Doctors recommend MMR vaccine amid measles outbreaks
(WKBN) — The Centers for Disease Control recently issued a travel warning for Americans as measles cases continue to rise around the world.
Doctors say kids who are not vaccinated are at higher risk for serious problems from measles. The MMR vaccine helps protect against measles, mumps and rubella and has been used for many years.
Dr. Camille Sabella with the Cleveland Clinic is a pediatric infectious disease specialist. She says the first dose of the MMR vaccine is given when a child is about 12 months old, and the second dose is given between 4 and 6 years old.
Sabella says measles is a very contagious illness that spreads through coughing and sneezing.
'Most cases of measles in this country, and most of the outbreaks that we've had, began with someone who was not fully vaccinated against measles traveling internationally where measles is incredibly common,' Sabella said.
Sabella says if you've recently traveled and have a rash, high fever, cough, runny nose or red, watery eyes, you should see a doctor right away but make sure you call before you go because you could be contagious.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Hundreds of CDC employees reinstated after being laid off
The Brief Over 460 CDC employees have been reinstated after April layoffs, mainly from public health divisions. Thousands of jobs remain unfilled, with no word on further reinstatements. RFK Jr. appointed eight new vaccine advisers, including controversial figure Dr. Robert Malone. ATLANTA - More than 460 employees at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have been reinstated after being laid off earlier this year, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) confirmed Wednesday, according to the Associated Press. What we know The employees are among the approximately 2,400 CDC staffers let go in April, a move that sparked widespread backlash and legal challenges. According to HHS, the reinstated workers include 200 employees from the Center for HIV, Hepatitis, STD and Tuberculosis Prevention and another 150 from the Environmental Health division, which includes a lab focused on lead poisoning prevention. PREVIOUS STORIES Reactions to mass layoffs underway at Atlanta-based CDC 2,400 CDC jobs to be cut in HHS overhaul announced by Secretary Kennedy CDC to lose nearly 1,300 probationary employees under Trump's job cuts Former employees and public health advocates have criticized the layoffs for leaving vital public health positions vacant. Reese Williams, a former CDC worker, said the terminations affected key personnel. "They fired a lot of our scientists, a lot of our public health communicators, a lot of anybody to do with DEI, birth defects, anything to do with smoke and health, domestic abuse and domestic violence," Williams said. Williams says the 2,400 roles that were eliminated this year played a critical role in public health. "They took a part a lot of the funding for our global partners. Funding that goes for Ebola or for these diseases that don't necessarily effect us, but could effect us, they took away a lot of that," she said. This is the second wave of reinstatements. In February, about 180 employees who were laid off were later asked to return. Despite the new round of rehirings, thousands of jobs remain unfilled, and officials have not indicated if additional reinstatements are forthcoming. Employees say many vital positions are still left empty. "Eventually, we will all feel this. Even the ones who think they won't feel it. We're going to feel it," Reese said. Meanwhile, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has appointed eight new members to the federal vaccine advisory committee. The move follows his abrupt dismissal of the previous panel earlier this week. Among the new appointees is Dr. Robert Malone, a controversial figure known for spreading misinformation about COVID-19 and vaccines. RELATED STORIES RFK Jr.'s newest CDC vaccine panel includes critics of COVID shots, lockdowns Protest against CDC vaccine committee firings held at Atlanta headquarters RFK Jr. ousts entire CDC vaccine panel The committee advises the CDC director on how approved vaccines should be used nationwide.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
RFK Jr.'s latest big move could leave you paying more for vaccines
