Britain 'investing in 30,000 more electronic tags for criminals' amid massive overhaul
The huge expansion of tagging technology will see nearly 40,000 criminals electronically monitored at once.
Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood is understood to have secured £700 million in funding from the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, to buy the devices.
This will increase the Probation Service's budget by roughly a third and enable it to quadruple the number of criminals fitted with electronic tags, The Times reports.
It comes as David Gauke, the former Conservative justice secretary, will publish a long-awaited sentencing review this month.
The report is expected to lead to the most drastic shake-up of sentencing legislation in decades and, the government is predicted to accept most of his recommendations.
A MoJ spokesman said last week: 'This Government inherited a justice system in crisis, with prisons days from collapse.
'David Gauke is conducting a sentencing review to ensure that we never run out of prison places again, and we are committed to reforming sentencing to ensure our prisons cut crime and keep the public safe.'
The Ministry of Justice is also thought to be preparing to announce a new type of tag that will measure the level of drugs in an offender's system by monitoring their blood pressure and heart rate.
Mahmood said the new devices are the 'holy grail' of tagging technology because of the large proportion of criminals whose offending is driven by drugs.
It comes as David Gauke (pictured), the former Conservative justice secretary, will publish a long-awaited sentencing review this month
Low-risk offenders could also be monitored using GPS trackers and biometric check-in technology on smartphones to make sure tags are saved for more serious criminals.
Google and Palantir Technologies, another technology company, have been commissioned by the government to come up with an accurate way to predict an offender's risk level using AI software.
The software would use both location-tracking information and other data to identify changes in risk levels.
The Probation Service has the ability to put tags on roughly 9,000 criminals at any one time.
This will rise to almost 40,000 under plans that will be announced by Mahmood on Thursday.
Labour's sentencing review is also expected to suggest the biggest-ever reductions in the time prisoners must serve, in exchange for good behaviour while they are behind bars.
In some cases that could see inmates set free after serving only a third of their initial sentence.
A prison overcrowding crisis led the Government to introduce early release for most inmates after they have served 40 per cent of their sentences, and discounts are now likely to be extended even further for some criminals.
A key measure expected to be set out in next week's report will see convicted offenders handed maximum and minimum sentences by the courts.
Under the minimum sentences, inmates will serve one third if they complete work, training or education in jail, and show good behaviour.
Those who fail to comply will have to serve their maximum terms – which are likely to be beyond the 40 per cent automatic release date currently in force, the Telegraph reported.
Labour's existing early release scheme excludes offenders jailed for sex crimes, terrorism and serious violent crimes carrying more than four years' imprisonment.
The new proposals – drawn up for Ms Mahmood by former Conservative justice secretary David Gauke – are likely to follow a similar pattern.
It could mean most criminals will benefit from extended sentence discounts, including some violent offenders, fraudsters, drug dealers, burglars and thieves.
Jails in England and Wales were holding 88,087 inmates on Monday, with headroom of 1,355 places.
Ministry of Justice forecasts suggest jails will run out of space again early next year, despite the opening of a new 1,500-bed jail HMP Millsike, near York, a month ago.
Another key reform outlined in the review is the idea of using technology to create 'digital prisons' for those under house arrest, The Times reported.
That will involve using electronic tags and other surveillance technology to build out a new three-stage model for prison release.
That will see first stage inmates transferred to a second stage of house arrest for the middle of their sentence before finally being released into the community for the third part once they have been ruled not a threat.
As well as ending shorter sentences, the sentencing review is also pushing the government to embrace intensive supervision courts which involves judges meeting offenders as frequently as every fortnight.
The scheme, already in its trial stage, is aimed at rehabilitating low level offenders who have to commit to two-year orders and seek treatment for drink, drugs or mental health issues.
Those on the scheme can be jailed for 28 days for major violations of their license and are cut from the scheme after three strikes.
However, early results have proved positive, with data showing than more than two-thirds (70 per cent) of offenders comply with the program.
