Trade tensions simmer under surface of cordial White House meeting between Trump and Merz
US president
Donald Trump
and German chancellor
Friedrich Merz
kicked off a White House meeting on Thursday with talks on
Ukraine
and trade but none of the fireworks that have characterised other Oval Office meetings with foreign leaders.
Mr Trump described Mr Merz as a good representative of Germany and also 'difficult,' which he suggested was a compliment. He said US troops would remain in Germany and said it was positive that Berlin was spending more money on defence.
Mr Merz said he was pleased to be there and preparing for a deeper relationship with the United States.
The two leaders met in the Oval Office, which has been the site of showdowns between Mr Trump and visiting dignitaries including Ukrainian president
Volodymyr Zelenskiy
and South African president Cyril Ramaphosa.
READ MORE
Mr Trump and Mr Merz, both conservatives, appeared to have a warm rapport from the start. Mr Merz started with praise, thanking Mr Trump for putting him up in the Blair House, a presidential guest dwelling across from the White House, and Mr Trump thanked him for doing so.
But tensions over trade simmered under the surface of their encounter. The United States and the European Union are in talks to reach a trade deal, which would be critical for Germany's export-heavy economy, but Mr Trump said he would be fine with an agreement or with tariffs.
'We'll end up hopefully with a trade deal,' Mr Trump said. 'I'm okay with the tariffs or we make a deal with the trade.'
Mr Merz, who took office last month, told reporters ahead of the meeting that they would discuss Russia's war in Ukraine, US tariffs and Nato in the meeting, but said he was not expecting major breakthroughs.
Germany is the second largest military and financial backer of Ukraine in its defence against Russia's invasion, after the United States.
Mr Trump has urged Nato countries to spend more on defence, though he suggested there might be some limits on how far Berlin should go given its second World War past.
The meeting came amid a broader fraying of ties between the US and many European countries.
Mr Trump's administration has intervened in domestic European politics in a break with past practice, aligning with right-wing political movements and challenging European policies on immigration and free speech.
Mr Merz (69) and his entourage have sought coaching from other leaders on how to deal with Mr Trump to avoid conflict, according to a source briefed on the matter.
The meeting took place just weeks before a critical summit of the Nato western military alliance, which has been strained by Mr Trump's threats that the US will not come to the aid of allies that do not increase their defence spending.
Such threats are of particular concern to Germany, which has relied on US nuclear deterrence for its security since the end of the second World War.
[
Donald Trump accuses Elon Musk of being 'hostile' to his administration
Opens in new window
]
[
Xi Jinping urges respectful trade talks in call with Trump
Opens in new window
]
Mr Merz has already made some bold policy moves that he can highlight to appease Mr Trump, analysts said. He has backed Mr Trump's demand for Nato members to commit to a target of more than doubling defence spending to 5 per cent of economic output in the future, earning praise last weekend from US defence secretary Pete Hegseth.
Mr Merz, who has promised a more assertive foreign policy, also co-ordinated a visit by European leaders to Kyiv just days after taking office, two European diplomat sources said.
'This shows that Germany is willing to accept a greater responsibility for Ukraine and the European security order – these are all things that have been wished for in the United States over years and will be welcomed,' said Sudha David-Wilp of the German Marshall Fund of the United States. – Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
42 minutes ago
- The Journal
A new organisation has taken over Gaza food distribution with disastrous results - who's behind it?
