logo
2026 mayor race: As speculation swirls, we talked to John Dailey, other possible candidates

2026 mayor race: As speculation swirls, we talked to John Dailey, other possible candidates

USA Today27-01-2025
2026 mayor race: As speculation swirls, we talked to John Dailey, other possible candidates
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Tallahassee Mayor John Dailey assesses city response to winter storm
Tallahassee Mayor John Dailey assesses city response to winter storm
There's no shortage of politicians whose names are being bandied about as potential candidates for Tallahassee mayor in 2026.
Chief among them is the mayor himself, John Dailey, who after serving three terms as county commissioner and winning two hard-fought mayoral contests has been said to be wavering on whether to seek a third term.
Dailey, who leads the 3-2 majority on the City Commission, hasn't made any official announcements about his political future. However, he signaled through an aide last summer that he indeed plans to file again.
'He is running,' Dionte Gavin, Dailey's chief of staff, told the Democrat in August. 'And the mayor is clearly focused on moving the city forward. He's leading the charge.'
Dailey gave absolutely no indication that he might not run again on Thursday, when he talked with reporters outside City Hall.
'We're doing great work,' he said, 'and about a year from now, I'll sit down with the family, we'll have a great conversation, we'll figure out what our next move is going to be, whether it's re-election or not, and we'll make announcements from there.'
Last summer, the rumor mill was in overdrive about not only whether Dailey would run again but also who might have ambitions to succeed him, from sitting city and county commissioners to former legislators and members of Congress.
'The larger rumor is that he's not going to run,' said Gary Yordon, a veteran political consultant and former Leon County Commissioner. 'I don't believe it. He seems to enjoy the job. And you know, it's kind of a look in somebody's eyes when they've had enough. I haven't seen that look.'
Others, even some of his closest supporters, aren't so sure. Just before the new year, Gregory James, a pastor and nonprofit CEO, posted a photo on Facebook of him and former U.S. Rep. Al Lawson at a local Waffle House. He told Lawson that the mayor's position would 'look good on you' and asked him to consider a run.
James, a Dailey backer, said in an interview that he hasn't spoken with the mayor about his plans. But he said 'it's been floating around that he's not doing it anymore.'
'If our city is going to keep moving forward, there has to be a viable candidate that's going to run,' said James, who ran for a state House seat in 2022. 'I see (Lawson) as that.'
The list of potential mayoral candidates is long if Dailey leaves the seat open and up for grabs. It's much shorter if he decides he wants to stay put, perhaps limited to candidates with only outside chances.
No one has filed to run for any city or county office in 2026, let alone the mayor's race.
More than a half dozen others have been mentioned as possible candidates, including Bill Montford, former school superintendent and state senator, and Loranne Ausley, former state representative who succeeded Montford in the Senate but lost to Sen. Corey Simon, R-Tallahassee, in 2022.
Montford, who gave $500 to Dailey's 2022 campaign, did not return a phone call. Ausley was seriously injured last year in a bicycle accident and returned home earlier this month from a spinal cord and brain injury rehab center in Atlanta.
Here are other names that have come up as potential mayoral candidates:
Leon County Commissioner Christian Caban
Caban, first elected to County Commission District 2 in 2022 and re-elected last year without opposition, didn't rule out a run for mayor in a text to the Democrat. He said he was 'humbled' by the support of community leaders who believe 'that we could serve our community at a higher level.'
