From tax suits to tech suites, it's a Recalibrate@Big4: Tech consultants now take up chunk of top advisory space
Traditionally known for their strengths in audit, tax and deal advisory, the Big Four in India have discovered an unlikely crown jewel in technology consulting. On the back of a post-pandemic digital transformation push, this has grown into the fastest-expanding vertical — now leading in headcount, partner strength and accounting for more than half of all new hires in FY25.
Ironically, these very firms—EY, Deloitte, PwC and KPMG—globally sold or spun off IT consulting divisions in the early 2000s, and only began rebuilding those capabilities in 2007-08.
That slow return has since turned into a full-fledged pivot—with the India market leading globally in both the scale and pace of that shift.'Consulting is now the new frontier,' said Sanjeev Krishan, chairman of PwC India.
Among the top four professional service firms, 60% of Deloitte's India workforce and 45% of EY's now comprise the tech consulting vertical, while PwC and KPMG both have approximately half of their India headcount dedicated to this business.
Recruitment will be dominated by technology consulting in FY26. Deloitte plans to hire another 6,000-8,000 people in this vertical. At KPMG, nearly 45 of every 100 new hires in FY26 will be in technology roles. PwC will hire 6,000-7,000 in tech consulting in the fiscal year.Sathish Gopalaiah, president, consulting, at Deloitte South Asia, said the firm had hired over 7,300 people as of April 2025, and by the end of May, that number will be close to 8,000. 'Our total headcount will cross 22,000 by then,' he said. 'Last year, our tech consulting business grew by 38%, and this year, we're on track to grow at 27% by the end of May.'Back-of-the-envelope estimates indicate that IT consulting generated over Rs 20,000 crore of the Big Four's combined Rs 38,500-crore India revenue in FY24—a trend expected to hold in FY25 as well, once all books are closed.Accelerating this business is India Inc's tech transformation drive gaining serious momentum, with large-scale projects underway at companies such as HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank, Shell, Unilever, HSBC, and several public sector units (PSUs).'The Covid-19 crisis was a watershed moment, ushering in an unprecedented era of tech-led transformation powered by cloud, data and analytics,' said Rohan Sachdev, managing partner for consulting at EY India. 'Today, AI-driven change is taking centre stage.'A look at tech transformation requests for proposals (RFPs) points to strong deal momentum in the consulting space—with over 30 RFPs valued above Rs 100 crore, more than 50 above Rs 50 crore and upwards of 75 proposals exceeding Rs 25 crore. The firms now have built capabilities to provide services across the IT value chain.'Iconic transformation happens at the intersection of consulting, technology & digital, and data & analytics. We're helping our clients move from opportunities to business outcomes by offering the best customised solution and service set,' said Sanjay Dawar, lead partner, One Consulting, at PwC India.But why are clients increasingly turning to the Big Four for technology transformation work, despite the presence of global tech majors such as Accenture and IBM, Indian IT services giants, a plethora of product companies and other pure-play tech specialists?Akhilesh Tuteja, national leader, clients and markets and technology, media & telecommunications (TMT), at KPMG India, explained, 'The top firms now have deep domain expertise, inhouse consulting capabilities, a technology advisory setup and strong collaborations with global tech alliances, making them one-stop partners for digital transformation.'KPMG has doubled its technology consulting business in the last three years, he added.After years of gaining experience and credibility, the Big Four surged ahead in tech consulting after Covid-19—when digitisation became unavoidable—by being the only ones capable of quickly marrying strategy with tech execution, mobilising cross-functional teams and driving company-wide change through automation and process innovation. 'Speed and RoI (return on investment) on fees is where we differentiate and win,' said Dawar of PwC.Interestingly, it's in the tech consulting domain that the most keenly contested battle in the Big Four is playing out, between early mover and overall market leader EY and aggressive and well-funded challenger Deloitte.Industry watchers say that technology consulting may well be the first front where Deloitte has finally managed to breach EY's leadership in any of the major service lines, with its aggressive investment-led growth, while EY maintains a lead in tax, deals, management consulting and audit.The firms are also investing heavily in technology consulting.It has taken centre stage in the refreshed global strategy of PwC, traditionally a strong player in technology implementation. The New Equation is emerging as the firm's biggest area of focus and investment.Deloitte