WHILE THE ENTIRE population of the Gaza Strip in Palestine remains on the brink of famine, and Israel refuses to allow in thousands of truckloads of humanitarian aid, an organisation called the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has taken over food distribution, with already disastrous results. The introduction of this new US and Israeli-backed entity into the besieged Palestinian territory has been part of Israel's plan to circumvent UN agencies and NGOs that already work in Gaza and have done so for decades. Those UN agencies and officials repeatedly condemned the establishment of the organisation, warning that it would allow Israel to weaponise the provision of food. NGOs said it would only serve to allow Israel to carry out a plan proposed by US President Donald Trump, and endorsed by Israeli government officials, which is to remove the Palestinian population from the area. At Nasser hospital in Khan Younis, people mourn those killed while gathering near a GHF centre on 3 June Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Trump's proposal to 'clean out' Gaza has been widely condemned as a plan for ethnic cleansing. The man who was initially heading up the organisation, US military veteran Jake Wood, resigned the day before it began operating in Gaza, citing similar concerns to those expressed by the UN. Israel has said the GHF is a means of preventing food and other supplies from falling into the hands of Hamas. In mid-May, Tom Fletcher of the UN's humanitarian affairs office called the Israeli-US plan to take over aid distribution 'a cynical sideshow'. 'Please stay away' Israeli forces have on a number of occasions now opened fire on crowds of hungry people who were making their way to distribution points operated by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). The term Orwellian may be overused in modern discourse but, in this case, it seems to be the most appropriate description for an ostensibly humanitarian organisation whose distribution centre almost immediately became the site of massacres. One witness to the latest Israeli attack told AFP: 'It's a trap.' Since Wednesday, the GHF has suspended all aid distribution until further notice after Israel declared roads leading to its hubs 'combat zones'. 'Please stay away from distribution sites for your safety,' the GHF said in a Facebook post on Friday. All of the Israeli attacks have taken place at a centre in the Tal al-Sultan area outside Rafah City in the far south of the territory. Advertisement Palestinians carry boxes and bags containing food and humanitarian aid packages delivered by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo The first deadly incident happened on the morning of Sunday, 25 May, when 31 Palestinians were killed by Israeli gunfire , according to the Gaza Civil Defence agency. The following morning, Israeli forces shot dead three people, according to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). And last Tuesday, 27 people were killed by Israeli fire near the site, according to health officials. Israel has denied firing on civilians, saying it fired 'warning shots ' and calling early reports 'false' while the GHF initially did likewise. The Israeli military did admit firing at 'suspects' who they said had moved in their soldiers' direction on Tuesday. Who funds and runs the GHF? The short answer to the question of who funds the GHF is, we don't know. The organisation is registered in the United States and while it has a website , all it says is: 'Delivering critical aid and support to the people of Gaza. More information coming soon'. The New York Times reported that the idea for an organisation like the GHF first came from Israel and opposition politician Yair Lapid has suggested it is funded by the Israeli government. People carry away supplies from a GHF centre in Gaza Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo The GHF said last month that a Western European country had donated more than $100 million but did not name the country. As for who runs the GHF, a little more is known. A former USAID contractor, John Acree, took over as John Wood's interim replacement and an evangelical preacher and former Trump campaign advisor named Reverend Johnnie Moore was named the new chairman on Tuesday. Also on Tuesday, US consulting firm Boston Consulting Group, whose participation had not previously been disclosed, terminated its contract with the GHF. With reporting from AFP Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... Our Explainer articles bring context and explanations in plain language to help make sense of complex issues. We're asking readers like you to support us so we can continue to provide helpful context to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Israeli businessman buys Ukrainian property formerly owned by Seán Quinn
