
Urgent 'terrorism' warning for Aussies heading to popular holiday hotspot
Aussies planning a holiday to the Maldives have been told to remain on high alert following an update to the Australian Government's official travel advice.
The Maldives is a tropical island nation in the Indian Ocean, southwest of Sri Lanka and India, known for its crystal-blue water and luxury holidays.
Australians are among the largest groups of visitors to the tropical paradise with over 30,000 travelling to the island nation in 2023 alone.
The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade's Smartraveller website on Thursday raised its advisory for the Maldives to Level 2: Exercise a High Degree of Caution.
It cited the risk of 'civil unrest and the ongoing threat of terrorism'.
'Terrorism can occur anywhere in the Maldives at any time,' the update continued.
'Potential targets include government institutions and areas frequented by tourists.'
Travellers are being advised to remain vigilant, avoid large gatherings and crowded places and to stay up to date by monitoring local media.
The heightened warning follows a series of security incidents in recent years.
In February 2020, a stabbing attack in the island of Hulhumalé left three foreign nationals injured, including an Australian.
That same year, a police speedboat was targeted by an arson attack in Laamu Gan, and in May 2021, an improvised explosive device detonated in the capital, Malé, injuring a prominent politician and several bystanders.
Smartraveller has also issued several other warnings for those planning a trip to the Maldives, particularly around civil unrest and general safety risks.
Protests, drug-related and gang-related violence is also known to occur in Greater Malé and other non-resort islands.
Even if the demonstrations appear calm, Smartraveller advises avoiding these gatherings and keeping up to date with official advice.
Petty crime is another concern.
Theft can occur on beaches and in hotel rooms, including at resorts, so travellers should take precautions and secure their valuables.
Australia is not the only country to issue a warning to travellers.
In April, the UK Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) updated its travel advice for British nationals visiting the Maldives.
The FCDO also emphasised that 'there is a high threat of terrorist attack globally affecting UK interests and British nationals '.
The advisory said that 'terrorist attacks in Maldives cannot be ruled out' and may occur indiscriminately, including in areas frequented by tourists.
Officials also noted that global tensions, particularly from the ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict, have contributed to an elevated risk environment, with terrorist groups such as Al-Qaida and Daesh actively calling for attacks in response.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Koran burner told of imminent terror threat to his life
An asylum seeker who burnt the Koran has received a police warning of an imminent terror plot to murder him, The Telegraph understands. Hamit Coskun was woken by officers acting on behalf of the Metropolitan Police at 2am on Saturday, who told him of 'an imminent threat', his lawyers said. The officers, who were from another force at a location where Coskun is in hiding, are understood to have read out what is known as an Osman warning. The 50-year-old was last week convicted of a racially aggravated public order offence, after shouting 'f--- Islam' and 'Islam is religion of terrorism' while setting fire to the religious text above his head during a protest on Feb 13. His supporters have accused the Met Police and Crown Prosecution Service of putting his life in danger by pursuing a prosecution against him. The court heard that Coskun, who was living in Derby and had to move to a safe house after a video of the incident was posted online, had been forced to leave his home country of Turkey two and a half years ago to escape persecution. In a letter to Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley, on behalf of Coskun, Lord Young of Acton, General Secretary of the Free Speech Union, stated: 'We consider that the risk to Mr Coskun's life was caused, in part, by the actions of your officers and the CPS. Danger from 'Islamic extremists' 'Your force had repeatedly suggested publicly that Mr Coskun had offended the 'religious institution of Islam'. Doing so has increased the risk to Mr Coskun from Islamic extremists.' Police are obliged to issue an Osman warning when there is intelligence of the threat, but there is not enough evidence to justify the police arresting the potential murderer. A spokesman for the Met Police said: 'There remains an ongoing police investigation in relation to allegations of threats to kill against a 50-year-old male. Given the investigation is ongoing, we won't be able to comment further at this stage.' Coskun was prosecuted under the Public Order Act after burning a copy of the Koran outside the Turkish Consulate in Knightsbridge. Critics of the decision to prosecute him accused British courts of reviving blasphemy laws by the back door in pursuing his prosecution. Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, said: 'This decision is wrong. It revives a blasphemy law that parliament repealed. 'Free speech is under threat. I have no confidence in two-tier Keir to defend the rights of the public to criticise all religions.' 'De facto blasphemy laws' Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch added on social media: 'De facto blasphemy laws will set this country on the road to ruin. This case should go to appeal. Freedom of belief and freedom not to believe are inalienable rights in Britain. 'I'll defend those rights to my dying day.' Blasphemy laws were abolished in the UK 17 years ago. In a statement after the verdict, Coskun said the decision was 'an assault on free speech' that would deter others from exercising their democratic right to protest. He added: 'As an activist, I will continue to campaign against the threat of Islam. 'Christian blasphemy laws were repealed in this country more than 15 years ago, and it cannot be right to prosecute someone for blaspheming against Islam. 'Would I have been prosecuted if I'd set fire to a copy of the Bible outside Westminster Abbey? I doubt it.' He has pledged to continue burning Korans and intends to go on a tour of the UK, visiting Birmingham, Liverpool and Glasgow, where he will set fire to the holy book. It is unclear if he will resist doing so until the case is heard at appeal - should he be able to challenge the verdict against him in a higher court. The CPS said that Coskun was not being prosecuted for burning the book. They argued it was the combination of his derogatory remarks about Islam and the fact that it was done in public that made it an offence. The CPS originally charged Coskun, who is an atheist, with harassing the 'religious institution of Islam'. CPS charge amended However, the charge was later amended after free speech campaigners took up his cause and argued he was essentially being accused of blasphemy. Katy Thorne KC, Coskun's barrister, had argued that his actions were not motivated by hostility towards the followers of Islam, but the religion itself. District Judge John McGarva, however, said he did not accept that argument. Giving his verdict, Judge McGarva said: 'Your actions in burning the Koran where you did were highly provocative, and your actions were accompanied by bad language in some cases directed toward the religion and were motivated at least in part by hatred of followers of the religion.' The judge ordered Coskun, who is currently claiming asylum, to pay a fine of £240. A man has admitted assaulting Coskun during his demonstration outside the Turkish Embassy, but has denied using a knife in the attack. The man, whose identity is subject to reporting restrictions, is due to go on trial in 2027.


Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
Dawn French apologises for ‘Oct 7 attacks' video
Dawn French has apologised 'unreservedly' after she posted a 'one-sided' video in which she appeared to dismiss the Hamas terrorist attacks of October 7. The 67-year-old comedian and actress was accused of belittling the attacks in a clip she put on social media in which she claimed the murder of 1,200 people was 'a bad thing'. In the video, posted on X on May 5, she mimics apparent defences of Israel's huge military campaign in Gaza. She was accused of appearing to belittle the Hamas-led murders of 1,200 people and adopting a 'mocking' tone. On Saturday, she removed that video and issued an apology, adding that she was 'sorry' her 'disgust at Hamas didn't figure'. The message, also on X, says: 'Ok, it's important to address this. I posted a video in the style I've been using for social media in an effort to convey an important point. I clumsily used a mocking tone. 'My intention was NEVER to mock, or dismiss, or diminish the horror of what happened on 7 October 2023 and what continues to unfold from that brutal, unthinkable, unforgivable, savage attack.' She said her 'heart broke' for the innocent people 'killed, tortured, r@aped [sic] and kidnapped', adding that it was 'appalling' that hostages were still being held. She insisted that her 'intention was to mock and point the finger of shame at the behaviour of the cruel leaders on ALL sides of this attricious [sic] war, who have continued to behave like the worst, dangerous, sickening bullies and seem to relish the tyrannical and childish one-upmanship of violence.' She added she was 'feeling increasingly helpless and hopeless as we witness the carnage and destruction worsen', adding how she was 'haunted … day and night ' by 'images of starving children.' The Vicar of Dibley actress wrote: 'History has taught us never to stand by and allow this kind of inhumane violence to be wrought on anyone, especially innocent children. 'I have felt my silence is complicit or even somehow sanctioning. So in my small way, I wanted to voice my desire to say NO - to both sides - to any further violence. 'I hope you will understand my intention was not to offend, but clearly I have. For which I am sorry and I have removed the video.' She was accused of adopting a baby-like face in the original 40-second video. She filmed herself saying: 'Complicated, no, but nuanced. But [the] bottom line is no.' She went on: ''Yeah, but you know they did a bad thing to us'... Yeah, but no. ''But we want that land and there's a lot of history…'. No. 'These people are not even people, are they really?' No.' The video was viewed more than half a million times in the 24 hours after it was posted. Tracy-Ann Oberman, an actress who has appeared in numerous West End shows, accused the comedian of adopting a 'mocking' tone. Comedy writer and self-described 'champion of Jewish rights' Lee Kern wrote: 'What you sneeringly mock as a 'bad thing' included the grieving children I met in hospital whose friends and family had been murdered, kidnapped and raped and who themselves were coming to terms with their own life-altering injuries. 'It also includes the 1,200 people murdered and tortured on October 7th… you proactively broadcast – with misplaced pride – a wicked glee in your mockery and dismissal of Jewish suffering, pain and death.' Israel began its ground offensive in Gaza in response to Hamas's terrorist attack, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage. There are now 56 hostages still held by Hamas in Gaza, at least 20 of whom are believed to be alive. Israel was criticised by Sir Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, for its recent 'appalling' military action, describing the conduct of Benjamin Netanyahu's government as 'intolerable' following claims that more than 50,000 people, including many women and children, had been killed by Israeli forces.


