This Particle Isn't Following the Rules of Physics. Maybe the Rules Are Wrong.
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story:
For nearly a century, the magnetic anomaly of the fundamental particle known as a muon has served as a means to test theories against experimental reality.
Recently, an international collaboration powered by the U.S.-based Fermilab has released its most accurate data on this anomalous magnetic dipole moment, known as g-2 ('gee minus two').
These new results align closely with recent theoretical predictions, and will serve as a benchmark moving forward.
The Standard Model of Particle Physics is a remarkable scientific achievement spanning nearly a century, and its predictive power has proven incredibly consistent. However, any scientific model worth its salt also needs to withstand experimental scrutiny, and one of the places those tests are employed is Fermilab.
Starting in 2017, an international collaboration of scientists have used data from Fermilab's 50-foot-diameter magnetic ring to measure the wobble of a fundamental particle known as a muon in what is referred to as the lab's 'muon g-2 experiment.' More than 200 times heavier than electrons, muons only survive for a few microseconds, but they have spins that makes them act like tiny magnets. This wobble, or precession, is due to an external magnetic field is called a g-factor, and a century ago, this factor was found to be 2 (hence the name 'muon g-2 experiment'). However, the introduction of quantum field theory complicates this number by bringing strong, weak, and Higgs fields interactions into the equation. This slight deviation from the '2' prediction is known as the muon's anomalous magnetic dipole moment.
To better understand this anomaly, Fermilab has consistently released results from its run of experiments that stretches from 2017 to 2023. On June 3, 2025, the muon g-2 experiment finally released its full results, with a precision of roughly 127 parts-per-billion—the most sensitive and accurate measurement of the muon's magnetic anomaly to date. The results of the study were submitted to the journal Physical Review D.
'The anomalous magnetic moment, or g–2, of the muon is important because it provides a sensitive test of the Standard Model of particle physics,' Regina Rameika, the U.S. Department of Energy's Associate Director for the Office of High Energy Physics, said in a press statement. 'This is an exciting result and it is great to see an experiment come to a definitive end with a precision measurement.'
Understanding this precise measurement of muon g-2 can help scientists discover new physics, as any deviation between experimental results and theoretical predictions using the Standard Model could point toward unknowns in our understanding of the subatomic world. While experimental physicists work to perfect ways of measuring the magnetic anomaly, theoretical physicists—especially those participating in the Muon Theory Initiative, which released its own update in late May—have largely sorted themselves into two 'camps' when calculating this theoretical prediction, according to Ethan Siegel at Big Think. One camp takes a data-driven approach to Hadronic vacuum polarization and the other uses a computational-based Lattice quantum chromodynamics (QCD) technique.
In 2021, it appeared that Fermilab's initial results were much closer to the Lattice QCD computational calculations, dampening (but not eliminating) the possibility of new physics orbiting the muon. Now, with this new calculation in hand, scientists can move forward with renewed confidence in an experimental result that's been a popular test of the Standard Model of Physics for a century.
'As it has been for decades, the magnetic moment of the muon continues to be a stringent benchmark of the Standard Model,' Simon Corrodi, assistant physicist at Argonne National Laboratory and analysis co-coordinator, said in a press statement. 'The new experimental result sheds new light on this fundamental theory and will set the benchmark for any new theoretical calculation to come.'
This isn't the end for measuring the muon magnetic anomaly—the Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex aims to make its own g-2 measurements in the 2030s (though Fermilab says that its initial precision will be worse than their own latest results).
Today, this muon g-2 result is a testament of the incredible engineering and multidisciplinary scientific effort required to uncover just a little bit more about our ever-mysterious universe.
