logo
Poop-Powered Racer Could Clean Up Motorsport

Poop-Powered Racer Could Clean Up Motorsport

Yahoo30-01-2025

The world needs to clean up how it gets around in a big way if we want any hope of leaving a planet for our kids to inherit. This sadly means that motorsport is in the cross hairs of environmentalists looking for activities that should be scrapped in order to cut emissions and reduce our reliance on fossil fuels. Help may be on the horizon for race fans, as a team of researchers in the UK has created a clean new racer that runs on a byproduct from the sewage industry.
From the outside, the Warwick Manufacturing Group's LMP3 racer looks like any other LMP3 racer that you might see at events like the European Le Mans Series. Under the hood, however, the concept racer is a very different beast.
That's because this endurance racer runs on waste from the sewage industry, reports BBC Sport. To do this, the car isn't packed full of raw sewage and sent out on track, instead it's been converted to run on hydrogen and uses gas created as a byproduct of sewage treatment to power it on track
To do this, a team that includes students from the University of Warwick in the UK investigated the way sewage breaks down in water treatment plants around the world. During this process, hydrogen gas is released by microbes that break down organic compounds in the waste, which WMG then collects, condenses and fills the tanks on its race car with, as the BBC explains:
They believe the car could be out in the mainstream in as little as five years, though they acknowledge there are still significant hurdles to overcome.
'There's been a real push for electric vehicles and it's fairly clear that there has to be other sort of energy in the mix as well, so hydrogen has a part to play,' Dr James Meredith, chief engineer at WMG, told BBC Sport.
'It comes from a long period of research. A microbial electrolysis cell is essentially a device used to clean water and microbes grow on recycled carbon fiber, eating the sewage. During that process, they produce hydrogen as a by-product.'
The hydrogen won't be fed into a fuel cell that creates electricity to power a motor, as you find in something like a Toyota Mirai. Instead, a supercharged V6 engine from Revolution Cars has been converted to burn the hydrogen and run like a normal internal-combustion engine. This means that race fans will still be treated to the roar of a motor rather than the hum of an EV.
What's more, the LMP3 racer uses a slew of other eco-minded parts in its construction, such as recycled carbon fiber, plant-based composites and reclaimed car batteries, reports Autosport:
'The carbon fiber, that would normally end up being in landfill, the natural fibers, then end up being composted, or animal feed or something like that. So doing something like this is so much greater for those materials and showing off what you can do with it,' added [professor Kerry Kirwan, chair of sustainable materials and manufacturing at WMG].
'The batteries are recovered from wrecks, the whole thing is made of stuff that would have ended up going down different routes that would have been nowhere near as good as this, and that was the idea, just show potential.'
The team is hoping to prove the concept's worth with a run at a handful of land speed records, including fastest standing and flying starts over a mile and a kilometer. If it works out, the project will follow the launch of Extreme H in bringing hydrogen power to the world of motorsport after electric off-road series Extreme E rebranded ahead of the new season.
For the latest news, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Here's How Much It Costs To Maintain a Tesla vs Other Electric Vehicles
Here's How Much It Costs To Maintain a Tesla vs Other Electric Vehicles

Yahoo

time13 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Here's How Much It Costs To Maintain a Tesla vs Other Electric Vehicles