The scheme actually has its origins in Conservative policy since it was first introduced by the then-justice secretary Michael Gove in 2015.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Shady past of Virgin Atlantic passenger who threatened to 'gang rape' stewardess
Salman Iftikhar launched a prolonged and vile verbal assault on a Virgin Atlantic flight attendant on a plane for Lahore, Pakistan, and the dad was jailed last week A yob who threatened to gang rape a Virgin Atlantic stewardess has had several brushes with the law, it has today emerged. Salman Iftikhar was sentenced to 15 months in jail last week after admitting making threats to kill and racially aggravated harassment. The judge took into account Iftikhar's six previous convictions, including a common assault, a record she described as "lengthy and appalling". These six previous convictions have arisen from 15 offences over the years. And now further details of these offences have come to light - days after Iftikhar, 37, began his time at HM Prison Brixton in south London. It is his first time behind bars despite his two counts of common assault in 2004, drink driving in 2008 and driving with excess alcohol that same year among other crimes. In 2021, father-of-three Iftikhar was fined £3,000 after he was caught drunk behind the wheel. When pulled over, police also found him in possession of cannabis. Iftikhar, who was two times over the legal limit, subsequently pleaded guilty to drink driving, cannabis possession and failing to stop a vehicle when required to by a constable. Neighbours in Iver, Buckinghamshire, this week said police had also been called to his six-bedroom home dozens of times in recent years. Iftikhar had lived there with one of his two wives - Erum Salman, who is the mother to his three children. She was described as a "nice lady" by neighbours, who branded Iftikhar "not very friendly" this week. "There's been so many rowdy late night parties that have ended up in fights in the early hours of the morning. At one point it felt like the police were here almost every day," said one neighbour who also described Iftikhar as "often spaced out". The father of three kept a range of expensive cars - from a Range Rover, Bentley and Rolls-Royce - on his driveway at the time of his arrest. He and his UK-based wife together the pair run a London-based staffing company which provides training to businesses working in customer service and manufacturing. Yet, according to those known to the Buckinghamshire couple, the pair had a "rocky marriage and would argue quite a bit". Daily Mail reports Iftikhar diversified his skillset in recent years into "exposure to cryptocurrencies," a project likely to prove tricky to manage from his cell in jail. When he was sentenced at Isleworth Crown Court, a judge described the episode as "a sustained incident" and felt she could only impose a custodial term. Ben Walker-Nolan, defending, had said his client "had a long-standing drug and alcohol problem which he has not addressed for many years".
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
King Charles leads 80th VJ Day commemoration in UK
King Charles led VJ Day commemorations in the UK as a national service of remembrance and two-minute silence marked the 80th anniversary of Japan's surrender in the second world war and the end of the six-year-long conflict. He was joined by the queen, the prime minister, Keir Starmer, and veterans who served in the far east theatres of war as wreaths were laid at the National Memorial Arboretum service in Staffordshire. Powerful testimonies read aloud reminded of the terrible cost of war, while a flypast featured the Red Arrows and historic second world war aircraft, including a Spitfire, Hurricane and Lancaster bomber. Guests of honour included 33 veterans aged from 96 to 105. A Royal Navy veteran, Alfred Conway, from Lincolnshire, watched as his great granddaughter laid a wreath on the Burma railway memorial at the arboretum. George Durrant, who served in the intelligence corps, appeared on stage to urge people not to forget the sacrifices made by his comrades. In Japan, Emperor Naruhito spoke of his 'deep remorse' on the anniversary and said he felt 'a deep and renewed sense of sorrow' in a sombre speech in an indoor arena in the centre of the Japanese capital. A visit by two cabinet ministers to the Yasukuni Shrine in Tokyo angered countries that suffered Japanese military atrocities, particularly China and South Korea, AFP reported. The shrine, which the country's Asian neighbours view as a symbol of Japan's wartime aggression, honours 2.5 million mostly Japanese soldiers who perished since the late 19th century but also enshrines convicted war criminals. Japan's prime minister, Shigeru Ishiba, a political moderate, sent a customary offering to Yasukuni, according to Kyodo news. No Japanese prime minister has visited the shrine since 2013, when a trip by then-premier Shinzo Abe sparked fury in Beijing and Seoul. China's foreign ministry on