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. sent shockwaves through the scientific community this week when he fired all 17 members of the federal government's key vaccine advisory board, raising concerns that he might try to replace them with immunization skeptics. Those fears were confirmed for many on Wednesday when Kennedy unveiled eight new members who included some of the most prominent critics of the COVID-19 vaccines. The swap could have wide-reaching public health consequences. But one of the most straightforward impacts may be on consumers' wallets. That's because recommendations by the board — known as the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices, or ACIP — determine which vaccines most insurance plans are required to cover at zero cost, such as inoculation against measles or your annual flu shot. If the new members decide to reverse the panel's old guidance, patients could find themselves paying out of pocket for vaccines that were once available for free. 'For the average person who has never heard of ACIP before, this could affect their access to vaccines,' said Jennifer Kates, a senior vice president at the healthcare think tank KFF. Created in 1964, ACIP is the official outside panel of medical experts responsible for advising the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on what to include on its lists of routine shots for both children and adults. While its recommendations aren't binding, federal officials have typically adopted them. As a result, the board's decisions carry enormous weight, affecting patients and parents, as well as the vaccines schools require for students. Over the years, the panel has played a growing role in determining insurance coverage as well. By law, shots recommended by ACIP must be covered by the free Vaccines for Children program, the Children's Health Insurance Program, Medicaid, and Medicare Part D. The Affordable Care Act also requires private insurers to pay for vaccines with no cost sharing if they have the panel's seal of approval. (Past administrations have said the rule only applies if the CDC also adopts the board's recommendation.) In a Wall Street Journal op-ed this week, Kennedy said his decision to replace the board was meant to fight a 'crisis of public trust' in vaccines by ridding the committee of what he described as 'persistent conflicts of interest.' (Kennedy's critics have argued that his allegations against ACIP's former members are unfounded.) His new picks for the panel include several figures who rose to national fame by casting doubt on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. Among them is Dr. Robert Malone, an accomplished scientist who did pioneering work on mRNA technology but later attacked its use in shots during the pandemic and who was at one point banned from Twitter for spreading COVID misinformation. He'll be joined by Retsef Levi, an MIT business school professor who gained attention in 2023 for claiming there was 'indisputable evidence' that 'MRNA vaccines cause serious harm including death,' and Dr. Martin Kulldorff, who advocated letting COVID spread among younger Americans to achieve 'herd immunity' and was later let go from Harvard Medical after refusing to be vaccinated. In his announcement, Kennedy said that each new member of ACIP was 'committed to demanding definitive safety and efficacy data before making any new vaccine recommendations' — suggesting they'll be less likely to add new shots to the government's immunization schedules. But he added that the board will also 'review safety and efficacy data for the current schedule as well,' raising the possibility that it will scrap some of its old recommendations. Even before this week's shake-up, the government had already begun changing its recommendations on COVID shots. In May, the CDC dropped its recommendation that healthy pregnant women receive the vaccine and revised its guidance for young children, saying they should only receive it after consultation with a doctor. Private insurers could still choose to cover vaccines even if the federal government stops recommending them. Whether they will is less certain. 'That's territory we haven't really had to traverse before,' said KFF's Kates. Sarah Moselle, a vaccine market expert at the health industry consulting firm Avalere, said there may be some 'fragmentation' in how carriers approach the issue. Some may drop coverage entirely or begin requiring co-pays. But many 'do anticipate that they would continue to cover some vaccines,' even if they aren't required to, since it would 'add value' for their customers, she said. In theory, insurers could also have an incentive to maintain vaccine coverage since it could keep their patients healthier and reduce the costs of their care, though it's unclear exactly how those savings would stack up against the added expense of paying for shots. For many vaccines, the out-of-pocket cost might be relatively cheap for patients. But others could turn out to be steep. Take Gardasil, the HPV vaccine that has been the focus of growing safety concerns among patients despite studies suggesting they're unfounded. Some experts told Yahoo Finance they thought the shot could be a target for more scrutiny under Kennedy's new ACIP. Currently, the shot is covered by insurance because it's recommended for pre-teens through young adults. The CDC lists its full price at over $300 a dose. Even modest costs can dissuade patients from getting vaccinated, according to Loren Adler, associate director at the Brookings Institution's Center on Health Policy. 