Teslas and other EVs don't need oil changes, but that doesn't mean they're maintenance-free. And when service is needed, the costs still add up. Learn More: Try This: So, how do Tesla's long-term maintenance costs compare to those of other electric vehicles? Let's take a closer look at what you can expect. When it comes to maintenance, EVs and combustion engines have some similarities. According to CarEdge, they both require: Tire monitoring and replacement Battery replacement HVAC maintenance Brake maintenance Cabin air filter replacement But there are also key differences. EVs don't require oil changes, timing belts, radiator fluids or fuel filters. There are fewer moving parts, which means there's less of a chance of mechanical failure, and brakes wear more slowly due to regenerative braking. Trending Now: On the other hand, tires wear out more quickly, and battery or motor work will need to be done at the automaker's service center. EV maintenance can vary depending on the brand, model, how you drive and even where you live. Tesla notes that aggressive driving can wear down tires faster and put more strain on the brakes. If you live in an area with rough roads or colder weather, you might see more frequent maintenance needs. And if service centers are limited in your area, that can drive up both wait times and costs. According to Consumer Reports and CarEdge, Tesla has the lowest maintenance costs over a 10-year period compared to other major car brands, with an estimated average of $5,050. Here are CarEdge's estimated 10-year maintenance costs for different Tesla models: Tesla Model 3: $3,257 Tesla Model S: $3,974 Tesla Model Y: $3,994 Tesla Model X: $4,847 Tesla Cybertruck: $5,359 However, there are other brands and models with similar maintenance costs. According to CarEdge, the estimated 10-year maintenance cost for the Toyota Mirai is $3,222 — slightly lower than the Tesla Model 3. Here is the complete list of EVs, besides Tesla, and their estimated 10-year maintenance costs: Toyota Mirai: $3,222 Nissan LEAF: $3,236 Toyota bZ4X: $3,496 FIAT 500e: $3,549 Hyundai IONIQ 6: $3,930 Honda Prologue: $4,600 Nissan ARIYA: $4,671 Hyundai Kona Electric: $4,727 Volkswagen ID.4: $4,811 Subaru Solterra: $4,825 Kia EV6: $5,029 Hyundai IONIQ 5: $5,043 Chevrolet Equinox EV: $5,096 Volkswagen ID. Buzz: $5,102 Hyundai IONIQ 5 N: $5,265 Kia EV9: $5,285 Ford Mustang Mach-E: $5,331 Chevrolet Blazer EV: $5,403 GMC HUMMER EV SUV: $5,821 GMC HUMMER EV Pickup: $6,384 GMC Sierra EV: $6,253 Ford F-150 Lightning: $6,574 Chevrolet Silverado EV: $6,653 Ford E-Transit-350 Cargo Van: $6,876 RAM ProMaster 3500 EV: $11,649 More From GOBankingRates 7 Things You'll Be Happy You Downsized in Retirement This article originally appeared on Here's How Much It Costs To Maintain a Tesla vs Other Electric Vehicles

Should McLaren focus on one driver in title battle?
Should McLaren focus on one driver in title battle?

Yahoo

time17 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Should McLaren focus on one driver in title battle?

