
Starmer's EU ‘reset' risks betraying Brexit
Having brought trade negotiations with the United States to a lacklustre conclusion, Sir Keir Starmer is now preparing for the UK-EU summit later this month. As the contours of a potential deal with the bloc begin to emerge, concerns are rising over what the Prime Minister is giving up, and what he is winning in return.
A leaked draft of a new security partnership commits the UK to consider sending its Armed Forces abroad on EU military missions, and would effectively lock Britain's decision-making powers in Nato, the G7, the G20 and the United Nations to the EU in an aligned foreign policy, severely limiting the UK's room for independence. Separately, we may be preparing to concede long-term access for European boats to fish in our waters, and to agree a 'youth mobility' scheme for the under-30s.
In exchange for these concessions, Britain is seeking dynamic alignment with EU rules on food standards to reduce border frictions, and for Brussels to consider its participation in a £127 billion rearmament programme, with no actual guarantee of participation.
While British sources have insisted that no final deal has been reached, the direction of travel is concerning. It is entirely possible that we will strike a deeply uneven deal at considerable cost. Should this happen, it will reflect at least in part Sir Keir's failure to update his world-view to account for developments since 2016, a moment when Britain's leverage with the bloc was at its lowest.
With the German economy crushed by catastrophic mismanagement, populists surging across the Continent, a major land war unfolding on the EU's borders, and the US increasingly unwilling to shoulder the cost of defending it, the ability of the UK to win concessions is much greater.
Regrettably, this appears to have passed the Government by. Downing Street is still acting as if London is in far greater need of a deal than Brussels, and as if each crumb that falls from the EU's table should be gratefully received or dearly purchased. It is an attitude of a piece with his calamitous approach to negotiations over the Chagos Islands, and his willingness to give up too much to American and Indian negotiators in exchange for too little in return.
Sir Keir, an ideological Remainer, may have struck trade deals which will make realignment with the EU more difficult. He has not, however, struck deals which will make it impossible, and Britain should be deeply wary of his attempts to negotiate closer ties. The sting in the tail may be a real risk of London surrendering its hard-won Brexit freedoms without a fight, slipping into the EU's regulatory orbit without a voice and without a vote, making the path to rejoining all too real.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Austria plans stricter gun laws following deadly school shooting
The conservative-led administration confirmed the measures on Wednesday after a cabinet meeting. The gunman, a former pupil at the school in the southern city of Graz, legally owned the two firearms used in the attack: a shotgun and a Glock pistol. Under existing laws, a shotgun can be purchased by any adult not prohibited from owning weapons, following a three-working-day waiting period. The Glock pistol, however, requires a gun permit, for which individuals must be 21 or older and pass a psychological test. In response to the tragedy, the government intends to raise the minimum age for obtaining a gun permit from 21 to 25. Furthermore, the psychological test required for permits will be made more stringent, and the "cooling-off phase" for all weapon purchases will be extended to four weeks. "We ... promised that we would not go back to business as usual and that we would draw the right conclusions from this crime to live up to the responsibility we have," Chancellor Christian Stocker told a joint press conference with the leaders of the two other parties in the ruling coalition. "Today's cabinet decision shows that we are fulfilling that responsibility," he said. The school shooter, identified by Austrian media as Arthur A., failed the psychological test that is part of the screening for military service, but the armed forces are not currently allowed to share that information. The government plans to ensure such information is shared and taken into account in applications for gun permits, it said in a statement issued after the press conference. Newly issued gun permits will also expire after eight years, it added. The government said it planned to introduce a separate gun permit for those under 25 that would apply to the category of weapons that includes the shotgun the shooter used, but a spokesman said details were still being ironed out. Beyond gun ownership rules, the government plans to increase psychological counselling and monitoring at schools as well as ensure a greater police presence in front of schools until the end of the school year, Stocker said.