'We know that folks having to pay $10 for a vaccine limits the uptake somewhat,' he said. As a result, just a small increase in what patients have to pay out of pocket could have ripple effects on public health. One issue to keep an eye on, according to Moselle, is whether state governments step in to require more extensive insurance coverage of vaccines if the federal government walks back some of its recommendations. If they do, vaccine access could start to vary more by where patients happen to live. Jordan Weissmann is a senior reporter at Yahoo Finance. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest health industry news and events impacting stock prices
WebMD
an hour ago
- WebMD
More Thoughts on the Myth of the Perfect Patient
In my last post, I talked about the extreme efforts I took to be the healthiest, most perfect MS patient. I realized I had more to say on the subject. If the average person looked at my diet today, they'd still think I was pretty strict. I still cut out most inflammatory foods: gluten, dairy, excessive sugar, corn, oats, veggie oils, and highly processed foods. But some "bad" habits have definitely snuck back into my life. I drink coffee every day, have Diet Coke a few times a week, indulge in (gluten-free and vegan) sugary desserts, eat out often, sacrifice sleep for fun, no longer read food labels with a magnifying glass, blast music through my headphones, and occasionally grab fast food after a night out. And with these choices comes guilt. Constant, nagging guilt that I indulge so much despite having an inflammatory condition. You would think I'd have more self-restraint, given the implications, and yet I've entered a chapter in my life where that's just … not a priority. People are often surprised by my lifestyle. Those who knew me throughout my MS journey saw me transform from a lifestyle that was average, to extremely strict and healthy, to average again, and now possibly even slightly unhealthy. They're shocked that I've "regressed" so much, and I get questioned about it constantly. I'm always uncomfortable answering. What do I say? "Yes, I still have multiple sclerosis and it's a really scary disease, but I'm just kind of taking a break from being healthy"? Or when people who newly meet me realize I have MS, they often question how it's possible when we seemingly live the same lives. They applaud me for having so much energy and "handling it so well." But they don't see me take three-hour naps just to get through my day. They don't see the migraines, numbness, and spasms that creep up on me. They don't see the constant doctor appointments, blood tests, and MRIs. Why are they so shocked by my diagnosis? Why are people shocked that I stopped eating such a strict diet? Why do they make comments about it? Why do their comments make me feel even more guilty? Why are they allowed to drink a can of soda, but not me? Nothing is worse than when someone points out I'm doing something unhealthy and asks how it affects my MS. Even when they don't mention my MS directly, the implications of my chronic illness hang heavy in the air. Because the reality is they're projecting an image of a perfect patient onto me, and that simply does not exist. Even when I was at my healthiest, I wasn't perfect. Eating that healthy gave me extreme anxiety, and any misstep sent me into a spiral. But truly, you cannot win with a chronic illness. When you try to eat super healthy, you put immense pressure and stress on yourself. When you decide not to prioritize it, the guilt and shame eat at you. Not to mention that your body changes throughout each transformation, making the transition even more obvious and difficult. When people come to me for advice about managing MS through lifestyle changes, I feel like an imposter. Yes, for almost two years I was eating strictly healthy and following all the health trends. But now, I don't really think about them. I feel inauthentic talking to people about what they should do to be healthier because I don't currently follow those practices. Sometimes, I wish I could recapture that energy, passion, discipline, and motivation I had to be so healthy. But I'm not perfect, and I am certainly not the perfect patient. For now, I will enjoy my indulgences. I will remind myself that nothing in life is permanent and that life has many chapters. I will never be the perfect patient, because there is no perfect patient. It is not my fault I have MS, and there is no need to punish myself more for it. I'm sure my healthy habits will come back to me one day. For now, I will enjoy myself in ways I never even thought possible a few years ago. And I'll try to let go of the guilt that comes from not living up to an impossible standard. Maybe the healthiest thing I can do is accept myself exactly as I am today, and try my best to live in the present.
