Awarding €100,000 to Gerry Adams is like spitting on the graves of those killed by IRA, says Austin Stack
The decision of a jury in the
Dublin
High Court
to award defamation damages
to the republican leader
Gerry Adams
'is like spitting on 1,800 graves', the son of a man murdered by the
IRA
has said.
Austin Stack was speaking in the wake of Mr Adams being awarded €100,000 for damage to his reputation arising from a 2016
BBC
programme, where it was alleged he sanctioned the killing by the IRA of republican informer Denis Donaldson in 2006.
'It makes a mockery of the 1,800 people that the IRA and the republican movement killed,' Mr Stack said. 'It is a complete mockery. It is like spitting on 1,800 graves, giving that man that money.'
Mr Stack (56) was a teenager in 1983 when his father, Brian, then the chief prison officer in Portlaoise Prison, was shot by the IRA on South Circular Road, Dublin. He was in a coma for six months, was paralysed from the neck down after he came out of the coma, and died 18 months after the shooting.
READ MORE
Mr Stack was 'extremely disappointed' by the outcome of the trial, where the BBC wanted to call him as a witness. This was not allowed by the trial judge who decided his evidence would not be relevant to the questions the jury had to answer.
'As a victim of the Troubles I believe that this has been another attempt by
Sinn Féin
- we have had a litany of individuals from that organisation, and I believe that this is the second or third one from Gerry Adams himself - where they are attempting to shut down the debate about the past,' Mr Stack said.
'I think that the fact that Gerry Adams took the case down here rather than in the UK speaks volumes in relation to our defamation laws.'
The loss of his father had a terrible and enduring effect on him and his family, Mr Stack said.
His mother and his family had never received any compensation for what happened to them.
[
Gerry Adams v BBC libel case: What the jury didn't hear
Opens in new window
]
'It is quite galling for people like me to see that Adams and his people are trying to change the narrative of what happened in the Troubles,' Mr Stack said.
'They are trying to whitewash it for the younger generation, romanticise it for the young. Adams tries to come across as your cuddly, grandfather type, you know, like they were out on boy scout missions.'
[
Inside Court 24: Gerry Adams's witness box quips were often met with laughter, including from the jury
Opens in new window
]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
21 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Trade tensions simmer under surface of cordial White House meeting between Trump and Merz
US president Donald Trump and German chancellor Friedrich Merz kicked off a White House meeting on Thursday with talks on Ukraine and trade but none of the fireworks that have characterised other Oval Office meetings with foreign leaders. Mr Trump described Mr Merz as a good representative of Germany and also 'difficult,' which he suggested was a compliment. He said US troops would remain in Germany and said it was positive that Berlin was spending more money on defence. Mr Merz said he was pleased to be there and preparing for a deeper relationship with the United States. The two leaders met in the Oval Office, which has been the site of showdowns between Mr Trump and visiting dignitaries including Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy and South African president Cyril Ramaphosa. READ MORE Mr Trump and Mr Merz, both conservatives, appeared to have a warm rapport from the start. Mr Merz started with praise, thanking Mr Trump for putting him up in the Blair House, a presidential guest dwelling across from the White House, and Mr Trump thanked him for doing so. But tensions over trade simmered under the surface of their encounter. The United States and the European Union are in talks to reach a trade deal, which would be critical for Germany's export-heavy economy, but Mr Trump said he would be fine with an agreement or with tariffs. 'We'll end up hopefully with a trade deal,' Mr Trump said. 'I'm okay with the tariffs or we make a deal with the trade.' Mr Merz, who took office last month, told reporters ahead of the meeting that they would discuss Russia's war in Ukraine, US tariffs and Nato in the meeting, but said he was not expecting major breakthroughs. Germany is the second largest military and financial backer of Ukraine in its defence against Russia's invasion, after the United States. Mr Trump has urged Nato countries to spend more on defence, though he suggested there might be some limits on how far Berlin should go given its second World War past. The meeting came amid a broader fraying of ties between the US and many European countries. Mr Trump's administration has intervened in domestic European politics in a break with past practice, aligning with right-wing political movements and challenging European policies on immigration and free speech. Mr Merz (69) and his entourage have sought coaching from other leaders on how to deal with Mr Trump to avoid conflict, according to a source briefed on the matter. The meeting took place just weeks before a critical summit of the Nato western military alliance, which has been strained by Mr Trump's threats that the US will not come to the aid of allies that do not increase their defence spending. Such threats are of particular concern to Germany, which has relied on US nuclear deterrence for its security since the end of the second World War. [ Donald Trump accuses Elon Musk of being 'hostile' to his administration Opens in new window ] [ Xi Jinping urges respectful trade talks in call with Trump Opens in new window ] Mr Merz has already made some bold policy moves that he can highlight to appease Mr Trump, analysts said. He has backed Mr Trump's demand for Nato members to commit to a target of more than doubling defence spending to 5 per cent of economic output in the future, earning praise last weekend from US defence secretary Pete Hegseth. Mr Merz, who has promised a more assertive foreign policy, also co-ordinated a visit by European leaders to Kyiv just days after taking office, two European diplomat sources said. 'This shows that Germany is willing to accept a greater responsibility for Ukraine and the European security order – these are all things that have been wished for in the United States over years and will be welcomed,' said Sudha David-Wilp of the German Marshall Fund of the United States. – Reuters
