This former penny stock fell 10% after the Musk-Trump clash! Time to buy?
Filtronic (LSE: FTC) has been on an almighty run lately, having risen 82% year to date to reach 137p. But the two-year gain is even more eye-popping, as this was a penny stock trading for just 13p back in June 2023.
So that makes it a 10-bagger over this period!
However, the Filtronic share price fell as much as 10% on 6 June. What caused this? And should I buy the dip?
Filtronic designs and manufactures high-frequency communication products for various sectors, including telecommunications, aerospace, and defence. Its products include E-band transceivers, tower-mounted amplifiers, and other radio frequency (RF) components.
Over the years, the firm has secured contracts with the likes of BAE Systems, QinetiQ, and the European Space Agency. However, it was a strategic partnership with SpaceX announced last year to supply specialist equipment for the Starlink satellite constellation that sent the stock surging.
In February, Filtronic secured its largest production order from SpaceX, valued at $21m, to be fulfilled over the next couple of years. And this gave the firm confidence that it would beat previous market expectations for FY2025 and FY2026.
Looking ahead, the company should also have an attractive pipeline of growth opportunities in the European defence and satellite communications markets.
The founder of SpaceX is, of course, Elon Musk, and he's just fell out spectacularly with President Trump. I won't rehash the soap opera-like details here, as they're widely available elsewhere. But Trump did threaten to terminate federal contracts for Musk's enterprises, including SpaceX.
This prompted Musk to announce the immediate decommissioning of SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, which is critical for transporting astronauts and cargo to the International Space Station.
What has any of this got to do with Filtronic? Well, Reuters reports that around $22bn worth of federal contracts could be at risk. If so, SpaceX's budget and the continued pace of the Starlink build-out could be jeopardised. That may lead to reduced need for Filtronic's components in the years ahead.
Given that Filtronic has scaled up manufacturing and R&D to meet future demand, it might face excess capacity and margin pressure. In this situation, sentiment for Filtronic shares could sour, sending them much lower.
Now, this is all just theoretical. As I write, Musk has retracted the kneejerk Dragon capsule decision, and it even seems like there might be some sort of public reunion with Trump. But literally anything could happen from this point onwards.
Weighing things up, there doesn't appear to be any immediate threat to Filtronic. And the share price pullback isn't that severe in the grand scheme of things. As I write, it's just 6%.
The company's revenue for FY2026, which has just started, is forecast to be £50m. That would be double what it was in FY2023, signalling very robust growth.
However, this stock is currently trading at around 45 times forward earnings, and there's no dividend. Much of the company's current value rests on the SpaceX partnership, which could be a double-edged sword if anything goes wrong there.
Investors considering the stock should be mindful of the relatively high valuation and customer concentration risks. While I like the SpaceX-related growth story here, I'm currently not looking to buy any shares.
The post This former penny stock fell 10% after the Musk-Trump clash! Time to buy? appeared first on The Motley Fool UK.
More reading
5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50
One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool
Ben McPoland has positions in BAE Systems. The Motley Fool UK has recommended BAE Systems and QinetiQ Group Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.
Motley Fool UK 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Florian Wirtz to Liverpool a ‘done deal' as staggering contract details revealed
Liverpool's move to sign Florian Wirtz is a 'done deal', according to the latest reports in Germany. It emerged this week that Liverpool have increased their offer for Wirtz to £113million as they look to seal a club-record deal for the Bayer Leverkusen attacking midfielder. Advertisement That offer falls short of the £125m that Leverkusen are demanding for Wirtz but a fresh report from Bild says an 'agreement is certain'. The report also claims Wirtz is set to earn around a staggering £340,000 a week at Anfield, where he will sign a five-year contract. Wirtz is currently on international duty with Germany (Getty Images) Negotiations continue and Wirtz could undergo a medical next week as Liverpool bid to wrap up a deal. Wirtz has made it clear he wants to move to Anfield and Liverpool are confident a deal will be struck for the 22-year-old. Liverpool are ready to spend big in the transfer market this summer as they bid to strengthen Arne Slot's side after they cruised to the Premier League title last season. Advertisement The Reds are also in talks to sign full-back Milos Kerkez from Bournemouth for between £45m and £50m. They have already agreeed a £29.5m deal for Wirtz's Leverkusen team-mate Jeremie Frimpong. Slot said recently that the champions would be "stupid" not to strengthen this summer. 'There are not many that can strengthen us, but the few that are out there, we will try to get them,' said Slot. 'At this moment in time we're not sure if that's possible.' Luis Diaz, Darwin Nunez and Federico Chiesa have all been linked with moves away from Anfield. Barcelona have had an approach for Diaz rejected.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Engineering firm closes with the loss of 130 jobs
An engineering firm has announced it is to close with the loss of 130 jobs. Administrators Leonard Curtis have been appointed to Workington Engineering Limited, trading as Chapel Bank Engineering in Workington, Cumbria, after a failure to secure private investment. The business on Curwen Road had been trading since 1939 under various ownership and names and offered heavy engineering services in the nuclear, oil, gas and steel sectors. The administrators said they were working with various parties including the Unite union to ensure employees received all their entitlements. The company, then TSP Engineering, was sold to Workington Engineering in September which was able to protect some contracts and was seeking private investment to help the business recover, the administrators said. But the investment was not "forthcoming" and the company has had to cease trading, they said. Workington MP Josh MacAlister said on social media the closure was a "devastating blow" and that he was working with the union to get employees into alternative suitable jobs as quickly as possible. Iain Nairn, from Leonard Curtis, said directors at Workington Engineering had "no option" but to close the doors. "It's a very sad day for everyone involved," he said. "There have been big challenges in the last few years in the steel sector and the inability of the company to raise investment has caused its closure." Workington job centre is holding an open day between 10:00 BST and 16:00 on Wednesday to support affected employees. Follow BBC Cumbria on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump and Musk can both hurt each other in their feud. Here's how.