is investing 9% of its total revenue in technology consulting, while at KPMG, it's 8% of TC earnings, including man hours spent in building solutions. PwC India has spent nearly Rs 300 crore on hiring partners, people and making acquisitions in the last two years.What's also helped the firms gain ground on tech companies is the global network of partnerships they've stitched up with companies such as Microsoft, Google, Intel, IBM and Salesforce, giving them early access to technologies in cloud, AI, data and cyber capabilities, among others.Within the technology consulting vertical, AI has emerged as the top priority, with firms channelling maximum focus, resources and energy into it, and finding strong traction among clients eager to experiment and integrate AI into their operations.'Clients' asks have evolved beyond, 'What use cases can AI deliver?' to strategic imperatives such as 'How do I transform my organisation with AI or embed an AI-first mindset across my business?',' said EY's Sachdev.KPMG's Tuteja said his firm was involved in at least 30 AI assignments and every large project had an AI component. It was becoming central to nearly every tech consulting mandate, he said.Big Four experts say they will be major players even in AI, as they already have a good understanding of clients' tech infrastructure and data setup. 'AI is part of every technology conversation these days. We have completed AI-enabled sales worth Rs 1,000 crore,' said Deloitte's Gopalaiah.Dawar of PwC India said that during 2000-10, consulting evolved from just making strategy decks to driving implementation, and the following decade was about marrying strategy with core technologies.'Post-2020, the focus has shifted to digital transformation—and today, it's largely also about generative AI,' he said. 'To truly leverage GenAI, companies must first get their foundation tech DNA right—by starting with the right infrastructure, data foundation and intelligence layers. It's about bringing these three pillars together and linking them seamlessly to enable tangible business outcomes. The firms have all the capabilities to deliver this end-to-end for clients.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
29 minutes ago
- Mint
How Docusign is modernizing the age-old business contract
When Allan Thygesen became CEO of Docusign in 2022, the company's stock was on a steep down-ramp after a nearly two-year rally. Shares of the digital agreements company's surged during the Covid-19 pandemic, peaking at $310. 'A lot of companies had overbought licenses," Thygesen told Barron's editor at large Andy Serwer in an interview for the At Barron's video series. As the pandemic cooled, some businesses' needs for virtual contract signing went away, he explained, adding, 'Of course, that is very disruptive inside the company." Thygesen, who joined Docusign after more than 10 years at Google, worked to turn things around. In the summer of 2023, a solution was conceived: implementing artificial intelligence assistance into the digital agreements workflow. Docusign started integrating its intelligent agreement management in early 2024 and rolled out an AI contract agent in April. Thygesen said Docusign now has about $3 billion in revenue from the 1.7 million businesses, nonprofits, and government organizations that pay monthly for its services. Ninety-five percent of Fortune 500 companies use Docusign, according to Thygesen. 'Docusign is probably the best-known company in signatures," Thygesen said. 'Most people regard Docusign as the gold standard for signing documents." In conversation with Serwer, Thygesen detailed the company's AI agent and how it is changing the business. Below are some highlights from their interview, which have been edited and condensed for clarity. Barron's: Some people might think of your company as a one-product company, but I bet you don't think of it that way. Allan Thygesen: We don't. But it's not unfair to say that we are so identified with our product category. As a result, we have built a tremendous amount of trust that over the years we've extended to other moments in the journey. An agreement goes through a journey. You draft it, you negotiate it, you execute it, and then you manage it once it is executed. And we have, over time, added pieces of all those workflows. If you want to sell mass-customized agreements, we can do that. If you want to verify the identity of people who you are sending documents to, we can do that. But we never really put the whole thing together and we never put it on modern plumbing. So that is what I've been working on. We announced our new platform called intelligent agreement management last year. And now we're releasing the full suite with modern AI built in. How do you go through the Docusign agreements journey? We help you create templates of various forms of agreements. You can then customize it, maybe pulling in data from your other systems. That creates a tailored agreement that then goes to the other party. You can go back and forth, and when you