Friday summoned the chief minister of Japan's embassy in China, Yokochi Akira, to lodge solemn representations over Japanese politicians visiting the war shrine, according to a ministry statement, Reuters reported. In an audio message before the national service of remembrance to the nation, realms and Commonwealth, Charles spoke of allied prisoners of war 'who endured years of brutal captivity: the starvation, disease and cruelty that tested the very limits of human endurance' and the 'mental and physical scars' the war left on those who survived. He vowed the service and sacrifice of VJ Day heroes 'shall never be forgotten'. In what is believed to be the most direct reference by a British monarch to the suffering in Hiroshima and Nagasaki after their atomic bombings, he said: 'We should also pause to acknowledge that in the war's final act, an immense price was paid by the citizens of Hiroshima and Nagasaki – a price we pray no nation need ever pay again.' More than 90,000 British troops were casualties in the war against Japan, and nearly 30,000 died according to the Royal British Legion, while more than 12,000 Britons were among the 190,000 Commonwealth troops held as prisoners of war by the Japanese. Of the Allied forces, the US suffered the greatest losses, with more than 100,000 killed in action. In Hiroshima and Nagasaki, more than 200,000 people were killed by the US bombs and in the months after succumbing to radiation sickness, the effects of burns and other serious injuries. Hundreds of buildings across the UK were due to be lit up on Friday evening to mark VJ Day 80, including Buckingham Palace, 10 Downing Street, the Houses of Parliament, the Tower of London, Tower 42, the Shard, Blackpool Tower, Gateshead Millennium Bridge, Durham Cathedral, Cardiff Castle, the Cenotaph and the White Cliffs of Dover.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
The handshake that shook the world: Why Putin left grinning and Trump insisted he'd stood firm after three-hour meeting to change history
In the end, the 'Don and Vlad' show ended without a big finale. After nearly three hours behind closed doors in Alaska, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin emerged like heavyweight prize fighters who had fought each other to a standstill. They proceeded to talk briefly to the millions watching with bated breath on TV but revealed no specifics of what they had discussed. The only conclusion for those in Kyiv, and in European capitals, was that the encounter had ended in stalemate, and there would be no immediate ceasefire in the Ukraine war. Putin spoke first, and seemed the happier, jauntily inviting Trump to Moscow for another meeting. He and Trump had reached an 'understanding,' Putin said, as he ominously warned Europe not to 'torpedo the nascent progress.' Trump called the summit 'very productive' but said there were a 'couple of quite big' issues not agreed. He later seemed more optimistic and rated it '10/10.' For Trump, it was undoubtedly a historic achievement to get Putin to the negotiating table at all, and a starting point for what may be a long road to peace, and a Nobel Prize. But for Kremlin watchers it looked like Putin had achieved his two main goals - a return to the world stage, and buying more time to make military gains in Ukraine. By agreeing to the meeting Putin avoided further impending U.S. sanctions, and by then not agreeing to a ceasefire he kicked the diplomatic can down the road. Putin's troops are currently advancing in Ukraine, so it was always going to be to his advantage to delay Trump's demands for a ceasefire, and seek a better deal later. Indeed, on the eve of the summit Putin bombed Ukraine yet again with a ballistic missile, and his troops advanced six miles towards the eastern town of Dobropillia. The starting points for the summit had never been entirely promising. Putin wanted Ukrainian territory but the extent of his demands had been shrouded in uncertainty, due in part to apparent previous misunderstandings with Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff. Trump was prepared for 'land swaps' but had agreed not to make any commitments without the approval of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who was not invited. Zelensky wanted a ceasefire before any discussion on territory. Meanwhile, European leaders wanted post-war security guarantees for Ukraine. And Putin wanted Ukraine membership of NATO ruled out, which was a diplomatic non-starter. However, for Ukraine, and its European allies, there was some relief that no harm was done in Alaska. They had feared a repetition of Yalta, the 1945 conference where Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin decided the fate of European counties without them being represented at the negotiating table. Russia occupies about one fifth of Ukraine, including large parts of Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, areas rich in coal and gas, and other minerals like lithium. With Zelensky not in Alaska, he