A shopping centre and an office development in Kyiv formerly owned by businessman Seán Quinn have been sold by the Irish Bank Resolution Corporation (IBRC) to an Israeli businessman with operations in Ukraine. The properties – the Leonardo business centre and the Ukraina shopping centre – were sold for a price between €40 million and €50 million, substantially below the €70 million to €80 million they were worth when the IBRC first got legal control over the assets, according to sources. The sale, to Ofer Kerzner's City Capital Group (CCG) group, comes 14 years after Mr Quinn's assets were seized by Anglo Irish Bank after a disastrous contracts for difference investment by him in the bank's shares. After Anglo was subsumed into the State-owned IBRC, the bank engaged in a hugely expensive multi-jurisdictional battle with Mr Quinn and his family to assert its control over an international property portfolio that included the Ukrainian assets. READ MORE The Quinns, using offshore companies and a series of court actions in jurisdictions around the world, sought to frustrate the bank, creating a situation that was estimated to have cost the State up to €170 million in legal fees, lost rental income, and other costs. During the battle, both Mr Quinn and Seán Quinn jnr were jailed for contempt of court. [ IBRC liquidators hand €360m over to State as wind-up nears end Opens in new window ] The IBRC's efforts to assert control over the assets at one stage involved a deal with a Russian financial conglomerate, the Alfa Group , owned by a number of Russian oligarchs. Eventually the battle between the Quinns and the IBRC was settled. However, by then the developing tensions with Russia had affected property prices in Ukraine . The deal with the Alfa Group was unwound and the properties continued to be managed on the IBRC's behalf after the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine . Mr Kerzner is an Israeli citizen who has been doing business since 1998 in Ukraine, where his City Capital Group has an extensive property portfolio. One source said the price paid by City Capital is a very good one from its point of view, but involves a substantial risk given the ongoing war with Russia.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Ukrainian commander's final dispatch: ‘I had hoped my service and sacrifices would be enough, but they haven't'
Today is the 1,199th day since Russia 's full-scale invasion of Ukraine , and this is my last of six columns for The Irish Times. I'm sorry I cannot provide a definitive conclusion. The war shows no sign of ending. At best we hope for a temporary ceasefire. We nonetheless received a tremendous morale boost six days ago, when more than 100 first-person view (FPV) drones smuggled into Russia by the Ukrainian intelligence service, SBU, damaged or destroyed 40 bombers at bases from Siberia to the Kola peninsula. The SBU estimates we caused $7 billion in damage and destroyed 34 per cent of Russia's strategic aircraft. It was the most important Ukrainian victory of the war, and it was stupendous. These aircraft have been used by Moscow to terrorise Ukrainian cities. They are part of Russia's nuclear capability, so the attack was also a lesson to western allies who've been intimidated by Vladimir Putin 's threats of escalation. It was a humiliating blow to Putin. One wonders what other special operations the SBU is planning. On June 3rd it staged its third attack on the Kerch Bridge, Putin's prestige project, inaugurated in 2018 to link Russia to occupied Crimea. READ MORE Operation Spider's Web gave us a surge of joy comparable to the sinking of the Moskva , the flagship of Russia's Black Sea fleet, in 2022, or the Ukrainian incursion into the Kursk region of Russia last August. It may provide some respite to Ukrainian cities, and I hope it will change the narrative. Our allies always overestimate Russia's strength and underestimate ours. One of the principal tasks of the drone platoon I command, the Hellish Hornets, is to designate front-line targets for FPV drones. Based on our reconnaissance, drone pilots kill a couple of Russian infantrymen daily. We observe Russian bases and logistics farther behind the front line, but our infantry are often unable to strike them because shell hunger – the chronic shortage of artillery shells – continues. The SBU programmed the same type of drones, costing just a few thousand dollars each and with a range of 15-20km, to attack Russian aircraft worth hundreds of millions of dollars, on airfields thousands of kilometres away. Tiny drones were packed into hidden compartments in the ceilings of containers driven by Trojan trucks. The lids opened and drones flew out in attack mode. I don't know all the details, but I certainly agree with the British defence commentator who said the operation shows that Ukraine's armed forces are the most innovative in the world. In the Oval Office last February 28th, Donald Trump taunted President Volodymyr Zelenskiy with the words 'You don't have the cards.' Zelenskiy held his cards very close to his chest while he supervised the planning of Spider's Web over 18 months. Ukrainian memes and videos mock Trump now. In the weeks before Spider's Web, the Russians continued to ratchet up their bombardment of Ukraine. On the eve of our drone attack on Russian aircraft, they fired 472 Shahed-type attack drones at Ukraine – 100 more than the previous nightly record – and seven ballistic missiles. US president Donald Trump, right, and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy, in the Oval Office on February 28th. Photograph: Doug Mills/The New York Times Near our house in a front-line town, a civilian was killed and several were wounded. Last week our previous billet, which I decided to abandon three months ago, was obliterated. On May 28th, Makar, a middle-aged soldier from my company, was burned over 80 per cent of his body when a Russian glide bomb set fire to his unit's house. He's in hospital in Dnipro and we don't know if he will survive. A prisoner exchange was the only tangible result of talks between Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul on May 16th. The second session on June 2nd lasted only an hour but reached an agreement to exchange all prisoners under the age of 25, all who are seriously ill or wounded and 6,000 bodies. It was moving to see the famished, exhausted but joyous prisoners who were freed in May . The Russians had earlier tortured them psychologically by telling them they were going to be exchanged, then driving them back to prison. They didn't believe they were free until they saw Ukrainian flags and cheering people. The first thing they did was to call their family and say, 'Mom, I'm home!' I saw grown men crying. Trump has told European leaders that Putin isn't ready for peace because he thinks he's winning the war. Putin demands the lifting of sanctions, the disarmament and permanent neutrality of Ukraine, and even more Ukrainian territory than he has already seized. He wants unconditional surrender. We cannot accept that. Sometimes I think Ukraine is like a dog on a chain. The dog is fed enough not to die, but it is still chained. The owner of the dog is the West. I cannot see a path to a just, negotiated peace. We're preparing our society for the fact that the war won't end for as long as Russia exists in its present form. Putin is a dictator, but his death would not end the war, because Russia is more than Putin; it's a police state run by an intelligence service. Lt Yulia Mykytenko in Donetsk. Photograph: Julia Kochetova We've spent too much time and too many resources speculating about Trump, hoping he'll change. He kept threatening Putin with sanctions, but he never followed through and now he seems to have walked away from the conflict. I had to laugh when I read his May 26th post: 'I've always had a very good relationship with Vladimir Putin of Russia, but something has happened to him. He has gone absolutely CRAZY! He is needlessly killing a lot of people ...' Two US senators travelled to Kyiv to see Zelenskiy last weekend. I was encouraged by Sen Lindsey Graham's speech about a new package of sanctions that would badly hurt Russia. The sanctions Bill that Graham is promoting would impose 500 per cent tariffs on all countries who buy hydrocarbons from Russia. Graham is a Republican, and he won't bring the Bill to a vote unless Trump supports it. It's a long shot, but I need to have hope. It turns out the Europeans have paid Russia more for hydrocarbons since 2022 than they have given Ukraine in aid. They help fund the war by buying Russian gas and oil. Europe has not organised its defence industry, and the promise of a Franco-British security force is all but forgotten. Yet we have no option other than to trust the Europeans. They could be reliable allies if they wanted to be. They must decide if they want to be remembered as strong leaders who prevented a larger conflagration, or as appeasers. Putin may not want a ceasefire, but I think he overestimates his troops. On our section of the front line, the Russians hardly ever use armour, because we destroy it with FPVs. There are interviews with Russian soldiers on Telegram and YouTube and even on Russian propaganda channels. They say it was a mistake to join up for money. They say they are treated badly by their commanders and warn, 'Don't go there because you are going to die'. They are demoralised and they no longer see the point of the war. Zelenskiy said recently that Russia was recruiting 40,000-50,000 soldiers a month, compared with about 25,000 for Ukraine. They have to recruit a lot more because they lose a lot more, attacking all the time, all along the front line. In military academy they taught us that you lose three times as many soldiers on the offensive, but my impression is the Russians are losing five times as many as we are, because they don't hide or protect their soldiers. Ukrainian soldiers are exhausted, but we still know what we are fighting for. Despite my exhaustion, I am determined to protect my freedom and my family. I still believe that life is stronger than death. I will turn 30 next month. I must be careful not to gain weight. I need to be more active and eat less, take care of my skin. I just hope that maybe I will have a few years to live for myself, at last, and not for the army. Lieut Yulia Mykytenko with her younger brother, Bohdan, who intends to join Yulia's brigade this summer. Photograph: Yulia Mykytenko My little brother Bohdan will be eligible for the draft in a few months, when he turns 25. He'd rather join the 54th mechanised infantry brigade, where I've served since 2016, than be conscripted. Relatives can't fight in the same platoon, but I hope we'll be in the same company. Last September, Bohdan visited the Hellish Hornets in Donetsk and made himself useful repairing our vehicles. Of course, I will worry about him, but I believe every individual in Ukraine must protect himself and his family. I had hoped that my service and sacrifices – and the lives of my husband, my father and so many comrades – would be enough, but they haven't. Lieut Yulia Mykytenko's five earlier dispatches The Russians made them kneel in a line and shot them point blank The Americans have nerve, asking us to sacrifice teenagers Denys was skinny and muscular, with fair hair and blue-grey eyes. He was killed near Donetsk in February I think Putin is testing Trump, to see how far he can go and how many advantages he can get It may be extortionate, but I'd rather share our resources with US than Russia
