&w=3840&q=100)
Pakistan Army chief Munir rejects speculation over President Zardari's ouster
Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir has ruled out any change in the leadership, describing rumours about the removal of President Asif Ali Zardari as completely false and against both the government and the establishment, a media report said on Saturday.
In July, social media reports began to circulate that President Zardari may be asked to step down and that the army chief would take over the top office.
However, top government officials — Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi — rejected such claims.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Suhail Warraich, a columnist for the Jang media group, claimed in an article published Saturday that the army chief had spoken to him in person on the matter during a recent meeting in Brussels.
Munir briefly stayed in Belgium on his return from last week's visit to the United States.
'The talk started with politics, especially on rumours that there is some effort to change the president of Pakistan as well as the prime minister. Field Marshal Munir clearly said, during both the Brussels gathering and in his two-hour discussion with me, that the rumours about a change were completely false,' Warraich claimed in the column published in the Urdu daily Jang.
'There are elements behind this (rumour) who oppose both the government and the authorities and wish to create political anarchy,' the army chief was quoted as saying.
The article claimed that Munir also outlined his ambitions in the Brussels gathering, saying that: 'God has made me protector of the country. I do not desire any position other than that.' 'On a question about politics, he [Munir] said that political reconciliation is possible only if there is a sincere apology,' the report read.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Although it was not clear who Munir was referring to, it can be inferred that he may have been referring to the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf: and its incarcerated leader, Imran Khan. On foreign relations, Munir was said to have expressed confidence in maintaining equilibrium between the US and China. 'We will not sacrifice one friend for the other,' Munir was quoted as saying.
The army chief also described President Donald Trump's efforts for peace as 'genuine', and said Pakistan had taken the lead in nominating him for the Nobel Peace Prize, which was then followed by other nations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
an hour ago
- News18
'Pakistan Paying 10% Development Funds To Terror Group': JUI-F Chief's Scathing Attack On Govt
Speaking at an All Parties Conference, Fazl warned that the state had 'failed to protect its people, their lives and property,' leaving citizens at the mercy of armed groups. Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) chief Maulana Fazl-ur-Rehman has made a scathing attack on the federal and provincial governments, alleging that Pakistan is sinking deeper into chaos due to unchecked terror financing, extortion, and militancy. Speaking at an All Parties Conference, Fazl warned that the state had 'failed to protect its people, their lives and property," leaving citizens at the mercy of armed groups. According to him, militant groups are thriving across Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Balochistan, and parts of Sindh, with no real writ of the government visible. 'Institutions have completely collapsed. Militants have taken control of tribal areas, stopping people on roads, checking their IDs, kidnapping officials and looting civilians in broad daylight," Fazl said. The JUI-F chief also claimed that nearly 10 per cent of Pakistan's development funds were being siphoned off to militant groups through systemic corruption. This, he said, had turned terror financing into an institutionalised practice, undermining both governance and security. 'Extortion and ransom for kidnappings have become a parallel economy, while ordinary people live in fear," he remarked. He further warned that the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) routes — projected as Pakistan's economic lifeline — were no longer safe. Militants, he alleged, were frequently ambushing convoys, disrupting trade, and targeting workers. Fazl's remarks come amid growing tensions between the federal and provincial leadership over terror financing. Only days earlier, Pakistan's Interior Minister and the Chief Minister of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa accused each other of facilitating extortion networks and militant groups. By publicly acknowledging the scale of militancy, Fazl has exposed deep fissures within Pakistan's political establishment. His remarks underline the gravity of the security vacuum, with Pakistan increasingly struggling to maintain control in restive provinces where governance appears to have collapsed. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Pakistan rides high on US ties after clash with India, but it won't last
Pakistan's military, buoyed by recent India clashes, sees itself central to regional politics, with Army Chief Munir twice visiting the US, meeting Trump, and addressing overseas Pakistanis Bloomberg Pakistan's army — and its chief Asim Munir — are brimming with confidence at the moment. A bit more caution would be wise: The generals, who hold the real power in Islamabad, have a history of over-promising and getting their country into trouble as a result. The military is reveling in what it sees as its new centrality in regional politics. Munir has been invited to visit the US twice in as many months. On the last trip, he had a long lunch with President Donald Trump. This time around, he visited US Central Command in Tampa, and spoke to overseas Pakistanis about the nation's growing importance. That is, at least, how the generals see their position at the moment. The military emerged from a bruising confrontation with India in May with its domestic and international position enhanced. Several major airbases were hit by airstrikes, which is a major escalation when compared to previous confrontations. But the Pakistani public was nevertheless pleased by reports that several Indian warplanes had been shot down. This buttressed the military's case that they were the nation's irreplaceable guardians — an argument that the jailed former prime minister, Imran Khan, has tried for some time to undermine. Even more importantly, both civilian and military leaders were effusive in their praise of Trump and his