You Might Also Like
The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape
The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere
Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scientists Calculate That the Entire Big Bang Must Have Taken Place Inside a Black Hole
The standard model of cosmology may be the best explanation we've got for why the universe is the way it is and how it all came to be. But it's not the only explanation. Enter black hole cosmology. It's a radical idea which proposes that the Big Bang — the rapid unraveling of an infinitely dense point, believed to have given birth to the cosmos as we know it — actually took place in a black hole, which itself formed inside a larger "parent" universe. Ergo, all of us — and every star, planet, galaxy, and internet rando — are living inside one of these mysterious singularities. Enrique Gaztanaga, lead author of a new study published in the journal Physical Review D and a professor at the Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation at the University of Portsmouth, isn't the first to propose this controversial idea. But his team's research offers a new model for imagining how this hypothetical scenario took place. "Our calculations suggest the Big Bang was not the start of everything, but rather the outcome of a gravitational crunch or collapse that formed a very massive black hole — followed by a bounce inside it," Gaztanaga wrote in an essay for The Conversation. Certainly, there are a lot of holes you could poke in the standard model. Why is there more matter than anti-matter, when the universe should be uniform? Why did the universe undergo a period of "cosmic inflation" in which it expanded at faster than light speeds, then stopped? And why does its present day rate of expansion appear to be different depending on how we measure it? Gaztanaga's main gripe seems to be with our current understanding of a singularity. To him, the idea of the universe starting as a point of infinite density is immensely unsatisfying. "This is not just a technical glitch; it's a deep theoretical problem that suggests we don't really understand the beginning at all," he wrote. Gaztanaga also takes aim at other convenient cosmological constructions like dark energy, which is intended to explain why the universe's expansion is mysteriously accelerating. This hypothetical force is thought to make up 68 percent of the universe but is completely unobservable, leaving room for different-minded scientists to call its existence into question. Rethinking singularities could neatly resolve many of these conundrums. We return to Gaztanaga's paper. "Gravitational collapse does not have to end in a singularity," he wrote for The Conversation. "Our maths show that as we approach the potential singularity, the size of the universe changes as a (hyperbolic) function of cosmic time." This is a bold claim. The consensus is that gravitational collapse — like a star imploding into a black hole — must result in an infinitely dense singularity. What Gaztanaga is arguing happens instead is that the collapse not only halt short of completely crushing the matter, but reverses course — a "bounce," in his terminology. "What emerges on the other side of the bounce is a universe remarkably like our own," Gaztanaga explains. "Even more surprisingly, the rebound naturally produces the two separate phases of accelerated expansion — inflation and dark energy — driven not by a hypothetical fields but by the physics of the bounce itself." It's a fascinating explanation, but there's a lot that remains to be proved. It relies on discounting some very well-established physics behind singularities. The standard model may not be perfect, but it's the standard for a reason. It'll take a lot more to dethrone it, and Gaztanaga is optimistic that future missions like the European Space Agency's ARRAKIHS, which will study invisible structures of dark matter to test the model, could reveal the answers we're looking for. More on cosmology: Astronomers Confused to Discover That a Bunch of Nearby Galaxies Are Pointing Directly at Us
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
This Particle Isn't Following the Rules of Physics. Maybe the Rules Are Wrong.
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: For nearly a century, the magnetic anomaly of the fundamental particle known as a muon has served as a means to test theories against experimental reality. Recently, an international collaboration powered by the U.S.-based Fermilab has released its most accurate data on this anomalous magnetic dipole moment, known as g-2 ('gee minus two'). These new results align closely with recent theoretical predictions, and will serve as a benchmark moving forward. The Standard Model of Particle Physics is a remarkable scientific achievement spanning nearly a century, and its predictive power has proven incredibly consistent. However, any scientific model worth its salt also needs to withstand experimental scrutiny, and one of the places those tests are employed is Fermilab. Starting in 2017, an international collaboration of scientists have used data from Fermilab's 50-foot-diameter magnetic ring to measure the wobble of a fundamental particle known as a muon in what is referred to as the lab's 'muon g-2 experiment.' More than 200 times heavier than electrons, muons only survive for a few microseconds, but they have spins that makes them act like tiny magnets. This wobble, or precession, is due to an external magnetic field is called a g-factor, and a century ago, this factor was found to be 2 (hence the name 'muon g-2 experiment'). However, the introduction of quantum field theory complicates this number by bringing strong, weak, and Higgs fields interactions into the equation. This slight deviation from the '2' prediction is known as the muon's anomalous magnetic dipole moment. To better understand this anomaly, Fermilab has consistently released results from its run of experiments that stretches from 2017 to 2023. On June 3, 2025, the muon g-2 experiment finally released its full results, with a precision of roughly 127 parts-per-billion—the most sensitive and accurate measurement of the muon's magnetic anomaly to date. The results of the study were submitted to the journal Physical Review D. 'The anomalous magnetic moment, or g–2, of the muon is important because it provides a sensitive test of the Standard Model of particle physics,' Regina Rameika, the U.S. Department of Energy's Associate Director for the Office of High Energy Physics, said in a press statement. 