'It means our brand of community focused leadership is being noticed and appreciated, which is truly gratifying to hear,' Caban wrote. 'Having just been reelected to serve District 2, my current focus is on continuing to deliver wins for our neighbors so we can make Leon County and Tallahassee the best place in the state to live, work and raise a family.'
Since taking office, Caban has played an outspoken role on the commission and the Blueprint board and has been highly visible during disasters, standing beside Gov. Ron DeSantis during a press conference on Hurricane Idalia in 2023.
Caban, managing partner of Wolf Hospitality Group, which owns Recess, Clyde's and Costello's and the Governor's Inn, also has more than $125,000 parked in his political committee should a mayoral opportunity arise.
Former Congresswoman Gwen Graham
Graham, an attorney, served in Congress from 2014 to 2016, earning a reputation as one of its more bipartisan members. She opted not to run for re-election after redistricting divided her district in two, one a GOP-friendly 2nd District and the other a minority-access District 5.
The daughter of the late Florida Gov. Bob Graham, she ran for Florida governor herself in 2018 but was edged out by then-Tallahassee Mayor Andrew Gillum, who went on to lose the general election to DeSantis. She later served on the city's Independent Ethics Board.
In 2021, she was nominated by President Joe Biden and confirmed by the Senate as assistant secretary for legislation and congressional affairs in the U.S. Department of Education.
Graham, who recently exited the department ahead of the arrival of President-elect Donald Trump, is back in town but declined to comment for this story.
Former U.S. Congressman Al Lawson Jr.
Lawson, a former Florida A&M University basketball star and Florida State University basketball coach, spent a combined 28 years as a Democrat in the Florida House and Senate.
In 2016, he was elected to Congress after the 5th District was redrawn to include Tallahassee. Six years later, after the minority-access district was erased through redistricting, he lost to Rep. Neal Dunn, R-Panama City, in a redesigned GOP-friendly 2nd District.
'I have been asked by a lot of business leaders in the community whether I might consider running for mayor,' he said. 'They thought that I could really bridge the gap in the commission that is so divided and could get something done because I have a history of being able to work with Republicans and Democrats all through the years.'
But he said the legal challenge over redistricting is still pending before the Florida Supreme Court. He also said he supports Dailey and hasn't 'really given it serious consideration.' He said he told James at the Waffle House that, 'It wasn't on my radar.'
Leon County Commissioner Nick Maddox
Maddox, a former FSU and professional football player, won re-election to his fourth term as one of two at-large county commissioners in 2022, fending off several challengers in the process.
He serves as CEO of Family Promise of the Big Bend, which provides shelter and services to people experiencing homelessness. An ally and friend of Dailey, he also has long been said to have his eyes on the Mayor's Office.
However, Maddox said in an email that he has no current plans to run for mayor.
'I have been informally approached by people suggesting I should consider running for mayor of Tallahassee,' he said. 'I may consider one day, but for now I am happy in my current job and look forward to all the important work we are doing at the county.'
Tallahassee City Commissioner Jeremy Matlow
Matlow, who won a nearly 12-point re-election victory in 2022, is up for a third term in 2026. Part of the City Commission's progressive minority and a vocal critic of City Hall management, he expressed interest in running for mayor in an unpublished 2023 interview with the Democrat but never made any subsequent announcements.
