logo
Experts reveal the most painful way to be executed

Experts reveal the most painful way to be executed

Daily Mail​04-05-2025

Though inmates on Death Row all have the same destination, some methods are more painful and torturous than others.
Last year, 25 people - all men - across nine states were put to death as punishment for heinous crimes like murder.
There are several execution methods performed in the US, but the vast majority, about 1,000 since the 1970s, have been through lethal injection, a three-drug concoction that renders the body unconscious and induces a heart attack.
However, amid a series of botched executions with lethal injection that have led to painful deaths and even failed executions that required the inmate to undergo another round, some more archaic methods have gradually made their way back into the 27 states that allow the death penalty.
Before lethal injection became the most common execution method, most offenders were killed by electric chair, which sends 2,000 volts of electricity through the nervous system and 'fries' the brain.
Earlier this year, Alabama executed murderer Brad Sigmon via firing squad, a 400-year old technique in which corrections officers shoot one bullet into an inmate's chest.
It was America's first firing squad execution in 15 years.
DailyMail.com has revealed the most brutal ways to be executed, as told by experts and witnesses.
Firing Squad
Last month, Brad Sigmon of South Carolina was tied down to an armless chair. A white target with a red bullseye was pinned to his chest.
Guards held his head in place with straps across his chin and forehead and put a black hood over his head. Sandbags surrounded the chair to soak up his blood.
In an enclosure about 20 feet away, three officers raised their rifles and each shot a bullet into Sigmon's chest at the same time. He was declared dead three minutes later.
Sigmon, 67, was the first American in 15 years to be put to death via firing squad, a centuries old execution method that only recently regained traction.
Just weeks after Sigmon's execution, 42-year-old Mikal Mahdi of South Carolina met the same fate after choosing firing squad over lethal injection or the electric chair.
He spent about 45 seconds groaning in pain and was declared dead four minutes after the shots rang out.
Firing squad executions in the US date back to 1608, and about 142 people have been put to death this way since then.
In a modern-day firing squad execution, three officers stand about 15 feet away and fire through a small opening in the wall. The inmate's head is covered and they are restrained by their arms and legs.
Despite the brutality of the method, some experts have suggested a firing squad execution may be one of the fastest ways to die.
Dr James Williams, an emergency room physician in Texas and courtroom expert on firing squad executions, told The Marshall Project: 'There is a lot of evidence that the near-instant loss of blood pressure means no blood gets to the brainstem, and there is a rapid loss of consciousness.
He compared it to a chokehold, which causes loss of consciousness in three to five seconds.
However, a South Carolina court in 2022 said firing squad death could be considered 'torture' because it damages an inmate's heart and its surrounding bone and tissue.
Experts testifying in the case said this would be extremely painful until the inmate falls unconscious.
Firing squads are legal in Idaho, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Utah. Inmates can choose the methods in Utah and South Carolina, and in Mississippi it may be used if lethal injections are unavailable.
A March 2025 bill made firing squad the main execution method in Idaho.
Nitrogen gas
Nitrogen gas execution, also called 'nitrogen hypoxia,' uses nitrogen gas to suffocate a person.
Inmates are strapped to a gurney, unable to move any of their limbs, and are fitted with a mask and forced too breathe in pure nitrogen.
Though nitrogen is naturally occurring and composes more than three-quarters of the air we breath, inhaling it at high concentrations leads to suffocation.
While authorities in the four states where nitrogen hypoxia is legal - Alabama, Oklahoma, Mississippi and Louisiana - predict nitrogen hypoxia knocks an inmate unconscious and causes multi-organ failure in five to 15 minutes, critics say it causes excessive pain and humiliation.
This could mean being left in a vegetative state or choking on one's own vomit.
The World Society for the Protection of Animals said in its 2013 guidelines: 'Current evidence indicates this method is unacceptable because animals may experience distressing side effects before loss of consciousness.'
The American Veterinary Medical Association made a similar conclusion in its 2020 guidance.
And officials from the United Nations said it could breach human rights treaties that forbid 'torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.'
Some critics say that the use of a one-size-fits-all mask means that it's not airtight.
An inadequate seal could lead to oxygen leaking through the mask, which could lead to a prolonged and painful death.
According to the theory, this could also lead to a stroke, seizure or the inmate being put into a vegetative state instead of dying.
Even brain cells that are starved of oxygen for a few minutes may never recover, leaving the sufferer brain dead but still technically alive.
Last year, Kenneth Smith of Alabama became the first American executed with nitrogen gas. It took 22 minutes for the 58-year-old to be pronounced dead, during which he thrashed against the gurney, convulsed and vomited into his mask.
Since then, four more men have chosen nitrogen gas for their execution.
Jessie Hoffman Jr of Louisiana became America's fifth inmate executed with nitrogen gas in March. It took 19 minutes for him to stop breathing.
Witnesses reported he twitched and jerked his head with fists clenched.
Prisoners can select this method of execution. In Mr Smith's case, he chose it after surviving a botched lethal injection.
Lethal injection
Lethal injection is the most common execution method in the US, with 1,377 injections administered since the 1970s.
The method was first developed in 1977, though it would be five years before it would be used for the first time in Texas inmate Charles Brooks.
Today, all 27 states that have the death penalty allow lethal injection.
Lethal injection involves restraining the inmate to a gurney and placing heart monitors on their skin.
Two needles, one of which is a backup, are inserted into the prisoner's veins, usually their arms.
