logo
Trump and HHS claw back $80 million in federal public health funding from New Hampshire

Trump and HHS claw back $80 million in federal public health funding from New Hampshire

Yahoo28-03-2025
U.S. Sen. Maggie Hassan (left) speaks with leaders of community resource centers in New Hampshire about the effects of the federal government's funding cuts. At right is Michelle Lennon, president and CEO of Archways. (Photo by William Skipworth/New Hampshire Bulletin)
The federal government, under President Donald Trump, announced Tuesday it was revoking $11.4 billion of unspent, leftover, post-pandemic COVID-19 relief funding from state and local governments, $80 million of which is coming from New Hampshire.
'The COVID-19 pandemic is over, and HHS will no longer waste billions of taxpayer dollars responding to a non-existent pandemic that Americans moved on from years ago,' Andrew Nixon, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' director of communications, said in a statement. 'HHS is prioritizing funding projects that will deliver on President Trump's mandate to address our chronic disease epidemic and Make America Healthy Again.'
Gov. Kelly Ayotte told WMUR and others Wednesday that she's asked the Trump administration to reconsider the decision but was told it is irreversible. State officials believed they would have until the end of 2026 to spend the funding.
'As I understand it, at the federal level, they're just saying these were pandemic funds and they were only meant to be temporary,' Ayotte, a Republican, said. 'And the pandemic's concluded and we're gonna claw them back.'
This worsens what was already an extremely difficult budget year for New Hampshire. The state has dealt with years of lagging business tax revenues, is set to be forced to pay hundreds of millions of dollars in settlement money to victims of a yearslong child abuse scandal in its juvenile detention centers, and was already running out of pandemic-era federal funding. Amid these challenges, Ayotte unveiled her $16 billion two-year budget proposal in February. Since then, legislators have been proposing further cuts to that proposal after the House Ways and Means Committee decided her revenue projections were too optimistic by hundreds of millions of dollars.
This week's cut from the federal government creates a new hole in the state budget that lawmakers will have to figure out how to address. Ayotte said she disagrees with the federal government's decision to revoke this funding so abruptly.
'Of course I think it is much easier for states if resources have been appropriated for a period that at least we fulfill that period,' Ayotte said.
On Friday, U.S. Sen. Maggie Hassan met with leaders of community organizations from across the state in Tilton at Archways Community Resource Center to discuss how this will affect their programming, which also relies on the funding that was cut.
'This is about the administration taking away critical things from the American people who need them to give more tax cuts for billionaires who are already billionaires,' Hassan, a Democrat, said.
Archways, as well as several other organizations at the event Friday, were using the federal funding that was revoked to provide a number of services, including those aimed at treating substance use disorder as well as helping people get the Medicaid and SNAP benefits they qualify for.
'These are not just nice things you do for the community,' Michelle Lennon, president and CEO of Archways, said. 'There's evidence that it saves money and it saves lives.'
Lennon said a lot of people don't realize how difficult it is for those who need welfare services to obtain those services. Her organization relies heavily on federal funding to help people receive their services.
'The assumption is that the resources are readily available, and I can tell you, 99% of the time, they are not,' Lennon said. 'The assumption is that, 'Oh, you can go to town welfare when you're in trouble and you're good.' And it doesn't work that way. It is so complicated. Rejections come fast and furious, sometimes to the point where we have to engage with legal aid to get people the help they are entitled to as American citizens.'
Among the specific programs being cut is the Health Disparities Grant, which funds employees at Archways who help impoverished people navigate the state's health care system.
'We have to train our workers in terms of navigating that (system),' Mark Watman, vice president and COO of Archways, said. 'These are people who are trained, and it's still difficult. To have individuals out there trying to navigate this on their own, this is going to be disastrous.'
Watman said the programs that have been supported by this funding 'help families survive.'
'The lack of these resources is going to have very practical implications on the health and survivability of New Hampshire families,' he said.
Several leaders of community organizations present Friday said these cuts will devastate their operations at the same time that need in their communities is rising.
'Now that they've done this, it's like, 'Oh my god, they can do anything to just wreck us overnight,'' Joelyn Drennan, assistant vice president of impact at Granite United Way, said. 'And that is super concerning to me, because we are seeing the needs rise, and we're having such a hard time keeping up with the capacity now.'
'It is one thing to plan for budget cuts in future budgets,' Hassan said. 'We go through that at the state level, at the local level, at the federal level all the time. … This is different. This is the administration cutting already committed funds, laying off people in the middle of a budget, doing things that really are going to harm the people of this state and make our communities less able, less resilient to deal with the challenges that they're facing.'
Hassan said she's fighting back by spotlighting the importance of the services being cut in New Hampshire, and she's trying to persuade her Republican colleagues to help the Democrats oppose these actions. She pointed out that they'd need only four Republicans in the Senate and a few more in the House to overcome the GOP majority. She wouldn't say whether the onus is on Ayotte as a Republican to appeal to the Trump administration to stop this funding cut.
'This clawback of money, this taking away of money that was already promised to New Hampshire and that New Hampshire has already planned to use, will really harm families, people in mental health crisis, people with chronic illness, young children whose disabilities are just being identified and need that bit of extra help so that they won't need special education later on,' she said. 'Those are all services at risk.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gabbard strips security clearances of 37 intelligence officials, including many with Biden ties
Gabbard strips security clearances of 37 intelligence officials, including many with Biden ties

