logo
Tony Hancock's guide to the trials – and errors – of being a household comic

Tony Hancock's guide to the trials – and errors – of being a household comic

Telegraph24-02-2025

This article is published as part of The Telegraph's Greatest Interviews series, which revisits the most significant, informative and entertaining conversations with notable figures over our 170 year history. The below interview is introduced by Christopher Howse. It appears as it was originally published.
The Sunday Telegraph was still in its first year of publication when Philip Purser interviewed Tony Hancock. Hancock, meanwhile, was at a turning point in his career. In 1961 he was a highly paid, popular and critically admired television comedian. His despondent bloodhound face looked older than his years.
His radio series Hancock's Half Hour, broadcast from 1954 to 1961, was scripted by the celebrated team of Ray Galton and Alan Simpson, who afterwards wrote Steptoe and Son. From 1956, the radio series alternated with a television series with the same title.
The plans outlined in this interview did not prosper. For the new television series from May 1961 he dropped his popular foil, Sid James. The series was to be his last. Yet, while he still had Galton and Simpson, episodes such as The Blood Donor and The Radio Ham proved classics.
The two films in which he starred, The Rebel (1961) and The Punch and Judy Man (1962), were disappointing. Privately Hancock was aggressive and he had been drinking heavily since 1952. In 1968, in Australia, he committed suicide. As the humorist Arthur Marshall observed when he was a Sunday Telegraph columnist: 'Seldom has such a dazzling career disintegrated so quickly.'
Philip Purser (1925-2022) stayed at The Sunday Telegraph as its valued television critic for another 26 years, until sacked by Sir Peregrine Worsthorne. – Christopher Howse
I think I was about five when I decided I wanted to be a comic. My father kept a pub in Bournemouth where theatre people like Elsie and Doris Waters and Stainless Stephen used to stay. They took me backstage and I became interested. My father was a semi-professional comedian himself – a dude entertainer – top-hat and monocle. He did semi-professional concerts, club suppers – things like that.
I used to listen to them all in the bar, and listen to the radio comics – Claude Dampier, Clapham and Dwyer – and go to the pictures. Will Hay was my favourite. A double feature, and half a bar of Palm toffee and 3½ hours in the dark, that was my idea of fun.
Out of school
My father died when I was 11. He'd always encouraged me enormously to do what I wanted, my mother, too. The only alternative aim I ever had was one time when I thought I might be a journalist. I was sent away to school – Bradfield – but I left there after a year. I removed myself because – well I don't know really. It was to try and get into the theatre.
I started off fairly easily, because I started in troop shows. The large audiences in Ack-Ack were prepared to see anybody and anything. In those days anybody who could entertain was accepted. That was my Tommy Trinder period, with the brown and white shoes and turned up hat. I was 16 or 17.
I used to go into the pubs and listen to the jokes, and if I heard one that got a laugh I used it. I ended up with the filthiest act. I didn't understand it until I was about 25. It was diabolical.
I cleared a church hall in Bournemouth once. They walked out slowly row by row. It was very embarrassing, and it was then I decided I would not go on with the blue stuff.
Like most people I have gained by being in the Forces, because for anyone who could get up and do anything – even imitate Popeye or something – it was such splendid opportunity.
Acting sergeant
From about 1944 to 1946, I was in the RAF Gang Show. We had a marvellous trip. Italy, North Africa, Sicily, Greece. We played under all sorts of conditions, on lorries, in tents, and all over the place. Peter Sellers and I were in charge of the wardrobe as acting sergeants, paid. We were near-professionals when we came out.
After the war there was a very special atmosphere among the young comics and actors. We all seemed to know each other. We worked the Nuffield Centre and hung around the Windmill. Anyone who was working helped the others, paid for their laundry even.
Things weren't always easy, I had a long period of doing nothing, slowly getting through the gratuity. In the hard winter of 1947 I spent most of my time in bed keeping warm.
I got my turn at the Windmill during the 1948 Olympic Games, which was charming. It's difficult to get a laugh there anyway – they come to see the girls, not you – but when you get the Chinese pole-vaulting team in the front row it makes it seem even more difficult.
But there was a change in comedy fashions about now which began to help me – a reaction to the patter style of people like Max Miller and Tommy Trinder. It was a return to a more subtle and more visual humour, I'd never been very hot on the patter stuff and my act was ready completely visual already.
To TV with a sigh
As a matter of fact when I tried radio I found it very difficult; I still feel a visual comic. The first broadcast got a laugh but it was a series of noises and silences as far as the audience at home was concerned. When I finally got into radio properly I really had to work harder than in any other medium. When we changed to television it was a sigh of relief.
With the first series, which was on ITV, we had a lot of script difficulties. Nobody's fault really. We didn't understand how much preparation has to be done before you start. A tremendous amount of the work takes place before you get on the air. The first sketch (I suggested it myself) was about a coffee bar – plants gradually strangling all the guests, the espresso machine sinking through the floor. It is pretty difficult to get plants to strangle people. It needs about six months' preparation, really.
I went back in the BBC and, for the first time, we did real situation comedy, with one episode going right through the half-hour. This could go wrong, too. There was one about trying to sell a house at the end of an airport runway that was a disaster.