Canadian Grand Prix Venue: Circuit Gilles Villeneuve, Montreal Dates: 13-15 June Race start: 19:00 BST on Sunday Coverage: Live commentary of first practice, third practice and qualifying on BBC Radio 5 Sports Extra 2, with FP2 on Sports Extra. Race is on BBC Radio 5 Live; live text updates on BBC Sport website and app Advertisement Formula 1 heads back to North America this weekend for the Canadian Grand Prix in Montreal. There is now some daylight at the top of the drivers' standings between the McLaren drivers and the rest with Oscar Piastri 10 points ahead of team-mate Lando Norris, and Red Bull's Max Verstappen a further 39 points behind Norris. Before the race at Circuit Gilles Villeneuve, BBC Sport F1 correspondent Andrew Benson answers your latest questions. Should McLaren be focusing on one driver for the title? We have seen other teams be dominant at the beginning of a season and slip back later on. - Luke This debate is an interesting one. Advertisement On one side, teams often receive criticism when they impose team orders and favour one driver over another. On another, the same can happen when they have two evenly matched drivers, both in a title fight, and they split the points between them against a rival who is the only driver challenging from another team. The second is clearly the case this year. For parallels in history, one can look back, for example, to 1986, when the Williams was the fastest car but Nigel Mansell and Nelson Piquet made a pair of warring team-mates and McLaren's Alain Prost drove a wonderful season to slip through the middle and claim the title in a dramatic final race in Australia. Advertisement Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri are - so far - very much not Mansell and Piquet. Relations between them are good and the intra-team battle is being conducted in a way for which all teams would wish. McLaren don't really have a choice at the moment but to conduct this season as they are so far doing. Norris and Piastri have contracts that guarantee them equal treatment, and as a team McLaren's philosophy is to allow free competition between their drivers. The one proviso is that they remember they are driving for a team and that, from time to time, they may be asked to do something that maximises the team's interests but perhaps not their own. Advertisement McLaren are approaching this with a philosophy of openness. Keep talking. Don't let anything go unsaid. Be honest. If an issue comes up, it'll because no one had thought of it. Not because of any attempt to conceal. They accept that the drivers are likely to clash, but they believe that, because of their approach, they will be able to handle that, too. So far, it's working. They accept that Max Verstappen is a real threat, even that there is a risk he could 'do a Prost'. But as Piastri put it in a BBC Sport interview in Monaco: "It is a possibility, yes. But, on both sides of the garage here, we want to win because we've been the best driver, the best team, including against the other car in the team. You always want to earn things on merit and you want to be able to beat everyone, including your team-mates. Advertisement "So that gives Lando and I the best chance of our personal goals of trying to become drivers' world champion, while also achieving the main result for the team, which is the constructors' championship. "If we do get beaten by Max, of course that would hurt, but we would know that we both had the same opportunity, we were racing everybody out there and that's just how it panned out. "For us it's the most straightforward, the fairest way of going racing and that's what we've asked for." Has the Franco Colapinto swap at Alpine backfired? He does not seem to have been much of a step over the less experienced Jack Doohan. - Tim It would be going quite far to say that it has backfired after just three races, but it's true to say that it's hard to discern any major difference between Colapinto's performance and Doohan's before him. Advertisement When executive adviser - and de facto team boss - Flavio Briatore brought Colapinto in, he said he wanted him to "be fast, not crash and score points". So far, the Argentine has failed to meet that target on every level. Colapinto had a significant crash on his debut weekend at Imola. In his three qualifying sessions so far, he is 0.392 seconds on average slower than team-mate Pierre Gasly, compared with Doohan's 0.366secs over the first six races. And, like Doohan, he has scored no points. Colapinto has another couple of races before he reaches the five Alpine's statement announcing his elevation to the race seat said he would have before the situation was reassessed - a deadline Briatore immediately rejected as soon as he spoke in public about the swap. Advertisement What happens next is anyone's guess. Why is the last chicane in the Canadian Grand Prix so difficult, causing many drivers to hit the 'Wall of Champions'? - Christopher The concrete wall on the exit of Turns 12 and 13 at the Circuit Gilles Villeneuve earned its nickname after Damon Hill, Michael Schumacher and Jacques Villeneuve all crashed there in 1999. Many others - including Sebastian Vettel and Jenson Button - have since followed suit. It's tricky because it is approached from very high speed, drivers have to bounce over the kerbs to be fast, and if they misjudge that, there is a wall waiting to collect them on the outside, with no run-off area. Advertisement Put that combination together, and it's no wonder drivers crash there. Donington Park hosted the 1993 European Grand Prix, a race won by Ayrton Senna in one of his greatest performances. It was the last time a circuit other than Silverstone staged an F1 race in the UK [Getty Images] With Spain likely having two races next season and Italy having had two for the last few years, I find it odd that the UK hasn't had more than one at different tracks in a season since 1993. Considering the majority of the teams are based here, the massive F1 fanbase that Britain has and the very good attendances Silverstone gets every year, why do you think the UK has not been considered to host more than one? - James Two reasons - money and circuit specification. Imola returned to the calendar in the pandemic year of 2020, and a way was found to keep it on afterwards because the local region of Emilia-Romagna and the Italian government saw its promotional value and found the sanctioning fee. Hence the event's rather convoluted and inelegant official title. Advertisement Of course, it didn't hurt that F1 chairman Stefano Domenicali is from Imola and was keen for the race to continue. In Spain, Barcelona has kept its place next year because it has a contract through 2026, while Madrid is entering the first year of its new contract. Again, state funding is involved in both events. Britain has two issues. One, while the country has many terrific race tracks, only Silverstone meets modern F1 standards. And there is no money for any of them to pay F1 to host a race. Making the British Grand Prix work on a financial basis is difficult enough for Silverstone as it is. On top of that, slowly but surely the idea of countries hosting more than one race is likely to die away, so it's highly unlikely there would be any appetite for another country to have two. Advertisement Apart, that is, from the USA, where there are three races, in Austin, Miami and Las Vegas, because it is such a large and important marketplace for the sport's commercial rights holders, Liberty Media. Would competition be more level across all teams, and expenditure lower if rules existed for longer periods without change? - Matthew Expenditure is set by the budget cap. It makes no difference what the rules are, teams will spend to that limit and no more. As for keeping the rules in place for a longer period, yes, everyone accepts that the field closes up the longer a set of regulations remains in place. You can see that this year, when the field is probably more compact in terms of time from front to back than it has ever been. Advertisement But it is part of the DNA of F1 to change the rules every few years. Often it's because there is a feeling the cars need to be slowed down, or changed in character in some ways; sometimes it's because it has been perceived that the engine formula needs to change. For 2026, it's all of those reasons. The new power-unit rules were conceived as a way of simplifying the engines and attracting the VW Group into F1. After Audi committed, Ford and General Motors followed suit. Having created a new power-unit design, with a much greater proportion of its performance derived from the electrical part of the engine, the chassis rules needed to be changed to ensure the cars worked holistically with that engine, and also to iron out some issues that were perceived to have arisen with the existing ones. Advertisement The process of refining the 2026 chassis regulations has not been without its difficulties, to say the least, and there are questions as to how successful the new rules will be. But that at least is why they're being introduced.

