logo
Chesapeake Bay oyster population stays strong, but budget cuts sow concern

Chesapeake Bay oyster population stays strong, but budget cuts sow concern

Yahoo21-03-2025

The Chesapeake Bay Foundation and Chesapeake Oyster Alliance served oysters grown by Maryland aquaculture businesses at their lobbying day outside the State House on Tuesday. (Photo courtesy the Chesapeake Bay Foundation)
Chesapeake Bay oysters had another good year in 2024, new Maryland data shows.
Oyster reproduction levels were above the median for the fifth straight year, according to the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, which surveys for the bivalves each year in the bay and its tributaries.
The overall population was also strong, with the third-highest level over the past 32 years. In addition, the data showed a decline in the prevalence of oyster diseases, which proliferated in 2023 amid high salinity conditions.
'The 2024 Fall Survey confirms Maryland's oyster population is doing well, with the key indicators showing encouraging results,' said Christopher Judy, director of DNR's Shellfish Division. 'Certain low-salinity regions still need to improve, but overall the findings are promising for the near-term future of this vital species.'
But even with the promising data, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation and other advocates are concerned for the future of oyster programs, given the uncertainty of state and federal budgets.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
'We are concerned that there would be an opportunity to disinvest in oyster restoration moving forward, which has resulted in some of the important gains we have seen over the past few years,' said Allison Colden, Maryland executive director of the Bay Foundation.
In particular, CBF cited potential cuts to the state's Chesapeake and Atlantic Coastal Bays 2010 Trust Fund and the Clean Water Commerce Program, which contribute funding to oyster plantings as well as aquaculture operations. Legislative analysts had included those programs among a list of potential cuts as the state struggles to close a projected $3 billion deficit for fiscal 2026.
The House Appropriations Committee on Thursday rejected cuts to the Clean Water Commerce Program, but approved the transfer of $10.5 million out of the bays trust fund. It could have been worse: Analysts had recommended cutting the trust fund without limitation through fiscal 2029.
The money transfered out this year would be moved to general DNR operating expenses.
'The transfer will enable DNR to continue to fully fund and staff all programs, grants, interagency transfers, and planned projects,' read a statement from department spokesman A.J. Metcalf.
Oysters are filter feeders, meaning that they can purify the bay's waters, removing harmful nutrients and sediment. As a result, the success of their population is seen as critical to the bay's overall health.
2023 was a banner year, particularly for baby oysters, known as 'spat.' High salinity in the bay, spurred by drought conditions, contributed to strong spat numbers, including 'once-in-a-generation' results in the Potomac River.
But the 2023 conditions were also favorable for the spread of diseases MSX and Dermo, which can cause die-offs in oyster reefs.
Luckily, the disease numbers declined in 2024, as a rainy start to the year inundated the watershed with fresh water and drove salinity downward.
The 'spatset' in the Potomac River returned to a 'modest' level in 2024, according to DNR. But gains were observed elsewhere, including in the 'rare' observation of spat north of the Chesapeake Bay Bridge.
To Capt. Robert Newberry, chairman of the Delmarva Fisheries Association, which represents watermen, the new data is evidence that a healthy oyster population can coexist with a strong oyster harvest. He decried oyster sanctuaries, where harvesting is prohibited.
'You got problems with oysters? You call an oysterman,' he said.
Colden said the successes with oysters show the value of a multipronged restoration effort, including oyster plantings at sanctuaries and elsewhere in the bay, and plantings on oyster farms, which yielded $13.3 million in economic output in 2023, with more than 94,000 bushels harvested, compared to about 430,000 bushels in the wild fishery during the 2023-2024 season.
But she fears that cuts not just at the state level, but at the federal level, could call into question future efforts.
Colden said she wonders about state government employees focusing on oyster restoration, whose positions are funded by federal money, and about the fate of federal grant programs that sponsor new oyster reefs, and monitor current reefs.
'We're in a really good place with the areas that have been restored, but if we just walk away forever? … We won't know how those reefs are doing,' she said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UnitedHealthcare sues The Guardian for defamation after explosive nursing home story
UnitedHealthcare sues The Guardian for defamation after explosive nursing home story

