&w=3840&q=100)
How India fought the US for the ‘Sudarshan Chakra' which foiled Pakistan's attack
India on Thursday foiled multiple attacks from Pakistan thanks to the Triumf S-400 made by Russia. But did you know that India had to fight the US to buy the Triumf, which is famed for being one of the world's best surface-to-air missile systems? Here's how New Delhi defied Washington and made a deal with Moscow read more
Indian officials have named the S-400 air defence system the 'Sudarshan Chakra'. Reuters
On Thursday, India foiled multiple attacks from Pakistan.
First there was the attack in the early hours of Thursday in which Pakistan targeted 15 locations in northern and western India.
Then there was the attack on with missiles and drones in Jammu and other locations late on Thursday.
The heart of India's defences was the Triumf S-400 air defence system – which Indian officials have nicknamed the 'Sudarshan Chakra.'
Interestingly, India went up against the US in order to purchase the S-400 on Russia.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Let's take a closer look:
What we know
India had in 2018 agreed to purchase five Triumf squadrons – each comprising 16 vehicles – from Russia at a cost of $5 billion (Rs 35,000 crore).
Manufactured by Russia's Almaz-Antey corporation, the Triumf is famed for being one of the world's best surface-to-air missile systems.
It is even used by China – which first purchased it in 2014.
Catch LIVE updates on India-Pakistan conflict .
However, the US spent years pressuring India not to go through with the deal.
As per Business Today, the US in 2018 warned that India could potentially face sanctions under the Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (Caatsa) for its purchase of the S-400.
The Caatsa was passed into law in August 2017 – during President Donald Trump's first term.
It levied sanctions on Iran, Russia, and North Korea and countries doing business with them.
President Donald Trump. AP File
This was the result of Russia annexing of Crimea in 2014 and allegedly meddling in the 2016 US presidential elections.
When it came to Russia, it specifically imposed sanctions on those buying major hardware from Moscow.
Washington instead tried to sell India its MIM-104 Patriot and the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) systems.
The US claimed that Russian hardware would undermine defence interoperability between the two nations.
What did India do?
As per The Tribune, India in September 2018 signed the Communications, Compatibility and Security Agreement (Comcasa) agreement with the US.
The deal allowed for military information to be shared in real-time between the two nations.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Then, in October 2018, India ignored the warnings from the US and signed the S-400 deal with Russia.
'Both sides welcomed the conclusion of the contract for the supply of the S-400 long-range surface-to-air missile system to India,' the joint statement after a meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Russian President Vladimir Putin read.
India also had its counter-argument ready for the US.
Nirmala Sitharaman, at the time defence minister, defended the deal. PTI
Nirmala Sitharaman, who was the Defence Minister at the time, said, 'We have told the US Congress delegation (that visited India) that it is a US law and not a UN law.'
Asked if the law did not apply to India, Sitharaman responded, 'Of course, it does not.'
The US went on the defensive immediately.
'The intent of Caatsa is to impose costs on Russia and is not intended to impose damage to the military capabilities of our allies (India)… The waiver authority is not a blanket waiver. Waivers are considered on transaction basis. We cannot prejudge any sanction decisions,' its statement read.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The US in December 2020 imposed sanctions on Turkey under the Caatsa for buying the S-400 from Russia.
But India wasn't deterred.
How India stood up to the US
As per Business Today, India simply refused to back down.
Officials said no foreign law could influence India's decision given the prevailing scenario with Pakistan and China.
Officials thought that the S-400 would be key to India protecting and controlling its airspace.
The S-400's performance over the past couple of days has proved that India made the right decision.
The S-400 Triumf is considered one of the world's best surface-to-air missile (SAM) systems. AP
India's purchase of the S-400 is also relevant in light of the fact that Russia remains the biggest weapon supplier to India.
As per Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), Russia still comprises over a third (36 per cent) of India's arms imports.
Aftermath
In January 2022, the United States House of Representatives passed an amendment granting India a waiver from Caatsa sanctions.
The historic amendment was written and introduced by Indian-American Congressman Ro Khanna.
Khanna said, 'The United States must stand with India in the face of escalating aggression from China. As Vice Chair of the India Caucus, I have been working to strengthen the partnership between our countries and ensure that India can defend itself along the Indian Chinese border. This amendment is of the utmost importance, and I am proud to see it pass the House on a bipartisan basis.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'My bipartisan NDAA amendment marks the most significant piece of legislation for US-India relations out of Congress since the US-India nuclear deal.'
