Khamenei's advisor: 'New war between Israel and Iran may occur at any time'
Seyed Yahya Rahim Safavi, an advisor to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, alluded to the possibility of renewed conflict between Israel and Iran on Sunday, Persian media reported.
"A new war between Iran and Israel may occur at any time. We must adopt an offensive strategy; the best defense is an attack," Safavi said in a video statement.
"There is no agreement between us and the Israelis and Americans," Safavi said, adding that Iran is reportedly preparing for the "worst-case scenario."
Both Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and the commander-in-chief of Iran's military, Amir Hatami, made similar claims earlier this month.
"A 1% threat must be perceived as a 100% threat. We should not underestimate the enemy and consider its threats as over," Hatami said, according to the official IRNA news agency.
At the same time, Araghachi claimed that "everything is possible, and it is not just Iran that should be worried in concerned," in an interview with the Iranian Student News Agency.
Ongoing cyber war
Even so, despite the current impermanent ceasefire, the ongoing cyber war between Iran and Israel has never stopped.
'Although there is a ceasefire in the physical world, in the cyber arena, [the attacks] did not stop,' Boaz Dolev, chief executive of the Israeli cyberintelligence company ClearSky, told the Financial Times.
Cyberattacks came from both sides. Israel launched a cyberattack campaign with over 20,000 attacks during the 12-day war, mainly to gather intelligence. At the same time, Iran attempted to maximize civilian casualties by including messages that appeared to be from the Home Front Command, which advised Israelis to avoid bomb shelters.
"You can do whatever you want in cyberspace," said Menny Barzilay, a cybersecurity expert who served as the chief information security officer of the IDF intelligence services. "And probably no one will say anything.'
This is a developing story.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
4 minutes ago
- The Hill
Where's JD Vance? VP takes eighth vacation in seven months
Vice President JD Vance has been in office since January, and already he's racked up more vacation days than most Americans could dream of in a decade. The man who built his brand railing against 'elites' has basically become one — living like the very people he claimed to stand against. His latest trip? A summer holiday in the Cotswolds, the region of England nicknamed 'the Hamptons of the UK.' Vance rented a sprawling manor that goes for about $10,000 a week. Between his motorcades clogging tiny country roads and the protests that followed him across the pond, it's safe to say his family getaway got more press than privacy. But this isn't an isolated incident. This is vacation No.8 this year. Italy, India, Nantucket, Disneyland, Vermont, Greenland — wherever you can name, he's been. Some of those vacations he even labeled as 'official business,' meaning taxpayers footed the bill. Like in March, when he flew with the second lady to Greenland during the height of Trump's fixation with the territory. The trip was so poorly received by Greenland's government that it was cut it short from a multi-day trip to a three hours' trip. Imagine flying all that way for less time than most people spend at a barbecue. The only thing that came from the trip were some Instagram-ready photos of Vance and his wife in the snow. Then there's Disneyland, which he shut down for his family. Then there's a $2,500 Michelin-starred dinner in San Diego. And who could forget his birthday kayak trip, when the military literally raised the level of an Ohio river just to smooth out his paddling conditions. That's not just elite — that's emperor-level. The bigger question is: how does he have so much time off? Most Americans can't even get two consecutive weeks approved without begging their boss. Yet the sitting vice president has managed to disappear almost every month since taking office. For context, Mike Pence barely took personal trips in his first six months. Kamala Harris didn't take a single personal vacation in hers. Meanwhile, families here at home are being crushed under the weight of rising costs. Groceries, health care, gas — everyday basics are becoming luxuries. And while Americans are forced to 'do more with less,' their vice president seems determined to 'do less with more.' The optics matter. When you're the right-hand man to Donald Trump, the guy who wants to convince working-class America that he's their champion, jet-setting across the globe on lavish retreats doesn't scream solidarity. It screams out-of-touch. So as the bills pile up and medical benefits shrink because of the 'big beautiful bill,' JD Vance may be hard to find. Not in Washington. Not in Ohio. But likely on vacation — again. The message is clear: while everyday Americans are fighting to make ends meet, JD Vance is fighting to make his next reservation.
