logo
Unpacking claims nursing homes say they will 'close their doors' if GOP passes budget bill

Unpacking claims nursing homes say they will 'close their doors' if GOP passes budget bill

Yahoo03-07-2025
A June 2025 survey by the American Health Care Association (AHCA) found that 27% of nursing home providers said they would have to close facilities if Medicaid funding was reduced in the 2025 congressional budget bill One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
However, the survey represented responses from 363 nursing home providers about hypothetical actions they would take, not confirmed closure plans.
The survey was conducted by a trade association representing nursing home interests, to highlight industry concerns about proposed federal Medicaid cuts.
House Republicans have proposed approximately $880 billion in Medicaid cuts over the next decade in the bill, while the Senate passed its own version with a projected $930 billion Medicaid reductions.
In late June 2025, after U.S. House Republicans passed (archived) budget legislation proposing cuts to Medicaid, social media posts spread claiming that many nursing homes would be forced to close if the legislation advanced.
For example, on June 28, U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D‑Mass., wrote (archived) on Facebook: " BREAKING: 1 in 4 nursing homes say they will be forced to close if Republicans pass Trump's Big Beautiful Bill. No grandma should be kicked out of her nursing home so that Mark Zuckerberg can buy another Hawaiian island."
(Sen. Elizabath Warren/Facebook)
The post had received more than 140,000 reactions and 8,200 shares as of this writing.
Similar claims appeared on Facebook (archived) from Social Security Works, an American political advocacy group that calls for expansion of Social Security, as well as on X (archived) from Jesse Ferguson, former deputy press secretary for Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign.
The posts referenced survey data from the American Health Care Association (AHCA), a nursing home industry trade group. According to the organization's June 2025 "Provider Insights: Medicaid" survey of 363 nursing home providers, 27% indicated they would "close facility(ies)" if the federal government reduced Medicaid funding under the bill.
The survey asked: "If the federal government reduces Medicaid funding, what changes would your facility(ies) have to make?" Respondents could select multiple options. Beyond the 27% who said they would close facilities, 55% said they would reduce their Medicaid census (lowering the number or percentage of residents whose care is paid for by Medicaid), 58% said they would reduce current staff, and 77% said they would defer modernization efforts.
Snopes attempted to contact AHCA for additional details about the survey methodology and respondent characteristics. We have not yet received a response as of publication.
The AHCA survey provides context for why nursing home operators have expressed concern about potential Medicaid cuts. According to the survey, 80% of nursing homes were operating at a loss or with narrow profit margins of 3% or less. Specifically, 30% reported operating at a loss, while 50% reported operating with total margins between 0-3%.
Medicaid serves as the primary revenue source for nursing homes, accounting for 59% of their income on average, according to the survey. However, 62% of providers report that Medicaid reimburses less than 80% of their actual costs of care, with 24% saying Medicaid covers less than 60% of costs.
The survey found that 79% of nursing home providers were "extremely concerned" about potential Medicaid reductions, with an additional 13% "moderately concerned."
Meanwhile, a June 2025 analysis by Brown University School of Public Health researchers Vincent Mor and Fangli Geng commissioned by Senate Democrats identified 579 nursing homes nationwide at high risk for closure. According to the study, these facilities represent approximately 4% of all U.S. nursing homes and met three criteria: over 85% of patients on Medicaid, occupancy rates below 80%, and quality ratings of 1-2 stars on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Five-Star Quality Rating System. The facilities were distributed across 45 states, with Illinois having 93 high-risk facilities, Texas 66, Ohio 41, Missouri 39, and Georgia 37.
Regarding potential impacts of Medicaid cuts, the researchers wrote:
It is difficult to say for sure, but a payment freeze lasting more than a year could nearly double the closure rate. People tend to enter nursing homes that are close to their homes or near where their families live, so closures often result in greater travel for residents and their families. In many communities, nursing homes are a major employer of low-skilled workers, particularly in rural and exurban areas. When they close, those in the community have to look further afield for employment, and in rural areas, discharged workers may need to relocate.
The Brown analysis focused on facilities currently meeting specific risk indicators, while the AHCA survey asked nursing home operators about their anticipated responses to hypothetical funding reductions. The researchers noted that facilities with high Medicaid populations would be "differentially adversely affected" by payment freezes since they have limited non-Medicaid revenue sources.
On May 22, 2025, House Republicans passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, a budget reconciliation package that includes major changes to Medicaid. According to the Congressional Budget Office, baseline federal Medicaid outlays were projected to total $8.2 trillion over the next 10 years. Independent analyses, including those by the Kaiser Family Foundation (archived) and State Health and Value Strategies, estimated that the House legislation would reduce Medicaid spending by approximately $880 billion over that period.
The Senate approved its version, with deeper projected reductions of around $930 billion, on July 1, 2025.
As of this writing, the legislation was back in the House, which must decide whether to adopt the Senate-passed version or negotiate a final bill through a conference committee.
American Health Care Association. "Provider Insights: Medicaid." June 2025. https://www.ahcancal.org/News-and-Communications/Documents/AHCA-2025-Provider-Insights-Report-Medicaid.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2025.
Congressional Budget Office. "Re: Mandatory Spending Under the Jurisdiction of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce." 5 Mar. 2025. https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/2025-03/61235-Boyle-Pallone.pdf?utm_source=80m.beehiiv.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=budget-reconciliation-update-senate-and-house-republicans-set-to-kick-the-can-on-medicaid-spending-cuts. Accessed 1 July 2025.
House Budget Committee. "What They Are Saying: President Trump Congratulates House Republicans on Passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act." 27 May 2025. https://budget.house.gov/press-release/what-they-are-saying-president-trump-congratulates-house-republicans-on-passage-of-the-one-big-beautiful-bill-act. Accessed 1 July 2025.
Burns, Alice. "The Math is Conclusive: Major Medicaid Cuts Are the Only Way to Meet House Budget Resolution Requirements." Kaiser Family Foundation. 7 Mar. 2025 https://www.kff.org/quick-take/the-math-is-conclusive-major-medicaid-cuts-are-the-only-way-to-meet-house-budget-resolution-requirements/. Accessed 1 July 2025.
Mor, Vincent and Fangli Geng. "Response to Senate Finance Nursing Home Request." Brown University School of Public Health. 23 June 2025. https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/response_to_senate_finance_nursing_home_request_1.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2025.
State Health and Value Strategies. "Medicaid Provisions in the House Budget Reconciliation Bill." 22 May, 2025. https://shvs.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/SHVS_Medicaid-Provisions-in-the-House-Budget-Reconciliation-Bill_5.22.2025.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2025.
U.S. Congress. "H. Con. Res. 14 - Establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034." 119th Congress. https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/14/text. Accessed 1 July 2025.
U.S. Senate Committee on Finance. "Wyden Statement on New CBO Numbers Showing More Than $930 Billion in Medicaid Cuts in New Senate Draft." 28 June, 2025. https://www.finance.senate.gov/ranking-members-news/wyden-statement-on-new-cbo-numbers-showing-more-than-930-billion-in-medicaid-cuts-in-new-senate-draft. Accessed 1 July 2025.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Swiss see risk of tariffs increasing cost of U.S. F-35A jets
Swiss see risk of tariffs increasing cost of U.S. F-35A jets

