The economy's January air pocket
The good news about the U.S. economy in January is that inflation was subdued and Americans were making more money. The bad news is that people weren't interested in spending it.
Why it matters: The latest data on the state of the economy as President Trump took office is further evidence that there was something of an air pocket in spending and confidence to start the year.
It's a warning about consumers' wariness as the administration undertakes an aggressive economic agenda.
The intrigue: The Atlanta Fed's GDPNow, an estimate of GDP growth based on incoming data, fell to negative 1.5% for Q1 after incorporating Friday morning's releases.
That includes preliminary trade data showing a record surge of goods imported into the U.S. — a sign of businesses bringing things in early to get ahead of the administration's tariff threats. Rising imports are a drag on GDP.
Before Friday's data, GDPNow was comfortably in positive territory, at +2.3%.
What they're saying: "The data indicates that consumers were saving more in January, which aligns with the rise in economic pessimism we've seen in recent sentiment data," NerdWallet senior economist Elizabeth Renter wrote in a note.
"People are feeling uncertain about the near-future economy, and are spending a bit more cautiously," Renter added.
By the numbers: The Consumer Price Index released earlier this month indicated the inflation last month was hotter than expected. The Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index — the inflation measure preferred by the Federal Reserve — was more encouraging, as economists expected.
In the year through January, the PCE increased 2.5% — cooling for the first time since September.
Core PCE, which excludes energy and food costs, rose 2.6%, the slowest pace since 2021. On a three-month annualized basis, core PCE held at 2.4%, still higher than the Fed's 2% target.
Between the lines: Personal income sped ahead of inflation in January, increasing 0.9% (or 0.6%, adjusted for inflation). That surge was primarily led by the cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security benefits, along with healthy compensation growth and a boost from interest and dividend payouts.
Meanwhile, consumption expenditures fell 0.2%, the first decline in monthly spending since March 2023.
That resulted in a sharp rise in the savings rate, which increased to 4.6% from 3.5% in December.
Yes, but: Consumer spending is the bedrock of the economy, and one month of data doesn't mean the cracks are here to stay.
Isolated events, like the cold front and the Los Angeles wildfires, likely dented spending.
"The recent slump in consumer confidence suggests some of January's drop in spending was due to fears of the impact of tariffs, [Department of Government Efficiency] cuts and deportations," Comerica chief economist Bill Adams wrote in a client note.
"But winter weather also likely delayed a lot of nonessential spending, which should rebound in February with less disruptive weather. January's robust increase in incomes also suggests spending growth should recover near-term."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
U.S. bombs Iran nuclear sites, Trump issues warning
U.S. bombs Iran nuclear sites, Trump issues warning originally appeared on TheStreet. The U.S. has carried out a major strike on Iran on Saturday, bombing three of its key nuclear facilities — Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan. President Donald Trump confirmed the move on Truth Social, calling it a 'successful attack' and warning Iran not to retaliate. In an address to the nation, Trump said, 'Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities were completely and totally obliterated,' he said. 'Any future attacks would be far greater and a lot easier.' The strikes come on the ninth day of escalating conflict between Israel and Iran, with the U.S. now directly involved. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi reacted swiftly, calling the attacks a 'grave violation' of international law and said Iran 'reserves all options' to defend itself. 'The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences,' he posted on X, adding that Iran would act under the UN Charter's self-defense provisions. U.S. officials are on high alert for possible retaliation over the next 48 hours, especially against U.S. bases in the Middle East. In Latin America, however, the reaction has been less supportive. Leaders from Mexico and Cuba condemned the strike and urged diplomatic solutions. At the White House, top officials including VP JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard were present in the Situation Room during the attack. The U.S. Navy also launched 30 Tomahawk missiles as part of the strike. And Trump's message to Iran was loud and clear: 'ANY RETALIATION... WILL BE MET WITH EVEN GREATER FORCE.' As war jitters spread globally, crypto markets responded. Bitcoin slipped below $103,000, and Ethereum dropped 5.7% to $2,287. The total crypto market cap fell 3.7% to $3.26 trillion in the past 24 hours. Traders seem to be taking profits and hedging risk amid geopolitical uncertainty. U.S. bombs Iran nuclear sites, Trump issues warning first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 22, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 22, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
HELOC rates today, June 22, 2025: The interest rate on a home equity line of credit moves even lower (to 6.68%)