New Statesman
31 minutes ago
- New Statesman
PMQs review: The grooming gangs scandal continues to shake Parliament
Photo by House of Commons Kemi Badenoch must be fuming that Keir Starmer is flying back from the G7 in Canada right now, with Angela Rayner standing in for him at PMQs and convention dictating that the Leader of the Opposition also offers up a deputy. So it was that in a week where the headline topic remains the grooming gang scandal that Badenoch has decided is one of her key passion projects, it was one of her shadow ministers asking the questions. Badenoch has chosen not to have a regular deputy for these occasions, offering the job to a revolving cast of Tory frontbenchers. Unsurprisingly given what was obviously going to be the main issue, today it was the shadow home secretary. No, not Robert Jenrick (though you'd be forgiven for the mistake), but Chris Philp. That's the same Chris Philp who appeared with Badenoch on a panel of grooming gang survivors, parents and activists yesterday morning, during which they were urged that 'all the political stuff needs to be put aside' by survivor Fiona Goddard. And it's also the same Chris Philp who seemed to show very little interest in the scandal until Elon Musk brought it back to Westminster's attention in January, including for the almost two years in which he was policing minister in the Home Office. All of this meant that, when Philp began his questioning by noting he had met with survivors on Tuesday, he was greeted to heckles that he'd never met with any of them while in office. He brushed this off, adopting a dignified tone as he asked about survivors' justifiable insistence that the national inquiry announced on Monday will be fully independent, have statutory powers, cover all affected towns and put the affected individuals at its centre. It was an attitude that won him appreciation from Rayner, who struck a stateswomanlike poise as she thanked him for 'his tone and for putting the survivors central', adding wryly that she hoped members of his party would follow his lead. Badenoch's own tactic of ferociously hammering the government over Louise Casey's report, most notably in the Chamber on Monday afternoon, has drawn criticism – including from victims, and from Casey herself. The air of cross-party respect didn't last. Before long Philp was channelling his inner Badenoch, calling on Rayner to apologise for Starmer's claim in January (which the Prime Minister surely now regrets) that those calling for an inquiry were 'jumping on a bandwagon' and 'amplifying what the far right is saying'. Rayner responded with the universal Labour defence of pointing out what the Tories had done in office: 'precisely nothing'. It was notable that, while Philp raged, Rayner was flanked on both sides by female colleagues (Lucy Powell and Yvette Cooper to one side, Rachel Reeves and Bridge Phillipson on the other). It was a powerful image. From there, we got an unedifying spat over illegal migrant numbers, the failure of the Rwanda scheme, asylum accommodation and – a nice new addition, presumably due to Rayner's brief – house building. Philp walked into a number of traps Badenoch could have told him were coming. Bringing up immigration at PMQs enables whoever is representing the government to return to their comfort ground of the Conservatives' own record. Philp's retort that the Rwanda scheme 'never started' isn't quite the win he thinks it is, given one of the key reasons voters abandoned the Tories was a feeling the party was so incompetent it couldn't even do what it was said it wanted to. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe As for his line wondering aloud how Rayner 'has the brass neck to claim she's got it under control, when the numbers crossing the Channel this year are the highest in history', Philp should have guessed his adversary would be prepared. And she was, punching the Boriswave bruise (nearly a million arrivals in 2022-3 alone), reeling off stats, and condemning Philp for the 'one million pounds a day 'spiffed' up the wall' (an allusion, perhaps, to Boris Johnson's similar turn-of-phrase discussing money spent on historic child abuse investigations – at any rate, a new one for Hansard). It wasn't the finest audition piece from Philp. One wonders why Robert Jenrick wasn't chosen to stand in (although the answer to that may be apparent). Rayner brought less of her characteristic fire to today's proceedings, and all in all it was a somewhat anticlimactic session, with the mood around the House gradually souring. We had Lib Dem and SNP MPs ask about cuts to disability benefits, designed to rile up Labour backbenchers who are queasy about what Liz Kendall will be announcing later today. And instead of an explosive intervention from Reform's MPs, we got two planted questions: one about a Reform council cutting a fire engine in Nuneaton, and another about the dodgy arithmetic behind Nigel Farage's claim he could save £7bn of government spending by cutting DEI programmes. We did hear Rayner signalling that the UK would not join the US were Donald Trump to choose to attack Iran, and stressing the need for a diplomatic approach. But given Keir Starmer insisted the US had no intentions of bombing Iran just before Trump implied it was a live consideration, who can say. (This week's New Statesman magazine is a War Special, covering everything going on in the Middle East, including an insight into Benjamin Netanyahu's mind from his former head of personal security and a deep dive into what Iran will do next by Lawrence Freedman, for once you're done digesting PMQs.) Question of the day probably goes to Nick Timothy, who noted that channel crossings are up this year, and asked whether, if they fail to go down, the Home Secretary's job could be at risk. Yvette Cooper has so far not been a major target of the Tory frontbench, with the force of their efforts aimed more at Rachel Reeves, Ed Miliband and Bridget Phillipson. Is Timothy testing out a new attack line for the Conservatives? Or is he simply reminding his colleagues of his presence should a shadow ministerial vacancy come up? [See also: Keir Starmer's grooming gang cowardice] Related