The Hill
4 minutes ago
- The Hill
Political vampires are draining the country — term limits are the answer
In American politics today, our collective energy is being drained at an alarming rate. The culprits? The vampires. Not the tasty ones like Count Chocula; rather, the blood sucking ones, like way too many members of our current Congress. A vampire, by my definition, is someone who takes more energy than he gives. In the workplace, where they're also a problem, I've learned to spot vampires quickly and remove them. In politics, they're just as easy to identify but far harder to root out, and their damage is far greater. Vampires in government come in various forms. Many are not believers in the vision of a better country; they're content to tinker at the edges and do whatever they must to keep their jobs. They will go whichever way the wind blows, as long as it carries them to another term in office. Others excel at shooting down big plans and bold ideas, telling us why things can't or shouldn't be done without offering meaningful solutions of their own. Some are slow-moving and low on energy and creativity. Others have boundless energy but spend it on distractions like launching and defending investigations, fighting over wedge issues that affect few Americans, and chasing political theater rather than measurable progress. Some are masters of endless debate, chewing over the same issues long past the point of usefulness, mistaking motion for progress. They gossip. They maneuver. They focus more on partisan intrigue than on real-world problem solving. And perhaps worst of all, they are not in a rush. They behave as if time is an endless circle. Here's the test: after a leader speaks, do you feel inspired and ready to act, or do you feel drained and disillusioned? If it's the latter, you've just encountered a vampire, and if we applied that standard across Washington, we might be left with only 15 or 20 true leaders in Congress. Our country does not need life-takers but life-givers — leaders who bring energy to the hardest problems, who dream, who believe and who actually create and enact big solutions to big problems. The first step is simple but not easy: Stop electing vampires. The second is even harder: Demand that the people we send to Washington give more than they take. No more small thinking dressed up as realism. The last step is the most challenging of all: We must impose term limits. When we started out as a country, we had Founding Fathers who did not agree with each other on everything. But they did agree on some very important things. It never would have occurred to Thomas Jefferson or George Washington to hang out in Washington, D.C., for 20 or 30 years. They had the good sense and, frankly, good manners, not to overstay their welcome. Vampires are thriving in American politics because politics has become a profession, whereas it was supposed to be a short-term public service. Without term limits, people with the same old ideas and energy-sucking ways can stay in D.C. indefinitely. And they do. Clearly, members of Congress are not motivated to vote themselves out of a job. How can we pass term limits without Congress itself proposing a constitutional amendment? Two-thirds of state legislatures (34 out of 50) must pass resolutions calling for a convention where a constitutional amendment could be proposed. The challenges we face — the national debt, economic inequality, education, public health, national security — are too urgent for leadership that runs on autopilot or thrives on division. We need public servants who treat time like the scarce resource it is and act with urgency on behalf of the real needs of Americans. To win the future, America doesn't need perfect leaders. It needs energetic, committed, life-giving ones. It needs people who push us to think bigger and act faster, even when it is not politically convenient. The stakes are too high to let the vampires keep running the country. Urge your state legislature to pass a resolution calling for a convention on term limits. In the meantime, the next time you vote, ask yourself a simple question: Will this person give the nation more energy than they take from it? If not, guard your neck — and don't vote for him or her. Brian Hamilton is the nationally-recognized entrepreneur who founded Sageworks (now Abrigo), the country's first fintech company. He is also the founder of the Brian Hamilton Foundation and Inmates to Entrepreneurs, where he serves as the leading voice on the power of ownership to transform lives.
Newsweek
5 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Amy Coney Barrett Offers Some Advice to Judges
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett offered advice to judges and others in the legal community during an address at the Seventh Circuit Judicial Conference on Monday night. Newsweek reached out to the Supreme Court's public information office for comment via email. Why It Matters Barrett has emerged as a swing vote on the nation's highest court. Although she was appointed by President Donald Trump, she has at times shown a willingness to break from the court's conservative majority. Americans' confidence in the judiciary has fallen in recent years, according to Gallup, which in December 2024 found that only 35 percent of Americans have confidence in the judicial system and courts. The pollster's latest survey on Supreme Court approval yielded similar skepticism from Americans, with only 39 percent approving of the High Court. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett in Washington on October 21, 2020. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett in Washington on October 21, 2020. Sarah Silbiger-Pool/Getty Images What To Know Barrett addressed hundreds of judges and other legal professionals during a brief address at the conference in Chicago. She urged courts to maintain a sense of "camaraderie and professionalism," Fox News reported. She acknowledged that there are disagreements in the legal field, Bloomberg reported. "Law is a profession that, unlike some others, operates continually under the strain of disagreement," she said, according to Bloomberg. "Doctors cooperate and coordinate to deal with patients. Engineers work together to build a bridge. But litigants and their lawyers are pitted against one another on opposite sides." While this may sound "bleak," it allows attorneys too learn how to argue "without letting it consume relationships," she said. "I'm grateful to the way our bar conducts itself in that regard, because that is what enables the judicial system to work well, that collegiality," she said. During the most recent Supreme Court term, Barrett sided with liberal justices on some issues, including a key deportation case in which she opposed the Trump administration's use of wartime legislation to deport civilians, or a case in which she rejected efforts to freeze foreign aid funding. She has also given the Trump administration wins, including in her ruling on a major birthright citizenship case. What People Are Saying Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, in May, per NBC News: "In our judiciary is a co-equal branch of government, separate from the others, with the authority to interpret the Constitution as law and strike down, obviously, acts of Congress or acts of the president. And that innovation doesn't work judiciary is not independent. Its job is to, obviously, decide cases but, in the course of that, check the excesses of Congress or the executive, and that does require a degree of independence." Gallup, in December 2024: "Few countries and territories have seen larger percentage-point drops in confidence in the judiciary [over a similar four-year span] than the U.S. These include Myanmar [from 2018 to 2022] overlapping the return to military rule in 2021, Venezuela [2012-2016] amid deep economic and political turmoil, and Syria [2009-2013] in the runup to and early years of civil war, and others that have experienced their own kinds of disorder in the past two decades." What Happens Next Supreme Court terms begin on the first Monday of October. This year, it's October 6.