In the 25th minute the place was supposed to disintegrate, when the surveyor came in. After two minutes the table fell down, the mantelpiece just after, and the place fell apart generally. The surveyor, played by Dick Emery, came in glassy-eyed and we looked at each other and there was nothing to do. As I stood up my braces broke. That was another little novelty. That was the time when I decided that as soon as it was possible we would not do any more live television.
We started pre-recording the shows, though still in one take, just as if they were on the air. In half an hour we may have five takes, sometimes only two or three, just to give us a chance to use different cameras in the studio, or eliminate quick costume changes. It is not very comfortable doing anything with one shoe half on.
The writers. Alan Simpson and Ray Galton and myself, after six years together are very close, both professionally and in every other way. We think the same about humour, we think the same about things we want to achieve. It. does not absolutely bind us for ever, but we think in the same terms.
We are going to do another four or five films with ABC. with whom we did The Rebel. That will be over four years. Then we hope to be able to put our own money into half-hour TV films, or, eventually, bigger films of which we can own the negative. We feel that so much stuff we've done has gone into thin air. We still have the scripts but none of the finished products.
We haven't got the story for the next film yet, but as with the television series, we're moving away from plot – at least from plots that bind you down too much. We intend to have a story out of which emerge high spots of comedy, maybe for four or five minutes, to get them really rocking in the cinemas,
Chaplin's City Lights, which I think is the finest full length comedy I have seen, has wonderful moments of comedy which come naturally out of the action. A lot of the older school of comics, Laurel and Hardy and Chaplin, stand up wonderfully well today. Among present-day comics I am most influenced by Jacques Tati. Monsieur Hulot's Holiday had some of the most inventive business comedy I have seen since Chaplin. I think I saw it about eight times, and each time I found something new to laugh at, and look at and enjoy. Mon Oncle was an advance in a way but not as hilarious by any means.
Comedy's essence
It seems to me that the essence of comedy is to be funny in itself. I mean it is not enough to stand and point and say 'Look at this, it is funny' or, worse still 'Look at me, I'm funny'. It puts the bloke who says that in a ludicrous position. You must be an essential part of it, and it a part of you.
You take what you think is ludicrous both about yourself and other people. Any comedy that I do is based on attitudes and moods as against characterisation, really means you can be pompous one minute, and then the opposite. You take on a mood.
People coming out with things, and doing things, that in everyday life they would restrain is a great source of comedy, of course. Natural antagonism. Like the Marx Brothers, all doing things that would be unacceptable. One realises why Groucho is so great.
The idea of the 'little man' in comedy is mostly mistaken. Chaplin is always referred to as a little man. Sometimes he is extremely aggressive. Remember the scene in City Lights when he is in a Rolls-Royce and he gets out of the car, kicks a tramp in the stomach, picks up a cigar butt and drives off? Nowadays you would probably be advised not to do it. Only the great could get away with it.
In the theatre
I've done comparatively little in the theatre – two years, twice a night, in Talk of the Town at the Adelphi was enough for me.
There is a strange difference between post-war and pre-war comics. We were put in the position of doing fresh material every week on radio, or whatever it was, and now it becomes necessary. There is no excitement in repetition. Admittedly, when you are in the theatre and have the audience really going it is a wonderful snowball of reaction, and very exciting, and it takes you out, of yourself
It is difficult to avoid sounding pompous. but I do believe comedy is terribly important in the world today, and can really help when people say that you really have made them laugh, and they say it honestly, it is not a thing to throw away, and say it doesn't matter. It is a compliment. It is the real thing.
I read a lot; mainly to put partly right an education that finished at 15. Mostly history. No particular period. I'm trying to do the lot, get a progression. You get some sort of evolutionary pattern which is highly connected with humour – the change-over from wearing things to keep warm to wearing things to look humorous. The evolution of the bowler hat.
I've turned a wall of my study into a sort of chart I'm plotting it all on. Just now I am interested in the Stone Age. They seemed to settle in communities and keep up with the Ogs next door, become conventional, like today.
I don't deliberately study people or make notes. That goes on automatically, I think. I do use a tape recorder a lot. You record everybody else's dialogue, and leave space for your own. (We've got a parrot that does a wonderful impression of me working away on the tape recorder upstairs, a sort of low-pitched grumble.)
Status symbol
Cicely, my wife, has been an enormous help – when I am working I am not particularly rewarding as a husband, because I do not stop – but, on the other hand, between high pressure spells we always have a good break when we can enjoy ourselves with each other. We spend quite a lot of time at home, and enjoy driving in the car. It's a 300 SL and I suppose it's our only real status symbol.
Otherwise, except for the obvious fact that I don't want to go back to eating sausages in Baron's Court, I don't value money for any other purpose than to give me freedom to do the work I want to do.
I am 37 and it is only the last two or three years that I have managed to put my finger on which way I would like to go. At one time I wouldn't go on to the stage without wearing a hat. This was a top hat and it made you feel someone. You start to work properly when you discard affectations and try and be what you are.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kate Middleton's royal title 'almost went to someone else' before 'intervention'
Kate Middleton's royal title 'almost went to someone else' before 'intervention'