Last year, after an election that saw his lone commission ally, Commissioner Jack Porter, easily win but other progressives lose that were backed by Matlow and his One Tallahassee political committee, he announced he was quitting X, formerly Twitter, and the Democrat. He recently declined to speak to a reporter, referring to a column he wrote accusing the Democrat of right-wing bias.
Ryan Ray, Matlow's aide and chair of the Leon County Democratic Executive Committee, did not comment on whether his boss at the city might run for mayor. However, as DEC chair, he offered remarks in a text, referring to a City Commission candidate who was accused last year of being a GOP plant.
'It's unclear whether the Republicans will support a Democrat for mayor again, or perhaps run another spoiler candidate like Donna Nyack,' Ray said. 'In any case, I'm confident a strong Democrat will be elected mayor in 2026.'
Leon County Commissioner Rick Minor
Minor, first elected to the County Commission District 3 seat in 2018, has been mentioned for years as a potential mayoral candidate. In 2022, he handily defeated two challengers, winning a primary outright and avoiding a runoff.
He worked as chief of staff under former Mayor John Marks, was an advisor to Charlie Crist and others and served as chair of the Leon County DEC. He has been critical of the current direction of the local Democratic Party, saying it needs to be more inclusive of Democrats of all stripes.
Minor told the Democrat in an email that 'at this point,' he's planning to run for a third county commission term in 2026.
'I love the job, and I think District 3 voters are really happy with the work we're doing,' he said. 'However, some people have suggested that I run for mayor if it's an open seat. Regardless of who runs, the community wants their next mayor to be focused on building bridges, not walls.'
Leon County Commissioner Bill Proctor
Proctor, first elected to the County Commission in 1996, has long been an outspoken advocate for District 1. While he's never shown much interest in another political job, he didn't dispel gossip about a possible mayoral bid when asked by Yordon last year on the talk show he co-hosts, 'The Usual Suspects."
'It's a good rumor,' Proctor said. 'I love the rumor.' He went on to say that Tallahassee is 'bigger than where we are now' and that the capital city was 'in a quagmire.'
Proctor endorsed Dailey in 2022 but said he now aligns more with Matlow and Porter. In an interview with the Democrat, he put his chances of a mayoral run at 'low to medium, not high, because I love my district.' However, he said he's so upset about a lack of city sewer and other services in his district that he's considering it.
'We shouldn't have to put our sewage in the backyard, in a big old concrete block and everybody else's sewage is being put in a pipe and going to be disposed of in a state-of-the-art, 21st Century way. That galls me, and it's enough to run for mayor.'
Leon County Commissioner Brian Welch
Welch, a Chiles High School social studies teacher, went from political unknown to unseating long-serving District 4 County Commissioner Brian Desloge in a shocking 2020 upset.
Last year, Welch, a Democrat serving in the county's most conservative district, trounced a well-funded GOP-backed candidate by more than 20 points. Welch raised even more, taking in a quarter of a million dollars in his individual account, second only to City Commissioner Curtis Richardson among local candidates.
Welch told the Democrat that while he has considered running for mayor, he's 'not interested.' He said he's 'very happy' serving in his current role and that were he to run for mayor, he'd have to quit his job as a a full-time teacher.
'The mayor of Tallahassee is a very important position — you have the ability to have a huge impact on improving the community,' Welch said. 'So in that regard, obviously it's attractive to anybody that's already serving. But for me, there would be significant drawbacks to doing that at this time.'
Contact Jeff Burlew at jburlew@tallahassee.com or 850-599-2180.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