The inmate is given a trio of chemicals: the anesthetic midazolam to render them unconscious, the paralytic bromide to stop them from moving and potassium chloride to stop their heart.
Dr Joel Zivot, an anesthesiologist and professor at Emory University in Atlanta, told CNN the 500 milligram dose of anesthetic likely triggers pulmonary edema, a condition in which fluid builds up in the lungs.
If the inmate is not fully unconscious, pulmonary edema could make them feel as if they are drowning.
However, Dr Ervin Ten, a retired anesthesiologist who has witnessed several executions, said if pulmonary edema starts after a patient becomes unconscious, it is likely 'not causing them discomfort.'
Experts have also raised concerns that the paralytic would render an inmate unable to communicate distress if they have not properly been knocked unconscious.
Dr Mark Health, an anesthesiology professor at Columbia University, testified in a lawsuit challenging Kentucky's execution protocol that some inmates have cried tears during the process.
He said this could indicate severe pain or suffocation.
Potassium chloride has also been shown to cause severe pain, which some experts comparing it to feeling like the arm is on fire.
The whole process is meant to take about five minutes, but botched case can take up to two hours.
The most recent lethal injection procedure was performed May 1, 2025, in Florida for Jeffrey Hutchinson, who was convicted of murdering 32-year-old single mother Renee Flaherty and her three children in 1998.
The procedure took 15 minutes. According to the Associated Press, Hutchinson's legs shook and his body spasmed for several minutes before he went still and was declared dead.
Glen Rogers, nicknamed the 'Casanova Killer,' will also be given a lethal injection in Florida two weeks later for the murder of five people in the 1990s.
An additional eight lethal injections have been planned so far for 2025.
Hanging
Up until the 1890s, hanging was the most common method of execution in the US, particularly famous in the Wild West.
But in 2025, it is only a legal execution method in Washington state, and this is only if lethal injection is either unavailable or ruled unconstitutional.
The last hanging execution was carried out in 1996 in Delaware for Billy Bailey, who was convicted of murdering elderly couple Gilbert and Clara Lambertson.
Hanging was the official method of execution in Delaware until 1986, and the gallows were disassembled entirely in 2003.
The method typically involves an inmate being weighed the day before and authorities having to perform a rehearsal with a sandbag the same weight as the inmate.
This is meant to determine how long the drop from the top of the gallows needs to be for a quick death.
During the execution, the inmate's hands and feet are secured and they are blindfolded. Once the noose is placed around their neck, a trap door beneath them opens and the inmate falls through, breaking their neck.
While hanging is meant to provide an instant death, small errors can make it torturous.
If the rope is too short, for example, an inmate could be strangled instead of having their neck immediately broken. This could leave them gasping for air for up to 15 minutes.
In fact, throughout the 1800s, inmates were known to hang by their broken necks for up to 30 minutes before finally succumbing to asphyxiation.
Harold Hillman, an expert in executions at the University of Surrey, told NBC News: 'Hanging is a very cruel way of killing people.
'The fracture obstructs their breathing, and they are left gasping for breath.'
If inmates fall too far, they may pick up so much speed that the noose decapitates them. This would be an instant death.
Electric chair
Around the time hanging became less common in the US, the electric chair came to take its place.
In 1881, a dentist named Dr Albert Southwick suggested using electrocution to execute inmates after he watched an elderly drunk man 'painlessly' die from touching an electric generator.
New York's Electrical Execution Law was passed eight years later and Edward David, an electrician at Auburn Prison, was commissioned to build the world's first electric chair.
On August 6, 1890, 30-year-old William Kemmler of New York became the first American killed via electric chair. A year earlier he had been convicted of murdering his wife Matilda 'Tillie' Ziegler.
However, the process was far from painless. The machine delivered 700 volts of electricity for only 17 seconds before the current failed. Even though witnesses reported smelling burned clothing and charred flesh, Kemmler was far from dead.
Anything over 50 volts is considered potentially deadly.
He underwent a second charge of 1,030 volts for two minutes. As he was confirmed dead, smoke wafted out of his head.
Since 1890, 4,374 electric chair executions have been performed in the US, the only country to have ever used the method.
The electric chair is no longer used as the sole execution method in any state, and the last one was in Tennessee in 2020.
The method is legal in nine states, and in many cases, the inmate can ask for it in place of lethal injection.
The method involves shaving and strapping a person to a chair with belts across their chest, groin, legs and arms. A metal skullcap-shaped electrode is attached to the scalp and forehead over a sponge moistened with saline.
The inmate is then blindfolded and the executioner pulls a handle to deliver between 500 and 2,000 volts of electricity for around 30 seconds. The exact amount depends on weight and how much the inmate is able to survive.
US Supreme Court Justice William Brennan, who opposed the death penalty, described electric chair executions in gruesome detail in 1986.
He said: 'The prisoner's eyeballs sometimes pop out and rest on [his] cheeks. The prisoner often defecates, urinates, and vomits blood and drool.
'The body turns bright red as its temperature rises, and the prisoner's flesh swells and his skin stretches to the point of breaking.
'Sometimes the prisoner catches fire... Witnesses hear a loud and sustained sound like bacon frying, and the sickly sweet smell of burning flesh permeates the chamber.'
This happens because the intense electric current causes all muscles in the body to lose control, including those in the bladder and bowels. The body also thrashes so hard that multiple bones break.
The current also fries all nerves in the body, including those in the brain.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supreme Court spares US gun companies from Mexico's lawsuit
Supreme Court spares US gun companies from Mexico's lawsuit

