
Canada update fields of study wey qualify for post-graduation work permits
Canada goment don change di kain education programmes wey fit give you work permit afta you graduate.
On 25 June, di Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) make some important change to di field of study wey qualify for Post-Graduation Work Permits (PGWP), so e go fit reflect dia updated labour market demands for 2025.
Dis na part of IRCC plans and priorities for Canada immigration for 2025 -2026.
Canada Minister of Immigration Refugees and Citizenship, Lena Metlege Diab, say immigration dey bring economic advantage for di kontri, but dem go work to reduce di kontri population.
"Many newcomers dey come here to build beta lives and to be part of Canada. Immigration don become economic advantage to Canada, and dat one dey come wit responsibility to maintain sustainable immigration level wey dey consistent wit our kontri community and service capacity."
For many wey wan japa go Canada through di student visa way, dis new changes go determine weda di field wey dem dey go study go fit qualify dem for PGWP.
Students for 119 new fields of study go dey eligible for PGWP, while IRCC don comot 178 fields of study from di eligibility list.
Dis new changes go affect all international students wey wan apply for non-degree programmes. Dis na programmes wey no go give you bachelor, master, or doctoral degree certificate.
E go also affect all di students go apply for study permit on or afta 1 November 2024.
If you don submit your study permit application before June 25, 2025, you go remain eligible for PGWP as long as your field of study dey di approved PGWP-eligible list during di time wey you apply, even if dem remove.
Changes to eligible fields of study
For di year 2025, na 920 fields of study dey eligible for di Post Graduate Work Permit.
Di IRCC completely remove educational programs in Transport from di current list of PGWP-eligible programmes, but dem leave only one educational programme in Agriculture, dat na Agri-food field.
Di latest eligible educational programs dey directly related to work for some key sectors wey di govment say dem experience ogbonge labour market shortage.
On di oda hand, di 178 fields of study wey no eligible again na sake of di kain work wey demd ey linked to, wey no dey experience labour shortages again.
Di 119 education programmes wey dem newly add na for fields like healthcare and social services, education and trades.
Dis na di first time wey dem dey add programmes for di education field of study to di PGWP-eligible fields of study.
Fields wey no elegible
Inside dis new change, if you wan do programmes for Agriculture, unless na for Agri-food field, you no go dey eligible for PGWP.
Education programmes wey eligible for 2025 na French language plus teacher education, biology and chemistry teacher education, computer teacher education, and drama and dance education.
Some STEM programmes sef no dey PGWP eligible again, including fields like environment, water, and natural resources, among odas.
Although di PGWP-eligible fields of study dey help immigration department give priority to students wey dey non-degree level, wey meet labour market demands for work permits, Express Entry categories dey allow IRCC to give priority to immigration candidates wey meet labour market demands for permanent residence (PR) selection.
Still, no mata which field of study pesin wan apply for, all students wey wish to get PGWP afta dem graduate, must to meet di kontri language proficiency requirements, according to di level of study.
Inside all of dis, graduates of PGWP-eligible flight schools no need to meet di field of study requirements.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer shares ‘deep regret' over divisive immigration comment after arson attack
Sir Keir Starmer expressed deep regret for using the phrase "island of strangers" in an immigration speech, admitting the language "wasn't right." In an interview with The Observer, the Labour leader said he was "not in the best state" to deliver the press conference, which took place hours after an alleged arson attack on his family home. The controversial phrase, used on 12 May, drew immediate comparisons to Enoch Powell 's divisive 1968 speech and sparked significant backlash. Sir Keir clarified he had no intention of echoing Powell's rhetoric and that neither he nor his speechwriters were aware of the potential interpretation. He took responsibility for not reviewing the speech more thoroughly, despite being shaken by the incident at his home.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Starmer's ‘island of strangers' speech didn't go far enough
