logo
BLA 2.0: Reinventing Baloch Resistance With Operational Finesse And Strategic Messaging

BLA 2.0: Reinventing Baloch Resistance With Operational Finesse And Strategic Messaging

News1803-06-2025
Unless Pakistan ensures accountability and addresses the Baloch people's legitimate demands, the cycle of violence and repression will persist
Over recent years, Pakistan has experienced numerous overlapping and escalating crises, beginning with the regime change in Afghanistan. In August 2021, Pakistan's hybrid regime initially welcomed the developments that led to the rise of its longstanding ally—the Taliban. However, the situation rapidly deteriorated.
The Taliban's shift in allegiance inflicted not only a geopolitical setback but also spurred a surge in insurgent activity within Pakistan. Beyond the purported Taliban backing of terrorist organisations—particularly the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan or TTP (a claim the Taliban refutes)—there are various other factors contributing to the groups' structural and operational transformations. The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), regarded as the most formidable and ambitious insurgent faction in Pakistan alongside the TTP, clearly exhibits signs of tactical and ideological evolution, necessitating that the Pakistani state recognises these changes in order to formulate appropriate countermeasures.
The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) emerged during the late 1990s and early 2000s as an armed resistance against what the Baloch population perceives as systemic marginalisation and exploitation by the Pakistani state. Balochistan—the largest yet poorest province in the country—possesses significant reserves of natural resources, including coal, natural gas, gold, and copper. The demand for provincial autonomy has persisted for decades, further intensified by the prevalent belief that the region was historically incorporated into Pakistan through coercive means.
The BLA initially emerged with aims centred on greater provincial authority over governance and resource management, but it soon evolved into a movement advocating full independence. Originally led by tribal figures such as Balach Marri during its early phase, the organisation has since experienced a leadership transition, now predominantly composed of educated middle-class individuals, including women. Notable figures include Aslam Baloch—linked to the suicide attack targeting Chinese engineers in Dalbandin—along with Bashir Zaib Baloch, Hammal Rehan, Rehman Gul Baloch, among others.
This leadership has overseen a significant transformation in the BLA's tactical approaches and strategic orientation. Once primarily associated with hit-and-run attacks in mountainous regions—typically targeting gas pipelines, mobile towers, railway lines, and similar infrastructure—the group has shifted towards more coordinated and advanced urban guerrilla assaults against state security personnel.
A notable recent example occurred on 11 March, when BLA militants hijacked the Quetta-Peshawar Jaffar Express, demanding the release of Baloch political prisoners and victims of enforced disappearances. In retaliation, the Pakistani military undertook a rescue mission lasting over 24 hours, underscoring the BLA's capacity to engage in prolonged confrontations with state forces. Furthermore, the escalation of suicide attacks—especially since the reactivation of the Majeed Brigade (the BLA's suicide unit) in 2018—has added a new layer of lethality and strategic depth to its operations.
These attacks have also included female combatants such as Shari Baloch, who killed three Chinese lecturers at the Confucius Institute at Karachi University in 2022. Such incidents, along with assaults on Chinese personnel and projects as well as Punjabi migrant workers, serve as deliberate strategic messaging by the BLA. They underscore the group's territorial claims and its willingness to indiscriminately target civilians it perceives as symbols of colonial domination and state-led exploitation.
The notable expansion in the BLA's numerical strength, operational reach, and strategic standing must be understood within a broader, multi-faceted context. Crucially, recognising the debilitating effects of factionalism, several Baloch insurgent groups opted to unite in 2018 under the collective banner of the Baloch Raji Aajoi Sangar (BRAS). This alliance even announced the formation of a joint military command—the Baloch National Army—tasked with implementing a coordinated strategy across the province.
Additionally, similar to the TTP, the BLA has significantly profited from the sophisticated weaponry abandoned by US forces following their withdrawal from Afghanistan. Following the March train hijacking, Pakistani authorities disclosed the serial numbers of three American rifles used by the attackers, which were originally supplied to Afghan troops during the conflict. Furthermore, the Taliban's return to power has created new sanctuaries for Baloch militants to regroup within Afghanistan, in addition to those already existing in Iran's Sistan-Balochistan province.
Beyond the aforementioned developments, the BLA has adapted to contemporary dynamics by enhancing its communication capabilities through strategic use of social media. Its evolution from rural hit-and-run tactics to an urban guerrilla force engaged in narrative construction is also a response to exclusionary urban development, significant rural-to-urban migration, and increasing internet accessibility.
A further aspect of this rhetorical strategy was evident following the deadly terror attack in Pahalgam, India. In a statement issued on 11 May, the BLA claimed responsibility for executing 71 coordinated attacks across 51 locations in the province as part of preparations for Operation Herof 2.0, shedding light on the group's broader strategic calculus. The BLA appealed to India and other international actors to recognise and support it as a legitimate, indigenous national liberation movement, drawing parallels with the Bangladeshi independence struggle from Pakistan. Through this, the BLA sought to assert its position as a relevant actor in South Asian geopolitics, aiming to weaken what it describes as 'the terrorist state" of Pakistan.
Nevertheless, above all other factors, the primary driver behind the BLA's expanding capabilities is the sustained repression of the Baloch population by the Pakistani state. Decades of harsh policies characterised by systemic marginalisation and collective punishment have so profoundly alienated the Baloch people that, in the absence of viable alternatives, even those opposed to violent methods often find themselves sympathetic to the BLA. It has been reiterated to the point of becoming axiomatic in political science that political challenges cannot be resolved solely through military means.
The longstanding political grievances of the Baloch population have consistently been dismissed, silenced, and met with severe, indiscriminate force by the state. Unless Pakistan initiates a process grounded in accountability and sensitivity and meets the legitimate demands of the Baloch people, the region will remain ensnared in an unending cycle of violence and repression.
The writer is an author and a columnist. His X handle is @ArunAnandLive. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
June 03, 2025, 18:24 IST
News opinion Right Word | BLA 2.0: Reinventing Baloch Resistance With Operational Finesse And Strategic Messaging
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India won't initiate normalisation of ties, onus on Pakistan: Shashi Tharoor
India won't initiate normalisation of ties, onus on Pakistan: Shashi Tharoor