see their edits, you can have the AI review whether you approve or disagree with their comments. Then you sign electronically, of course, with Docusign. And then the agreement goes to our intelligent repository, where now we can give you AI-assisted intelligence about everything in those agreements. When is my agreement up for renewal? What would I want to renegotiate next time around? What are things I want to keep an eye on? All those things we can extract out of the agreements and present them to you. How is the AI rollout going? It is the fastest-growing product in our company's history. I announced at a customer event that we have over 10,000 customers live with the product already, which is just an exceptional ramp for a new software product. And we keep building new functionality. This spring, we're announcing a whole suite of new functionality, including a contract agent—using AI to automate the end-to-end agreement workflow. Let's imagine your job is to review contracts with all your vendors. We can automate every step in that process: checking the vendor, whether something has changed with them. Checking the contract, whether it complies with your templates now. Automating the communication with the vendor. Every one of those steps, which normally would have been a separate workflow and step for a contract person or procurement person, can now be fully automated. How are humans integrated into that process? That will be a risk-adjusted thing. Maybe if you're negotiating an nondisclosure agreement, you'd let the [AI] system just run it because there is a standard set of rules. But if it is a complicated, high-value agreement, there would be both a review on the front end and maybe multiple reviews during the negotiation process. So it is really tailored; the system is flexible enough to let you use as much or as little automation as you want. There is a lot of talk about Washington policies impacting different businesses in different ways. What does that mean for Docusign? We have a very diversified customer base across all industries, so we aren't as exposed to individual industries that might suffer more in the case of short-term swings in trade. And to the extent the trade shifts between countries, that also doesn't have a huge impact on us. Obviously, if global trade really compresses, that wouldn't be great for the big companies that work with us that import or export a lot. We haven't seen any evidence of that yet, but that could happen. The uncertainty could impact the investment climate, and we are an investment for companies. So we will just have to see. But we are hopeful—I think all Americans should be, that the U.S. economy can continue to perform strongly. Final question. Why should someone buy or hold Docusign stock now? We have the benefit of being trusted, well positioned, having established distribution, and we have a vision that I think addresses a very large pain point. We worked with Deloitte, and they estimated that over two trillion dollars are lost globally every year to inefficient agreement practices and systems. That is a meaty problem to attack, and I think we are in the best position to do it. And I think we are delivering. There is some good early evidence that customers are adopting. So I think it is a good story.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
US aerospace industry anxious as tariffs loom
US airlines and aerospace manufacturers insist they have no use for tariff protections, warning that the proposed Trump administration levies could eat into the healthy trade surplus the sector has enjoyed for more than 70 years. At the request of President Donald Trump, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick's department launched an investigation on May 1 to determine whether to impose tariffs of between 10 and 20 percent on civil aircraft and parts, including engines. The US industry those tariffs were crafted to protect swiftly let the administration know it was not interested. "Imposing broad tariff or non-tariff trade barriers on the imports of civil aviation technology would risk reversing decades of industrial progress and harm the domestic supply chain," the Aerospace Industries Association said in a letter addressed to Lutnick and obtained by AFP. The interested parties were given until June 3 to communicate their positions. The very next day, Lutnick announced that Washington aimed to "set the standard for aircraft part tariffs" by the end of this month. "The key is to protect that industry," he said, adding: "We will use these tariffs for the betterment of American industry." But AIA and the Airlines for America trade association voiced fear that far from helping, the tariffs would end up harming US manufacturers. "Unlike other industries, the civil aviation manufacturing industry prioritizes domestic production of high-value components and final assembly," AIA pointed out. According to the organization, US aerospace and defense exports reached $135.9 billion in 2023, including $113.9 billion for civil