vacant within the 70 days preceding a primary but more than 70 days from the general election in an odd-numbered year, the governor may — but is not required to — call for the seat to be filled at the state's next general election. In such cases, a district's county committee members choose their party's nominee.
State law also allows the governor to call for special elections — with both primaries and generals — to fill House vacancies. Gov. Phil Murphy called for a special election last year after Rep. Donald Payne Jr.'s April death. Then-Newark City Council President LaMonica McIver won the special primary in July to be the Democratic Party's nominee and won the special election in September to serve the remainder of Payne's term (she won election to a full term in November).
Murphy did not call for an election in August when Rep. Bill Pascrell died. Democratic officials picked then-state Sen. Nellie Pou (D-Passaic) to replace him on the November ballot, and she was elected to a full term.
Under current law, when the governor is required to call for a special election, there is no required timeline for them to do so.
'They can keep that seat vacant until the next general election, and they frankly might do that for politics if there's a razor-thin margin and it's a Democratic seat, or vice-versa,' bill sponsor state Sen. John McKeon (D-Essex) said Thursday.
The bill would require the governor to call for a special election within 10 days of a seat becoming vacant unless there are fewer than 100 days remaining in the unexpired term.
First introduced following Payne's death, the bill would require special elections — including primaries — to be held between 74 and 80 days after a seat becomes vacant when there are more than 180 days left before the end of the current Congress.
Vacancies incurred with between 100 and 180 days left in the term would be filled by special elections held between 80 and 86 days after the seat becomes vacant. In that case, there would be no special primary, and district county committee members would select parties' nominees.
If a House seat becomes vacant within 100 days of the end of the congressional term, it would be filled at the next regular election. County committees would select replacements for candidates who die after they've been placed on the ballot, as they do under current law.
That timeline especially is condensed by the bill. Under current law, House vacancy races with special primaries can sit empty for more than five months.
'This is now practical as opposed to theoretical. We went through it with the death of Congressman Payne and then the death of Congressman Pascrell,' McKeon said. 'We figured out what a nuisance it is, quite frankly, and a nightmare to fill those congressional seats.'
Zwicker said he hoped to have the bill passed before the end of Murphy's term in early January.
Fears about another vacancy redoubled after Rep. Donald Norcross (D-01) was hospitalized for an infection that turned septic in early April. Norcross was discharged from the hospital after roughly a month following the life-threatening episode.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
28 minutes ago
- CNN
‘We have to take what we can get right now": House Republican chair on budget package
House Republican Chairwoman and Michigan Rep. Lisa McClain joined "The Situation Room" to discuss Trump's spending bill, which the House has passed and the Senate is taking up starting this week.


Axios
37 minutes ago
- Axios
Gallego pushes to expand Dems' tent with eye on 2028
Freshman Sen. Ruben Gallego is already making moves to appeal to moderates and boost his national profile barely five months after winning his seat. Why it matters: Gallego (D-Ariz.) — like a growing number of Senate Democrats — is positioning himself for a possible 2028 presidential run as his party looks to build a fresh bench after their devastating loss in November. Gallego criticized the Democratic Party last month for "kicking people out of the tent" ahead of the 2024 election. "What happened the last election is that we got so pure, and we kept so pure that we started kicking people out of the tent," he said at a town hall in a Philadelphia-area swing district that Trump narrowly flipped. "It ends up there aren't enough people in the tent to win elections," he added. Zoom in: Gallego also released an immigration reform plan that pairs liberal priorities such as pathways to citizenship with conservative principles like increased border security funding. He had one of the best-ever fundraising debuts for a Senate Democrat, pulling in more than $1 million in his first quarter. Axios has learned that Gallego — who kept his seat in the Democrats' column despite Trump's victory in Arizona — is planning additional stops in key battlegrounds over the coming months. The big picture: There are signs that Gallego's appeals to moderates and conservatives are starting to make a difference for him back home. Gallego's 50% statewide approval rating in May is higher than Trump's and Democratic Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs', according to a recent poll by Noble Predictive Insights, a Phoenix-based nonpartisan polling firm. Gallego also doubled his overall favorability with Republican voters, with 37% of GOP voters viewing him favorably. His net favorability is higher than that of Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Az.), according to the survey. What they're saying: " Senator Gallego shows up, listens and delivers. Voters know he is fighting for them, and this has helped him build strong, bipartisan support across Arizona," Gallego's chief of staff Raphael Chavez-Fernandez told Axios. One senior GOP operative said Gallego is the type of Democrat who appeals to the swing voters that both parties fight over at each election.


Axios
37 minutes ago
- Axios
Jewish lawmakers fear they're next after antisemitic attacks
Jewish members of Congress are worried by a spate of attacks aimed at Jews — and are openly saying they may be next on the target list. Why it matters: There has been a sharp rise in antisemitism and threats against lawmakers in recent years. For some Jewish representatives, the two trends are eerily correlated. "The number of times in the course of a week I'm called a 'Jewish demon' is pretty unsettling," Rep. Greg Landsman (D-Ohio) told Axios. Landsman said "most" Jewish members are "facing these very unsettling and potentially dangerous situations," pointing to the pro-Palestinian encampment that was erected outside his house in Cincinnati. Driving the news: Capitol Hill was rocked last month when two Israeli embassy staffers were fatally shot outside an American Jewish Committee meeting at the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington, D.C. The suspect, Elias Rodriguez, shouted "free, free Palestine" as he was arrested by police. "I have had a hard time getting the image of being shot and killed out of my head. It happens almost every time I'm in a big crowd now," Landsman said in a statement after the shooting. The incident came after a man who set fire to Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro's official residence cited the Jewish governor's stance on the war in Gaza as a factor. State of play: Concerns about Jewish safety spiked again this week after a man yelling "free Palestine" threw Molotov cocktails at attendees of a Boulder, Colorado, rally advocating for the release of hostages held by Hamas. The attack left at least eight people — four women and four men, aged 52 to 88 — hospitalized. What they're saying: Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.) said in a phone interview that he "increased our investment in security" after the D.C. attack. "It's a dangerous world," he told Axios. "I will not let this become normal ... and I will not let this force me to back away or fail to do what I need to do representing all my constituents in the 10th district." Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.) said: "I've always thought we were in jeopardy and jeopardized when we were on the Capitol campus." And Rep. Laura Friedman (D-Calif.) added: "The Jewish community is very much on edge ... and elected officials in general, I think, are feeling less safe." Zoom out: Beyond their personal safety, several lawmakers previewed a renewed push to fund the Nonprofit Safety Grant Program, particularly to provide security for houses of worship and faith-based organizations.