New Indian Express

time13 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

India won't initiate normalisation of ties, onus on Pakistan: Shashi Tharoor

Senior Congress leader Shashi Tharoor has said India will no longer take the first step in normalising relations with Pakistan, citing a long history of 'betrayals' and urging the neighbouring country to demonstrate genuine intent by dismantling terror networks operating from its soil. Speaking at the launch of 'Whither India-Pakistan Relations Today?', an anthology edited by former ambassador Surendra Kumar, Tharoor said that any future dialogue depends on Pakistan's willingness to crack down on terror outfits. 'Given Pakistan's record, the onus is on them,' Tharoor said. " Why can't they shut down these terror camps? Everyone knows where they are. The UN even lists them.' Citing past Indian outreach efforts from Nehru's 1950 pact with Liaqat Ali Khan, Vajpayee's 1999 Lahore visit, to PM Modi's surprise 2015 stopover, Tharoor said all were followed by hostilities or terror attacks. Referring to the 2008 Mumbai attacks, he noted that India had shared 'overwhelming evidence' of Pakistani involvement, but 'not one mastermind has been prosecuted'. He said India showed restraint then, but repeated provocations led to actions like the 2016 surgical strikes and 'Operation Sindoor'. Tharoor also dismissed U.S. President Donald Trump's claims of brokering peace post Operation Sindoor. 'It was the strikes on May 9-10 and the successful interception of Pakistani missiles that led to their DGMO calling for a ceasefire, not Trump,' he said.