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on UK defence spending: a splurge of military spending
This week's publication by the British government of its long-awaited strategic defence review (SDR) marks the beginning of the most significant reform and upgrading of the UK's armed forces and defence since the second World War. The report, commissioned by prime minister Keir Starmer on accession to office, is a response to the dramatically changed security environment since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the perceived threat Moscow poses to Nato allies, and Donald Trump's insistence on Europe paying its share of the costs of its own defence. The initial commitment is to increase defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP this year, with an eventual target of 3 per cent. The purpose of the SDR is sobering. It is to 'increase national warfighting readiness'. It commits to a £15 billion investment in new nuclear warheads, and to 12 new attack submarines estimated at £2.6 billion each. Although land forces are not expected to increase, the report argues their lethality can be increased tenfold 'by harnessing precision firepower, surveillance technology, autonomy, digital connectivity and data,' in part learning from Ukraine. Nato ministers, moving in lock step with the UK, met on Thursday to ratify the organisation's defence spending target for members at 3.5 per cent of GDP. The SDR recommendations, accepted in their entirety by the British government, will cost some £67.7 billion by the end of the 2030s, posing huge challenges at a time when the government faces massive problems balancing its budget. Most controversially, the first casualty will be the slashing of the UK's international aid budget . READ MORE Ireland's defence establishment will note that a major part of the UK's strategic shift will be away from building expeditionary forces in favour of enhancing domestic protection, specifically by focussing on north Atlantic naval patrols to guard against Russian submarines. Ireland's vital underseas cable networks should receive added protection – and pressure will come on the Government here to contribute to this effort.
Irish Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Gerry Adams to donate €100k to Irish language and Palestinian charities
Gerry Adams said he will donate the €100,000 (£84,000) he is to receive in damages from the BBC to charities that help children in Gaza, the homeless in Ireland and Irish language groups. Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson, for which he denies any involvement. Last Friday a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him €100,000 (£84,000) after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. The BBC will also have to pay Mr Adams's legal costs. During an eight-minute video posted on the official Sinn Fein YouTube channel, Mr Adams accused the BBC of showing "arrogance" when it did not resolve the dispute after he issued legal letters nine years ago. In Putting Manners On The BBC – The Gerry Adams Blog, Mr Adams said that the BBC has been held accountable for the content it broadcasts. Mr Adams said: "As for the money that the jury awarded me in damages, I will donate this to good causes. "These will include the children of Gaza, groups in Ireland involved in helping the homeless, Cumann Carad, the Irish language sector and other projects like this in west Belfast." He added: "When the case began six weeks ago, the BBC's legal strategy was evident very quickly. Their narrative was that pursued by successive British and Irish governments for years. "They blamed everything during the conflict on Irish Republicans and by extension, during this trial, on me. "The BBC lawyers embarked on a Jesuitical presentation of the case that tried to convince the jurors that the words broadcast and published by the British Broadcasting Corporation, that I had sanctioned the murder of Denis Donaldson, did not, in fact, mean that I sanctioned the murder of Denis Donaldson. "They were, they said, that's the British Broadcasting Corporation, not defending the truth of the accusation. "Instead they were defending, they claimed, their journalism, which they said was fair and reasonable, in the public interest and made in good faith. "They concluded their case by trying to exert moral pressure on the jurors by claiming that a defeat for the British Broadcasting Corporation would be a blow to freedom of speech and a setback to victims. "In the end the jury didn't buy in to any of this. "On all the key issues the jurors unanimously accepted that the script used by the Spotlight programme did mean that I had sanctioned and approved the murder of Denis Donaldson." He said that after the BBC's decision to air the Spotlight programme, he decided to sue the broadcaster. Mr Adams said the BBC could have resolved the dispute there and then. "They chose not to. Why? That's a question to be asked. Why did they not resolve this issue when they could have? "Was it arrogance? Yes, that's part of it. But I also suspect political interference. "In January, the British Prime Minister Keir Starmer responded to a decision in the High Court in Belfast, which included that I and, by implication, up to 400 other former internees, were wrongfully detained and that we were entitled to compensation. "Mr Starmer told the British Parliament that he would look at every conceivable way to block compensation being paid." Mr Adams also urged the Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan to meet Denis Donaldson's family. He signed off by saying "slan agus tog go bog e", which means goodbye and take it easy. Earlier this week the BBC was granted time to consider appealing against the jury's decision. The broadcaster was granted a stay on paying the full costs and damages to allow it time to consider whether to lodge an appeal. The stay was subject to paying half the damages (€50,000 or £42,000) and €250,000 (£210,000) towards solicitors' fees.