The Hill

time26 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Gabbard strips security clearances of 37 intelligence officials, including many with Biden ties

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard revoked the security clearances of 37 current and former intelligence officials, sharing the list in a move that prompted swift criticism that the Trump administration was politicizing clearances. Among those on the list are several Biden administration officials, including Maher Bitar, who joined the National Security Council (NSC) after previously working for then-House Intelligence Chair Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) amid the first Trump impeachment. Bitar has since returned to Schiff's office. Emily Horne, an NSC spokesperson under Biden, also had her clearance revoked, as did Brett Holmgren, who most recently served as Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research and who is married to former Biden White House Counsel Dana Remus. Gabbard, without evidence, accused those listed of politicizing or leaking intelligence or 'committing intentional egregious violations of tradecraft standards.' She said the move came at the direction of President Trump. 'Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right. Those in the Intelligence Community who betray their oath to the Constitution and put their own interests ahead of the interests of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold. In doing so, they undermine our national security, the safety and security of the American people and the foundational principles of our democratic republic,' Gabbard wrote on X. The announcement was quickly condemned by national security professionals, including others who have had their clearances revoked by Trump. 'Can you say 'Privacy Act violation'? I certainly can. Further proof of weaponization and politicization. The vast majority of these individuals are not household names & are dedicated public servants who have worked across multiple presidential administrations,' said Mark Zaid, a national security attorney who has represented those who have had clearance revoked and also had his own clearance stripped under Trump. Zaid noted that the move was first published by The New York Post ahead of the public announcement by Gabbard. 'Pure politicization of security clearance process. These are unlawful decisions that deviate from decades of precedent. Completely unprofessional that individuals are targeted in [a] way that impacts their careers, yet they are not notified before leaking memo to friendly media,' he wrote on X. Larry Pfeiffer, who served as senior director of the White House situation room and chief of staff at the CIA, said the decision would only undercut U.S. intelligence. 'The skill and talent that Trump and Gabbard deprive the US national security and intelligence communities, govt & private sector, is huge. Makes one wonder who they are really working for, directly, indirectly, or as useful idiots,' he wrote on X, ending the tweet with a Russian flag. The list also cuts clearances for those who have spoken in the media about various Trump administration decisions. Beth Sanner, a longtime national security official who also served during the first Trump administration, has commented on Trump's policies through her role as a national security analyst at CNN. Charles Kupchan, who worked at NSC under the Clinton and Obama administrations, and Sarah Vinograd, who was at NSC under Obama and at the Department of Homeland Security under Biden, have also recently commented on Trump's foreign policy moves. Trump has revoked security clearances for a number of officials, including those who signed onto a letter saying the Hunter Biden laptop had the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign, as well as the clearances of attorneys working at major law firms.

Trump's GOP allies warn against Ukraine entanglement
Trump's GOP allies warn against Ukraine entanglement

The Hill

time26 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump's GOP allies warn against Ukraine entanglement

