No bail for reckless drivers in fatal crashes
The committee met at Parliament House with Raja Khurram Shahzad Nawaz in the chair. The committee unanimously passed the amendment to the law, which ensures that accused drivers involved in fatal accidents due to negligence cannot secure bail.
The proposal was part of the Criminal Law Amendment Bill 2024, presented by PPP lawmaker Sharmila Farooqui, who highlighted that 128 people died in road accidents in Islamabad last year.
"Accidents don't discriminate between the poor and the rich," committee member Qadir Patel said. "Even God forgives mistakes, but the law must uphold justice." The members supported the amendment to the Section 320 of the PPC.
Section 320 PPC deals with the punishment for 'Qatl-i-Khata', a form of culpable homicide, by rash or negligent driving. The committee however, kept Section 319, which also dealt with 'Qatl-i-Khata', unchanged.
The committee also approved the Anti-Terrorism Amendment Bill 2024 without any opposition. Meanwhile, the CrPC Amendment Bill 2025 was deferred to the next session at the Law Ministry's request.
Notably, no PTI-backed members attended the meeting. Amid PTI's call for protests in Islamabad, State Minister for Interior Talal Chaudhry stated that only eight individuals were detained. He criticised PTI's leadership for failing to follow proper procedures.
Talking to reporters after the meeting, Chaudhry said that the PTI had applied for permission for protest via email but never followed up on it. He added that the provincial authorities reached out to the PTI's local leadership but received no response.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
LHC disposes of plea seeking 250 PTI workers recovery
LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Wednesday disposed of a petition of PTI leader Akmal Bari seeking recovery of around 250 PTI workers and advised the petitioner to file the petition again with details of the detainees. Earlier, a law officer contended that the petition is not maintainable. How a court could get recover the detainees without their details, he added. The petitioner's counsel, however, said the petitioner was compiling the list of the detainees. The court, therefore, disposed of the petition with direction to file it again with details of all the detainees. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Tensions escalated in NA as Gohar claims PTI under siege
ISLAMABAD: Tensions escalated in the National Assembly on Wednesday as the chairman of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), Barrister Gohar Ali Khan, claimed his party was under siege and warned the government not to 'put democracy on the line.' Speaking with palpable urgency, Gohar accused the government of a 'systematic campaign' to dismantle the opposition through arrests, disqualifications and blocking parliamentary participation. 'Even mothers don't love their sons as much as this nation loves Imran Khan,' he said, referring to the former prime minister, who is currently imprisoned in connection with the May 9, 2023, riots. Gohar's remarks went beyond political posturing, highlighting what he described as a deepening crackdown on PTI and insisting that suppressing a political party was wholly unjustified. He pointed to the arrest of 80-year-old party veteran Rehana Dar from Sialkot, the disqualification of Opposition Leader Omar Ayub in the National Assembly, the opposition leaders in Senate ShibliFaraz and Punjab Assembly Ahmad Bachar and disqualification of party scores of party MNAs and MPAs. 'These actions are part of a great injustice,' he warned, urging the government not to 'put democracy at risk' and calling for justice rather than vengeance amid rising political tensions. 'The doors of Parliament are being slammed shut on elected representatives,' he added. 'If our members are removed one by one, what message does that send to the nation?' In what many saw as both a passionate appeal and a veiled warning, Gohar said: 'Do not put democracy at risk. We demand justice, not vengeance.' Responding, Minister for Law and Justice Senator Azam Nazeer Tarar rejected the allegations, reminding the House that legal proceedings are the responsibility of the courts, not Parliament. 'These convictions are not the outcome of political manipulation,' Tarar said. 'They are the result of a lawful judicial process. Once a case reaches trial, it falls within the jurisdiction of the courts, not politicians.' He defended the post-May 9 prosecutions, citing the example of Jamshed Dasti, another opposition figure who recently received interim relief from the Lahore High Court. 'Objections can be raised, but the appropriate forum is the judiciary, not this assembly,' he added. Tarar also highlighted the constitutional aspects of Articles 63(g) and (h), noting that interpretation of these provisions is the remit of the courts and the Election Commission, not parliamentarians. While Gohar depicted a parliament under siege, Tarar pointed out that previous prime ministers, including Nawaz Sharif, have faced judicial scrutiny without accusations of undermining democracy. 'Our duty is not to act as judge or jury,' Tarar said. 'Our role is to improve legislation and uphold the constitutional framework.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
What's driving PTI disqualifications?
EDITORIAL: The Election Commission of Pakistan's (ECP's) ongoing purge of PTI (Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf) parliamentarians continues unabated with nine lawmakers from the party — including National Assembly Opposition Leader Omar Ayub and Senate Opposition Leader Shibli Faraz — losing their seats over their convictions by anti-terrorism courts in cases related to the May 9 riots. With this latest action on August 5, the ECP has now disqualified 14 PTI legislators within two weeks due to their convictions over the May 9 unrest. Last month, it had de-seated Jamshed Dasti, the party's MNA from Muzaffargarh, over allegedly holding a fake degree. The ECP's recent moves have inevitably raised serious and troubling questions about its conduct. At a minimum, they reflect what many legal experts have cogently argued is its misinterpretation of constitutional disqualification rules, and at worst, about its institutional neutrality, selective application of the law, and a wilful disregard for due process and democratic principles. A bizarre panic appears to have gripped the Commission, prompting it to act with undue haste and little regard for legal consistency or the broader democratic fallout of its decisions. As several respected legal voices have noted, these disqualifications sidestep the procedure outlined in Article 225, which requires that any election to the national or provincial assembly be challenged through a petition before an election tribunal. Even under Article 63 — invoked to disqualify those convicted over the May 9 unrest — the ECP has to follow a prescribed process and cannot act unilaterally. Disqualification can only proceed once a conviction is upheld by the highest appellate court and the speaker of the relevant assembly files a reference seeking the member's removal. In these cases, however, the ATC rulings are from trial courts, inevitably raising the question: on what grounds has the ECP assumed that these convictions will stand on appeal? By acting before the appeals process has been exhausted, it has clearly moved prematurely. Dasti's case further underscores this, as the ECP announced a by-election in his constituency, only for the Lahore High Court to suspend the notification and halt the process. The Commission also failed to give lawmakers a chance to be heard before issuing disqualification notices, completely disregarding Article 10-A, which guarantees a fair trial and enshrines the fundamental principle that no one shall be condemned without being heard. Equally striking is the alacrity with which the electoral system acted after the May 9 riots convictions, in stark contrast to the sluggish handling of the numerous disputed results from the 2024 general elections. Much of that delay stemmed from the ECP's own failure to promptly notify election tribunals, leaving challenges unresolved for months. Then there is its lethargy in implementing various court rulings, including even that of the Supreme Court, further underscoring the selective urgency with which it operates. Whether the May 9 trials met the highest standards of justice or the decade-long sentences were truly warranted is a separate debate. What matters is that the country's top electoral body is expected to uphold the highest standards of fairness, transparency and legal propriety, and it has apparently failed to do so. Questions must be asked about what is driving this inexplicable disqualification campaign, particularly when it targets an already weakened party posing no real threat to those in power. This decimation of the principal opposition party in parliament — representing millions of voters — will cast a long shadow over the health of representative politics and the broader democratic project, with there also being serious consequences for public trust in institutions and national unity, especially at a time of growing domestic terror threats and global geopolitical volatility. Those in power must consider the damage being done to the polity by this systematic sidelining of the opposition. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
