
Why perfume could be bad for you
Wearing perfume or using a fragranced body lotion could be bad for health, a study suggests.
Ingredients in perfume have been shown for the first time to interfere with a protective invisible cloud around human skin that is thought to clean and filter the air we breathe.
The scents are themselves harmless to human health but by interfering with the protective cloud that clings to our skin they could be diminishing the benefits it provides, scientists believe.
Researchers at the University of California Irvine and Max Planck Institute discovered the skin cloud in 2022, which is technically known as an 'oxidation field'.
They found that ozone in the air reacts with natural oils on the surface of our skin, such as squalene, a chemical which keeps skin supple, and creates short-lived particles called OH radicals through a process called ozonolysis, which form a protective bubble around the body.
OH radicals are highly reactive and neutralise toxic molecules which has earned them the nickname 'detergents of the atmosphere' for their cleaning properties. They target pollutants in the air but also help clean surfaces.
A study of four volunteers, published in the journal Science Advances, investigated what happens to the chemical cloud when people have no products on their skin, after they apply perfume, when wearing lotion and after dabbing scented essential oils on their skin.
Data show that the perfume used in the study, the unisex CK One, diminished the cloud by 86 per cent, and the lotion, Unilever's Neutral Sensitive Skin, by 34 per cent.
'Affects human health'
'This study has determined that the human oxidation field generated by people exposed to ozone indoors is substantially disrupted when personal care products are worn,' the authors write.
They add: 'Given that the human oxidation field influences the chemical composition of air in the breathing zone and close to the skin, it affects our intake of chemicals, which, in turn, affects human health.'
Experiments found that the ethanol which makes up most perfumes diminishes the cleansing aura by converting the OH radicals into other products quickly and therefore wicks away the cloud.
However, the tested lotion interferes with the cloud by preventing the crucial OH radicals from being made in the first place.
Prof Jonathan Williams, of the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry in Mainz, Germany, co-author of the study, told The Telegraph: 'For both these applications, the result was to actually suppress the OH field, but the suppression seems to occur through two different mechanisms.
'There may be other methods, maybe there's other ways you can influence it, but I think we've shown that, at least in those two cases, it reduces the oxidation field.'
However, he added that it remains unknown whether the diminishing of the chemical body cloud is a health net positive or negative when considering every chemical and environment.
'What we've discovered here is really the phenomenon that there is an oxidation field and it can be manipulated by various forms – at least these two,' Prof Williams said.
'But I really, unfortunately, cannot give a clear message to the public of whether I recommend on a health basis to wear or avoid perfume or lotion because there is not enough information to base a recommendation.'
The scientists found that not all nice smelling chemicals have a significant impact, however.
Linalool, a citrus-scented essential oil which makes up about a third of lavender oil, only reduces the OH cloud by about ten per cent.
'This demonstrates that the ozonolysis of linalool, in the absence of ethanol, may not have a large impact on the OH concentration inside a room,' the scientists said.
The implications for health remain unknown and will be the subject of further research, but previous studies have shown that having a plentiful supply of the chemicals that make up the protective cloud is linked to better airway function, lower inflammation, reduced biological stress, healthier blood vessels and improved blood pressure.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Mystery as small unexpected US town is rattled by dozens of earthquakes overnight
A small town in Idaho has been rattled by more than 35 earthquakes in just 24 hours. The US Geological Survey (USGS) recorded the swarm near Stanley, a town of fewer than 150 people perched along a fault line capable of producing major quakes. The latest tremor, a 3.5 magnitude, hit at 9:48am PT (12:48pm ET) on Wednesday. Stanley sits near the Sawtooth Fault, a 40-mile-long fault line running through central Idaho. While geologically ancient, the Sawtooth Fault was only clearly identified in 2010. It drew national attention after a magnitude 6.5 earthquake struck in 2020, one of the largest in Idaho's recent history, which was felt across several states. Experts have called the Sawtooth Fault a 'sleeping giant' as it is dormant for long periods but capable of triggering a devastating earthquake when it awakens. This week's constant wave of seismic activity in the same area is 'unusual' and concerning to Idaho state geologist Claudio Berti, who said it's unclear what's going to happen next. This is a developing story... More updates to come The earthquakes detected overnight range from 1.9 magnitude to 4.0 magnitude. While earthquakes above a 2.5 magnitude can be felt, this region of Idaho is sparsely populated. Only dozens of people reported shaking in the last 24 hours.