Reuters

time5 hours ago

  • Reuters

Supreme Court spares US gun companies from Mexico's lawsuit

WASHINGTON, June 5 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday spared two American gun companies from a lawsuit by Mexico's government accusing them of aiding illegal firearms trafficking to drug cartels and fueling gun violence in the southern neighbor of the United States. The justices in a 9-0 ruling overturned a lower court's ruling that had allowed the lawsuit to proceed against firearms maker Smith & Wesson (SWBI.O), opens new tab and distributor Interstate Arms. The lower court had found that Mexico plausibly alleged that the companies aided and abetted illegal gun sales, harming its government. The companies had argued for the dismissal of Mexico's suit, filed in Boston in 2021, under a 2005 U.S. law called the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act that broadly shields gun companies from liability for crimes committed with their products. The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decided in 2024 that the alleged conduct by the companies fell outside these protections. "Mexico alleges that the companies aided and abetted unlawful sales routing guns to Mexican drug cartels. The question presented is whether Mexico's complaint plausibly pleads that conduct. We conclude it does not," liberal Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the court. The case came to the Supreme Court at a complicated time for U.S.-Mexican relations as President Donald Trump pursues on-again, off-again tariffs on Mexican goods. Trump has also accused Mexico of doing too little to stop the flow of synthetic drugs such as fentanyl and migrant arrivals at the border. Mexico's lawsuit, filed in Boston in 2021, accused the two companies of violating various U.S. and Mexican laws. Mexico claims that the companies have deliberately maintained a distribution system that included firearms dealers who knowingly sell weapons to third-party, or "straw," purchasers who then traffic guns to cartels in Mexico. The suit also accused the companies of unlawfully designing and marketing their guns as military-grade weapons to drive up demand among the cartels, including by associating their products with the American military and law enforcement. The gun companies said they make and sell lawful products. To avoid its lawsuit being dismissed under the 2005 law, Mexico was required to plausibly allege that the companies aided and abetted illegal gun sales and that such conduct was the "proximate cause" - a legal principle involving who is responsible for causing an injury - of the harms claimed by Mexico. Mexico in the lawsuit sought monetary damages of an unspecified amount and a court order requiring Smith & Wesson and Interstate Arms to take steps to "abate and remedy the public nuisance they have created in Mexico." Gun violence fueled by trafficked U.S.-made firearms has contributed to a decline in business investment and economic activity in Mexico and forced its government to incur unusually high costs on services including healthcare, law enforcement and the military, according to the lawsuit. Mexico, a country with strict firearms laws, has said most of its gun homicides are committed with weapons trafficked from the United States and valued at more than $250 million annually. The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case on March 4.