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

UnitedHealthcare sues The Guardian for defamation after explosive nursing home story

UnitedHealthcare is suing British newspaper The Guardian for defamation, alleging that the outlet falsely accused them of enticing nursing homes to enroll in a special program that works to restrict medical expenses for elderly patients. "The Guardian knowingly published false and misleading claims about our Institutional Special Needs Program, forcing us to take action to protect the clinician-patient relationship that is crucial for delivering high-quality care. The Guardian refused to engage with the truth and chose instead to print its predetermined narrative," UnitedHealthcare told Fox News Digital in a statement. The Guardian article, published May 21, claimed that UnitedHealthcare is pursuing cost-cutting tactics that jeopardize the health of nursing home patients. The article claims that the health insurance giant provides what amounts to secret bonuses to enroll in a program that stations medical staff that reports directly to UnitedHealthcare, and in practice works to reduce hospitalizations for patients, some of whom allegedly may urgently need the care. Unitedhealthcare Ceo Murder Suspect Luigi Mangione Indicted In New York The article also claims UnitedHealthcare financially entices nursing homes to join their "Institutional Special Needs" program, and allegedly illegally had nursing homes share confidential patient data with the insurer so that it could skirt federal law and market programs to patients – some of whom lack the capacity to make financial decisions on their own – and families. The Guardian also alleged that UnitedHealthcare leaned on nursing home staff to convince patients to sign DNR's, even if they had expressed a desire for all medical options to be used to save their life. "A recent article published by The Guardian presents a narrative built largely on anecdotes rather than facts. It is unfortunate that the article misrepresents a program that, in reality, improves health outcomes for seniors through on-site clinical care, personalized treatment plans, and enhanced coordination among caregivers. We stand firmly behind the integrity of our programs, which consistently receive high satisfaction ratings from our members," UnitedHealthcare said in a statement in response to the article in May. Read On The Fox News App The lawsuit alleged that The Guardian used a "heavily cropped screenshot" of an internal UnitedHealthcare email which they claim, when seen in full, contradicts their reporting. The suit also accuses The Guardian of "gratuitously" linking its report to the assassination of their former CEO Brian Thompson. Unitedhealth Shares Slide As Criminal Probe Report Adds To Investor Fears "The Guardian knew these accusations were false, but published them anyway," the lawsuit stated. The Guardian told Fox News Digital it stood by its reporting. "The Guardian stands by its deeply-sourced, independent reporting, which is based on thousands of corporate and patient records, publicly filed lawsuits, declarations submitted to federal and state agencies, and interviews with more than 20 current and former UnitedHealth employees – as well as statements and information provided by UnitedHealth itself over several weeks. It's outrageous that in response to factual reporting on the practice of secretly paying nursing homes to reduce hospitalizations for vulnerable patients, UnitedHealth is resorting to wildly misleading claims and intimidation tactics via the courts," a representative from The Guardian said. Click To Get The Fox News App When asked by Fox News Digital for clarification regarding the "heavily cropped screenshot," a representative for The Guardian said the image was in fact a "visual illustration" and the so-called missing information was provided "in an on-record comment and a denial from UnitedHealth" in the proceeding paragraph. The Guardian rep also claimed that UnitedHealthcare never asked the press outlet to alter the article source: UnitedHealthcare sues The Guardian for defamation after explosive nursing home story

Flying boats make for a rare sight as Washington clears an island of derelict vessels by helicopter

time3 days ago

Flying boats make for a rare sight as Washington clears an island of derelict vessels by helicopter

