logo
President Trump Could Sell His Tesla Model S Amid Elon Musk Feud

President Trump Could Sell His Tesla Model S Amid Elon Musk Feud

In the midst of his feud with Elon Musk, President Donald Trump may sell his recently purchased Tesla Model S.
U.S. presidents aren't actually allowed to drive, so the red Model S here is symbolic.
Tesla's stock price is suffering due to the very public feud, and the storm isn't over yet.
Where once the powerful feuded publicly in newspaper columns, social media has now enabled all sorts of angry outbursts to go very public, very quickly. Thus, the falling out between President Donald Trump and one-time ally Elon Musk involved a heated exchange that everyone with an internet connection was invited to. The rift has yet to heal, and now a White House official is indicating that President Trump might be selling off his red Tesla Model S.
Ownership of this car is largely symbolic, as U.S. presidents and vice presidents are not actually allowed to drive on the public road (there have been some exceptions, notably Lyndon B. Johnson's love of speeding around Texas). However, the contrast between the livestreamed event in March, where Tesla models were lined up on the White House lawn, and the President selling off the Model S he bought at the time, shows how icy the relationship between the two powerful figures has become.
getty images
This feud is not really a surprise to anyone familiar with the behavior of either of the combatants in the past. The spark that lit the fuse was Musk posting on his social media network, X, that the upcoming public spending bill recently passed by the House was financially irresponsible. President Trump responded, expressing that he was disappointed in Musk's comments.
Financially, the public squabble has been disastrous for Tesla's stock price, which tumbled 14 percent yesterday before slightly recovering today. SpaceX also relies heavily on government contracts, and one of Trump's threats on Thursday was to pull the funding for those contracts, which could also put that company in danger.
Online, there's been plenty of both schadenfreude and chagrin, depending on where people fall on the political spectrum. Should the feud continue or worsen, there's the potential for plenty of damage to both men. Trump selling off his Tesla publicly might not quite be a canary-in-the-coal-mine moment, but it is another escalation.
Certainly, neither figure here is short on ego, and neither is a stranger to airing their grievances. The fighting isn't over, and the arena couldn't be more public.
Brendan McAleer
Contributing Editor
Brendan McAleer is a freelance writer and photographer based in North Vancouver, B.C., Canada. He grew up splitting his knuckles on British automobiles, came of age in the golden era of Japanese sport-compact performance, and began writing about cars and people in 2008. His particular interest is the intersection between humanity and machinery, whether it is the racing career of Walter Cronkite or Japanese animator Hayao Miyazaki's half-century obsession with the Citroën 2CV. He has taught both of his young daughters how to shift a manual transmission and is grateful for the excuse they provide to be perpetually buying Hot Wheels.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Direct pay to college athletes starts July 1. Some key dates tied to implementation of settlement
Direct pay to college athletes starts July 1. Some key dates tied to implementation of settlement

Washington Post

time25 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Direct pay to college athletes starts July 1. Some key dates tied to implementation of settlement

It took five years for the $2.8 billion antitrust lawsuit against the NCAA and five major conferences to reach a settlement. Now comes the process for implementing it. Following are significant dates: Settlement approved; settlement-related NCAA rules are effective, as adopted by the NCAA Division I Board on April 21, 2025. NIL Go portal launches. Opt-in deadline for non-defendant schools to fully commit to revenue sharing. First date for direct institutional revenue-sharing payments to student-athletes. Opt-in schools must 'designate' student-athletes permitted by the settlement to remain above roster limits. With the exception of the 'designated' student-athletes, fall sports must be at or below roster limits by their first day of competition. With the exception of 'designated' student-athletes, winter and spring sports must be at or below roster limits by their first day of competition or Dec. 1, whichever is earlier. ___ AP college sports:

Trump says he thinks the government has a 'very easy case' against Kilmar Abrego Garcia
Trump says he thinks the government has a 'very easy case' against Kilmar Abrego Garcia

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says he thinks the government has a 'very easy case' against Kilmar Abrego Garcia

President Donald Trump on Saturday said that it wasn't his decision to bring Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador, back to the U.S. to face federal charges, saying the 'Department of Justice decided to do it that way, and that's fine.' 'That wasn't my decision,' Trump said of Abrego Garcia's return in a phone call with NBC News on Saturday. 'It should be a very easy case' for federal prosecutors, the president added. Trump added that he did not speak with Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele about Abrego Garcia's return, even though the two men spoke about Abrego Garcia during an April meeting in the Oval Office. His remarks came after Abrego Garcia arrived back in the U.S. on Friday and was charged in an indictment alleging he transported people who were not legally in the country. The indictment came amid a protracted legal battle over whether to bring him back from El Salvador that escalated all the way up to the Supreme Court. Abrego Garcia's family and lawyers have called him a family man, while Trump and his administration have alleged that he is a member of the gang MS-13. The case drew national attention amid the Trump administration's broader push for mass deportations. After Abrego Garcia's deportation, lawyers for the Trump administration said he was deported in an 'administrative error,' as Abrego Garcia had previous legal protection from deportation to El Salvador. Still, the Trump administration did not attempt to bring Abrego Garcia back, even as the Supreme Court ruled that it had to 'facilitate' his return to the U.S. Democrats, including Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., had for weeks said that Abrego Garcia was denied due process when he was detained and deported, arguing that he should have been allowed to defend himself from deportation before he was sent to El Salvador. Trump on Saturday called Van Hollen, who went to visit Abrego Garcia in jail in El Salvador in April, a 'loser' for defending the man's right to due process. 'He's a loser. The guy's a loser. They're going to lose because of that same thing. That's not what people want to hear,' the president said about Van Hollen. 'He's trying to defend a man who's got a horrible record of abuse, abuse of women in particular. No, he's a total loser, this guy.' On Friday, Attorney General Pam Bondi alleged that Abrego Garcia 'was a smuggler of humans and children and women. He made over 100 trips, the grand jury found, smuggling people throughout our country.' In a statement Friday, Abrego Garcia's lawyer called Bondi's move 'an abuse of power, not justice.' This article was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store