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Swiss see risk of tariffs increasing cost of U.S. F-35A jets

(Reuters) -Switzerland remains committed to buying Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning II fighter jets from the United States despite an unclear total cost of procurement in part due to the impact of U.S. tariffs, the government said on Wednesday. The Swiss government reaffirmed its commitment to buying the jets a week after the United States imposed some of its highest tariff rates worldwide on Switzerland due to the size of the U.S. trade deficit with the European country. The price of the jets would ultimately depend on inflation in the United States, global commodity prices "and other factors such as price increases due to the tariffs imposed by the USA worldwide," the government said in a statement. Bern chose the F-35A as its next-generation fighter plane in 2021 for what it considered a fixed price of around 6 billion Swiss francs ($7.47 billion) for 36 jets. The U.S. has since said that sum was a misunderstanding. Talks with the United States to avert the total sum from potentially increasing by $650 million to $1.3 billion showed it was impossible for Switzerland to assert a fixed price, the Swiss government said. ($1 = 0.8028 Swiss francs) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Mark Cuban Says Rich People Should Get Incentives To Help Others, But Gets Asked Why The Working Class Only Gets Discipline, Not Incentives
Mark Cuban Says Rich People Should Get Incentives To Help Others, But Gets Asked Why The Working Class Only Gets Discipline, Not Incentives

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Mark Cuban Says Rich People Should Get Incentives To Help Others, But Gets Asked Why The Working Class Only Gets Discipline, Not Incentives