aviation alone. This allowed the sector to generate a trade surplus of $74.5 billion and to invest $34.5 billion in research and development, it said. The sector employs more than 2.2 million people in the United States across more than 100,000 companies, which in 2023 produced goods worth nearly $545 billion. In its response to Lutnick, the A4A highlighted how beneficial the international Agreement on Trade in Commercial Aviation had been by helping to eliminate tariffs and trade barriers over nearly half a century. "The US civil aviation industry is the success story that President Trump is looking for as it leads civil aerospace globally," it insisted. A full 84 percent of production was already American, it said, stressing that Washington "does not need to fix the 16 percent" remaining. "The current trade framework has enhanced our economic and national security and is a critical component to maintaining our national security moving forward," it said. For manufacturers, the potential tariffs would act like sand jamming a well-oiled machine that has been running smoothly for decades, experts warned. They would also throw off balance an ultra-sensitive supply chain still recovering from the Covid-19 pandemic. "To avoid the situation getting worse, we advocate to keep aerospace outside of trade wars," Willie Walsh, head of the International Air Transport Association , told the organization's general assembly last week. AIA meanwhile stressed that "aircraft and parts are already in high demand and have a limited supply." "Integrating new suppliers and expanding capacity is complex, timely, and costly," it warned, pointing out that finding suppliers capable of meeting rigorous safety certifications could "take up to 10 years." Delta Air Lines also argued for sticking with the status quo, cautioning that the proposed tariffs "would hinder Delta's ability to maintain its current trajectory." "If component parts incur tariffs upon entering the United States, Delta will be at a competitive disadvantage to foreign competitors," it said. "The action would also impose an unexpected tax on Delta's purchases of aircraft contracted years in advance." Delta chief Ed Bastian insisted in late April that the airline "will not be paying tariffs on any aircraft deliveries we take," adding that it was "working very closely with Airbus" to minimize the impact. Delta pointed out in its letter to Lutnick that it currently had 100 aircraft on order from Boeing, and that it was demanding that its Airbus A220s be produced primarily in Mobile, Alabama. But if the tariffs are imposed, it warned, "Delta would likely be forced to cancel existing contracts and reconsider contracts under negotiation." elm/tu/ph/nl/aha AIA Group Delta Air Lines Airbus Group BOEING
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Mukesh Ambani reveals why he didn't take admission in..., donates Rs 151 crore to....
Mukesh Ambani reveals why he didn't take admission in…, donates Rs 151 crore to… New Delhi: One of the most richest men in the world Mukesh Ambani has recently donated a hopping whopping amount of Rs 151 crore to the prestigious Institute of Chemical Technology (ICT), making it the biggest donation in the history of the institute. Notably, the chairman of the country's most valuable company – Reliance Industries – studied at the institute. Earlier known as the University Department of Chemical Technology (UDCT), the ICT was established in the year 1933 by the University of Bombay. It was given the status of a deemed university in 2008 and subsequently renamed as ICT. Ambani announced the donation at the launch of Anita Patil's book 'The Divine Scientist'. The book is based on the life of Padma Vibhushan Professor Man Mohan Sharma. Many students consider him to be the greatest guru of Indian chemical engineering. While speaking about Guru Dakshina, the Reliance Chairman discussed several topics and announced a donation of Rs 151 crore to the institute at the behest of Sharma. 'When they tell us something, we just listen. They told me, 'Mukesh, you have to do something big for ICT', and I am happy to announce that it is for Professor Sharma,' Ambani said. Why Did You Not Go To IIT-Bombay Responding to the question, why did you not go to IIT-Bombay? Ambani stated, 'Visiting the UDCT campus always feels like visiting a sacred temple. Professor Sharma, I regard you as my most respected Guru, my guide and source of inspiration.' He recalled his fond memories of the institute and also praised Patil, saying, 'It is a very difficult task to write the life of a great man like Sharma.' I chose UDCT over IIT -Bombay.' Ambani stated that Sharma's inaugural lecture solidified his belief in Sharma's exceptional abilities. He described Sharma as a transformative figure, capable of converting curiosity into practical knowledge, then into profitable ventures, and finally into enduring wisdom. Ambani attributed major growth within India's chemical sector to Sharma bestowing upon him the title of 'Rashtra Guru' (national teacher).