President Donald Trump branded, browbeat and prevailed. But his big bill may come at a political cost
President Donald Trump branded, browbeat and prevailed. But his big bill may come at a political cost

Chicago Tribune

timean hour ago

  • Chicago Tribune

President Donald Trump branded, browbeat and prevailed. But his big bill may come at a political cost

WASHINGTON — Barack Obama had the Affordable Care Act. Joe Biden had the Inflation Reduction Act. President Donald Trump will have the tax cuts. All were hailed in the moment and became ripe political targets in campaigns that followed. In Trump's case, the tax cuts may almost become lost in the debates over other parts of the multitrillion-dollar bill that Democrats say will force poor Americans off their health care and overturn a decade or more of energy policy. Through persuasion and browbeating, Trump forced nearly all congressional Republicans to line up behind his marquee legislation despite some of its unpalatable pieces. He followed the playbook that had marked his life in business before politics. He focused on branding — labeling the legislation the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' — then relentlessly pushed to strong-arm it through Congress, solely on the votes of Republicans. But Trump's victory will soon be tested during the 2026 midterm elections where Democrats plan to run on a durable theme: that the Republican president favors the rich on tax cuts over poorer people who will lose their health care. Trump and Republicans argue that those who deserve coverage will retain it. Nonpartisan analysts, however, project significant increases to the number of uninsured. Meanwhile, the GOP's promise that the bill will turbocharge the economy will be tested at a time of uncertainty and trade turmoil. Trump has tried to counter the notion of favoring the rich with provisions that would reduce the taxes for people paid in tips and receiving overtime pay, two kinds of earners who represent a small share of the workforce. Extending the tax cuts from Trump's first term that were set to expire if Congress failed to act meant he could also argue that millions of people would avoid a tax increase. To enact that and other expensive priorities, Republicans made steep cuts to Medicaid that ultimately belied Trump's promise that those on government entitlement programs 'won't be affected.' 'The biggest thing is, he's answering the call of the forgotten people. That's why his No. 1 request was the no tax on tips, the no tax on overtime, tax relief for seniors,' said Rep. Jason Smith, R-Mo., chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee. 'I think that's going to be the big impact.' Presidents have seen their signature legislative accomplishments unraveled by their successors or become a significant political liability for their party in subsequent elections. A central case for Biden's reelection was that the public would reward the Democrat for his legislative accomplishments. That never bore fruit as he struggled to improve his poll numbers driven down by concerns about his age and stubborn inflation. Since taking office in January, Trump has acted to gut tax breaks meant to boost clean energy initiatives that were part of Biden's landmark health care-and-climate bill. Obama's health overhaul, which the Democrat signed into law in March 2010, led to a political bloodbath in the midterms that fall. Its popularity only became potent when Republicans tried to repeal it in 2017. Whatever political boost Trump may have gotten from his first-term tax cuts in 2017 did not help him in the 2018 midterms, when Democrats regained control of the House, or in 2020 when he lost to Biden. 'I don't think there's much if any evidence from recent or even not-so-recent history of the president's party passing a big one-party bill and getting rewarded for it,' said Kyle Kondik, an elections analyst with the nonpartisan University of Virginia's Center for Politics. Democrats hope they can translate their policy losses into political gains. During an Oval Office appearance in January, Trump pledged he would 'love and cherish Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid.' 'We're not going to do anything with that, other than if we can find some abuse or waste, we'll do something,' Trump said. 'But the people won't be affected. It will only be more effective and better.' That promise is far removed from what Trump and the Republican Party ultimately chose to do, paring back not only Medicaid but also food assistance for the poor to make the math work on their sweeping bill. It would force 11.8 million more people to become uninsured by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office, whose estimates the GOP has dismissed. 'In Trump's first term, Democrats in Congress prevented bad outcomes. They didn't repeal the (Affordable Care Act), and we did COVID relief together. This time is different,' said Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii. 'Hospitals will close, people will die, the cost of electricity will go up, and people will go without food.' Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., repeatedly argued the legislation would lead to drastic coverage losses in his home state and others, leaving them vulnerable to political attacks similar to what Democrats faced after they enacted 'Obamacare.' With his warnings unheeded, Tillis announced he would not run for reelection, after he opposed advancing the bill and enduring Trump's criticism. 'If there is a political dimension to this, it is the extraordinary impact that you're going to have in states like California, blue states with red districts,' Tillis said. 'The narrative is going to be overwhelmingly negative in states like California, New York, Illinois, and New Jersey.' Even Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who eventually became the decisive vote in the Senate that ensured the bill's passage, said the legislation needed more work and she urged the House to revise it. Lawmakers there did not. Early polling suggests that Trump's bill is deeply unpopular, including among independents and a healthy share of Republicans. White House officials said their own research does not reflect that. So far, it's only Republicans celebrating the victory. That seems OK with the president. In a speech in Iowa after the bill passed, he said Democrats only opposed it because they 'hated Trump.' That didn't bother him, he said, 'because I hate them, too.'

