China Clashes With US Ally Over Rocket Launch
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The Philippines—a treaty ally of the United States—accused its major rival, China, of being irresponsible for launching a rocket across the South China Sea and putting its people at risk.
While Chinese authorities have not responded, state media—citing sources—reported that debris from the rocket fell into "predesignated drop zones" within international waters.
Newsweek has contacted the Chinese Embassy in Manila and the Philippine Embassy in Beijing for further comment via email.
Why It Matters
China and the Philippines both claim sovereignty over parts of the South China Sea, where overlapping claims often lead to clashes between their forces. Heightened tensions could draw the U.S. into a conflict, as Washington has signed a mutual defense treaty with Manila.
To support its fast-growing and ambitious space program, China has built two spacecraft launch facilities on the southern island province of Hainan, which borders the South China Sea. One is operated by the national space agency, while the other is commercially run.
A Chinese Long March-12 carrier rocket carrying a group of internet satellites blasts off from the Hainan commercial spacecraft launch site in Wenchang, Hainan province, China, on August 4.
A Chinese Long March-12 carrier rocket carrying a group of internet satellites blasts off from the Hainan commercial spacecraft launch site in Wenchang, Hainan province, China, on August 4.
VCG via AP
What To Know
China's Xinhua News Agency reported that a Long March-12 carrier rocket was launched from the commercial spacecraft launch site on Hainan Island on Monday evening. The rocket successfully placed its payload—low-orbit internet satellites—into orbit.
In a statement released on Tuesday, Philippine National Security Adviser Eduardo Año said China's rocket launch caused alarm and concern in the country because of "loud explosions," adding that a "fireball" was seen in the sky before it exploded, causing the ground to shake.
Footage and images shared by Jay Tarriela, a spokesperson for the Philippine coast guard, show a condensation trail in the sky, which he said was consistent with rocket exhaust or propulsion. He added that five loud explosions were recorded because of rocket-related activity.
Philippine Coast Guard Confirms Sound of Explosion Related to PRC Rocket Launch Activity
The Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) has confirmed the monitoring of rocket-related activity in the eastern part of Palawan on August 4, 2025, where a series of five loud explosions… pic.twitter.com/SMqkxTLdkt — Jay Tarriela (@jaytaryela) August 5, 2025
The Philippine Space Agency said the expected rocket debris was projected to have fallen within the designated drop zone in the Sulu Sea, in the southwestern part of the country.
According to a map provided by the Philippine Space Agency, the drop zone is located 24 miles from Puerto Princesa, Palawan, and 20 miles from Tubbataha Reefs Natural Park. It lies outside Philippine territorial waters, which extend up to 13.8 miles from the coastline.
While no damage or injuries had been reported, Año warned that rocket debris "poses a clear danger and risk" to land areas, as well as to ships and aircraft passing through the drop zone.
The Philippines has deployed ships and aircraft to search for rocket debris. Año asked the public to notify local authorities if they find suspected debris but warned them not to attempt to retrieve or come into close contact with the debris because of possible toxic fuel residues.
ROCKET LAUNCH ADVISORY | NDRRMC cautions the public for the possible falling of debris from the People's Republic of China's Long March 12 rocket that is scheduled to be launched on August 04, 2025.
The People's Republic of China is scheduled to launch the Long March 12 from the… pic.twitter.com/r42b4vEHMM — NDRRMC (@NDRRMC_OpCen) August 4, 2025
In response to Manila's claims, China's Global Times reported on Wednesday, citing sources familiar with the rocket launch mission, that the launch aligned with the mission designs, safety notices issued to surrounding countries prior to the launch and international practices.
What People Are Saying
Philippine National Security Adviser Eduardo Año said in a statement on Tuesday: "We condemn in no uncertain terms the irresponsible testing done by the People's Republic of China of its Long March 12 rocket which alarmed the public and placed the people of Palawan at risk."
Jay Tarriela, a spokesperson for the Philippine coast guard, wrote on X on Tuesday: "The PCG continues to prioritize maritime safety and environmental protection in Philippine waters. Mariners and the public are advised to remain vigilant and report any sightings of potential debris to local PCG stations. No immediate threats to safety or navigation have been reported as a result of this event."
China's Global Times reported on Wednesday: "The Chinese Foreign Ministry has repeatedly stated that China consistently conducts peaceful space activities in accordance with international law and practices. From the development phase of space projects, China has integrated requirements for debris mitigation and deorbiting measures for launch vehicles and satellites entering orbit."
What Happens Next
It remains to be seen whether the Philippines will recover any Chinese rocket debris following its search.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Ivy League School Waives Tuition for Low-Income Students in Aid Expansion
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Princeton University, one of the "Big Three" Ivy League schools, has expanded its financial aid program as it welcomes the Class of 2029, which it says comprises the school's "largest-ever number of low-income students." Newsweek has reached out to Princeton University for comment via email on Sunday. Why It Matters Princeton's announcement comes after months of the Trump administration targeting colleges and universities, threatening to withdraw federal grants and pressuring them to meet its demands, all amid a broader affordability crisis with millions of Americans struggling to pay off trillions in student debt. Last month, with the passage of President Donald Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill," universities with very large endowments, such as Princeton, will face a new tiered tax on their endowment investment income, with rates up to 8 percent. What To Know In an August 7 press release, Princeton's office of communications said, "Most families with incomes up to $150,000 a year will now pay nothing for their student to attend Princeton, receiving aid to cover the total cost of attendance, including tuition, housing, food, books and personal expenses." For the 2025-26 school year, Princeton estimates the cost of attendance at about $91,000. That includes $65,210 for tuition, roughly $12,500 for housing, about $9,000 for food, just under $300 in fees, and a little over $4,000 for miscellaneous expenses such as books and personal costs. The cost of college has soared exponentially in recent decades, with Princeton's tuition climbing about 165 percent since 2000, when it was $24,630. Blair Arch is viewed on the Princeton University campus, Wednesday, March 19, 2025, in Princeton, N.J. Blair Arch is viewed on the Princeton University campus, Wednesday, March 19, 2025, in Princeton, N.J. Phelan M. Ebenhack via AP The announcement also noted that "most undergraduate families with incomes up to $250,000 will pay no tuition." It is not clear how the university will determine who will and won't pay tuition. Families with incomes up to $350,000 "will receive grant aid, including those at higher income levels with multiple children in college." The selective school said it is welcoming a first-year class with the "largest-ever number of lower-income students." Higher education has long struggled with opportunity, affordability, and access. Princeton noted that around 25 percent of the incoming class are eligible for federal Pell Grants, the highest in the University's history. The university estimates that the average aid package for the coming school year will be more than $80,000, with around 69 percent of the class qualifying for some aid. To do so, the university is drawing on its endowment, valued at about $34.1 billion and has averaged a 9.2 percent annual return over the past decade. According to analysis by the conservative think tank, American Enterprise Institute, Princeton could face a $217 million tax on its endowment next year. