Police investigate Enoch Powell portrait hung in village shop as ‘hate incident'
Mumfords, an ironmonger in Cleobury Mortimer, Shropshire, hung a framed picture of the divisive former Tory MP and an excerpt of his 1968 'Rivers of Blood' speech in February.
Shopkeeper Elizabeth Griffiths said she put the photograph in her window to highlight the 'need for strong assertive leadership during tough political times.'
But West Mercia Police said it was treating the A4 display as a 'hate incident' after receiving a report on Friday 16 May of 'offensive content'.
Mr Powell used inflammatory language and caused a national political firestorm when he criticised immigration to the UK in a 45-minute speech to local Conservative members at a Birmingham hotel.
The former Conservative MP for Wolverhampton South West said white British people would find themselves 'strangers in their own country' as a result of migration.
He was sacked from the Conservative front bench for making the speech and it outraged his senior colleagues at the time.
A hate incident is any non-criminal offence that a victim thinks is motivated by hostility or prejudice towards a person's race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or disability.
Last week, Sir Keir Starmer was accused of copying Mr Powell's words when he warned that the UK was becoming an 'island of strangers' while vowing to crack down on immigration.
Sir Keir said he would 'take back control' to slash the number of people coming to the UK as the country 'risks becoming an island of strangers, not a nation that walks forward together.'
Norwich South MP Clive Lewis said: 'It's simply not sustainable for the prime minister to echo the language of Enoch Powell's 'rivers of blood' speech.
'This kind of language doesn't just alienate communities, it drives people away from our country altogether.'
Downing Street rejected comparisons made with Mr Powell, who is a political hero of Reform leader Nigel Farage, and said Sir Keir 'absolutely stands by' his language.
Mrs Griffiths told The Independent the picture had been in her shop window since the first week of February and she had received 'nothing but praise for all the time it has been there'.
She said it was put there alongside Sir Winston Churchill, St Francis of Assisi, 'our Lord Jesus Christ', Churchill mugs and books on Churchill and Donald Trump.
A West Merica Police spokesperson told The Independent: 'On 16 May we received a report of offensive content displayed in a shop window on Church Street in Cleobury Mortimer.
'This is being treated as a hate incident and enquiries are ongoing.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Explained: How much is the government paying to house asylum seekers in hotels?
Anti- immigration protests have surged in recent weeks, with some targeting hotels used to house asylum seekers, sparking violence and prompting multiple arrests. Amid the demonstrations, misleading claims about the cost of accommodating migrants have been spreading widely online. But what does it actually cost to house asylum seekers in hotels — and how are false figures shaping public anger? Misleading figures spread online One focal point has been the Britannia Hotel in Canary Wharf, East London, which has witnessed clashes between anti-immigration protesters and anti-racism demonstrators, leading to the arrest of two people on 8 August. Social media posts and viral messages have claimed that housing asylum seekers in hotels costs the government between £200 and £500 per night. However, there is no evidence to support these figures. One expert claims these kinds of falsehoods are 'most likely spread with a strategic purpose in mind'. The real cost The Home Office told The Independent that the Britannia Hotel costs £81 per night to house asylum seekers. In March 2025, the average cost per night for a hotel room used to accommodate asylum seekers was £118.87 — down from £162.16 in March 2023. Across all hotels, this equates to around £5.77m per day, down from £8.3m per day the previous year. Stephan Lewandowsky, Professor of Cognitive Science at the University of Bristol, told The Independent that false information spreads because divisive posts attract more attention from readers. He said: 'Social media algorithms favour information that is outrage-evoking because it generates more audience engagement – hence making more money for the platforms – and in consequence disinformation often has an advantage over factual content and spreads faster and further. On top of that, the goal is, of course, to incite hatred and what better way to do that than to spread outrageous falsehoods.' These misleading claims are not just a matter of numbers. Experts warn they could amplify public anger and stoke already high tensions. 'There is now very clear and strong evidence that online misinformation can cause real-world harms. For example, last year's riots in the UK targeted mosques based on the false rumour that the perpetrator of a heinous crime was a Muslim refugee – he was not, he was a native-born British citizen,' Mr Lewandowsky said. Court ruling piles pressure on Starmer Pressure is mounting on Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer after Epping Forest District Council secured an interim High Court injunction to ban migrants from being housed at The Bell Hotel after weeks of protests at the site. The council argued the site had become a 'feeding ground for unrest' following a spate of violent protests that left several police officers injured. On 4 August, Starmer condemned the violence as 'far-right thuggery' and warned that those responsible would face the 'full force of the law.' For now, one of many challenges for ministers will be to ensure the facts about the costs of asylum hotels are reaching the public.
Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Take them to the tower: As Scotland's NHS is on its knees nationalist MSPs want to end oath of allegiance to King
Senior Nationalists have sparked outrage after demanding an end to MSPs swearing allegiance to the King – while public services 'collapse around them'. The move would require rewriting the Scotland Act which underpins devolution and votes in the House of Commons, House of Lords and Holyrood. The Scottish Conservatives said voters crying out for improvements in the NHS, education and policing would be repelled by the 'constitutional navel gazing'. Tory MSP Murdo Fraser called it 'the worst sort of petty student politics'. He said: 'Scots will be outraged SNP MSPs are focusing on this issue while our public services collapse around them. 'Parliament should be holding this failing SNP government to account on so many issues such as the ferry scandal, Scotland's record level of drug deaths and our flagging economy, rather than wasting time discussing this. 'It is typical Nationalist MSPs are yet again putting their obsession with the constitution above everything else and things that really matter to people.' Statistics this week showed worsening A&E waits, with more than a third of patients waiting more than the four-hour target to be seen, and growing numbers of cancer deaths. Recent weeks have also revealed a 15 per cent surge in drug overdoses, a stubborn attainment gap between rich and poor schools pupils, and growing numbers of crimes going unsolved. The annual GERS report also indicated a £26.5billion gap between public spending in Scotland and what is raised in tax, driven in part by a runaway welfare budget. Scotland is also still stuck in a cost of living crisis that has seen bills continue to soar. The row was triggered by former SNP minister Kevin Stewart calling for Scotland to follow the example of one of the smallest nations in the Commonwealth. The Caribbean island of Grenada last month agreed to change its oath of allegiance to remove the words 'His Majesty King Charles the Third, His Heirs and Successors'. In future, parliamentarians will simply swear allegiance to 'Grenada'. Mr Stewart tabled a parliamentary motion on Tuesday. The Aberdeen Central MSP said Holyrood should 'commend' Grenada for dropping 'the oath of allegiance to the British crown'. Urging MSPs to recognise 'the people of Scotland are sovereign', he said Holyrood 'should have the power to follow Grenada's lead and have its members pledge allegiance to the people of Scotland and not an unelected monarch'. By Wednesday night, the motion had been signed by another 11 SNP MSPs, including former housing minister Paul McLennan and ex-minister for parliamentary business George Adam. Scottish Green MSP Ross Greer and Labour left-winger Mercedes Villalba also supported the call, as did SNP-turned-independent MSP John Mason. A host of MSPs have complained about the oath since the Scottish parliament was revived in 1999. Within minutes of the devolution era beginning, then SNP leader Alex Salmond stated his 'primary loyalty lies with the people of Scotland' before being sworn in as the third ever MSP. Then Scottish Socialist Party leader Tommy Sheridan was sworn in 'under protest' in 1999, saying it was at odds with his 'vision for Scotland' as a 'democratic socialist republic'. In 2003, fellow Scottish Socialist Rosie Kane famously made her affirmation with 'my oath is to the people' written on her upraised palm. Hitting out at the latest bid to undermine the oath, Mr Fraser added: 'This is a shameless bid from an Nationalist MSP to try and pander to republican voters inside and outside of his party. 'The reality is the King and the monarchy remain one of the most loved and respected institutions across Scotland. 'Most people will wonder why Nationalist MSPs are focusing on this constitutional navel gazing when they should be tackling the real priorities of Scots... rather than engaging in the worst sort of petty student politics.' Alastair Cameron, chair of Scotland in Union, said: 'It's typical of the SNP to focus on trivial matters when so much else is going wrong. It's a waste of time and effort, and shows more than ever why Scotland must vote for change next May.' Labour peer George Foulkes, a former MSP, said the SNP habitually obsessed about 'trivia' and 'vanity projects' and voters were 'increasingly fed up with them'. He said: 'The papers are full of stories about people being let down by the NHS and schools and the justice system, yet the SNP is focused on irrelevancies. 'These strange diversions only play into the hands of the people who want to abolish Holyrood.'
Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Government issues urgent appeal for 5,000 homes to house 20,000 migrants
The Home Office has issued an urgent appeal for 5,000 properties to house up to 20,000 migrants amid an accommodation crisis caused by a landmark High Court ruling. Asylum accommodation contractors working for the Home Office 'reached out' to property specialists earlier in August, seeking 5,000 residential units. Insiders suggested each flat would have two bedrooms on average, with space to house four migrants. The move emerged on Wednesday, a day after Epping Forest district council was granted a temporary injunction by the High Court to shut down the Bell Hotel in Essex over alleged planning breaches after it became a focus for anti-immigration protests. The hunt for alternative accommodation is part of Labour's pledge to end the use of hotels for asylum seekers by the close of this Parliament in 2029. However, some 200 hotels are still being used by the Home Office to house more than 32,000 asylum seekers, a similar number to summer 2024 – after Labour was forced to find accommodation for the record 27,997 migrants to have crossed the Channel so far in 2025. The Epping council ruling threatens to spark similar legal challenges by other councils seeking to shut asylum hotels in their areas. Two dozen have already signalled that they will consider following suit which, if successful, could worsen the asylum accommodation crisis. Ministers are seeking to partner councils to buy, lease or rent houses and vacant properties in which to place asylum seekers as an alternative to hotels. Officials are also targeting disused tower blocks, student accommodation and old teacher-training colleges for use as 'medium-sized' accommodation sites. The new appeal is understood to have been seeking shorter-term leases or rents, where migrants would be accommodated for 90 days with an additional 30 days' notice. Similar 'contingency' accommodation has also been commissioned at the former Wethersfield RAF base near Braintree, Essex, where the Home Office has raised the cap of 800 migrants to allow 1,225 to live on the site. Residents were told at a meeting on Tuesday that the numbers had already risen to 890, with two intakes of 50 more asylum seekers scheduled every week. Wethersfield is the only 'large' site that Labour inherited from the Tories and kept open, despite Sir Keir Starmer saying before the election that it 'needs to close'. The two other major sites identified by the Tories – the Bibby Stockholm barge and RAF Scampton in Lincolnshire – have both been abandoned by Labour. On Wednesday, Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, called on the Government to guarantee that none of the asylum seekers removed from the Bell Hotel would be transferred to hotels or any other accommodation 'much needed for British people'. He also urged Sir Keir to call an emergency Cabinet meeting to draw up plans to deport all illegal migrants on arrival. 'The previous government established alternative accommodation on current or former military sites and an accommodation barge, which are all alternative options while deportation plans are put in place,' he said. Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, has launched the campaign Lawyers for Borders, which has already attracted top-flight barristers to advise councils on legal challenges to close asylum hotels. 'Every patriotic council, whether Conservative, Reform, whatever, should follow Epping's lead and seek an injunction. And if you are a council or a community group and you need our help, contact my office. If you're a lawyer and you want to join the fight, contact me,' he said in a video on X. 'Let's create a new movement, Lawyers for Borders… We need to put as much pressure as possible on Keir Starmer to change the law, to deport every single illegal migrant who's here, and to close all the hotels.' A Home Office spokesman said: 'This Government has consistently said the use of hotels to house asylum seekers is neither sustainable nor suitable as a long-term approach. 'We remain committed to working with our partners to identify more suitable and cost-effective alternatives.'
