Banaskantha ‘honour killing': Victim had told parents she left home because they were against her further studies, say police
As per the investigations, it was on June 25, two days before the Gujarat High Court was scheduled to hear a habeas corpus petition filed by Haresh Chaudhary over her disappearance, that she was found dead. Her body was discovered hanging in the courtyard of her parent's home in Dantiya village, staged to appear like a suicide case.
Additional Superintendent of Police (ASP) Suman Nala of Danta Division told The Indian Express, 'Chandrika had taken the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) in May. Her parents had subsequently taken her back home from the Palanpur hostel. After she left her house with Haresh, she was tracked by the Tharad Police and returned to her family on June 12. She was at her home when the NEET results were declared on June 14 and she had scored well. She wanted to study further but her parents, it primarily appears, did not agree with her.'
Chandrika belonged to the Chaudhary- Patel community, who are traditionally agrarian.
The officer said that Chandrika possibly wanted to study further to be a doctor or nurse.
Notably, the FIR filed on August 6, based on the complaint filed by Haresh Chaudhary, who was already married and had a son, stated, 'I had taken Chandrika for her NEET exam and then dropped her back near her hostel. On May 4, Chandrika's cousins, Suresh and Haresh, took her to a relative's wedding where she stayed for up to a week after which she went to her village.'
The FIR stated, 'Chandrika kept telling her parents that she wanted to study nursing and take other exams but her parents refused her requests. However, later her father (Sendha Darga Patel) took her to a nursing college in Palanpur but since they didn't have all the documents, the admission process did not go through and they returned to the village.'
'After Sendha informed his brother Jayram that the admission did not go through, Jayram told him that Chandrika was of marriageable age, that there was no need to educate her further, and advised him to take away her phone and make her perform household chores. Chandrika then called and told me that her parents had refused to let her study further and that she was afraid that they would come to know about their affair and kill her. She asked me to elope with her,' the FIR quoted Haresh as saying.
On June 4, Haresh and Chandrika eloped. The duo signed a contract of live-in relationship at the Mirzapur court in Ahmedabad on June 5. They then travelled to Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan.
On June 12, the Tharad Police along with Chandrika's cousin Hira took both of them from a resort in Rajasthan to Tharad Police station in Banaskantha.
The NEET results were declared on June 14, two days after Chandrika had been handed over to her parents, while Haresh was arrested, first in an assault case and then in a Prohibition case. He was released on bail on June 21.
Meanwhile, ASP Nala said, 'We have seen messages sent by Chandrika to her parents after leaving with Haresh, telling them that she wished to study further and that she had to run away because they would not allow her to do so.'
According to the FIR, Haresh, after being released from prison, came to know about the messages from Chandrika, on his phone, allegedly pleading with him 'to save her because her family wanted to marry her off and if she didn't agree, they would kill her'.
On June 23, Haresh's lawyer filed a habeas corpus petition in the Gujarat High Court, leading to an order asking Tharad Police to present her in court on June 27. However, Haresh said that on June 25, he learnt that Chandrika had died. He then wrote an application to the police seeking an inquiry into her death.
When the petition came up for hearing on June 27, the HC was informed that the girl for whom the petition was filed, had died. Following this, the bench of Justice Vaibhavi Nanavati disposed of the plea after taking on record the girl's death certificate. However, the inquiry into the suspicious death and hurried cremation, found that she had allegedly been drugged with sleeping pills by her uncle Shivram and then murdered by strangulation, before being hung in the courtyard.
While the original FIR on August 6 named only Chandrika's father Sendha Darga Patel and his brother Shivram Darga Patel for the alleged murder, the police later, on August 11, also arrested Sendha's cousin Naran Sava Patel in the case.