and European allies were concerned about a 'Yalta 2,' with Trump handing over parts of Ukraine's territory to Putin. Trump's detractors had also cast him the role of British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain at Munich in 1938. Last month, he lamented: 'We get a lot of bulls*** thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth. He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.'" Chamberlain gave the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia to Hitler and then infamously claimed that he had achieved 'peace for our time.' The following year, the world was at war. Trump showed in Alaska that he is no Chamberlain. Instead, he is a man with a strong dislike for people trying to pull the wool over his eyes. Last month, he lamented: 'We get a lot of bulls*** thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth. He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.' There was also no repeat of the 2018 meeting in Helsinki when Trump was widely criticized for siding with Putin over his own intelligence agencies, denying that Russia had interfered in the 2016 election. In Alaska, there was also no repeat of the 2018 meeting in Helsinki when Trump was widely criticized for siding with Putin over his own intelligence agencies, denying that Russia had interfered in the 2016 election. Unlike Helsinki, Trump took the decision not to meet Putin alone this time. Instead, he brought into the room a diplomatic 'good cop' and 'bad cop'. The 'good cop' was Witkoff, who has built up a rapport with Putin over several long meetings. The 'bad cop' was Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who has in the past savaged Putin as a 'thug and gangster.' In one sense, just being in Alaska was a victory for Putin, a man responsible for launching the largest land war in Europe since 1945. He is, officially, an internationally wanted war crimes suspect after a warrant for his arrest was issued by the International Criminal Court in March 2023. The summit allowed him to become the first Russian leader to set foot in Alaska since Tsar Alexander II sold it to the U.S. in 1867. Trump effectively brought him in from his three-and-a-half year exile as a global pariah. Despite the challenges the summit had begun in a hopeful atmosphere. On the tarmac at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Trump's Air Force One sat next to Putin's so-called 'Flying Kremlin,' an Ilyushin Il-96-300PU aircraft. Trump disembarked first and played the perfect host, standing at the end of an ultra-long red carpet as Putin descended the steps and walked briskly toward him. The American leader applauded Putin on his walk and then deployed what body language experts call a 'clasp and yank' handshake - gripping Putin's hand and pulling the Russian toward him. Putin resisted the power play and stood his ground as they locked hands for 20 seconds, with Putin telling Trump he had come to 'help.' As they walked up another stretch of red carpet, past two parked U.S. jets, there were pats on the back and a few pleasantries. Putin paused and gazed up as there was a flyby of a B2 bomber and four F-35 fighter jets. He looked impressed. The two men then stood on a stage over the words 'Alaska 2025.' Trump's carefully choreographed welcome was upended when an American reporter yelled at Putin: 'Will you stop killing civilians? Putin shrugged pointed to his ear as if couldn't hear. They then headed toward Trumps armored limousine, 'The Beast.' Putin appeared to chuckle as he got in the back with Trump for what was likely to be their only one-on-one encounter. After they arrived at the venue for the meeting they sat with advisers for photographs. Putin again appeared rattled as a reporter yelled: 'Mr Putin, will you commit to a ceasefire? Will you commit to not killing any more civilians?' He cupped his hands to his face and appeared to mouth 'I can't hear you.' Ahead of the meeting, Putin sought to smooth Trump's ego, praising his 'energetic and sincere efforts to end the conflict.' On top of that, he offered a carrot, that a deal could lead to talks on 'strategic offensive arms control,' a clear reference to a potential nuclear arms deal. Russia and the United States have by far the biggest arsenals of nuclear weapons in the world. The last remaining pillar of nuclear arms control between the two countries is the New Strategic Arms Reduction (New START) treaty, which expires in February. But, as Trump found out, pushing Putin into a ceasefire will be an uphill struggle. Not all wars end at the negotiating table. According to research by the Hague Center for Strategic Studies between 1946 and 2005 only 30 percent of wars between countries ended in a ceasefire, and only 16 percent in a peace agreement. It found 21 percent ended in a decisive victory, and 33 percent in some other form like a stalemate or ongoing low-level conflict. When there was a negotiated settlement in 50 percent of hose cases the counties were at war again within five years.