President Trump's Republican allies are putting pressure on him not to entangle the U.S. militarily in Ukraine after he signaled an openness to helping craft security guarantees for the embattled nation in its war against Russian aggression. Trump and the White House on Tuesday insisted the U.S. would not put boots on the ground in Ukraine, but floated the idea of providing air support using U.S. pilots and warplanes. That came after a meeting on Monday at the White House with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and seven other European leaders, during which they discussed security guarantees for Kyiv in lieu of allowing it into NATO, a red line for Russian President Vladimir Putin. While the summit resulted in few specifics about what those security guarantees would entail, at one point a reporter asked Trump if the U.S. would send troops to Ukraine. Trump didn't answer directly but said the U.S. would 'help them out.' That, combined with special envoy Steve Witkoff saying the U.S. could participate in ' Article 5-like protections ' for Ukraine, has set off alarm bells for some of Trump's 'America First' supporters. Top allies are warning him not to go too far, citing a key MAGA tenet of not getting involved in any lengthy conflicts or 'forever wars.' 'I'd have to look at what the responsibilities would be. We don't want another war,' Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) told reporters at the Capitol on Tuesday. 'People in this country, they can't fathom that after 20 years of war over in the Middle East and then getting into another. I know the president's not into that, but we don't want anything to happen in terms of having to fight and lose more lives.' When asked how big of an ask that would be to constituents and voters, the Alabama senator — a top MAGA supporter — was blunt. 'It would be an impossible sell,' said Tuberville, who is currently running to become governor of his home state. 'The American people aren't going to go for it, I'm just going to tell you that right now. The people in Alabama would be definitely against it. … I know President Trump's trying to do the right thing, but people in Europe have to take responsibility for this.' 'President Trump enjoys taking over and trying to help, but he knows he can only go so far with all this. … [He's] trying to do what's right for us,' Tuberville added. 'But there's no appetite for war or us getting involved with this anyway with troops on the ground that would actually fight. We're talking about security, which might be different.' Pressed during a phone interview with 'Fox & Friends' Tuesday morning about any 'assurances' he could make that there will not be any U.S. troops on the ground in Ukraine as part of any deal, Trump sought to quell any eruption by supporters. 'Well, you have my assurance, and I'm president,' he said, suggesting that France, Germany, and Great Britain might do so instead. Trump's latest remarks came a day after marathon meetings with the European cohort, during which Zelensky specifically referenced progress towards a deal on security guarantees. They are among the most prominent Ukrainian demands for any deal that may include ceding territory to the Russians. Zelensky also noted that as part of a potential security guarantee agreement, Kyiv would purchase $90 billion in American weapons, including sophisticated systems for air-defense support and war planes. The U.S. would buy Ukrainian drones in return. Some of Trump's top supporters almost immediately warned him against getting involved militarily. 'Right now, it's all predicated on American cash, American arms, and now they're going to need American involvement,' former White House strategist and conservative firebrand Steve Bannon said on his radio show Monday, adding that European leaders and Senate GOP hawks cannot be trusted on this issue. Bannon said the group is 'trying to get America sucked into a deep involvement' in the region. 'These are tripwires,' Bannon said. 'This is where things go from regional conflicts to world wars.' The battle also marks the latest one where Trump has had to straddle the concerns of key MAGA figures. He has had to manage similar situations in Iran after the U.S. struck against their nuclear capabilities and backed Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza. Jack Posobiec, a right-wing activist and editor at Human Events, also pressed White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt about the questions about the security guarantees being discussed. 'The president understands the security guarantees are crucially important to ensure a lasting peace,' Leavitt said at Tuesday's press briefing. 'He has directed his national security team to coordinate with our friends in Europe, and also to continue to cooperate and discuss these matters with Ukraine and Russia as well.' The Ukrainians are seeking security guarantees akin to those afforded to NATO nations via Article 5, which Witkoff, Trump's envoy to the Middle East and Ukraine, floated over the weekend. That would potentially draw the U.S. into a larger conflict if Moscow attacked the peacekeeping effort. Russia has vociferously objected to security guarantees even though Trump indicated recently that Putin would be open to the idea of a peacekeeping force by NATO nations in eastern Ukraine. 'We reiterate our longstanding position of unequivocally rejecting any scenarios involving the deployment of NATO military contingents in Ukraine, as this risks uncontrollable escalation with unpredictable consequences,' said Maria Zakharova, a spokeswoman for the Russian Foreign Ministry. Trump and European leaders are expected to continue discussion in the coming days in a bid to keep up the momentum. Secretary of State Marco Rubio is set to head up a U.S.-European-Ukrainian commission to draft a proposal of potential security guarantees as part of a final accord, and Trump is seeking a meeting with both Putin and Zelensky.

7 in 10 fear AI causing permanent job loss: Poll
7 in 10 fear AI causing permanent job loss: Poll

The Hill

time26 minutes ago

  • The Hill

7 in 10 fear AI causing permanent job loss: Poll

More than 7 in 10 Americans are concerned that the improvements within artificial intelligence (AI) will spark permanent job losses for a large number of people in the U.S., according to a new poll that was released Tuesday. The new Reuters/Ipsos survey found that 71 percent of U.S. adults are worried that AI will put 'too many people out of work permanently.' The large majority of respondents, 77 percent, said they have concerns that, as AI technology improves, it could be utilized to provoke political turmoil. Americans also have reservations about the government's potential use of AI in warfare, according to the survey. Nearly half of Americans, 48 percent, said the federal government should never utilize AI to locate a potential target of a military attack. Around a quarter, 24 percent, said that the government should use AI to locate targets for military strikes, while another 28 percent were not sure when asked. Other topics respondents were polled about include energy and interpersonal relationship concerns. More than 6 in 10 Americans, 61 percent, have expressed concerns about the amount of electricity necessary to power AI. Around two-thirds of Americans in the survey said they are concerned people will flee relationships with other individuals and pivot to relationships with digital AI characters. On the education front, respondents were split on whether AI will help improve the field. About 4 in 10, 40 percent, said that AI will not improve education, while another 36 percent argued it will. Some 24 percent were not sure when asked. A January survey from the World Economic Forum's (WEF) 'Future of Jobs Report' found that 41 percent of employers worldwide said they are likely to cut jobs as AI continues to improve. The Reuters/Ipsos poll was conducted among 4,446 Americans and had a margin of error of around two percentage points.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store