Aging CEOs, Ambitious Nepo Babies and a Tech Revolution: Succession in the Music Biz
Aging CEOs, Ambitious Nepo Babies and a Tech Revolution: Succession in the Music Biz

Yahoo

time6 days ago

  • Yahoo

Aging CEOs, Ambitious Nepo Babies and a Tech Revolution: Succession in the Music Biz

The business of music long has been an incestuous one, even when the players aren't related. But some of the leaders of today's recorded music industry — 84 percent of which is housed under the three major label groups, Universal, Warner and Sony — actually are. When Lucian Grainge, chairman and CEO of UMG, took the reins in 2011, his son, Elliot, had barely graduated college. Today, the junior Grainge is running Warner's Atlantic Records (home to Ed Sheeran, Coldplay and Bruno Mars) alongside another so-called 'nepo baby,' WMG's billionaire majority owner Len Blavatnik's 27-year-old son, Val Blavatnik, who is a member of WMG's board of directors with an increasing presence at the company. Elliot was brought in at age 30 in late 2024 to turn around the label's declining market share (from 10 percent at the end of 2020, down to 5.7 percent last year). While the results of his appointment are yet to be assessed, his track record for breaking acts on platforms like TikTok at his record label 10K Projects — where his successes included Ice Spice and the controversial 6ix9ine — preceded him. (WMG bought a majority stake in 10K in 2023.) More from The Hollywood Reporter Billy Joel Tells Howard Stern: "I'm Not Dying" ABBA's Björn Ulvaeus on Writing a Musical Assisted by AI and Those Kiss Avatars: SXSW London Diddy Trial Sees Heckler Disrupt Court as Judge Learns Anonymous Witness' Name Leaked Online 'Everyone in the industry is doing the same stuff,' Elliot told The Wall Street Journal earlier this year. 'I'm not doubting any of the human capabilities of these great guys, women and companies — however, they grew up in the fax machine era.' Elliot's ascent to CEO brought with it some upheaval — namely the exit of Julie Greenwald, a beloved executive who had shepherded the Atlantic labels for 20 years. Now, the industry's eyes are on the bigger Warner picture. Specifically, the company's succession line. THR talked to nearly a dozen executives across management, recorded music and publishing — all of whom requested anonymity to speak freely on the matter — who parroted a common refrain: that CEO Robert Kyncl, who joined WMG from YouTube in 2022, may be nearing the end of his run. (A rep for WMG says 'these are just totally false rumors,' declining further comment.) While not everyone had the same theory about who would take over if that happened, the most likely candidate, most agreed, was Val Blavatnik. 'Len will throw his kid in the seat as fast as he can,' one artist manager says. 'It's the succession. Warner's like a vanity [asset] for Len.' Adds a top manager: 'Val and Elliot are very close. It would make sense to bring Elliot in so he could sit and see for a while and help Val.' Another insider puts it more bluntly: 'This has always been a dynastic play for Len and Val.' To be fair, Kyncl is an easy target for rumor fodder given that he's the only CEO with a background in tech and media rather than music, and the music industry — with its less conventional work environment and reliance on intangibles like golden 'ears' — hasn't typically embraced outsiders. Coming off an underwhelming Q1 earnings report (WMG's stock price is down 16 percent since this time last year) also makes it easy for onlookers to put Kyncl under the microscope even if the chatter is unfounded. A change would be somewhat ironic, though, at a time when AI is poised to upend the music business if a digital native wouldn't have the mandate to navigate those rough waters. While insiders are turned toward Warner, it's worth remembering the fickle and cyclical nature of the music business, where hits still remain the top currency. With enough of them, the conversation could change. Currently WMG holds five of the Top 10 slots on Spotify's Global 50 chart as Alex Warren's 'Ordinary' (Atlantic) remains the biggest song in the world, Warner Records' Sombr hold two spots, 'La Plena – W Sound 05″ out of Warner Music Latina is seventh, and Atlantic's Rosé and Bruno Mars are in eighth with Apt.' If the past tells us anything, it's that seismic technological shifts have often served as a precursor for a changing of the guard at the record companies. In the early days of Napster and peer-to-peer file-sharing, Doug Morris (and his Universal colleagues, including Jimmy Iovine, who would go on to sell his Beats by Dr. Dre headphone line to Apple for $3 billion in 2014) was tasked with fending off the death of the CD, to mixed results. The era of digital downloads followed, making Apple's iTunes the world's biggest music store. Still, the 2000s would see year-over-year declines as album sales (typically $9.99 and up) ceded to song sales at 99 cents. By 2011, just