Trump branded, browbeat and prevailed. But his big bill may come at a political cost
Trump branded, browbeat and prevailed. But his big bill may come at a political cost

San Francisco Chronicle​

time3 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Trump branded, browbeat and prevailed. But his big bill may come at a political cost

WASHINGTON (AP) — Barack Obama had the Affordable Care Act. Joe Biden had the Inflation Reduction Act. President Donald Trump will have the tax cuts. All were hailed in the moment and became ripe political targets in campaigns that followed. In Trump's case, the tax cuts may almost become lost in the debates over other parts of the multitrillion-dollar bill that Democrats say will force poor Americans off their health care and overturn a decade or more of energy policy. Through persuasion and browbeating, Trump forced nearly all congressional Republicans to line up behind his marquee legislation despite some of its unpalatable pieces. He followed the playbook that had marked his life in business before politics. He focused on branding — labeling the legislation the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' — then relentlessly pushed to strong-arm it through Congress, solely on the votes of Republicans. But Trump's victory will soon be tested during the 2026 midterm elections where Democrats plan to run on a durable theme: that the Republican president favors the rich on tax cuts over poorer people who will lose their health care. Trump and Republicans argue that those who deserve coverage will retain it. Nonpartisan analysts, however, project significant increases to the number of uninsured. Meanwhile, the GOP's promise that the bill will turbocharge the economy will be tested at a time of uncertainty and trade turmoil. Trump has tried to counter the notion of favoring the rich with provisions that would reduce the taxes for people paid in tips and receiving overtime pay, two kinds of earners who represent a small share of the workforce. Extending the tax cuts from Trump's first term that were set to expire if Congress failed to act meant he could also argue that millions of people would avoid a tax increase. To enact that and other expensive priorities, Republicans made steep cuts to Medicaid that ultimately belied Trump's promise that those on government entitlement programs 'won't be affected.' 'The biggest thing is, he's answering the call of the forgotten people. That's why his No. 1 request was the no tax on tips, the no tax on overtime, tax relief for seniors,' said Rep. Jason Smith, R-Mo., chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee. 'I think that's going to be the big impact.' Hard to reap the rewards Presidents have seen their signature legislative accomplishments unraveled by their successors or become a significant political liability for their party in subsequent elections. A central case for Biden's reelection was that the public would reward the Democrat for his legislative accomplishments. That never bore fruit as he struggled to improve his poll numbers driven down by concerns about his age and stubborn inflation. Since taking office in January, Trump has acted to gut tax breaks meant to boost clean energy initiatives that were part of Biden's landmark health care-and-climate bill. Obama's health overhaul, which the Democrat signed into law in March 2010, led to a political bloodbath in the midterms that fall. Its popularity only became potent when Republicans tried to repeal it in 2017. Whatever political boost Trump may have gotten from his first-term tax cuts in 2017 did not help him in the 2018 midterms, when Democrats regained control of the House, or in 2020 when he lost to Biden. 'I don't think there's much if any evidence from recent or even not-so-recent history of the president's party passing a big one-party bill and getting rewarded for it,' said Kyle Kondik, an elections analyst with the nonpartisan University of Virginia's Center for Politics. Social net setbacks Democrats hope they can translate their policy losses into political gains. During an Oval Office appearance in January, Trump pledged he would 'love and cherish Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid.' 'We're not going to do anything with that, other than if we can find some abuse or waste, we'll do something,' Trump said. 'But the people won't be affected. It will only be more effective and better.' That promise is far removed from what Trump and the Republican Party ultimately chose to do, paring back not only Medicaid but also food assistance for the poor to make the math work on their sweeping bill. It would force 11.8 million more people to become uninsured by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office, whose estimates the GOP has dismissed. 'In Trump's first term, Democrats in Congress prevented bad outcomes. They didn't repeal the (Affordable Care Act), and we did COVID relief together. This time is different,' said Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii. 'Hospitals will close, people will die, the cost of electricity will go up, and people will go without food.' Some unhappy Republicans Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., repeatedly argued the legislation would lead to drastic coverage losses in his home state and others, leaving them vulnerable to political attacks similar to what Democrats faced after they enacted 'Obamacare.' With his warnings unheeded, Tillis announced he would not run for reelection, after he opposed advancing the bill and enduring Trump's criticism. 'If there is a political dimension to this, it is the extraordinary impact that you're going to have in states like California, blue states with red districts,' Tillis said. "The narrative is going to be overwhelmingly negative in states like California, New York, Illinois, and New Jersey.' Even Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who eventually became the decisive vote in the Senate that ensured the bill's passage, said the legislation needed more work and she urged the House to revise it. Lawmakers there did not. Early polling suggests that Trump's bill is deeply unpopular, including among independents and a healthy share of Republicans. White House officials said their own research does not reflect that. So far, it's only Republicans celebrating the victory. That seems OK with the president. In a speech in Iowa after the bill passed, he said Democrats only opposed it because they 'hated Trump.' That didn't bother him, he said, 'because I hate them, too.'

