‘Golden Dome' is pure fantasy
MUTZIG, FRANCE: First stop on my annual visit to France's mighty Maginot Line forts is this lovely Alsatian town. Mutzig was built by the Germans 1893-1916 to defend against enemy approaches to the important city of Strasbourg. It was – and remains – the largest modern fortress in Europe.
The vast fortress, which covers over 800 acres, was never attacked during World War I by the Germans or French. But as Europe's first important fortress made of concrete and fully electrified, it was eagerly studied by French engineers and served as a template for the Maginot Line forts two decades later.
Both world wars showed the vulnerability of fixed fortifications. An enemy will always find a way round them or discover a fatal weakness.
In regard to the 322km-long Maginot Line, the forts did not fail. They held out to the bitter end.
The reason for France's stunning defeat in 1940 was the failure of its field army and its blockheaded generals. Interestingly, a French parliamentary deputy with the effervescent name of Perrier precisely predicted where the Germans would break through the Ardennes Forest in 1940.
Though vulnerable, the fixed defences of the Maginot Line were hugely popular in France and wildly overestimated because they involved huge construction projects for many of the villages and factories along France's eastern border with Germany.
Just as New Deal make-work projects boosted the United States during the Great Depression.
We see a similar mania in the response to President Donald Trump's plan to create a national 'Golden Dome' defensive shield to protect the nation from assorted nuclear threats.
In many ways, it's a re-run of President Ronald Reagan's Star Wars missile shield, which never got off the ground but was extremely popular among the public.
Frederick the Great of Prussia noted, 'he who defends everything, defends nothing,' As true today as it was in the 18th century.
A national missile defence system to cover the entire nation would be impossibly expensive for a nation already deeply mired in debt.
The always powerful military-industrial complex will see Trump's Golden Dome fantasy as a second Christmas though the basic technology has yet to be proven.
One wonders if the proponents of this defensive system have noticed that Russia has developed ballistic missiles that can alter course, change altitudes and switch targets? Or that China has ICBMs aboard freighters in the Pacific.
What about evolving electronic countermeasures that can fry enemy communications and guidance systems?
It would be far more prudent for the US to pursue disarmament talks and effective inspection regimes with its rivals than pie in the sky defensive systems that will certainly enrich military companies but fail to protect North America.
What's more, having even a partial anti-missile system will likely make the US more aggressive and prone to wars.
Better to spend the trillions on curing cancer or blindness than on space wizardry.
Alas, we have a view of what awaits us. Lately, Trump banned people from 12 mostly Muslims nations and imposed restrictions on seven nations. Good work Mr President.
You and your New York City construction buddies have now made enemies of a quarter of the world's population.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
41 minutes ago
- The Sun
Mutilation ban and microchips: EU lawmakers vote on cat and dog welfare
STRASBOURG: Compulsory microchipping, as well as bans on ear-cropping and tail-docking, are among a set of new rules to protect cats and dogs that European lawmakers are due to vote on Thursday. The European Union is home to more than 72 million dogs and 83 million cats, according to the European Commission, which so far has only regulated health requirements for them related to travel within the bloc. But an uptick in trafficking pushed the EU to propose a set of common rules for breeding, housing and handling the animals, whose sales generate an estimated 1.3 billion euros ($1.5 billion) annually. The European Parliament in Strasbourg is to vote on a text put forward by the commission in 2023, which introduces minimum welfare criteria for dogs and cats in kennels, shelters and pet shops. The bill says all dogs and cats should be identified with a subcutaneous microchip when they are sold -- a system already in use in some member states -- and registered in an EU database. That would boost traceability and tackle illegal traffic, predominantly of dogs, with animal protection groups singling out eastern EU countries like Romania and Bulgaria. Hunting exception Painful mutilations, like cutting tails or ears, will also be banned in most cases and so will electric, choke and spiked collars. The law also seeks to prohibit inbreeding and the breeding of animals with accentuated traits, such as overly short legs, that could affect their welfare. The measures enjoy broad consensus among political groups but the extent of their application has been the cause of contention, for those keeping a small number of animals will be exempt. 'For the time being, 80 percent of breeders would not be covered,' lamented Green lawmaker Tilly Metz. Other exemptions have upset animal rights activists. Strays will not be covered by the microchipping requirement, for example, and the ban on mutilations is less stringent for hunting dogs. Similarly, coercive collars will still be allowed to train police, military and border patrol dogs. 'This text lays some interesting foundations, but it does not go to the heart of the matter,' said Christophe Marie of French animal protection group Fondation 30 Millions d'Amis. If adopted by lawmakers, the legislation will need to be approved by EU member states before coming into force.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
EU lawmakers vote on cat and dog welfare
STRASBOURG: Compulsory microchipping, as well as bans on ear-cropping and tail-docking, are among a set of new rules to protect cats and dogs that European lawmakers are due to vote on Thursday. The European Union is home to more than 72 million dogs and 83 million cats, according to the European Commission, which so far has only regulated health requirements for them related to travel within the bloc. But an uptick in trafficking pushed the EU to propose a set of common rules for breeding, housing and handling the animals, whose sales generate an estimated 1.3 billion euros ($1.5 billion) annually. The European Parliament in Strasbourg is to vote on a text put forward by the commission in 2023, which introduces minimum welfare criteria for dogs and cats in kennels, shelters and pet shops. The bill says all dogs and cats should be identified with a subcutaneous microchip when they are sold -- a system already in use in some member states -- and registered in an EU database. That would boost traceability and tackle illegal traffic, predominantly of dogs, with animal protection groups singling out eastern EU countries like Romania and Bulgaria. Hunting exception Painful mutilations, like cutting tails or ears, will also be banned in most cases and so will electric, choke and spiked collars. The law also seeks to prohibit inbreeding and the breeding of animals with accentuated traits, such as overly short legs, that could affect their welfare. The measures enjoy broad consensus among political groups but the extent of their application has been the cause of contention, for those keeping a small number of animals will be exempt. 'For the time being, 80 percent of breeders would not be covered,' lamented Green lawmaker Tilly Metz. Other exemptions have upset animal rights activists. Strays will not be covered by the microchipping requirement, for example, and the ban on mutilations is less stringent for hunting dogs. Similarly, coercive collars will still be allowed to train police, military and border patrol dogs. 'This text lays some interesting foundations, but it does not go to the heart of the matter,' said Christophe Marie of French animal protection group Fondation 30 Millions d'Amis. If adopted by lawmakers, the legislation will need to be approved by EU member states before coming into force.