White House launches TikTok account as Trump's deadline to ban app looms
White House launches TikTok account as Trump's deadline to ban app looms

Business Standard

time13 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

White House launches TikTok account as Trump's deadline to ban app looms

The first video posted by the White House features a montage of Trump and other administration officials, including Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth Bloomberg The White House launched its own TikTok account on Tuesday, the latest signal of support as President Donald Trump continues to seek a sale of the social video app's US operations from Chinese company ByteDance Ltd. The first video posted by the White House features a montage of Trump and other administration officials, including Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and encourages viewers to follow the account. 'The Trump administration is committed to communicating the historic successes President Trump has delivered to the American people with as many audiences and platforms as possible,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told Reuters, which first reported the creation of the account. Trump has embraced TikTok after his latest presidential campaign, crediting the platform with helping him to reach young voters who backed his candidacy at higher rates compared to his previous efforts. It's a stark departure from his first term, when the president signed an executive order attempting to ban the app if ByteDance didn't divest its US operations over concerns it could endanger users' personal data. Lawmakers subsequently passed legislation forcing the sale of the app's US operations during former President Joe Biden's administration. But Trump has repeatedly delayed implementation of provisions in the law mandating the shutdown of the service as he's sought to broker a deal. It's not clear how the White House is complying with a separate law, passed during the Biden administration, which bans the use of TikTok on government devices except for law enforcement and national security research and activities. The legislation also requires the development of risk mitigation actions for any authorized use. In the Biden administration, TikTok was banned from officials' government phones — including at the White House — though the former president's campaign created an account using a staffer's personal device. In June, Trump said he had identified a buyer but that he believed a sale would be contingent on approval from Beijing and Chinese President Xi Jinping. 'We have a buyer for TikTok, by the way. I think I'll need probably China approval and I think President Xi will probably do it,' Trump said in an interview with Fox News. 'It's a group of very wealthy people.' A deal was said to be close earlier this year, led by a consortium of US investors including Oracle Corp., Blackstone Inc. and venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz. But Trump has said he believes that his implementation of tariffs on Chinese goods has complicated the effort. Under Trump's latest executive order, ByteDance has until Sept. 17 to divest, though the president has extended the deadline repeatedly.

TanTrump & xiopolitics
TanTrump & xiopolitics

Time of India

time13 minutes ago

  • Time of India

TanTrump & xiopolitics

New Delhi must keep back channels open with Washington, and use thaw with China as a leverage. Monday's talks between Trump, Zelenskyy and European leaders at the White House appear to have raised hopes for a possible solution to the Ukraine war. From India's perspective, this is great. Modi has consistently maintained that this isn't an era of war, and that solutions to the Ukraine war must be found through dialogue and diplomacy. The current geopolitical situation has forced India to play a delicate game between US, Russia and China. Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi just concluded a two-day visit to New Delhi. And China lifted a raft of restrictions, from rare earth magnets to tunnel boring machines, that was stalling production and projects in India. The big question after all these geopolitical manoeuvres is, does Trump's extra 25% penalty on Indian exports – set to come into effect on Aug 27 – for buying Russian oil hold water. As reported earlier, moves appear to be on to revive US-Russia energy cooperation with Putin signing a decree that allows the re-entry of American energy major Exxon Mobil in the massive Sakhalin-1 oil and gas project. Coupled with the fact that Biden-led US had actually asked India to buy Russian crude to stabilise global oil prices after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, New Delhi can't be faulted here. Plus, most of the payment for Russian crude was in rupees, preventing Moscow from diverting this money for its war machinery. Additionally, if Trump's 25% secondary tariff was meant as a demonstrative tool, that purpose has now been achieved with Putin today appearing to be open to negotiations. Given this situation, there is no rational basis to penalise India for buying Russian oil. Second, US needs to think ahead. Given India's large market and growing economy, this is where American companies want to be. India, unlike Pakistan, also pays hard cash for American defence platforms. And US defence manufacturers are certainly interested in big-ticket Indian deals like the 114 multi-role fighter aircraft and procurement of 5th generation fighters. Meanwhile, US's biggest strategic concern after the Ukraine war is China. True, there is a thawing of New Delhi-Beijing ties today. But if Trump wants a successful China strategy, he needs an India card in his pack, given New Delhi-Washington strategic complementarities. Therefore, Washington's 25% penalty is undermining a mutually beneficial partnership here. Two things must continue – quiet back channels between New Delhi and Washington to smoothen rough edges, and continuing engagement with China as a leverage. India has to play it smart. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store