administration, whom they credited with brokering an end to hostilities. This infuriated New Delhi, which has always refused to let anyone intervene in its disputes with its neighbor, but it endeared the Pakistanis to the White House. The Trump administration has also thanked the South Asian country for its willingness to provide a back-channel to Iran at a time of heightened tensions. Pakistan's capture of an Islamic State leader accused of plotting a bomb attack in Kabul in 2021 that killed 13 US soldiers was also viewed as positive. But the president is probably most pleased that Islamabad said it had officially nominated him for the Nobel Peace Prize. Partly as a result of this campaign of praise, Pakistan has managed to win a reasonable trade deal from Trump: The lowest tariffs in South Asia, at 19 per cent. Trump also announced that 'both countries will collaborate on developing Pakistan's extensive oil reserves,' and that he would shortly identify the lucky US company that would lead this partnership. This announcement is a bit of a head-scratcher. Pakistan doesn't have a lot of proven, easily accessible oil reserves. It did announce a big find last year, but details are yet to be confirmed; similar announcements in the past have had to be reversed. Even if it's correct, it isn't clear if developing these new reserves would make financial sense. Nor will it be easy to find a corporate partner, given how challenging the security situation remains. Even Chinese companies investing in a state they consider a reliable client have found themselves caught in the middle of various internecine ethnic and religious conflicts. Chances are that the generals just dropped a promise that they would put vast and undiscovered new oil reserves at America's disposal into Trump's ear, and that helped convince him he was getting a better deal. A few other developments might have caught the president's attention. In April, for example, less than a week after terrorists killed 26 people in Kashmir, raising the prospect of war on the subcontinent, Pakistan's finance ministry announced that its new crypto strategy would be run in cooperation with World Liberty Financial. The official press release explained that 'World Liberty Financial is backed by the Trump family, including President Donald Trump and his sons.' In June, the president disclosed that the crypto firm had earned him $57.7 million last year. Iran, oil reserves, crypto. The buzzwords are new, but the strategy isn't. The Pakistani military has always found some way of making itself useful to powerful foreign backers, whether in Beijing, Washington or the Gulf. But, as successive US administrations have discovered, the generals' promises sound good but are rarely kept. The military reuses these methods because they always survive the fallout. Pakistan, however, rarely benefits. If anything, the entire region gets less stable when its generals get overconfident. In Tampa, Munir was relaxed and expansive when talking to the Pakistani diaspora: He warned that a nuclear exchange between the two would impact 'half the world.' Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, speaking on the nation's Independence Day, shot back that 'nuclear blackmail' was unacceptable.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Trump runs into the difficulty of Putin diplomacy, ending long war
President Donald Trump walked into a summit with Russia's Vladimir Putin pressing for a ceasefire deal and threatening severe consequences and tough new sanctions if the Kremlin leader failed to agree to halt the fighting in Ukraine. Instead, Trump was the one who stood down, dropping his demand for a ceasefire in favour of pursuing a full peace accord a position that aligns with Putin's. After calls with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders, Trump wrote as he flew home from Friday's meeting in Alaska that it had been determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up. We're back to where we were before without him having gone to Alaska, said Fiona Hill, who served as Trump's senior adviser on Russia at the National Security Council during his first term, including when he last met Putin in Helsinki in 2018. In an interview, Hill argued that Trump had emerged from the meeting in a weaker position because of his reversal. Other leaders, she said, might now look at the US president and think he's not the big guy that he thinks he is and certainly not the dealmaking genius. All the way along, Trump was convinced he has incredible forces of persuasion, she said, but he came out of the meeting without a ceasefire the one thing he had been pushing for. Trump administration officials defended the move. Special envoy Steve Witkoff said on Fox News Sunday that Trump had talked about a ceasefire until he made a lot of different wins in this meeting and began to realise that we could be talking about a peace deal. The ultimate deal here is a peace deal. We are intent on trying to hammer out a peace deal that ends the fighting permanently. Very, very quickly quicker than a ceasefire, he said on CNN. Trump has touted himself as the president of peace Trump has tried to cast himself as a peacemaker, taking credit for helping deescalate conflicts between India and Pakistan as well as Thailand and Cambodia. He mediated a peace agreement between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo and another between the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan to end decades of fighting. Trump has set his eye on the Nobel Peace Prize, with numerous allies offering nominations. But Trump has struggled to made headway on the world's two most vexing conflicts: the Russia-Ukraine war and Israel's offensive against Hamas in Gaza. Some see a Putin win and a Trump loss In Europe, the summit was seen as a major diplomatic coup for Putin, who has been eager to emerge from geopolitical isolation. Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, deputy head of Russia's Security Council, praised the summit as a breakthrough in restoring high-level dialogue between Moscow and Washington. Former Swedish Prime Minister Carl Bildt called the meeting a distinct win for Putin. He didn't yield an inch but was also a distinct setback for Trump. No ceasefire in sight. What the world sees is a weak and wobbling America, Bildt posted on X. Witkoff disagreed. I think we ought to be focusing on what the end result is, he said. I think that we are a whole lot closer to eliminating death on the battlefield in Ukraine and Russia, and it's the overall goal.