An explosive breakdown in the relationship between President Donald Trump and his biggest political donor turned part-time employee, Tesla CEO Elon Musk, has been foreshadowed since their alliance first took shape. When Trump brought Musk along for the ride as he moved back into the White House, the looming question was always how long the two could possibly stay in sync. After all, neither the most powerful person in the world nor the richest person on Earth is known for keeping his ego in check. The main thrust of the Trump-Musk feud boils down to who can assert dominance over the other. In the intense back-and-forth that had everyone glued to their screens Thursday, we saw bullies used to getting their way desperately trying to find leverage over each other. But unlike the flame wars of old, where internet trolls would hurl insults at each other across message board forums, Trump and Musk can do serious damage to each other in the real world — and to the rest of us in the process. Musk first gained access to Trump through his vast fortune; he donated almost $300 million during last year's election and hasn't been afraid to throw his money around in races this year. Though he said in May he would be 'spending a lot less' on funding political races, he has also been quick to threaten pumping money into the midterms should lawmakers back the massive budget bill currently working its way through the Senate. And Musk has made clear that he expects a return on his investments, having already snidely claimed on his X platform that Trump would have lost and Democrats would have taken Congress without his backing. Trump is reportedly more focused on the midterms than he was during his first term, worried that a new Democratic majority would lead to more investigations and/or a third impeachment. While he's already sitting on $600 million to help hold on to a GOP majority, Musk's money could throw a spanner in the works, especially if he follows through on his public musing about bankrolling a third party to 'represent the 80% of Americans in the middle.' Though Trump has his own social media platform, Truth Social, X remains a much louder microphone to amplify Musk's messaging to the right, including his supposed 'bombshell' about Trump's presence in the Jeffrey Epstein files. (Musk provided no evidence for the claim and Trump has previously denied any involvement with Epstein's criminal behavior.) Trump, in turn, has threatened Musk's lucrative government contracts, which would include billions of dollars funneled toward his SpaceX company, as well as the subsidies that Tesla receives for its electric car production. Musk responded by warning about cutting off access to SpaceX launches, which would potentially cripple NASA and the Defense Department's ability to deploy satellites. But that would prove a double-edged sword for Musk, given how large a revenue stream those contracts have become. By Thursday evening, Musk had already backed down from his saber-rattling about restricting access to the Dragon space capsule, but he could change his mind again. That he made the threat in the first place has raised major alarm bells among national security officials. The Washington Post reported Saturday that NASA and the Pentagon have begun "urging [Musk's competitors] to more quickly develop alternative rockets and spacecraft" to lessen his chokehold on the industry. Notably, Trump isn't alone in his fight against Musk, though as ever those wading into the brawl have their own motives. Former White House strategist Steve Bannon took the opportunity to launch a broadside against Musk. 'People including myself are recommending to the president that he pull every contract associated with Elon Musk,' Bannon told NBC News on Thursday night. Bannon requested that 'major investigations start immediately' into, among other things, Musk's 'immigration status, his security clearance and his history of drug abuse.' There are already several federal investigations of Musk's companies that have been underway for years, which critics had previously worried might be stonewalled due to his influence with Trump. While the extremely public breakup makes for high drama and more than a little schadenfreude, the pettiness masks a deeper issue. The battle Musk and Trump are waging is predicated on both wielding a horrifying amount of unchecked power. In a healthy system of government, their ability to inflict pain on each other wouldn't exist, or at least such an ability would be severely blunted. Musk being able to funnel nearly unlimited amounts of spending into dark money super PACs is an oligarchical nightmare. Trump using the power of the presidency to overturn contracts and launch investigations at a whim is blatant authoritarianism in action. In theory, there are still checks to rein each of them in before things escalate much further. Musk's shareholders have been unhappy with his rocky time in government, and the war of words with Trump sent Tesla's stock price tumbling once more. Trump needs to get his 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' passed into law and — next year — ensure Congress doesn't fall into Democrats' hands. Trump and Musk have incentives, then, to stay in each other's good graces despite their wounded pride. Trump made clear to NBC News in an interview Saturday that he has no real interest in patching things up with Musk, warning that there will be "very serious consequences" if his one-time ally funds Democratic campaigns. Even if the two eventually reach a détente, it's unlikely to be a lasting peace, not so long as one feels his authority is challenged by the other. The zero-sum view of the world that Trump and Musk share, one where social Darwinism and superior genetics shape humanity, doesn't allow for long-term cooperative relationships. Instead, at best they will return to a purely transactional situationship, but one where the knives will gleefully come back out the second a new opening is given. Most importantly, there is no protagonist when it comes to the inciting incident in this duel, as a total victory won't benefit the American people writ large. Trump wants Congress to pass his bill to grant him more funding for deportations and to preserve his chances of staying in power. Musk wants a more painful bill that will slash the social safety net for millions. No matter what the outcome is as they battle for supremacy over each other, we're the ones who risk being trampled. This article was originally published on
