logo
The US bond market: Getting ‘yippy' again?

The US bond market: Getting ‘yippy' again?

Mint23-05-2025

Generally, US government debt auctions are sleepy affairs—except when they're not. And Wednesday's sale by the US Treasury Department of $16 billion in 20-year bonds definitely qualified for the latter category. It's unlikely to be the only one.
The offering was the government's first auction of so-called coupon-bearing debt since Moody's Ratings last Friday became the last of the three big credit assessors to strip the US of its top triple-A rating, following S&P Global Ratings in 2011 and Fitch Ratings in 2023.
Also Read: Vivek Kaul: The bond market called Trump's bluff but the coast is still hazy
The auction was considered subpar on at least two critical measures, the amount of bids received from investors relative to the amount being sold, and the higher interest rate investors demanded relative to where the bonds were trading in the so-called when issued market before the sale.
In a vast understatement, the interest-rate strategists at BMO Capital Markets described the auction as 'lacklustre" in a note to clients. That's an understatement because the poor auction sent yields for Treasuries of all maturities flying higher.
Those on 10-year Treasuries—the global benchmark that helps determine borrowing costs for the government, businesses and consumers—rose to the highest since February, higher than the levels in early April that forced President Donald Trump to reverse course and soften his draconian tariff plan.
Markets 'were jumping a little bit out of line," Trump told reporters at the time when asked why he backed off. 'They were getting a little bit yippy, a little bit afraid."
Like then, it's not only the bond market that's 'a little bit yippy." The Standard & Poor's 500 Index fell to its low of the day after the bond auction, tumbling as much as 1.51%. The greenback also took a hit, with the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index that measures the currency against its major global peers, falling as much as 0.57%.
Unlike in April, the latest turmoil isn't about tariffs, but rather the US's deteriorating fiscal position as lawmakers in Congress consider a budget bill [already passed by the House and awaiting a Senate nod] that will keep deficits near historic levels for years to come and add to the country's already heavy debt load.
Also Read: Mint Quick Edit | America's credit rating slip: How serious?
As my Bloomberg Opinion colleague Justin Fox points out, if the tax and spending bill is enacted more or less as is, the deficit a decade from now will, according to the latest estimates from the Congressional Budget Office, be around 6.8% of gross domestic product. That's remarkable because the federal deficit is already 6.4% of GDP, which Fox notes is unprecedented except in wartime or during other significant crises.
In that sense, it's understandable why bond investors are demanding higher rates to lend money to the US government.
Lawmakers in the Republican-controlled House and Senate are barely giving lip service to the notion that they want to rein in debt and deficits—a horrifying development for lenders.
'Republican claims to fiscal probity are now lost," TS Lombard Chief US Economist Steven Blitz wrote in a research note dated 21 May. 'The fundamental imbalance of outlays and revenue remains because the US refuses to tax itself enough to pay for what it has promised and/or refuses to break the promises it has made."
Indeed, Blitz suggested that if enough buyers step away from the auctions, the Treasury might be forced to tweak its rules to let banks hold more Treasuries and/or the Federal Reserve will have to step in and buy US government debt via another round of quantitative easing.
Former Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin went further, saying he's more alarmed by the country's growing budget deficit than its trade imbalances. 'I'm very concerned," Mnuchin, who headed the Treasury in Trump's first term, said during a panel discussion. 'The budget deficit is a larger concern to me than the trade deficit. So, I'm on the side of, I hope we do get more spending cuts—something that's very important."
Alas, whatever spending cuts come in this bill won't be enough to cover the proposed tax cuts. And that means more debt. As it stands, federal debt held by the public was already forecast to rise from about 100% of GDP this year to 117% by 2034. The House bill would push the ratio to 125%.
Also Read: Does the US credit rating cut by Moody's offer India an opportunity?
'Successive US administrations and Congress have failed to agree on measures to reverse the trend of large annual fiscal deficits and growing interest costs," Moody's said in a statement last Friday. 'We do not believe that material multi-year reductions in mandatory spending and deficits will result from current fiscal proposals under consideration."
What made this bond sale so worrisome is that 20-year Treasury auctions are generally the least consequential. The Treasury began selling that maturity in 2020 for the first time since the 1980s, and they don't trade hands as much as some of the more popular maturities, like two- or 10-year notes. 'I never write on the 20-year auction because it's sort of this low liquidity, lost child Treasury note where not many play around this maturity playground," Peter Boockvar, an independent strategist, wrote in a note to clients in describing the sale.
Even so, the poor results put pressure on next week's auctions of more consequential maturities, with the US slated to sell two-, five- and seven-year notes.
A similar outcome at those sales would only exacerbate the notion of a global synchronized 'Sell America' trade. Don't expect the yips to go away by then. ©Bloomberg
The author is executive editor of Bloomberg Opinion.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Yes, more and more celebrities are entering the phone business. Heres why
Yes, more and more celebrities are entering the phone business. Heres why