Whether it is reversing planned cuts to winter fuel payments for the elderly, watering down welfare reform, or committing to a national statutory inquiry into grooming gangs after being so against it, Sir Keir Starmer has proven himself to be the master of the U-turn. Continuing the trend, the Prime Minister has now expressed his deep regret over the 'island of strangers' speech he delivered last month. Clearly rattled by accusations that his speech announcing the new immigration white paper echoed the anti-migrant rhetoric of Enoch Powell, the Prime Minister has suggested he could have been more articulate. I agree with him – but not for the reasons he has given. In fact, the Prime Minister's 'island of strangers' intervention – which was one of his stronger moments since entering No10 – should have been more forceful over the fact that Britain is a home which is being vandalised by liberal internationalists who view it as a charity and free-market fundamentalists who wish to treat as a shop. Britain should not be a borderless international outpost which is designed to maximise global welfare; neither should it be a transnational economic zone which serves to line the pockets of rootless elites. It should be a stable democratic national community which prioritises the standard of living and collective security of its law-abiding citizens. That is impossible to achieve with industrial-scale, low-skilled migration from parts of the world with vastly different cultural norms and living standards. The Prime Minister also had the opportunity to flesh out a more communitarian agenda for the country at large. Over time, we have become a more atomised and individualistic society – one defined by family fragility, declining community spirit, and a lack of solidarity between the generations. Rapid secularisation means that many churches are no longer at the heart of communal life in many communities across Britain. The harsh winds of globalisation ripped industry out of many traditional working-class areas, and this has damaged local civic pride. The only regret the Prime Minister should have on this front is failing to provide his much-needed 'island of strangers' speech with the intellectual weight it deserved. By caving in to the so-called 'progressive' attacks on it, Starmer has yet again proven himself to be a weak politician with little to no conviction.


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Starmer says he regrets using 'island of strangers' phrase
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said he regrets saying the UK risked becoming "an island of strangers" in a speech about prime minister was accused by some critics of using divisive language when he made a speech to announce plans to cut immigration in MPs compared Sir Keir's remarks to those made by former MP Enoch Powell in a well-known speech about immigration in the time, Downing Street rejected the comparison and said the PM stood by his words and his view that "migration needs to be controlled". But in an interview with his biographer, Tom Baldwin, Sir Keir said: "I wouldn't have used those words if I had known they were, or even would be interpreted as an echo of Powell."I had no idea – and my speechwriters didn't know either."But that particular phrase – no – it wasn't right. I'll give you the honest truth: I deeply regret using it."The interview was published in the Observer newspaper ahead of Sir Keir's one-year anniversary since becoming prime minister next Keir's comments suggest neither he nor his speechwriters were aware of any similarity to a line in Powell's 1968 that speech, Powell described a future in which Britons "found themselves made strangers in their own country".It is widely known as the Rivers of Blood speech because of Powell's reference to "the River Tiber foaming with much blood", when setting out his fears about immigration. In the Observer interview, Sir Keir said he made the speech on immigration not long after an alleged arson attack on his family home in London."It's fair to say I wasn't in the best state to make a big speech," Sir Keir said. "I was really, really worried."He said his wife Victoria was "really shaken up", adding "it was just a case of reading the words out and getting through it somehow".The Observer article quotes Sir Keir as saying he should have read through the speech properly and "held it up to the light a bit more".Responding to the interview, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said the PM's admission of regret at using the phrase was "absolute proof that Keir Starmer has no beliefs, no principles and just reads from a script"."This country needs a leader who has vision," Farage posted. The comparison to Powell was made by John McDonnell, who lost the Labour whip last year after rebelling on a welfare in Parliament in May, the independent MP said: "When legislation of this nature is being introduced that is serious and could be contentious, it's critically important that ministers use careful language."When the prime minister referred to... an island of strangers, reflecting the language of Enoch Powell, does she realise how shockingly divisive that could be?"In the same debate, Labour MP Nadia Whittome said immigrants were being "scapegoated for problems that they didn't cause" and that "the rhetoric surrounding this" risked stirring racial MP asked: "Why are we trying to ape Reform, when that will do nothing to improve our constituents' lives and just stoke more division?"Home Secretary Yvette Cooper later defended the language used by Sir said Starmer's speech was "completely different" to Powell's, telling the BBC: "I don't think it's right to make those comparisons."The prime minster said yesterday, I think almost in the same breath, talked about the diverse country that we are and that being part of our strength."I know that everybody always gets caught up in focusing on different phrases and so on, but we do have to be talking about the policies."The launch of the government's immigration plan in May followed local elections in England earlier this month that saw Labour lose the Runcorn and Helsby parliamentary seat to Reform UK.