OLYMPIA, Wash. -- As the owner of a marina, Kate Gervais is used to seeing boats in the water. But for the last couple of days, she's been seeing them in the air. The Washington Department of Natural Resources this week used one of its firefighting helicopters to haul abandoned boats off an uninhabited island in the southernmost reaches of Puget Sound, where the vessels had come to rest after drifting with the currents, and fly them to the mainland to be deconstructed later. With 14 vessels removed, it was the agency's largest operation of its kind, officials said. 'It was a very, very weird sight,' said Gervais, who owns Boston Harbor Marina, just north of Olympia. 'The sail boat with the mast was the weirdest one to see.' A boat removal by helicopter is typically done by a private pilot, but for this operation, which was funded by a federal grant, the DNR opted to use one of its firefighting helicopters. It was cheaper and helped stretch the $1 million NOAA grant, said Commissioner of Public Lands Dave Upthegrove. The state agency opts to airlift boats when towing them would disrupt the marine bed or surrounding environment too much. The aquatic lands where the boats land often include kelp beds, which are critical for supporting the forage fish that salmon rely on. Vessels for this operation where found in hard-to-reach coves, at the tree line or in mud that rendered an airlift a better option, agency staff said. Since the boat removal program began in 2002, the department has hauled out more than 1,200 derelict vessels. There are at least 300 more out there, with more found all the time, Upthegrove said. 'It's a real challenge impacting the Puget Sound when people essentially dump their old boats into the water because they don't want to deal with disposing of them," he said. "That burden then falls on all of us.' The federal grant allowed the state to clean up boats on Squaxin Island, an uninhabited island that is of particular cultural importance to the Squaxin Island Tribe. The tribe's people once shared vast lands in western Washington state, but following the 1854 Treaty of Medicine Creek, the island — 4.5 miles (7.2 kilometers) long and half a mile (800 meters) wide — was the main area reserved for them, according to the tribe's website. Eventually, the tribe's members moved off the island, but they continue to use it for fishing, hunting, shellfish gathering and camping. 'The Squaxin Island Tribe is very enthusiastic about this opportunity to work with DNR to clean-up derelict vessels on tribal lands,' said Daniel Kuntz, the tribe's policy and program manager. 'Maintaining clean beaches and water are essential to the Squaxin Island culture to ensure gathering access for future generations.'

Public meeting on proposed CAFOs slated for Thursday in Pierce City
Public meeting on proposed CAFOs slated for Thursday in Pierce City

Yahoo

time28-05-2025

  • Yahoo

Public meeting on proposed CAFOs slated for Thursday in Pierce City

PIERCE CITY, Mo. — The Missouri Department of Natural Resources will hold a public meeting from 4:30-6:30 p.m. Thursday at the Pierce City High School gymnasium, 300 N. Myrtle St., Pierce City, to hear public comments on eight proposed concentrated animal feeding operations that could be built in Newton and Lawrence counties around this area. For those who are unable to attend the meeting in person, DNR is also accepting written comments through Friday, May 30, sent to cafo@ This in-person public comment meeting is to discuss and provide a permitting regulatory framework for the draft permits on five facilities to be built in Newton County near Wentworth and Pierce City and four in Lawrence County near Verona or Monett. The Missouri Coalition for the Environment, a grassroots group raising awareness of concentrated animal feeding operations, or CAFOs, said it's trying to spread awareness of this meeting to make sure the public knows about the kind of farming operations coming close to their homes. 'This opportunity for public comment comes in the wake of the 2025 Missouri legislative session, in which the Senate Agriculture committee chair Sen. Jason Bean, Republican from Southeast Missouri, refused to schedule a hearing for a key bill that would have given local county commissions more leeway in regulating CAFOs,' the Coalition for the Environment said in a news release. 'This bill, SB 400, was introduced by Senator Tracy McCreery, Democrat from St. Louis County, and would have reinstated the authority of local health boards and county commissions to pass ordinances that impact agriculture. Missouri Legislators revoked this local control in 2019 with the passage of SB 391, which stated that county commissions cannot 'impose standards or requirements on an agriculture operation' more stringent than statewide regulations. Since then, there has been an expansion of CAFOs in the state.' The coalition said hosting an in-person hearing for multiple CAFOs at once is an unusual move by the DNR. The MCE said not all agricultural operations are equal and CAFOs create undue burdens for the surrounding community. Environmental health costs include excess nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus running off into surrounding waterways, contributing to toxic algal blooms and aquatic dead zones. 'It is unjust for communities to bear the health and property costs of CAFOs without an avenue for recourse,' said Melissa Vatterott, the MCE's director of policy and strategy. 'Communities should have the chance to work with their local government to put practical parameters in place as to where and how these facilities can operate.' More information is available at Documents concerning the CAFOs that will be subject of this meeting can be read at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store