Mint

time33 minutes ago

  • Mint

Yes, more and more celebrities are entering the phone business. Heres why

NEW YORK (AP) — More and more celebrities are looking to attach their names to your phone. Or rather, wireless services that could power it. From cosmetics to snacks and signature spirits, brands launched or co-owned by high-profile figures are just about everywhere you look today. But several big names are also venturing into the market for mobile virtual network operators — or MVNOs, an industry term for businesses that provide cell coverage by leasing infrastructure from bigger, more established carriers. U.S. President Donald Trump's family was the most recent to join the list with the launch of Trump Mobile this week. Here's what to know. On Monday, The Trump Organization (currently run by the president's sons Eric and Donald Jr.) unveiled Trump Mobile. The company says this new business will offer cell service, through an apparent licensing deal with 'all three major cellular carriers" in the U.S., and sell gold phones by August. Trump Mobile marks the latest in a string of new Trump-branded offerings — which already span from golden sneakers to 'God Bless the USA' bibles — despite mounting ethical concerns that the president is profiting off his position and could distort public policy for personal gain. "This raises a real question about a conflict of interest,' said Ben Bentzin, an associate professor of instruction at The University of Texas at Austin's McCombs School of Business. As the sitting president, Trump appoints leadership for the Federal Communications Commission — and the family's new phone venture exists under this regulatory authority. All of this sets Trump Mobile apart from other big names that have recently ventured into the wireless business. Still, its launch arrives as a growing number of celebrities tap into this space. Just last week, actors Jason Bateman, Sean Hayes and Will Arnett launched SmartLess Mobile, a name that mirrors the trio's 'SmartLess' podcast. Now live across the contiguous U.S. and Puerto Rico, SmartLess Mobile runs on T-Mobile's 5G Network. Another wireless provider with ties to fame is Mint Mobile. While not launched by celebrities, Ryan Reynolds purchased an ownership stake in Mint in 2019. Mint's parent, the Ka'ena Corporation, was later acquired by T-Mobile in a deal worth up to $1.35 billion. Beyond names of famous people, well-known brands that weren't traditionally in the phone business have also got in on the action over the years — particuarly outside of the U.S., Forrester Research senior analyst Octavio Garcia Granados notes. He points to Walmart's 'Bait' mobile plan in Mexico, for example, as well as Italian soccer club AC Milan launching its own mobile SIM cards for fans. 'The MVNO market is not new," said Garcia Granados. 'What's new is the development on how it's consumed and the (ease) for brands to launch such plans.' MVNOs have also emerged outside of high-profile brands or launch teams. Bentzin points to Straight Talk and Cricket — which are now owned by Verizon and AT&T, respectively. Still, traditional celebrity endorsements are common across the board. And in recent years, 'influencer marketing" has been 'the fastest growing area of advertising and promotion," he notes. For Trump Mobile, the pitch seems to be all about having an 'all-American service" while also tapping into the fan base of the president. The company noted Monday that it chose to unveil Trump Mobile on the 10th anniversary of Trump launching "his historic presidential campaign.' The name given to its flagship offer, The 47 Plan, and the $47.45 monthly fee make reference to the president's two terms. And a mock-up of the planned gold phone on the company's website shows Trump's 'Make America Great' slogan on the front screen. According to the company, Trump Mobile's 47 Plan will include unlimited calls, texts and data through partner carriers, as well as free roadside assistance and telehealth services. It also says the new phone, called the 'T1 Phone,' will be available for $499 in August — but notes that this device won't be designed or made by Trump Mobile. Still, the company emphasized that these phones will be built in the U.S. Experts have since shared skepticism about that being possible in two months. And beyond the future T1 Phone, others stress that a monthly cell service fee of just under $50 is pricey compared to other MVNO options today. 'It's not actual lower pricing. It's really trading on the fan base, if you will, of Trump,' said Bentzin. SmartLess Mobile and Mint Mobile, of course, don't carry these same political ties. And the wireless plans offered by both boast less expensive offerings. T-Mobile-owned Mint advertises 'flexible, buy-in-bulk' plans that range from $15 to $30 a month. Each option includes unlimited talk and text nationwide, but vary depending on plan length and data amount. Mint, founded in 2016, says it started 'because we'd had enough of the wireless industry's games' — and promises to help consumers avoid hidden fees. SmartLess Mobile's plans also start at $15 a month. Depending on the data amount purchased, that base fee can rise to $30 — but all of its plans similarly offer unlimited talk and text using T-Mobile's network. When launching last week, SmartLess underlined that its goal is to help people stop paying for the data they don't use, noting that the majority of data used by consumers today happens over Wi-Fi. 'Seriously, if your phone bill knew how often you're on Wi-Fi, it would be embarrassed," Hayes said in a statement for SmartLess Mobile's June 10 launch. MVNOs have proven to be attractive acquisitions to big wireless carriers over the years. But whether or not the star factor promises significant demand has yet to be seen for the market's most recent entrants. For the more established Mint Mobile, Reynolds' investment is a success story. The 25% stake that the actor reportedly owned in 2023, when the company announced that it would be acquired by T-Mobile, was estimated to give him a personal windfall of over $300 million in cash and stock. And since that deal closed, Reynolds has remained in his creative role for Mint and as the face of many campaigns — helping the brand continue to attract new customers. It's no surprise that the potential of such business returns might attract other celebrities to make similar investments, Bentzin notes. Still, newer ventures are untested. And "as the market becomes more crowded, it could be harder and harder to pick off individual consumers,' he added. Beyond a high-profile name, quality of service and what consumers can afford is also critical. 'The competition battleground here is brand and price,' Bentzin said. Still, if the marketing is right and product meets consumer needs, experts like Garcia Granados note that MVNOs can be a profitable business, for both the brands that start them and the telecommunications giants — like T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T — offering this 'wholesale' access to their infrastructure. As a result, he said, such high-profile ventures become 'a catalyst for others to follow." AP Business Writer Bernard Condon contributed to this report from New York.