Billionaire Mark Cuban has been speaking out on social media, arguing that wealthy people should get targeted incentives to help others, while critics are asking why similar incentives aren't offered to the working class. Cuban's Incentives For The Rich Cuban recently argued on Bluesky that policy decisions have ripple effects, warning, "Think the 60% of Americans with stocks or retirement funds will like it when their savings crash? The layoffs when companies close and investment slows down considerably?" Cuban, who has long said he is fine with raising his own income taxes, proposed lowering corporate taxes for companies paying at least $25 per hour or giving employees stock at the same percentage as the CEO. "Bottom up incentives work. Dems never innovate. They bitch," he wrote. Don't Miss: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can That drew sharp criticism. One person replied, "It's always been funny how the rich need to be incentivized but the working class needs to be disciplined." The comment ratioed what Cuban wrote, meaning it received more engagement than Cuban's original post. They also questioned why Cuban would make this case so soon after a large corporate tax cut was passed, calling it tone-deaf, adding that many companies work to push wages as low as possible, undermining his claims about innovation. Defending Trump's Semiconductor Tax Structure Cuban also recently posted on X about a Trump policy imposing what he called a "billionaire's tax" on semiconductor sales to China from the most valuable company in the world, Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA). He credited Trump for using business leverage to get companies to pay, something he said progressives have failed to do. Trending: These five entrepreneurs are worth $223 billion – "POTUS is more progressive when it comes to taxation than anyone in the progressive wing of the Dems has ever been. The Dems should be celebrating just how progressive it is. The irony," Cuban wrote. While he disagrees with Trump on tariffs and most non-business issues, he called the move "the ultimate wealth tax" because it diluted all shareholders by 15% upfront. Cuban estimated the measure will result in Nvidia paying about $4 billion per year, connected to roughly $25 billion in high-margin revenue. He stressed that while it won't fix the deficit, it shows how targeting what wealthy companies need can result in significant tax revenue. Cuban's comments tie together a recurring theme in his public statements: using incentives to drive behavior. Whether it's corporate tax breaks for companies that pay higher wages, leveraging business needs to generate revenue from billionaires, or teaching his children to earn their own way, Cuban repeatedly comes back to the idea that motivation should come through opportunity rather than punishment. Still, the pushback shows that many people believe those same incentives should apply to working-class Americans, not just the wealthy. Read Next: Kevin O'Leary Says Real Estate's Been a Smart Bet for 200 Years — Bill Gates Warned About Water Scarcity. Imagn Images Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? NVIDIA (NVDA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Mark Cuban Says Rich People Should Get Incentives To Help Others, But Gets Asked Why The Working Class Only Gets Discipline, Not Incentives originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Sign in to access your portfolio

Cowboys owner Jerry Jones said he survived a stage 4 cancer battle that lasted more than a decade
Cowboys owner Jerry Jones said he survived a stage 4 cancer battle that lasted more than a decade

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Cowboys owner Jerry Jones said he survived a stage 4 cancer battle that lasted more than a decade

Jerry Jones sometimes says too much about his Dallas Cowboys. His cancer battle for more than a decade remained a secret though. Jones told the Dallas Morning News that he beat stage 4 melanoma. The Cowboys owner's battle lasted more than a decade, he said, and included four surgeries. "I now have no tumors," Jones, who is 82 years old, told the Dallas Morning News. Jones told the Dallas Morning News the initial diagnosis came in 2010. Over the next 10 years he had four surgeries, two on his lungs and two on his lymph nodes. He credited the experimental drug PD-1 — short for Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 — for his recovery. 'I was saved by a fabulous treatment and great doctors and a real miracle [drug] called PD-1 [therapy],' Jones said, via the Morning News. 'I went into trials for that PD-1 and it has been one of the great medicines." In an episode of the soon to be released Netflix series "America's Team: The Gambler and His Cowboys," Jones mentioned having cancer treatments, leading the Dallas Morning News to ask him about it in an interview. Jones is the NFL's most visible owner, and his Cowboys are the most valuable sports franchise in the world. They're the first sports team to pass the $10 billion mark in Forbes' annual survey. In 2017 — when, according to Jones, he was still fighting stage 4 cancer — he was inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Jones has no problem seeking out the media for attention on practically any matters regarding his team. But his long battle against cancer was out of the spotlight, until now.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store