Daily Mail
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
King Philippe of Belgium discusses abdication plans in new interview
King Philippe of Belgium has discussed whether he has plans to abdicate the throne in favour of his eldest child in a new interview. The 65-year-old Belgian king answered 30 questions put forward by the public in a video shared by the Belgian Royal Palace. One question asked Philippe, who is married to Queen Mathilde of Belgium, 52, about his plans for abdication, if any. 'A King steps back, but is not retired,' Philippe answered when translated to English via Hola. Should Philippe one day choose to abdicate, his eldest daughter, Crown Princess Elisabeth, 23, will ascend the throne. In his answer, Philippe continued, 'I will continue to work for Belgium and I must give my daughter time to enjoy her youth, develop herself and see the world and I support her 100 percent in that and I will do everything I can to give her all the time she needs to do.' Philippe's father, King Albert of Belgium, abdicated in 2013 after a 20-year reign, clearing the way for his son, Philippe, to take over as the nation's king. Aged 53 at the time, then-Prince Philippe took the oath before the nation's legislators at the Parliament building, a short walk across the Royal Park in the heart of the city. The future Belgian queen has certainly made the most of her youth, and is currently studying at Harvard University after finishing her undergraduate degree at Oxford University. In photos shared on the Belgian royal family's official Instagram page last September, Elisabeth appeared excited to settle into her all-American life amid reports she was already a highly sought-after companion among her peers. The Princess is currently enrolled in a two-year Master's program in public policy at the Harvard Kennedy School. Away from her royal duties, Elisabeth has embraced life as a student as she was pictured on the first day of term wearing an understated, yet chic, ensemble - complete with sneakers - in portraits shared by the Palace. The royal enrolled at the institution under the name 'Elisabeth de Saxe-Coburg' at Harvard Kennedy School. The palace told Brussels Times, 'The Princess was also selected for an 'Honorary Award' from the Fullbright Program, the US Department of State's international educational exchange programme. ' According to the university's website, the course aims to cultivate student's skills in preparation for them having a 'successful career in public service'. Princess Elisabeth has been touted as being one of the most intelligent royals - arguably surpassing Meghan Markle who was once dubbed the 'cleverest' of them. Not long after enrolling at the institution, the Princess celebrated her 23rd birthday, with the Palace releasing a series of sweet snaps to mark the occasion. Beaming towards the camera, Elisabeth wore a stylish in set from ba&sh, including a £240 short-sleeved vest with a jacquard pattern and a matching £230 midi skirt. The royal ditched a high-society snapper and had a fellow student called Max Bueno take the images - a scholarship student studying at the same school as Elisabeth. Max, a professional photographer, also documented the royal's first day at school in the official portraits shared by the Belgian Palace last September. According to HLN News, Elisabeth, had settled in well at her new American school because, perhaps unsurprisingly, 'quite a few people want to be her friend'. And proving her academic ability has never a struggle for Elisabeth, who only last year completed her studies at Oxford last year. Last summer, Princess Elisabeth thanked the University of Oxford for three 'wonderful' years. She moved to the UK in the autumn of 2021 to start her History and Politics undergraduate course at Lincoln College. Fiercely dedicated to not receiving special treatment thanks to her status, Elisabeth completed her entrance exam for Oxford 'anonymously' to ensure her royal status would not affect her chances of being offered a place, reported the Belgian newspaper Le Soir. Elisabeth graduated in three years with a degree in History and Politics, something she reportedly chose because she felt it would be most useful to her in her role as Queen later in life. After Elisabeth finished her studies in England, she took part in various engagements throughout the summer with her parents. An accomplished 23-year-old by any measure, the official royal website says Elisabeth enjoys walking in nature, reading and playing the piano – although like 'all youngsters her age', writes the palace, 'her taste in music is varied.' Elisabeth - who speaks Dutch, French, German, English, and has also taken classes in Mandarin Chinese - began attending royal engagements from a young age and was just nine when she delivered a speech at the opening of the Princess Elisabeth Children's Hospital.