Congress Won't Block State AI Regulations. Here's What That Means for Consumers
Congress Won't Block State AI Regulations. Here's What That Means for Consumers

CNET

time4 hours ago

  • CNET

Congress Won't Block State AI Regulations. Here's What That Means for Consumers

After months of debate, a plan in Congress to block states from regulating artificial intelligence was pulled from the big federal budget bill this week. The proposed 10-year moratorium would have prevented states from enforcing rules and laws on AI if the state accepted federal funding for broadband access. The issue exposed divides among technology experts and politicians, with some Senate Republicans joining Democrats in opposing the move. The Senate eventually voted 99-1 to remove the proposal from the bill, which also includes the extension of the 2017 federal tax cuts and cuts to services like Medicaid and SNAP. Congressional Republican leaders have said they want to have the measure on President Donald Trump's desk by July 4. Tech companies and many Congressional Republicans supported the moratorium, saying it would prevent a "patchwork" of rules and regulations across states and local governments that could hinder the development of AI -- especially in the context of competition with China. Critics, including consumer advocates, said states should have a free hand to protect people from potential issues with the fast-growing technology. "The Senate came together tonight to say that we can't just run over good state consumer protection laws," Sen. Maria Cantwell, a Washington Democrat, said in a statement. "States can fight robocalls, deepfakes and provide safe autonomous vehicle laws. This also allows us to work together nationally to provide a new federal framework on artificial intelligence that accelerates US leadership in AI while still protecting consumers." Despite the moratorium being pulled from this bill, the debate over how the government can appropriately balance consumer protection and supporting technology innovation will likely continue. "There have been a lot of discussions at the state level, and I would think that it's important for us to approach this problem at multiple levels," said Anjana Susarla, a professor at Michigan State University who studies AI. "We could approach it at the national level. We can approach it at the state level, too. I think we need both." Several states have already started regulating AI The proposed moratorium would have barred states from enforcing any regulation, including those already on the books. The exceptions are rules and laws that make things easier for AI development and those that apply the same standards to non-AI models and systems that do similar things. These kinds of regulations are already starting to pop up. The biggest focus is not in the US, but in Europe, where the European Union has already implemented standards for AI. But states are starting to get in on the action. Colorado passed a set of consumer protections last year, set to go into effect in 2026. California adopted more than a dozen AI-related laws last year. Other states have laws and regulations that often deal with specific issues such as deepfakes or require AI developers to publish information about their training data. At the local level, some regulations also address potential employment discrimination if AI systems are used in hiring. "States are all over the map when it comes to what they want to regulate in AI," said Arsen Kourinian, a partner at the law firm Mayer Brown. So far in 2025, state lawmakers have introduced at least 550 proposals around AI, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. In the House committee hearing last month, Rep. Jay Obernolte, a Republican from California, signaled a desire to get ahead of more state-level regulation. "We have a limited amount of legislative runway to be able to get that problem solved before the states get too far ahead," he said. Read more: AI Essentials: 29 Ways to Make Gen AI Work for You, According to Our Experts While some states have laws on the books, not all of them have gone into effect or seen any enforcement. That limits the potential short-term impact of a moratorium, said Cobun Zweifel-Keegan, managing director in Washington for IAPP. "There isn't really any enforcement yet." A moratorium would likely deter state legislators and policymakers from developing and proposing new regulations, Zweifel-Keegan said. "The federal government would become the primary and potentially sole regulator around AI systems," he said. What a moratorium on state AI regulation would mean AI developers have asked for any guardrails placed on their work to be consistent and streamlined. "We need, as