The Review Geek
5 hours ago
- The Review Geek
Mercy for None – K-drama Episode 1 Recap & Review
Episode 1 Episode 1 of Mercy for None begins in Yeouido, Seoul, in 2010. A man named Gi-jun tells his younger brother, Gi-seok, that he's spoken to Chairman Lee Ju-woon. Gi-seok can join the company soon. Gi-jun then heads out to a fight between two gangs. We watch him easily take down a fighter from the other gang, who had previously taken down several men. We then shift to the present day. A manager from Bongsan Group finds himself kidnapped by two foreign assassins who make quick work of him. Chairman Gu Bong-san of Bongsan Group and Chairman Lee Ju-woon of Juwoon Group discuss this matter over a meal. Bong-san describes how his son, Gu Jun-mo, hired foreign assassins to kill his manager after he found some business discrepancies. Chairman Bong-san doesn't want to get involved directly since he is Jun-mo's father, so he asks Ju-woon to take care of the foreign assassins and clean up the mess. In return, he offers help with a real estate issue. Chairman Ju-woon agrees and gives this task to Gi-seok, who is now senior managing director and also set to be Ju-woon's successor. However, Gi-seok wants to quit his job. Despite this, he takes up the work and visits Jun-mo along with his junior, Cheon Hae-beom. Gi-seok tells the foreign assassins to leave within three days. Jun-mo isn't happy about this and taunts Gi-seok by bringing up Gi-jun. Apparently, Gi-jun had created a mess and both the chairmen cleaned it up. They let him live but they cut his Achilles tendon to make up for it. With a couple of strikes, Gi-seok takes Jun-mo down and walks away while Jun-mo screams death threats at him. Meanwhile, a Bongsan manager named Kim Chun-seok gets a call and is shocked to learn that Gi-seok has gone to meet Jun-mo in person. Gi-seok then heads out to meet Gi-jun, who is living at a campsite in the middle of the woods. They're meeting after six years. Gi-seok tells him that Chairman Ju-woon wants him to be the successor but that he has mixed feelings about it. Gi-jun realises something is wrong. Back home, Gi-seok gets the feeling that someone is in the house. He goes down to the parking lot and finds a cat. However, as he's feeding the cat, a masked man attacks him. More men come out of the shadows — this is an ambush. Gi-seok easily takes them all down. He lets the last man go but when his back is turned, the man attacks and stabs Gi-seok. In the woods, Gi-jun gets a phone call. The scene skips to Gi-seok's funeral, where Juwoon employees come to pay their respects. As do Chairman Gu Bong-san and Jun-mo. Outside, Ju-woon's manager, Choi Seong-cheol speaks to Kim Chun-seok, hinting that Bongsan was behind the attack. Chun-seok tells him that it was just some runaway kids, as the police have verified. Just then, prosecutor Lee Geum-son, Lee Ju-woon's oldest son, arrives to pay his respects. However, Seong-cheol asks him to leave since his father doesn't want him here. Gi-jun then shows up and Seong-cheol has everyone bow to him. He takes Gi-jun to Gi-seok's body and Gi-jun asks if it was really just kids. Elsewhere, the two chairmen discuss the matter of Ju-woon's successor. Gi-jun enters the room and brings up the pact they made 11 years ago. Gi-jun had promised not to show his face again and the chairmen had promised to keep his brother safe. When they don't offer any more information about his brother's death, Gi-jun leaves. Outside, Hae-beom introduces himself to Gi-jun. Gi-jun then goes to Gi-seok's house, where he finds books on camping. He also finds a birthday gift that Gi-seok was going to send him. Gi-jun then wraps a band around his ankle, the one with a scar. Gi-jun then goes to the police station. He wants to meet the suspect in his brother's murder case. The detectives tell him it's not allowed but Gi-jun insinuates he knows something about the detective. Gi-jun is allowed to meet him. The young man, Hui-chan, shows no remorse but he accidentally reveals he has a brother as well. Gi-jun goes after the younger brother and finds Hui-cheon's entire gang corners him. Turns out, this was his plan to find the people who killed Gi-seok. The fight begins and Gi-jun mows through them easily. After all the men are down, he goes towards the younger brother. An epilogue of Mercy for None Episode 1 shows Hui-chan stab Gi-seok. Gi-seok casually throws him off and all the gangsters run away. He then removes the knife in his side and heads back out of the parking lot. But someone's waiting for him on the other side of the door. The Episode Review Episode 1 of Mercy for None is a gripping and thrilling pilot. The episode drops us right into the heart of gangs, murders, and power dynamics. It establishes the two gangs, Bongsan and Juwoon groups, quite well and introduces us to all the important players too. We get a taste of what Gi-jun was like and what Gi-seok became, as well as their relationship as brothers. The visuals are dark and infused with plenty of neon. The action is fantastically shot here; it's sharp and uses the right amount of camera movement. It's so interesting to see that Gi-jun and Gi-seok's fighting styles are different as well, the former's a lot more violent and messy when compared to Gi-seok's cleaner moves. Along with the serious tone and gritty storyline, this one looks to be a solid, enjoyable neo noir. On to episode 2! Next Episode Expect A Full Season Write-Up When This Season Concludes!