Five terrorists killed in Balochistan IBOs: ISPR
Listen to article
Security forces killed five India-backed terrorists in two separate intelligence-based operations in Balochistan on Wednesday, the military's media wing said on Thursday.
According to the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), in the first operation conducted in Loralai district, four terrorists linked to the India-sponsored group Fitna al Hindustan were killed during an intense exchange of fire.
The operation was launched on confirmed intelligence regarding the presence of terrorists in the area, ISPR said. The terrorists were effectively engaged by the troops, and weapons, ammunition, and explosives were recovered from their possession, it added.
Read more: Nine India-backed terrorists killed in K-P IBOs: ISPR
The statement shared that the slain individuals were actively involved in several acts of terrorism, including two major attacks on the N-70 highway near Rarasham on August 26, 2024, and February 18, 2025, which resulted in the martyrdom fo of 30 innocent civilians.
Security officials said the Indian-sponsored terrorists had long been on the radar of law enforcement agencies and was being relentlessly pursued, it added.
In a separate engagement in Kech district, another terrorist was killed during a brief encounter with security forces, ISPR said. The military reiterated its resolve to root out Indian-sponsored terrorism from Pakistani soil, vowing to bring all perpetrators and their facilitators to justice.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
India's 'hydro terrorism' untenable: COAS
Pakistan will never be coerced, and all inimical designs to derail the country's counterterrorism efforts will be "comprehensively defeated," Chief of Army Staff (COAS) Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir said on Friday, warning against India's "unlawful and legally untenable hydro terrorism," calling for a peaceful resolution to the Kashmir dispute to ensure strategic stability in South Asia. According to the military's media wing, the army chief made these remarks during his visit to Command and Staff College Quetta, where he addressed student officers and faculty members, touching upon operational readiness, regional stability, and Pakistan's national security doctrine. "Pakistan's enemies will fail in their attempts to distract us from our focus on counterterrorism," Field Marshal Munir was quoted as saying by the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), adding that the nation stands united in the defence of its sovereignty. He also underscored the need for a peaceful resolution to the internationally recognised Kashmir dispute. The remarks come amid recent tensions between Pakistan and India following a series of military engagements triggered by the deadly Pahalgam attack in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK), which claimed 26 lives, mostly tourists. India blamed Pakistan without evidence, prompting a chain of events that escalated into full-fledged cross-border hostilities. India's use of force was met with a calibrated military response under Operation Bunyanum Marsoos, which targeted Indian air assets, ammunition depots, and missile bases along the Line of Control and beyond. The operation formed part of a broader campaign, Marka-e-Haq, which ran from May 7 to May 10. Paying tribute to the martyrs of the operation, the COAS said the people of Pakistan had become a "wall of steel" under national leadership. "Marka-e-Haq is a testimony to our resolve, unity, and complete synergy among all elements of national power," he said, adding, "Allah's help comes to those nations that stand for the truth and fight with unity." Highlighting the changing nature of modern warfare, the COAS said Pakistan's military remained prepared to respond across the full spectrum of conflict. He particularly criticised India's growing tendency to resort to unprovoked military aggression, cautioning that strategic stability in South Asia was increasingly fragile and hinged on justice, especially in Kashmir.
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Assembly legal advisor resigns
The Legal Advisor to the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Assembly Ali Azeem Afridi has tendered his resignation, citing concerns over alleged illegal activities within the assembly. In a letter addressed to the Speaker, Afridi stated that while he was appointed based on merit and legal expertise, his conscience no longer allows him to remain silent on matters he believes violate the Constitution and the law. However, he emphasized that his role as a legal advisor had been more impactful and clarified that he could not be part of any illegal or unconstitutional activities under any circumstances. According to him, this is the right time to step down from the position, and he has made a final decision. He mentioned that he would now prioritize his legal practice. A copy of his resignation was also sent to the Secretary of the provincial assembly. On the other hand, according to the spokesperson for the K-P Assembly Secretariat, Ali Azim Advocate was appointed as Legal Advisor during the tenure of the previous government. The Assembly Secretariat, keeping in view institutional policy and discipline, reassessed his services. Based on this reassessment, Ali Azim was advised to resign respectfully. The spokesperson stated that he was aware of the likely outcome, but instead of following the advice, he fabricated a narrative. There were also serious reservations from the PTI's subsidiary organization, Insaf Lawyers Forum (ILF), regarding Ali Azim's political and personal activities. The ILF had repeatedly pointed out his involvement in such activities.
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
A tale of two escalations
Listen to article In any conflict between two countries escalation strategy controls the direction of the engagement. The initiation of conflict and its escalation depend upon who is in control of it and how it can be shaped or reshaped to dissipate the will of one's adversary. Once a conflict is started, the aggressor sets the benchmark and tone of its complexity. The defending state can retaliate with a range of possibilities depending upon its historical friction with the aggressor, the dynamics of its internal security environment, its governance cum administrative structure and more importantly strength of its leadership. There are however two types of escalations which can happen in modern day warfare. The first one occurs in physical space while, side by side, the other unfolds in non-physical medium at multiple levels. There are regions of convergence and divergence between the two escalations. The friction between these areas can provide room for future conflicts between two countries. A country which manages to expand its area of convergence between these two escalations can in fact strengthen its position locally and increases morale of its forces. A large island of divergence between physical and non-physical escalations is a potential source of discomfort among the leadership, security organizations and public in a country. It can push such a state towards adventurism in coming days. Any effort to offset it or defuse it in any manner can be a win-win situation for people of both countries. In a typical Pak-India scenario, India has upped the ante this year as compared to its response in 2019. This time round, it was inside Punjab and not in or around AJK. The other parts especially Balochistan and KP were deliberately omitted on multiple strategic counts. Perhaps it was a rational Indian choice not to target these regions as it might trigger anti-India sentiments where militancy is quite active. As a result, India started off at a higher level on the escalation ladder. The reaction to such multiple hits inside Pakistan had to come in a tit for tat fashion. However, Pakistan's response was mainly triggered by a barrage of attacks on its air-strips which also took its military by surprise in terms of target selection and attack intensification. In physical medium, de-escalation appears to be a permanent feature and actors, regional or international, are actually looking for an opportunity to synchronise the aggressor and the aggrieved. In the present conflict, many actors appeared now and again, striving for some sort of hostility adjournment, permanent or temporarily. Since, the ceasefire has resulted into mutual talks it is important to gauge the outcome of these engagements. Essentially, in case of any such like future occurrence, a modality needs to be established in which the two sides can examine the evidence and discuss it before reaching at a conclusion. A unilateral assessment of situation is bound to create friction leading to a future conflict. The questions arising are: Is the current de-escalation temporary or permanent? Is another dispute building up behind the scenes owing to the incomplete de-escalation mechanism? The current conflict has also depicted another escalation which has taken place in cyber medium. Claims, counter claims, truths and lies - in different formats and on various platforms — have inflicted a series of psychological blows on both sides. It goes on polluting the minds, causing confusion, frustration and fear as well. People usually believe in AI-generated images like old videos with new captions to create a false perception of escalation. Anything can happen in cyber space and anyone can say anything purposefully to modulate minds of citizens of both countries. Sometimes real facts and first-hand information are also transmitted on it, giving rise to new dimensions and proffer interesting avenues for analysis. This escalation is continuing in non-physical dimension and may not subside in coming days. The friction between individuals or groups on a cyber platform can become a potential source of mistrust among communities and ethnic groups living in different geographical dispositions. The post-ceasefire consultation should take stock of it too.