However, the US Senate is yet to pass the amendment.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
India must exploit the full potential of collaborative lending
India's financial ecosystem is evolving fast, driven by digitization and the need for inclusive credit. Within this landscape, collaborative lending has emerged as a promising way to bridge traditional credit gaps and bring formal finance closer to retail borrowers as well as small and medium businesses, especially the historically underserved. Among the various collaborative lending models available to banks and non-bank financial companies (NBFCs), two are most popular. One, co-lending arrangements between banks and NBFCs; and two, partnerships involving digital Lending Service Providers (LSPs). Though these models currently represent a small portion of India's total outstanding advances, their growth is far outpacing that of conventional lending. Synergy is at the heart of collaborative lending. Traditional banks and large NBFCs bring capital strength, regulatory compliance and reach. On the other hand, smaller NBFCs, fintech firms and digital platforms are agile, well connected to niche borrower segments and often excel in technology-driven origination and underwriting. Also Read: Banking on trust, losing billions: India's bank fraud epidemic needs urgent answers For example, a rural-focused NBFC that understands the borrowing behaviour of dairy farmers or small kirana shop owners in Tier 3 towns may have high-quality leads and underwriting insights, but may lack capital or the regulatory headroom to scale up. Joining forces with a larger bank or NBFC through co-lending would benefit both entities, while the borrower gets faster credit. LSP-based models are another key component. These digital platforms do not carry credit risk themselves, but play a vital role in onboarding, assessing and servicing customers. Their ability to use alternative data such as digital transaction patterns allows for the credit evaluation of customers outside the formal credit score system. Collaborative lending models typically involve a risk-sharing structure. In the bank-NBFC model, the bank usually funds 80% of the loan and the NBFC the rest. The NBFC often leads the origination and customer engagement process, while the bank brings capital and risk oversight. This structure aligns incentives aptly, provided that underwriting standards are agreed upon at the outset. In contrast, in LSP collaborations, the lending entity retains full credit exposure. The LSP's value lies in lowering acquisition and processing costs, improving the customer experience and enabling faster disbursement using digital workflows. Also Read: Needed: A hard policy reset to make Indian banks shape up In both models, borrowers benefit from quicker credit decisions, less rigid scorecard-based lending and better servicing. To scale up collaborative lending models responsibly, stakeholders must address a few challenges. Short-term operational hurdles include aligning the partners. Misalignment is a practical challenge, especially in co-lending arrangements. Differences in underwriting practices, exposure norms or documentation standards can create delays or even disqualify creditworthy borrowers. For example, a co-lender may enforce stricter income verification than the originator, creating friction. Such misalignment can reduce credit flows and lead to provisioning surprises. Customer service accountability is another operational hurdle. Regulations assign clear responsibility to the lender for grievance redressal, but the on-ground execution becomes complex when multiple entities interact with the borrower. This is especially true in rural or semi-urban areas where borrowers may not be able to distinguish between a bank and its LSP or NBFC partner. Without systems that clearly define servicing roles, response timelines and customer experience can deteriorate. Also Read: Don't let uneven access to credit get in the way of Viksit Bharat A longer-term systematic concern is data security and governance. Collaborative lending involves sharing sensitive borrower data across systems. This becomes especially concerning when lightly regulated entities are involved. Strong data encryption, consent protocols and audit trails must be in place. To realize the full potential of collaborative lending, several developments are necessary. In the regulatory context, it would help to have more detailed guidance on co-lending governance, data-sharing protocols and customer-servicing standards. A framework that outlines shared responsibilities and escalation norms could improve execution and accountability. Technological innovation will also be key. Innovations such as real-time co-lending APIs, AI-driven underwriting and distributed ledger technology hold the potential to increase the speed of disbursement, reduce operating costs as well as underwriting errors, and increase confidence among co-lenders. Industry-level standardization—for example, common onboarding protocols or interoperable APIs between regulated entities—would help further reduce onboarding friction and enhance scale. The potential for collaborative lending in India goes well beyond credit expansion—it is about enabling financial dignity and access for millions of people and small businesses. For banks, it is an opportunity to grow without building new last-mile infrastructure. For fintech firms and smaller NBFCs, it offers access to capital and credibility. For borrowers, it means faster and fairer credit. We must not view these partnerships as mere business arrangements. They are ecosystems that thrive when all participants are aligned with the purpose. The author is partner, banking and capital markets leader, Deloitte India.
The Print
29 minutes ago
- The Print
Canada's defence spending declaration is a wake-up call for India. US' credibility is low
The issue came to light when spare parts for Denmark's fleet of stealth F-35 combat aircraft were diverted to Israel, which is in the midst of a brutal assault on Gaza. The argument, and contracted at that, is that spare parts belong to the US Defence Department until they are installed on the planes. All future operating software and such updates also remain the sole property of the US, thus severely undermining individual members' sovereignty, and with the patronising attitude of President Trump acting as a wake-up call, Canada has declared its security intentions clearly and emphatically. This 2006 pledge was repeated in 2014 by NATO Defence Ministers, and remains the essential figure for each member country to spend to make the alliance a formidable and globally employable institution. The Russia-Ukraine war has compounded NATO members' anxieties, but it is the erratic nature of policy formulation in Washington that has finally pushed members over the edge. They can't sit idly and be secure about the viability of the US security umbrella. Even as it questions the commitment of individual members towards NATO, the US has attached bizarre contractual conditions on delivered high-end combat equipment. The magic of collective security can be tossed out of the window in a flash, as Canada has learnt from the mercurial behaviour of United States President Donald Trump. And threats from this 'dangerous and divided world' have led Canada to make an executive declaration — to spend '2 per cent of GDP on defence' by the end of the current fiscal year. In doing so, it will match the basic standard figure expounded by the Brussels-headquartered military collective, North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. Member states, including Canada, pledged in 2006 to hit this figure. Many such powers across the world will have to look within, analyse threadbare, dispassionately, and then predictably come to the same conclusion. That in the current unstable world, made more wobbly by President Trump's policy upheavals, they will also be defined not just by the 'strength of our values, but also by the value of our strength', as current Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney recently declared. It's obvious, to even the most simple minds, that this can only come from greater defence spending, hence the magic figure of 2 per cent of GDP. This, of course, also includes the overall welfare of soldiers as well as research and development expenditure that contributes to defence. Also read: Victor Gao claims all land north of Ganga for China. People say he's a 'diplomatic fighter' India's position Much has been said about India and its defence expenditure, especially as a percentage of GDP. Like all data-driven debates, analysts are not on the same wavelength when it comes to calculating the precise figures. So if the purpose is to arrive at a reliable figure, in an unsubstantiated environment, it is safest to fall back on the original global institution, the World Bank. And the World Bank chart clearly shows that India's defence spending as a percentage of GDP has been hovering above the magical figure. And has been consistently so for the past few years. India is, of course, the only country that has two nuclear-armed neighbours, both of whom covet Indian territory. It is also the only country that has had armed conflict with these neighbours. And both these countries violate international treaties and norms only to pin down India. This is not an easy task given the current national resolve, emphatically visible during the recently concluded Op Sindoor. Whatever the initial global marketing blitz and hype, post-operation analysis with cool heads has shown reality to be very different. Even the stock market has corrected itself. Global turbulence, and not just of the stock market variety, should, nevertheless, serve as a wake-up call for Indian policy planners to prepare for far greater challenges coming to the neighbourhood. Especially given the fact that the prevailing unity among the democratic order has been subverted. By monetising security agreements at any opportunity, Washington has only lowered its own credibility ratings in the global security sphere. And all this while the world is not sitting idle, especially not those countries that see an opportunity beckoning. For the first time, two Chinese aircraft carriers are now seen operating in different parts of the Pacific Ocean, clearly sending a message as much to Washington as to the rest of Asia. An aircraft carrier, after all, doesn't operate in isolation. It is part of an enormous flotilla of ships, a carrier group in naval parlance. It takes fairly good operational art and extremely impressive military logistics to operate two carrier groups simultaneously. And when deployed in the same oceanic space, it is the simplest message to decipher. As the first part of the Indo-Pacific hyphen, India must lead. Manvendra Singh is a BJP leader, Editor-in-Chief of Defence & Security Alert and Chairman, Soldier Welfare Advisory Committee, Rajasthan. He tweets @ManvendraJasol. Views are personal. (Edited by Theres Sudeep)
Economic Times
29 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Japan's Nikkei falls as US stock futures decline, firmer yen weighs
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Japan's Nikkei share average fell on Thursday as a stronger yen prompted a sell-off of exporters, while declines in U.S. stock futures hurt Nikkei fell 0.7% to close at 38,173.09. The broader Topix slipped 0.2%."Investors sold Japanese equities as they bet Wall Street would be weak again later in the day, after seeing declines of U.S. stock futures in Asia hours," said Seiichi Suzuki, chief equity market analyst at Tokai Tokyo Intelligence Laboratory."But the Nikkei closed above the 38,000 level for a fourth consecutive day, it seems that the index has cleared the first hurdle for further gains."The S&P 500 ended lower overnight, with investors spooked by Middle East tensions, while a tame inflation report calmed concerns around tariff-driven price pressures and trade rs awaited more details on the China-U.S. trade talks.S&P and Nasdaq futures each fell about 0.3% in Asia yen strengthened about 0.6% to trade at 143.67 per owner Fast Retailing dropped 2.6% to drag the Nikkei the declined as the yen gained, with Toyota Motor and Honda Motor losing 1.5% and 0.9%, respectively.A stronger yen typically weighs on exporter shares by reducing the value of overseas earnings when converted back into Japanese yen's strength this week has worked to keep the Nikkei below 38,500, Mizuho Securities analyst Yutaka Miura said."The yen's appreciation trend is expected to continue moderately, which is likely to be a factor in limiting the upside of Japan stocks," he said, predicting the Nikkei will move in the 36,000-39,000 range this the trend among exporters, Nintendo rose 1.1% after the game maker said it had sold more than 3.5 million Switch 2 units in the first four days after its launch, making the console the company's fastest-selling gaming device to Pharma was far and away the Nikkei's top percentage gainer, surging by its daily limit of 17% after Daiwa Securities upgraded the stock.