ahead of the streaming era, Lucian Grainge spearheaded Universal's acquisition binge, beginning with the catalog-rich EMI (bought for $1.9 billion in 2012, not coincidentally the year Spotify launched in the U.S.) and continuing to the present, where its holdings now claim two-thirds of music's global market share. Today, Grainge, who netted handsomely when the company public in 2021, is the longest-tenured CEO across the three label groups. Sony Music Group chairman Rob Stringer is a not-too-distant second. After working at the company all of his professional life, he replaced Morris as chief executive in 2017 and has gone on to see some formidable wins, including record-breakers like Adele, and culture-shifting albums by Beyonce and Tyler, the Creator, to say nothing of bringing to the world Harry Styles. Is another change on the horizon? It's certainly a topic making the rounds as executives and industry insiders question when the old guard will pass the torch to a younger generation gearing up for the next era. Some wonder if Grainge will continue to occupy the top seat past his contract-end date in May 2028, though others suggest it's still premature to speculate on Grainge's successor as he's still very active in the company and has laid out a vision for the company for the years ahead. Still, succession has been discussed at UMG board meetings, and a source familiar with the agenda scoffs at the idea of going outside the UMG family in the future. Indeed, insiders and reports have cited Republic Collective CEO Monte Lipman (who runs the label group with his brother, Avery, its co-president and COO) and Interscope chairman/CEO John Janick as logical candidates from Universal's U.S. operations, but leaders in other territories shouldn't be counted out, says a source. 'There's a deep bench of internal players who are more than qualified to step into this position.' As succession names float, a pattern becoming more apparent is the lack of women helming labels contending to take the top C-suite jobs. For a time just a few years ago, that picture looked brighter as Michelle Jubelirer was chairwoman and CEO of Capitol Music Group, Greenwald was chairwoman and CEO of Atlantic Music Group, Ethiopia Habtemariam was CEO of Motown and Sylvia Rhone was CEO and Chairwoman of Epic. (The publishing side fares slightly better as Jody Gerson logs a decade as CEO of Universal Music Publishing Group while Carianne Marshall has been Warner Chappell's COO since 2018.) 'Old white men have had a choke hold on the industry for years,' says one female executive, who blames the lack of women on the industry's inability to properly groom talent. 'It's pretty pathetic of the labels, but it's not surprising. … And now there's been such a revolt around DEI, everyone has permission to just do the easy thing and hire the average white man instead.' (Rhone is the sole remaining female label head, but at 73, her retirement has become a perennial musing.) There are signs of hope under the conglomerate umbrella, however, with a slew of next-gen execs in the wings. At UMG's Island Records (home to Sabrina Carpenter and Chappell Roan), Imran Majid and Justin Eshak were named co-CEOs in 2021; at Def Jam (Justin Bieber, Big Sean), Tunji Balogun came in as chairman CEO in 2022; and at Mercury (Post Malone), 32-year-old Tyler Arnold assumed the chairman and CEO title in March. Meanwhile at Sony, new leadership for Arista (Maneskin) was just announced with Clio Massey, daughter of outgoing chairman David Massey, transitioning to co-president alongside Matt D'Arduini. And WMG's own Warner Records has seen its parent company's most consistent recent successes between Zach Bryan, Benson Boone and Teddy Swims under the watch of co-chairman and CEO Aaron Bay-Schuck who, at 43, is among the more senior of the bunch. Elliot Grainge, now 31, certainly tips the scale towards a younger, more nimble record executive less constrained by the old-boys-club way of doing things. But when that elder is your father and mentor, the nepotism-whispers will linger until he's had enough hits of his own. And in a business where names like Azoff, Davis and Wasserman all evoke the nepo tag, the song remains the same. 'Imagine if Bob Iger had a son who went to work at a competing company — it would never happen,' says one prominent industry lifer. 'In music, it's like, 'Oh well, we're fucking morons.' Time and time again, these CEOs refuse to leave or to do what's right as far as their corporate responsibility.' A version of this story appeared in the June 4 issue of The Hollywood Reporter magazine. Click here to subscribe. Best of The Hollywood Reporter Most Anticipated Concert Tours of 2025: Beyoncé, Billie Eilish, Kendrick Lamar & SZA, Sabrina Carpenter and More Hollywood's Most Notable Deaths of 2025 Hollywood's Highest-Profile Harris Endorsements: Taylor Swift, George Clooney, Bruce Springsteen and More

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store