Even as Chandrika's father Sendha Darga Patel continues to evade the police, The Indian Express has now learnt that Chandrika's entire family has also abandoned their house in Danitya village.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
33 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘They beat him up without any provocation': Mob lynching victim's family seeks answers as eerie peace prevails in Maharashtra village
Four days after a 21-year-old man was allegedly beaten to death by a mob of 10 to 12 people, Jamner town in the Jalgaon district of Maharashtra remains tense but peaceful. The police have set up a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe the murder and arrested eight youths so far. On August 11, Suleman Rahim Khan Pathan, was allegedly paraded and beaten to death by a mob after they found him seated in a cafe in Jamner with a 17-year-old girl from another faith. They allegedly thrashed him in and outside the cafe, took him to his village, Betawad Khurd, some 25 kilometres from Jamner town, and beat him up again, leading to his death. Suleman's maternal uncle Kalim Shaikh said, 'Suleman was beaten up for hours by the mob. His parents and sister were also beaten up. Without any provocation, the mob beat up Suleman. He had come to Jamner to fill out the form for police recruitment. He was sitting in the cafe with some friends. We don't know why they beat him up.' Sabir Khan, another relative, said, 'Suleman was sitting in the cafe with friends. If the mob thought there was something objectionable happening, they could have taken them to the police station, which was next door. We urge Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis to slap the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) on the accused, as it was done in the Beed case.' He was referring to the murder of Santosh Deshmukh, the sarpanch of Massajog village in Beed district last year. Speaking to The Indian Express, Jalgaon District Collector Ayush Prasad said, 'The incident was very unfortunate. First, the mob attacked him in the cafe in Jamner and then took him to the Betawad village. He was again beaten up in front of his parents. He suffered injuries. The mob then left the village.' 'Suleman's parents then took him to their house, where he sipped some water after and fell unconscious. His parents then rushed him to a hospital but he was declared brought dead by doctors,' Prasad added. Following his death, a large crowd gathered at the hospital and the police station. They refused to take custody of the body until the suspects were arrested. The district collector, who is also the executive magistrate, said the death created tense moments as a mob of 500 people gathered at the police station demanding action. 'The police swung into action and immediately arrested two people the same day after registering an FIR. Immediately after the police took action, back-channel communication was maintained with leaders of all communities to ensure continued peace. There was no lathi charge or use of force to ensure peace. An inquest of the body was conducted immediately, and a post-mortem was done the next morning at the government medical college. Around 300 people were present during the burial,' said Prasad. Prasad said it has become clear that those in the mob were all youths. 'It appears that they are not affiliated with any right-wing organisations, as these organisations have denied any connections to the mob.' Prasad said an additional superintendent of police will lead the SIT investigating the case. Jalgaon Superintendent of Police Maheshwar Reddy said, 'We have slapped murder and lynching charges in the case.'
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
ED action on Reliance official, influencer part of ramped-up probe into Rs 20,000-crore loan scam
The searches on Angarai Sethuraman, a key official of the Anil Ambani group, and the arrest of Chandigarh-based influencer Sandeepa Virk come at a time when the Enforcement Directorate (ED) is switching to the second phase of its probe into what they now describe as a Rs 20,000 crore loan scam, The Indian Express has learnt. The agency has alleged that Sethuraman and Virk were together trying to 'influence' their probe into the Anil Ambani group in relation to the alleged scam. The ED had, in a statement Wednesday, alleged that Sethuraman had 'siphoned off' Rs 18 crore in loan he took from Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd (RCFL) and that he had been in contact with Virk for 'illegal liaising work'. Sethuraman, Group President (Corporate Affairs), Reliance Group, told The Indian Express that his residence was searched for over 30 hours the past two days and that the allegations were 'baseless'. He emphasised: 'I did meet Sandeepa Virk twice this month but that was for different reasons and at public places. It had nothing to do with the ED's probe. As far as the Rs 18 crore loan from RCFL is concerned, it was for building the house in Delhi where I now live. It is a fully secured loan and has been part paid back by me. It has not been siphoned off.' Sethuraman is also director of six companies, including Thales Reliance Defence Systems Ltd. Days after questioning Anil Ambani at the ED headquarters in New Delhi on August 5, top officials said the 'very complex' nature of transactions involved would take months to analyse. Following scrutiny of the alleged loan scam documents, the officials said, they will turn their attention to the defence companies and offshore entities set up by the Group Chairman. The sleuths pointed out that they have found the 'loan exposure'' of two Reliance companies — RCFL and Reliance Home Finance Limited (RHFL) — to be allegedly too high. A key official said, 'Prima facie, it appears that the loan amounts taken from the 39 lenders (banks and financial institutions) were routed to Reliance Infrastructure and Reliance Power, and that is how these companies were made debt free. But this was done via a complex money trail and through layers and layers of transactions.' Also under investigation is the reason why none of the 39 lenders, except for Yes Bank, filed police complaints against the Anil Ambani company. During his questioning, Anil Ambani is understood to have allegedly clarified that important decisions on loans given by RCFL and RFHL were taken by his employees and members of the credit committees of the two companies. It is learnt that he was then allegedly confronted with internal company decisions that may have been taken by senior officials but were signed off by him as chairman. The agency was now planning to call members of the credit committees for questioning and put Anil Ambani through another round of questioning. The Indian Express sent a set of questions on the allegations of a Rs 20,000 crore loan scam to the Anil Ambani group's corporate office but received only Sethuraman's statement released to the media Wednesday. In that statement, Sethuraman had denied any connection or involvement with Virk or any transactions related to her, and that the home loan he took was granted following due process. Virk, meanwhile, was arrested on August 12 under the provisions of PMLA, 2002 and produced before a court which granted custody to ED till August 14 for further investigation. According to the agency, Virk and her associates are alleged to have 'exerted undue influence through misrepresentation and defrauded individuals by soliciting money under false pretences'. 