The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
UN Security Council will vote on a resolution demanding a Gaza ceasefire, with US veto expected
The U.N. Security Council will vote Wednesday on a resolution demanding an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, and the Trump administration is expected to veto it because it does not link the ceasefire to the release of all the hostages held by Hamas. The resolution before the U.N.'s most powerful body also does not condemn Hamas' deadly attack in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, which ignited the war, or say the militant group must disarm and withdraw from Gaza — two other U.S. demands. The U.S. vetoed the last resolution on Gaza in November, under the Biden administration, because the ceasefire demand was not directly linked to the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages. Similarly, the current resolution demands those taken by Hamas and other groups be released, but it does not make it a condition for a truce. Calling the humanitarian situation in Gaza 'catastrophic,' the resolution, put forth by the 15-member council's 10 elected members, also calls for 'the immediate and unconditional lifting of all restrictions on the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza and its safe and unhindered distribution at scale, including by the U.N. and humanitarian partners.' President Donald Trump's administration has tried to ramp up its efforts to broker peace in Gaza after 20 months of war. However, Hamas has sought amendments to a U.S. proposal that special envoy Steve Witkoff has called 'totally unacceptable.' The vote follows a decision by an Israeli and U.S.-backed foundation to pause food delivery at its three distribution sites in the Gaza Strip after health officials said dozens of Palestinians were killed in a series of shootings near the sites this week. Israel and the United States say they supported the establishment of the new aid system to prevent Hamas from stealing aid previously distributed by the U.N. The United Nations has rejected the new system, saying it doesn't address Gaza's mounting hunger crisis, allows Israel to use aid as a weapon and doesn't comply with the humanitarian principles of neutrality, impartiality and independence. The U.N. says its distribution system throughout Gaza worked very well during the March ceasefire and is carefully monitored. The resolution demands the restoration of all essential humanitarian services in line with humanitarian principles, international humanitarian law and U.N. Security Council resolutions. Several U.N. diplomats from different countries, speaking on condition of anonymity because discussions have been private, said they expect the United States to veto the resolution. They also said they expect a similar vote to the one in November, when the 14 other council members supported the resolution. Israel's U.N. Mission said Ambassador Danny Danon, who will speak after the vote, will say the resolution undermines humanitarian relief efforts and ignores Hamas, which is still endangering civilians in Gaza. He also will say the resolution disregards the ceasefire negotiations that are already underway, the mission said. Gaza's roughly 2 million people are almost completely reliant on international aid because Israel's offensive has destroyed nearly all food production capabilities. Israel imposed a blockade on supplies into Gaza on March 2, and limited aid began to enter again late last month after pressure from allies and warnings of famine. 'The world is watching, day after day, horrifying scenes of Palestinians being shot, wounded or killed in Gaza while simply trying to eat,' U.N. humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher said in a statement Wednesday. He called for a flood of aid to be let in and for the world body to be the one delivering it. The Security Council has voted on 14 Gaza-related resolutions and approved four since the war began. That is when Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducting 251. They are still holding 58 hostages, a third of them believed to be alive, after most of the rest were released in ceasefire agreements or other deals. Israel's military campaign has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which doesn't say how many of the dead were civilians or combatants. The ministry is led by medical professionals but reports to the Hamas-run government. Its toll is seen as generally reliable by U.N. agencies and independent experts, though Israel has challenged its numbers. ___


Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE My brother was an early Diddy 'victim'... the warning signs were there from the start
Dirk Swain was on his first night out after escaping what should have been certain death. The 20-year-old had just recovered from being shot in the head after a college football game - and finally felt ready to embrace his second chance at life.