'This is an exciting result and it is great to see an experiment come to a definitive end with a precision measurement.' Understanding this precise measurement of muon g-2 can help scientists discover new physics, as any deviation between experimental results and theoretical predictions using the Standard Model could point toward unknowns in our understanding of the subatomic world. While experimental physicists work to perfect ways of measuring the magnetic anomaly, theoretical physicists—especially those participating in the Muon Theory Initiative, which released its own update in late May—have largely sorted themselves into two 'camps' when calculating this theoretical prediction, according to Ethan Siegel at Big Think. One camp takes a data-driven approach to Hadronic vacuum polarization and the other uses a computational-based Lattice quantum chromodynamics (QCD) technique. In 2021, it appeared that Fermilab's initial results were much closer to the Lattice QCD computational calculations, dampening (but not eliminating) the possibility of new physics orbiting the muon. Now, with this new calculation in hand, scientists can move forward with renewed confidence in an experimental result that's been a popular test of the Standard Model of Physics for a century. 'As it has been for decades, the magnetic moment of the muon continues to be a stringent benchmark of the Standard Model,' Simon Corrodi, assistant physicist at Argonne National Laboratory and analysis co-coordinator, said in a press statement. 'The new experimental result sheds new light on this fundamental theory and will set the benchmark for any new theoretical calculation to come.' This isn't the end for measuring the muon magnetic anomaly—the Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex aims to make its own g-2 measurements in the 2030s (though Fermilab says that its initial precision will be worse than their own latest results). Today, this muon g-2 result is a testament of the incredible engineering and multidisciplinary scientific effort required to uncover just a little bit more about our ever-mysterious universe. You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Some Black Holes May Be Portals Through Spacetime In Disguise
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: Theoretical physicists have long debated the possible existence of wormholes, which are mathematically possible, but no evidence points to their physical existence. One theory suggests that these hypothetical tunnels in spacetime could be masquerading as black holes, as both objects share similar characteristics as a result of existing right on the edge of where known physics breaks down. A new study adds more evidence to this conjecture by analyzing quasi-normal modes—distinctive vibrations in space-time caused by temporary perturbations—and finds that wormholes could mimic black holes in this particular context. Although traversable wormholes are a popular trope in sci-fi, the space-time structures that connect two different points of the universe are—at least, as of now—completely hypothetical. One of the first types of wormholes ever theorized, the Einstein-Rosen bridge, is simply a specific solution to Einstein's field equations, which map space-time geometry within certain matter and energy conditions. Sadly, these sci-fi dreams rest on the fantastical concept of 'negative energy,' a cosmic phenomenon that simply doesn't exist in the classical universe (though the answer isn't so clear cut in the quantum realm). Due to the space-time strangeness required to form a stable wormhole, some scientists have considered whether certain black holes might actually be wormholes in disguise. Although physical reality makes this a near-impossibility, mathematics shows that it's at least conceivable. Now, a new study has analyzed a certain attribute of Schwarzschild black holes—which are named for German physicist Karl Schwarzschild and are themselves hypothetical objects, as they're black holes that contain no rotation or electric field—known as quasi-normal modes (QNMs). These modes are considered quasi-normal because they describe distinctive vibrations of space-time when a compact object is perturbed (i.e. they don't continue indefinitely). Using different approaches—including a parameterization to define the properties of the area near the 'throat' of a wormhole while analyzing three different perturbation types (scalar, axial gravitational, and electromagnetic)—the researchers concluded that a wormhole could consistently replicate the QNMs associated with static (a.k.a. Schwarzschild) black holes. The results of the study were uploaded to the preprint server arXiv, and the authors note that the study will soon be published in the journal Physical Review D. 'Exotic compact objects—either beyond General Relativity (GR) predictions or arising from unconventional GR assumptions—could theoretically exist, though they remain undetected,' the authors wrote. 'This elusiveness may be due to their ability to closely mimic the observational properties of black holes.' The idea of wormholes masquerading as black holes of all shapes and sizes isn't a new one—in fact, it's a theory that's been debated for decades. More recently, a 2021 study pondered whether active galactic nuclei, or AGN, are actually wormhole mouths rather than supermassive black holes. A year later, a team from Sofia University in Bulgaria concluded that light emitted from a disk surrounding a traversable wormhole would likely be 'nearly identical' to that of a static black hole. Long-standing theories have also wondered if black holes could be paired with mirror twins, known as 'white holes,' which would together form wormholes. Of course, white holes have never been observed or detected either, but once again, the math allows for their existence. This new study adds to that growing discussion by analyzing the QNM aspect of static black holes and finding that the two are also similar. 'We can say that a wormhole can effectively emulate the Schwarzschild black hole in general relativity in its fundamental mode and first overtone across the three distinct perturbation types considered individually,' the authors wrote. The authors also expect to build on this approach by improving near-throat parameters and analyzing the polar gravitational perturbations theoretically exhibited by both wormholes and black holes (though the problem presents a few computational difficulties that will need solving). For now, wormholes remain firmly in the realm of science fiction. But with mathematics continuing to prove that such objects are possible, scientists will continue to search for these bridges across the universe. You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