'Probe conducted by the ED has revealed that Virk has acquired immovable property in her name by making false promises and cheating,' the ED spokesperson alleged in a statement. The agency also said that Virk claimed to 'the owner of a website purportedly selling FDA-approved beauty products'. However, the ED claimed, the 'products listed on the site have been found to be non-existent' and that 'the website serves as a front for laundering funds'. It claimed that Virk was 'in regular touch with' Sethuraman 'with whom she had been communicating regarding illegal liaising work'. In Punjab, Virk has been linked to an FIR filed at the Phase-8 police station in Mohali in November 2016 against a man identified as Amit Gupta, alias Nageshwar Gupta, accusing him of fraud amounting to Rs 6 crore committed under the pretext of investment in a film production company. Following the FIR, based on a complaint from Chandigarh resident Jasneet Kaur, Gupta was arrested in 2017 and a charge sheet was filed against him. During trial, he was declared a Proclaimed Offender under Section 299 CrPC on October 21, 2024. According to police records, Virk's name was mentioned in the initial complaint as an associate of Gupta but she was not listed as an accused in the case. The Mohali police is now ascertaining the status of court proceedings in the original FIR following the ED's action against Virk. – With ENS, New Delhi
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
Ahmedabad: Attacked after family's purchase of house in ‘Disturbed Area', teen ends life; seller, her son among six booked
'Saniya wanted to join the police force and help people like us who had nowhere to go. Now what do I do with this general knowledge book she brought from school?' Rifatjahan Khusru, 27, wells up as she remembers Saniya Ansari, her youngest sibling, who died by suicide on Saturday – two days after she and her other two siblings along with their mother were allegedly assaulted in a brutal manner outside their rented home by a group of people led by a neighbour whose ancestral house the Ansari family had purchased in October 2024. Saniya left behind a note naming people she held responsible for her death. Following intervention by Ahmedabad Commissioner of Police GS Malik, an FIR on charges of abetment to suicide was filed early on Thursday, four days after Saniya's death. Rifatjahan said the family had been living in Gomtipur for the last 16 years. Last year, they purchased the house of a neighbour for Rs 15.50 lakh. However, right before the house was to be handed over to their family, the husband of the seller died on December 22, 2024. She then requested that the handover be delayed for the 40-day mourning period. The harassment, claimed Rifatjahan, began in January this year after the seller handed over the keys of the house to her mother Shahjahan and went away to live with her eldest son. However, the first floor of this house was occupied by another son of hers who refused to leave the house, stating that there was a property dispute between him and his mother, said Rifatjahan. 'On August 7 night, around 10 people started hitting my mother, sister and brother while they were in the ground floor of the new house. They dragged my sister by her hair and kept beating her, kicking her so badly that she was covered in bruises,' she added. An FIR was filed against four of the accused, said Gomtipur Inspector DV Rana although the Ansari family claimed they were yet to receive a copy of this FIR. Saniya was buried at Chartoda Kabrastan on Sunday. Saniya's family claimed they were threatened with legal consequences under the Disturbed Areas Act by the accused for trying to purchase the house of a member of another community. In her suicide note, Saniya had named four people, stating that they had taken her family's money but didn't give possession of the house, which caused 10 months of misery. It further stated that nobody had taken action against the perpetrators. Gomtipur Police filed an Accidental Death report and sent the body for post mortem. The family alleged that in spite of them approaching the police with CCTV footage of Saniya's assault and suicide note, no FIR was filed. On Monday, the family met Commissioner Malik who intervened in the matter. The FIR was filed at 12.15 am on Thursday. Six people, including the seller and her son in question, was booked under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) sections 107 (abetment of suicide of a child) and 54 (liability of an abettor). On the delay in filing the FIR, Inspector Rana told The Indian Express, 'The suicide note was given to the police on the next day (of the suicide). We thought it may be fake because it had Hindi words written in English. So, we decided to send it to the FSL (forensic science laboratory) and await the results…' When asked about the assault on Saniya and her siblings, Inspector Rana said, 'We filed a separate FIR in that case… We booked four persons and arrested them as well.' On why the family did not approach the police earlier, Rifatjahan said one of the accused had threatened them with action under the Disturbed Areas Act. Rana said, 'Currently, there appears to be no violation of the Disturbed Areas Act because that would come in at the time of transferring ownership of the property. Further, there are clashing claims as to how much payment has been made towards the sale of the house. So we have to check the property documents.' When asked about liability under the Act, PI Rana said, 'The property cannot be sold without opinion from the administration. The request would come to me and then go right up to the Special Branch and from there, back to the Collectorate before any such legal sale can take place. However, none of this has happened so far. It appears that half the payment was made but the sale was stuck because the owner's son was not vacating the premises.' The Indian Express could not reach the seller's son as the part of the house where he resides was locked on Thursday. The Disturbed Areas Act in Gujarat empowers the administration to declare parts of the territorial jurisdiction as 'disturbed' in the context of communal clashes and prohibits the direct sale of property between people of different faiths unless it's cleared by the collector's office, who has to certify that the transaction involves free consent.