Several people arrested in Bali on drugs charges that could carry death penalty
Several people arrested in Bali on drugs charges that could carry death penalty

Belfast Telegraph

time5 hours ago

  • Belfast Telegraph

Several people arrested in Bali on drugs charges that could carry death penalty

©Press Association Several foreign nationals – including an Australian, an Indian and an American – have been arrested on the tourist island of Bali on suspicion of possessing drugs, charges that could carry the death penalty. The move comes after three British nationals accused of smuggling nearly a kilogram of cocaine into Indonesia were charged on Tuesday in a court on Bali. Customs officers at Bali's Ngurah Rai International Airport arrested an Indian national with the initials HV, who was carrying a duffel bag, in the customs and excise inspection area on May 29. The officers found narcotic-related items in his belongings, authorities said. Following up on the interrogation of HV, later that day officers from the National Narcotics Agency of Bali Province arrested an Australian man with the initials PR, who has been visiting Bali since 1988. PR asked HV to bring the duffel bag from Los Angeles to Bali, said I Made Sinar Subawa, an official from the narcotics agency, at a news conference. During a search at a house where he stayed, officers found drugs in the form of hashish, a cannabis concentrate product, that belonged to PR and had been purchased over the Telegram messaging app. The hashish was shipped from Los Angeles and Philippines before finally being received in Bali, Mr Subawa said. Officers seized 191 grams of hashish along with some candies consisting of tetrahydrocannabinol, and 488 grams of marijuana. Both PR and HV are now suspected of dealing in narcotics, based on the evidence that was found with them, Mr Subawa said. 'PR is suspected of violating Indonesia's Narcotics Law which carries the death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment for a minimum of four years and a maximum of 12 years,' said Mr Subawa. Along with HV and PR, the agency also arrested WM, an American, on May 23 while he was collecting a package from a post office in Bali. An officer opened the package carried by WM and found seven pieces of silver packaging containing a total of 99 orange amphetamine pills and secured one white Apple iPhone. The agency, at a news conference in the city of Denpasar on Thursday, presented the evidence, including marijuana and hashish, seized from the suspects. All suspects will undergo legal proceedings in Indonesia, including trial and sentencing. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime says Indonesia is a major drug-smuggling hub despite having some of the strictest drug laws in the world, in part because international drug syndicates target its young population. The south-east Asian country has extremely strict drug laws, and convicted smugglers can face severe penalties, including the possibility of execution by firing squad. About 530 people, including 96 foreigners, are on death row in Indonesia, mostly for drug-related crimes, latest figures from the Ministry of Immigration and Corrections show. Indonesia's last executions, of an Indonesian and three foreigners, were carried out in July 2016.

‘My biggest fear': the artist spending three days banged up in a jail cell
‘My biggest fear': the artist spending three days banged up in a jail cell