Russia warns US against military aid to Israel as Donald Trump snubs Putin's mediation offer
Russia warns US against military aid to Israel as Donald Trump snubs Putin's mediation offer

Mint

time33 minutes ago

  • Mint

Russia warns US against military aid to Israel as Donald Trump snubs Putin's mediation offer

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov on Wednesday (June 18) warned the United States against offering direct military aid to Israel or even speculating about such actions. In remarks to Interfax, Ryabkov said, 'We caution Washington against even speculative, hypothetical options of this kind. It would be a step that would radically destabilize the entire situation.' He emphasised Russia's active diplomatic engagement, stating, 'We are in contact with both sides. This is happening at the working level and at the political level.' US President Donald Trump revealed that Russian President Vladimir Putin offered to mediate between Israel and Iran during a phone call on June 17. Trump said he declined the offer, urging Putin to focus on his own country's war in Ukraine. 'I spoke to him yesterday. He actually offered to mediate,' Trump said. 'I said, 'Do me a favor. Mediate your own. Let's mediate Russia first, OK?'' Trump added that the call also served as a birthday greeting from Putin, who phoned him on June 16—Trump's 79th birthday. However, confusion arose over whether the conversation actually occurred. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov downplayed the claim, telling TASS: 'He was speaking figuratively. Life is so eventful right now that looking back a few days is like looking back to yesterday.' Trump continues to walk a tightrope between averting war and preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. On Wednesday, he told reporters: 'I'm not looking to fight. But if it's a choice between fighting and having a nuclear weapon, you have to do what you have to do.' He kept his plans ambiguous: 'I may do it, I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do… Nothing is finished until it is finished.' He also hinted at imminent developments: 'The next week is going to be very big — maybe less than a week.' Trump claimed the US knows where Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei is hiding: 'He is an easy target, but is safe there. We are not going to take him out—at least not for now.' Iran's UN mission strongly denied Trump's assertion that Iranian officials sought talks with the White House. 'No Iranian official has ever asked to grovel at the gates of the White House. The only thing more despicable than his lies is his cowardly threat to take out Iran's Supreme Leader,' the statement read. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed to lawmakers that the Pentagon is providing Trump with military options as the conflict intensifies. Trump warned Iran's 9.5 million citizens to flee the capital and cut short his G7 trip in Alberta, Canada, to return to Washington for urgent consultations. Despite the tensions, Trump confirmed plans to attend the upcoming NATO summit in The Hague on June 24–25: 'Yeah, I'll be going. I think so.'

US reopens visas for foreign students, imposes mandatory social media screening
US reopens visas for foreign students, imposes mandatory social media screening

Hindustan Times

time43 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

US reopens visas for foreign students, imposes mandatory social media screening

The US State Department on Wednesday announced that it is restarting student visa applications for foreigners. However, all applicants will now have to give access to their social media accounts for review. The department said consular officers will check for posts or messages that appear hostile toward the United States, its government, culture, institutions, or founding values. Student visa applicants who refuse to make their social media accounts public may now face rejection, the US State Department said in a notice released Wednesday. The department also announced it had lifted the suspension on student visa processing imposed in May. It added that refusing access to social media could be seen as an attempt to hide online behaviour or evade screening. The Trump administration temporarily paused new visa interview appointments for international students last month as it prepared to tighten social media screening, officials said. Students worldwide have been anxiously waiting for US consulates to resume scheduling, with limited time left to arrange travel and housing before the academic year begins. 'Under new guidance, consular officers will conduct a comprehensive and thorough vetting of all student and exchange visitor applicants,' the department said in a statement. 'To facilitate this vetting,' applicants 'will be asked to adjust the privacy settings on all their social media profiles to 'public,' the department said. It added, 'The enhanced social media vetting will ensure we are properly screening every single person attempting to visit our country.' The State Department has instructed consular officers to screen visa applicants' social media profiles for 'any indications of hostility toward the citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles of the United States.' Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, criticised the move, saying it echoes Cold War-era ideological vetting that excluded artists and intellectuals. 'This policy makes a censor of every consular officer, and it will inevitably chill legitimate political speech both inside and outside the United States," Jaffer said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store