Edinburgh Live

time6 hours ago

  • Edinburgh Live

Kate Middleton's royal title 'almost went to someone else' before 'intervention'

Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Within the ranks of the royal family, it's common for senior royals to be known by their secondary titles such as Duke, Duchess, Earl, and Countess, to name a few. Each title is distinctive, often passed down through generations, yet occasionally, more than one Royal could be in line for the same title. Back in 1999, a unique situation arose that nearly saw the now-Princess of Wales miss out on her former title as the Duchess of Cambridge. When Sophie Rhys-Jones married Prince Edward in 1999, it was anticipated that Edward would receive the prestigious title of Duke of Cambridge, making Sophie the Duchess of Cambridge. However, according to an insider speaking to The Telegraph in 2010, Prince Edward found inspiration from the silver screen to choose a different path, eschewing the dukedom earmarked for him, unlike his elder sibling Prince Andrew. READ MORE - Inside 'ghost town' shopping centre near Edinburgh that's been left to rot READ MORE - The giant lost Edinburgh building that once took up half of the Meadows The palace source divulged: "Prince Edward was going to be the Duke of Cambridge, but he watched the film Shakespeare in Love, which had a character called the Earl of Wessex. He liked the sound of it and asked the Queen if he could have that instead." Therefore, Sophie was styled as the Countess of Wessex, leaving the Cambridge titles to be bestowed upon Prince William and Kate Middleton upon their marriage in 2011, reports the Mirror. (Image: Jason Dawson/JASONPIX) (Image: POOL/AFP via Getty Images) In 2024, Prince Edward and Sophie underwent another title change, becoming the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh in honour of Edward's late father, Prince Philip. This change was part of the celebrations for Edward's 59th birthday in March. The Duke of Edinburgh title has a long history, having been first created for Prince Frederick, the eldest son of King George II, back in 1726. In 1764, it was bestowed upon Prince William, brother of King George III, as part of the joint title The Duke of Gloucester and Edinburgh. Prince Alfred, Queen Victoria's second son, assumed the title in 1866, before it was passed on to Prince Philip upon his marriage to the late Queen Elizabeth II. Prince Edward is now the fifth holder of the Duke of Edinburgh title, which he will retain for the rest of his life. However, the title is no longer hereditary, meaning there's no guarantee that it will be passed on to Edward and Sophie's son James when Edward passes away. This could potentially see the title being handed down to one of the children of the Prince and Princess of Wales in the future, with Prince Louis being the most likely candidate to inherit it. The practice of bestowing specific titles upon royals is rooted in a long history of lineage and land ownership, with each title signifying everything from a royal's duties and responsibilities to the correct way to address them.

Princess Kate's prestigious title 'almost went to another senior royal'
Princess Kate's prestigious title 'almost went to another senior royal'

Daily Mirror

time8 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Princess Kate's prestigious title 'almost went to another senior royal'