HELOC interest rates were even lower today, adding to a nice downward move yesterday. The continuing popularity of HELOCs means lenders are competing to win their share of home equity business with favorable interest rates. Homeowners with low mortgage rates on their primary mortgage may be looking to make home improvements or have other uses for the growing value locked inside their house. Known as a second mortgage, home equity line of credit accounts, and the lump sum version — the home equity loan — can be an excellent option for home equity access. Now, the details on HELOC rates today. Dig deeper: HELOC vs. home equity loan: Tapping your equity without refinancing This embedded content is not available in your region. According to Zillow, the rate on a 10-year HELOC dropped an additional two basis points to 6.68% today, after a nice retreat yesterday. The same rate is also available on 15- and 20-year HELOCS. VA-backed HELOCs ticked up three basis points to 6.33%. Homeowners have a staggering amount of value tied up in their houses — more than $34 trillion at the end of 2024, according to the Federal Reserve. That's the third-largest amount of home equity on record. With mortgage rates lingering in the high 6% range, homeowners are not going to let go of their primary mortgage anytime soon, so selling a house may not be an option. Why let go of your 5%, 4% — or even 3% mortgage? Accessing some of that value with a use-it-as-you-need-it HELOC can be an excellent alternative. HELOC interest rates are different from primary mortgage rates. Second mortgage rates are based on an index rate plus a margin. That index is often the prime rate, which today is 7.50%. If a lender added 1% as a margin, the HELOC would have a rate of 8.50%. However, you will find reported HELOC rates are much lower than that. That's because lenders have flexibility with pricing on a second mortgage product, such as a HELOC or home equity loan. Your rate will depend on your credit score, the amount of debt you carry, and the amount of your credit line compared to the value of your home. And average national HELOC rates can include "introductory" rates that may only last for six months or one year. After that, your interest rate will become adjustable, likely beginning at a substantially higher rate. You don't have to give up your low-rate mortgage to access the equity in your home. Keep your primary mortgage and consider a second mortgage, such as a home equity line of credit. The best HELOC lenders offer low fees, a fixed-rate option, and generous credit lines. A HELOC allows you to easily use your home equity in any way and in any amount you choose, up to your credit line limit. Pull some out; pay it back. Repeat. Meanwhile, you're paying down your low-interest-rate primary mortgage like the wealth-building machine you are. This embedded content is not available in your region. Today, LendingTree is offering a HELOC rate of 6.50% for a credit line of $150,000. That's likely an introductory rate that will convert to a variable rate later. When shopping lenders, be aware of both rates. And as always, compare fees, repayment terms, and the minimum draw amount. The draw is the amount of money a lender requires you to initially take from your equity. The power of a HELOC is tapping only what you need and leaving some of your line of credit available for future needs. You don't pay interest on what you don't borrow. Rates vary so much from one lender to the next that it's hard to pin down a magic number. You may see rates from nearly 7% to as much as 18%. It really depends on your creditworthiness and how diligent a shopper you are. For homeowners with low primary mortgage rates and a chunk of equity in their house, it's probably one of the best times to get a HELOC. You don't give up that great mortgage rate, and you can use the cash drawn from your equity for things like home improvements, repairs, and upgrades. Of course, you can use a HELOC for fun things too, like a vacation — if you have the discipline to pay it off promptly. A vacation is likely not worth taking on long-term debt. If you take out the full $50,000 from a line of credit on a $400,000 home, your payment may be around $395 per month with a variable interest rate beginning at 8.75%. That's for a HELOC with a 10-year draw period and a 20-year repayment period. That sounds good, but remember, it winds up being a 30-year loan. HELOCs are best if you borrow and pay back the balance in a much shorter period of time.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
The winners and losers in Trump's NATO arms race
NATO members are rushing to show President Donald Trump they're shoveling money into defense — some with a dose of creative math — as Russia's battle with Ukraine grinds on and war threatens to consume the Middle East. The group's summit this week in The Hague, which Trump plans to attend, will attempt to set a deadline for members to spend 5 percent of GDP on defense. Trump has complained about European defense budgets since his first term, claiming the U.S. gets ripped off by countries that rely on Washington for a security blanket. The way allies approach this at the summit is critical. Leaders will need to walk a tightrope between staying on the president's good side — and continuing to benefit from America's role in NATO — and declaring more independence from Washington. As Trump increases pressure, members are touting new investments and shuffling around money — from a 'defense-adjacent' Sicilian bridge to a stopgap German fund. A POLITICO analysis reveals telling gaps between the big spenders in Eastern Europe and those further afield from Russia, who are still creeping toward a decade-old target. The 32 member states break down into three groups: the winners, the risers and the laggards. Most countries occupy a crowded middle ground, not quite racing toward the new 5 percent goal, but making solid progress in exceeding the current 2 percent mark. 'Most of NATO recognizes that it has to be better,' said a U.S. Defense Department official, who like others, was granted anonymity to discuss internal conversations. 'We're looking at these meetings as a very public chance, with the president watching, for them to step up.' Here's how NATO members are faring in the race to spend. Poland has led the pack for the last several years, spending 4.7 percent of its GDP on defense as it splurges on everything from drones to fighter planes. The country, which borders Russia and has dealt with errant missiles killing citizens, is keenly aware of the threat from its eastern flank. That kind of wake-up call has spurred Warsaw to ask the European Commission to shift $6.9 billion of its funding in green projects to defense. The bigger spending has made Poland a favorite in Washington. The Poles are getting creative in their weapons purchases by mixing systems and suppliers from multiple countries to get equipment delivered faster. Poland was the first NATO member to spend billions on South Korean long-range artillery and other systems — a move that other countries frustrated with delayed shipments of U.S. weapons, such as Finland, are emulating. Countries will do 'whatever works' to get to 5 percent, said a diplomat from a NATO member country, including folding infrastructure upgrades into defense spending to push the overall number higher. Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia — former Russian territories that tend to march in lockstep when it comes to defense spending — have outlined plans to hit 5 percent by next year or soon after. They're already among the alliance's top spenders. Baltic officials are embracing a 'porcupine' strategy, modeled off Taiwan's efforts to ward off a Chinese invasion. This involves using small, mobile and lethal weapons fired from shore at any Russian Baltic Sea fleet ships that might threaten them. Greece is a surprise spender on defense, bucking the trend of most Mediterranean countries by dishing out more than 3 percent of its GDP. Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis in April announced a 12-year, $28 billion defense strategy that will focus on uncrewed vehicles, munitions, drones, satellites and its Achilles' Shield air defense system. The U.S. spends more than any other member on defense, but it still only reaches 3.4 percent of GDP. The country faces its own political challenges in reaching the NATO goal, even with a potential 2035 deadline that allies may recommend at the summit. The United Kingdom and France, Europe's two nuclear states, have made steady increases in recent years but face issues behind the scenes. Britain's defense budget rose from 2.2 percent of GDP in 2023 to 2.3 percent in 2024, with a sharp increase in research and development spending. It also paid extra for major operations such as air defense in the Red Sea and aircraft carriers deployed to the Pacific. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has promised to take that figure to 2.6 percent by 2026 — thanks in part to folding in intelligence and slashing spending on foreign aid. But he's beset by severe budget issues and has not yet set out a path to his goal of hitting even 3 percent. Paris has steadily increased defense spending since President Emmanuel Macron came to power in 2017. But it only hit 2 percent last year. France is one of the European Union's most indebted countries, and public finances are dire. It's unclear how the government would find extra money to reach the 5 percent goal, especially as Macron has ruled out raising taxes. Germany and Sweden have both rewritten their debt rules as they reach 2 percent and aim higher. German governments saw the NATO target as non-binding for years, and only the advent of war in Europe — dubbed the Zeitenwende, or turning point, by former German Chancellor Olaf Scholz — prompted the country to change course. Berlin in 2024 reported 2.1 percent of GDP on defense spending, exceeding the alliance benchmark for the first time since 1990. But the increase doesn't boost combat strength and relies on some fancy accounting. A sizable chunk of the 2024 defense budget came from a special temporary spending fund. Sweden's defense spending surged following its 2024 accession to NATO from 1.5 percent to 2.2 percent of GDP last year. Stockholm is tweaking its debt rules to allow for up to about $30 million in defense loans by 2035. Then there's Turkey. While Ankara has missed the 2 percent mark in recent years, it has a well-developed arms industry and punches above its spending weight in weapons and the size of its military — the second-largest in NATO. Several strategically vital countries hang well below the 5 percent goal, particularly Canada, Spain and Italy. All three have made pledges to catch up. But politics, accounting tricks and historical habits are slowing progress. Canada spends just 1.37 percent of GDP on defense, with key equipment gaps across its forces. Prime Minister Mark Carney this month promised to hit 2 percent 'this fiscal year,' bringing forward a target initially set up for 2029. The lag has deep roots. Ottawa has long relied on U.S. defense guarantees while prioritizing social spending and climate goals. Carney is framing rearmament as a sovereignty issue in light of Trump's threats to annex Canada, but that would require a rapid ramp-up in procurement and industrial capacity. Spain remains NATO's lowest spender, aside from Iceland, which has no army. Madrid spent 1.3 percent of GDP on defense in 2024. Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has rolled out an €11 billion military upgrade plan to reach 2 percent this year. It's the country's most ambitious defense posture in decades. But Sánchez is boxed in by his governing coalition. Left-wing allies remain opposed to higher military budgets, and previous attempts to raise spending triggered a backlash. He asked Rutte this month, in a letter obtained by POLITICO, for a carveout to the new spending target. 'It is the legitimate right of every government to decide whether or not they are willing to make those sacrifices,' he wrote, saying it would jeopardize the country's welfare system. Italy was only slightly higher at 1.5 percent last year. Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni said the government will hit the 2 percent target this year, but officials suggest that may happen more through clever accounting. Rome wants civilian infrastructure, such as a planned bridge to Sicily, to count as a defense-adjacent goal. Defense spending remains a politically fraught topic as the country faces high debt levels and strong pressure to protect pensions and welfare. This text is a collaboration of the Axel Springer Global Reporters Network. Paul McLeary reported from Washington, Chris Lunday reported from Berlin and Esther Webber reported from London. Jacopo Barigazzi in Brussels, Mike Blanchfield in Ottawa, Jack Detsch in Washington, WELT's Philipp Fritz in Warsaw, Max Griera in Brussels, WELT's Thorsten Jugholt in Berlin and Laura Kayali in Paris contributed to this report.