an industry and as a country, one clear federal standard, whatever it may be," Alexandr Wang, founder and CEO of the data company Scale AI, told lawmakers during an April hearing. "But we need one, we need clarity as to one federal standard and have preemption to prevent this outcome where you have 50 different standards." During a Senate Commerce Committee hearing in May, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman told Sen. Ted Cruz, a Republican from Texas, that an EU-style regulatory system "would be disastrous" for the industry. Altman suggested instead that the industry develop its own standards. Asked by Sen. Brian Schatz, a Democrat from Hawaii, if industry self-regulation is enough at the moment, Altman said he thought some guardrails would be good, but, "It's easy for it to go too far. As I have learned more about how the world works, I am more afraid that it could go too far and have really bad consequences." (Disclosure: Ziff Davis, parent company of CNET, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.) Not all AI companies are backing a moratorium, however. In a New York Times op-ed, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei called it "far too blunt an instrument," saying the federal government should create transparency standards for AI companies instead. "Having this national transparency standard would help not only the public but also Congress understand how the technology is developing, so that lawmakers can decide whether further government action is needed." A proposed 10-year moratorium on state AI laws is now in the hands of the US Senate, where its Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation has already held hearings on artificial intelligence. Nathan Howard/Bloomberg via Getty Images Concerns from companies, both the developers that create AI systems and the "deployers" who use them in interactions with consumers, often stem from fears that states will mandate significant work such as impact assessments or transparency notices before a product is released, Kourinian said. Consumer advocates have said more regulations are needed and hampering the ability of states could hurt the privacy and safety of users. A moratorium on specific state rules and laws could result in more consumer protection issues being dealt with in court or by state attorneys general, Kourinian said. Existing laws around unfair and deceptive practices that are not specific to AI would still apply. "Time will tell how judges will interpret those issues," he said. Susarla said the pervasiveness of AI across industries means states might be able to regulate issues such as privacy and transparency more broadly, without focusing on the technology. But a moratorium on AI regulation could lead to such policies being tied up in lawsuits. "It has to be some kind of balance between 'we don't want to stop innovation,' but on the other hand, we also need to recognize that there can be real consequences," she said. Much policy around the governance of AI systems does happen because of those so-called technology-agnostic rules and laws, Zweifel-Keegan said. "It's worth also remembering that there are a lot of existing laws and there is a potential to make new laws that don't trigger the moratorium but do apply to AI systems as long as they apply to other systems," he said. What's next for federal AI regulation? One of the key lawmakers pushing for the removal of the moratorium from the bill was Sen. Marsha Blackburn, a Tennessee Republican. Blackburn said she wanted to make sure states were able to protect children and creators, like the country musicians her state is famous for. "Until Congress passes federally preemptive legislation like the Kids Online Safety Act and an online privacy framework, we can't block states from standing in the gap to protect vulnerable Americans from harm -- including Tennessee creators and precious children," she said in a statement. Groups that opposed the preemption of state laws said they hope the next move for Congress is to take steps toward actual regulation of AI, which could make state laws unnecessary. If tech companies "are going to seek federal preemption, they should seek federal preemption along with a federal law that provides rules of the road," Jason Van Beek, chief government affairs officer at the Future of Life Institute, told me. Ben Winters, director of AI and data privacy at the Consumer Federation of America, said Congress could take up the idea of pre-empting state laws again in separate legislation. "Fundamentally, it's just a bad idea," he told me. "It doesn't really necessarily matter if it's done in the budget process."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store