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
In deadly tit-for-tat, Israel strikes Iranian nuclear sites, Tehran hits Beersheba hospital
WASHINGTON, June 19 — Israel struck a key Iranian nuclear site today and Iranian missiles hit an Israeli hospital, as President Donald Trump kept the world guessing about whether the US would join Israel in air strikes seeking to destroy Tehran's nuclear facilities. A week of Israeli air and missile strikes against its major rival has wiped out the top echelon of Iran's military command, damaged its nuclear capabilities and killed hundreds of people, while Iranian retaliatory strikes have killed at least two dozen civilians in Israel. The Israeli military said it targeted the Khondab nuclear reactor in Iran's Arak overnight, including its partially-built heavy-water research reactor. Heavy-water reactors pose a nuclear proliferation risk because they can easily produce plutonium, which, like enriched uranium, can be used to make the core of an atom bomb. Iranian media reported two projectiles hitting an area near the facility, which had been evacuated and there were no reports of radiation threats. Israel's military said it also struck a site in the area of Natanz, which it said contains components and specialised equipment used to advance nuclear weapons development. This morning, several Iranian missiles struck populated areas in Israel, including a hospital in the southern part of the country, according to an Israeli military official. Trails of missiles and interception efforts were visible in the skies over Tel Aviv, with explosions heard as incoming projectiles were intercepted. Israeli media also reported direct hits in central Israel. Emergency services said five people had been seriously injured in the attacks and dozens of others hurt in three separate locations. People were still trapped in a building in a south Tel Aviv neighbourhood, they added. Around a dozen mostly European and African embassies and diplomatic missions are located just a few hundred metres from the strike on Tel Aviv. Images showed buildings extensively damaged in Ramat Gan near Tel Aviv and emergency workers helping residents, including children. Soroka Medical Centre in Beersheba, in southern Israel, reported it had sustained damage. Iran's Revolutionary Guard said it was targeting Israeli military and intelligence headquarters near the hospital. The worst-ever conflict between the two regional powers has raised fears that it will draw in world powers and further destabilize the Middle East. Speaking to reporters outside the White House yesterday, Trump declined to say if he had made any decision on whether to join Israel's air campaign. 'I may do it. I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do,' he said. Trump in later remarks said Iranian officials wanted to come to Washington for a meeting. 'We may do that,' he said, adding 'it's a little late' for such talks. Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei rebuked Trump's earlier call for Iran to surrender in a recorded speech played on television, his first appearance since Friday. 'Any US military intervention will undoubtedly be accompanied by irreparable damage,' he said. 'The Iranian nation will not surrender.' Iran denies it is seeking nuclear weapons and says its program is for peaceful purposes only. The International Atomic Energy Agency said last week Tehran was in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in 20 years. The foreign ministers of Germany, France and Britain plan to hold nuclear talks with their Iranian counterpart tomorrow in Geneva to urge Iran to return to the negotiating table, a German diplomatic source told Reuters. Israel, which is not a party to the international Non-Proliferation Treaty, is the only country in the Middle East believed to have nuclear weapons. Israel does not deny or confirm that. Calls for diplomacy Trump has veered from proposing a swift diplomatic end to the war to suggesting the United States might join it. A source familiar with internal discussions said Trump and his team were considering options that included joining Israel in strikes against Iranian nuclear installations. But the prospect of a US strike against Iran has exposed divisions in the coalition of supporters that brought Trump to power, with some of his base urging him not to get the country involved in a new Middle East war. Senior US Senate Democrats urged Trump to prioritise diplomacy and seek a binding agreement to prevent Iran from attaining nuclear weapons, while expressing concern about his administration's approach. 'We are alarmed by the Trump administration's failure to provide answers to fundamental questions. By law, the president must consult Congress and seek authorization if he is considering taking the country to war,' they said in a statement. 'He owes Congress and the American people a strategy for US engagement in the region.' In social media posts on Tuesday, Trump mused about killing Khamenei. Russian President Vladimir Putin, asked what his reaction would be if Israel did kill Iran's Supreme Leader with the assistance of the United States, said today: 'I do not even want to discuss this possibility. I do not want to.' Putin said all sides should look for ways to end hostilities in a way that ensured both Iran's right to peaceful nuclear power and Israel's right to the unconditional security of the Jewish state. Since Friday, Iran has fired around 400 missiles at Israel, some 40 of which have pierced air defences, killing 24 people, all of them civilians, according to Israeli authorities. The Iranian missile salvoes mark the first time in decades of shadow war and proxy conflict that a significant number of projectiles fired from Iran have penetrated defences, killing Israelis in their homes. Iran has reported at least 224 deaths in Israeli attacks, mostly civilians, but has not updated that toll for days. US-based Iranian activist news agency HRANA said 639 people had been killed in the Israeli attacks and 1,329 injured as of June 18. Reuters could not independently verify the report. — Reuters