The Guardian

time5 hours ago

  • The Guardian

‘My biggest fear': the artist spending three days banged up in a jail cell

A filthy mattress lies in the corner of an otherwise barren room. The only adornments here, screwed to the wall, are a metal table and a payphone. But this is no ordinary prison. Rather, it's a north London gallery which has been temporarily converted into a humid, fetid cell. For 72 hours, it will cage an artist in solitary confinement. Cell 72: The Cost of Confinement at Harlesden High Street Gallery is the work of young American conceptualist Emmanuel Massillon, with fellow Washington DC artist Allen-Golder Carpenter performing the role of inmate for three days. The gallery is tiny, its glass storefront giving passersby an open view of its cramped, inhumane quarters. What they will see over the course of the performance is a black man in prison-issue attire, incarcerated behind one-way glass, suffering through the ignominy and humiliation of solitary confinement. It is a stark reminder of the cruelty currently being endured by thousands of prisoners who have fallen victim to the American prison industrial complex. But if the idea of an artist recreating a cell and pretending to be imprisoned sets you on edge, you're not alone. What Massillon and Carpenter are doing could easily be read as little more than an exploitation of others' trauma. Are they not fetishising the prison experience for artistic gain? 'The purpose of the project is not to exploit prison culture or black men being incarcerated for profit. We are trying to raise awareness,' says Massillon, who points out that 15% of the sales from the exhibition will be split between the US prison reform organisation DC Access to Justice Foundation and Volunteer Supported Education, a charity which helps young offenders at Feltham Prison and Young Offender Institution. 'I don't think people really know the horrors of prison, because you might listen to a song, you might hear it in music, and you might say, 'wow, this seems cool', because people glorify it, but there's real people that are being put in these situations. I came up with this project to show people that this isn't a place you want to be.' Though neither Massillon nor Carpenter have been to prison, they say that growing up in Washington DC – a city with one of the highest incarceration rates in America – made them aware of the the brutal societal impact of the prison system. 'We talk often about being black and from America and our personal experiences of having our family members incarcerated,' says Massillon. 'A lot of people talk about the people who are incarcerated, but they never talk about how it affects your family and the psychological trauma it inflicts on the people around you.' He talks about how prison changes people, how they have to adapt mentally to survive, how they go in as one person and emerge as someone totally different. People can, he says, come out 'over aggressive, with this animalistic nature, lashing out at my family, threatening our safety'. Growing up surrounded by friends and loved ones being sent to prison creates a constant feeling that you might be next. 'No matter your socio-economic background, when you're black, you're still black,' says Massillon. 'The thing about being racially profiled is nobody knows at first glance if you're a doctor, a lawyer, an NBA player or a street level thug, you're just black, so if you match the profile, that's literally all it takes.' Thirty-two per cent of American prisoners are black, despite making up just 13% of the general population. In Britain, those figures are 13% and 4% respectively. Those are statistics used by racists to justify their bigotry, but they tell a wider story of injustice that Massillon and Carpenter are laying bare. Massillon took inspiration for the installation from pioneering German conceptual artist Joseph Beuys who, in his seminal 1974 piece I Like America and America Likes Me, locked himself in a room with a wild coyote for three days. 'What is my coyote? What do I fear?' asks Massillon. 'My coyote is prison. Just walking in the street, just being a black man, I could really go to prison at any given time.' 'Going to prison is probably one of my single greatest fears,' echoes Carpenter. 'My way of coping with it is getting as close to it as I can, facing it, not turning myself away from it.' So Carpenter will spend three stuffy London summer days stuck alone in this tiny gallery, getting closer than ever to the idea of imprisonment. When I visit the gallery, on a muggy early June morning, it already feels claustrophobically tight and airless: it smells of bodies and sweat, it's too warm, too small, the atmosphere both dull and unnerving. Carpenter will spend their time in here making improvised artworks out of disposable toothbrushes – the kind used to create makeshift prison shivs – whittling them down and turning the shavings into hourglasses to mark the passing of these 72 hours. After the performance, the prison-issue sweatsuit will be hung on the wall – all that will be left for the rest of the exhibition's month-long duration will be the remnants of time served. In among all the fear and anxiety of prison life is an acknowledgment that music and film have both spent decades glorifying it. 'Prison itself is so intimately tied up with black American culture, especially through hip-hop,' says Carpenter. 'It's inseparable almost, prison is a pressure cooker that deeply impacted and influenced blues and jazz and eventually rap music. I think the glorification of violence through music is at an all-time high. It's almost like a caricature of itself at this point.' It's the same here, where an entire generation of UK drill rappers have ended up in prison for crimes ranging from murder to drug trafficking, as English artist RIP Germain recently explored at Cabinet Gallery to devastating effect. Going to jail has become something to aim for, a status symbol, a badge of honour. So how do Massillon and Carpenter counter allegations that what they're doing is appropriative, a kind of incarceration cosplay? 'People might project whatever motive on to it they want, but what else could we talk about?' says Carpenter. 'I don't really want to paint pictures of flowers when [black people] are locked up at an all-time high and prison is one of the biggest businesses in America. When private universities like Columbia own shares in prisons and have an active role in profiting from disadvantaging people of colour on a mass scale. I'm trying to say the thing that's not being said.' Regardless of whatever criticism gets levelled at them, they'll be satisfied to get people talking, thinking. 'I preserve history through artwork and put it in places where people can see it publicly to start conversations,' says Massillon. 'These are real-world problems that are being put in front of you. What do you do to make sure that people stay out of these situations? Are you donating money? Are you checking in on your loved ones that are incarcerated?' Ultimately, he's hoping this confrontational work causes people to examine their own responses. As he says: 'If you're mad at us for creating a mock scenario of somebody locked in a box, why are you upset?' The Cell 72 performance by Allen-Golder Carpenter is at Harlesden High Street Gallery, London from 6-8 June

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store