Before Kate became the Duchess of Cambridge when she married Prince William in 2011, one other unlikely royal was also in the running for the prestigious title. Within the royal family, many senior members of the Firm are often referred to by their alternative titles, such as Duke, Duchess, Earl, Countess, Lady, and countless others. While each royal holds their own unique title, which can often go back generations, there have been rare occasions of two people eligible for the same moniker. One such instance stems back to 1999, and almost cost the Princess of Wales her previous title of the Duchess of Cambridge. When Sophie, born Sophie Rhys-Jones, tied the knot with Prince Edward in 1999, Edward was originally to be awarded the coveted title of Duke of Cambridge, while Sophie would become the Duchess of Cambridge. ‌ ‌ However, according to a palace courtier, Prince Edward - the youngest of Queen Elizabeth's children - drew inspiration from a very unusual source to establish his own unique title as an alternative, opting not to be awarded dukedom like his older brother Prince Andrew. The courtier explained to The Telegraph in 2010: "Prince Edward was going to be the Duke of Cambridge, but he watched the film Shakespeare in Love, which had a character called the Earl of Wessex. He liked the sound of it and asked the Queen if he could have that instead." As a result, Sophie became the Countess of Wessex and the titles of Duke and Duchess of Cambridge eventually went to Prince William and Kate Middleton when they got married in 2011. Prince Edward and Sophie changed their titles once more in 2024 as they became the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh as part of the Edward's 59th birthday celebrations in March, in honour of his late father Prince Philip. The Duke of Edinburgh title was originally created for Prince Frederick, eldest son of King George II back in 1726. In 1764, it was given to Prince William, brother of King George III, as part of the joint title The Duke of Gloucester and Edinburgh. ‌ Prince Alfred, second son of Queen Victoria, took over the title in 1866, before it was handed to Prince Philip when he married the late Queen Elizabeth II. Prince Edward is the fifth Duke of Edinburgh title and will hold the title for the rest of his life. The role is no longer a hereditary one, meaning there is no guarantee the moniker will go to Edward and Sophie's son James when Edward dies. This could mean the title could be passed to one of the Prince and Princess of Wales 's children in the future, with Prince Louis the most likely candidate to inherit the name. The tradition of awarding royals with certain unique titles stems from a long history of genetic lineage and land ownership, with each title denoting everything from a royal's roles and responsibilities to how they should be referenced.

Little UK town named most 'boring' place to live but not everyone agrees
Little UK town named most 'boring' place to live but not everyone agrees

Daily Mirror

time4 days ago

  • Daily Mirror

Little UK town named most 'boring' place to live but not everyone agrees

One South West London town has been named one of the UK's most boring places to live - but its great transport and activity offerings have some begging to differ London, known for its vibrant life offers endless activities day and night. Yet, surprisingly, a South West London town has been dubbed one of the UK's " most boring" places to live. Surbiton received the title from The Telegraph, alongside five other UK towns. The criteria used by the publication is not entirely clear, but it appears to have selected locations that people "collectively consider boring", despite each having its own unique charm. Surbiton indeed has much to offer those seeking a tranquil experience on the outskirts of London, reports MyLondon. ‌ Nestled on the edge of London and Surrey, the leafy and peaceful Surbiton was once described by The Telegraph as "neither London nor Surrey, neither ultra-middle class nor confusedly 'gritty.' It also notes that the area is close to Home Park and Hampton Court, as well as Surrey Hills and Kingston. ‌ The paper notes that the area's top tourist attraction is its station which is perhaps why it made it to the list in the first place. However, what some might not know is that the hit sitcom series The Good Life was set in Surbiton, although it was actually filmed in the Middlesex borough of Northwood. So while it might have just won the title of being one of the UK's most boring towns, Surbiton has actually got plenty to offer for those looking for a more relaxed outskirts of London experience. Transport and housing The town is well-connected to the city, despite falling within Travelcard Zone 6. Journeys between Surbiton station and London Waterloo takes on average 27 minutes - making it a great option for commuters. Its train station has a beautiful art-deco front which has featured in its fair share of TV shows and films including Harry Potter and Poirot. The area has also been home to celebrities like Spiderman star Tom Holland, and authors Enid Blyton and Jacqueline Wilson. Things to do ‌ Surbiton may have been branded one of the UK's "most boring" places, but it surprisingly offers a fair bit more activity-wise. It's nestled near several verdant areas, including Claremont Gardens and Berrylands Nature Reserve. One TripAdvisor review that is a self-proclaimed "regular" at Claremont Gardens confirmed the area is beautiful year-round. "The colours of the trees and landscape are beautiful in different ways through the year. It's definitely worth a visit for a little exploration and calm wander around the grounds." The reviewer also suggested heading out onto the water for some added fun. "I've enjoyed hiring a boat to head out on the pond too, with the quizzical looks of interest from the ducks and birds floating around. The obligatory visit to a National Trust cafe for a scone also helps!" Come the weekend, the locals revel in the "great atmosphere and true sense of community" found at the bustling Surbiton Farmers Market. Another TripAdvisor reviewer emphasises the friendliness of locals: "This farmers' market is great to visit with such a variety of food and drinks plus plants and flowers. All the stall holders are so friendly and cheerful, whatever the weather." Connoisseurs of fine architecture can also admire the historic clock tower, a John Johnson creation commemorating the coronation of HRH King Edward VII in 1902.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store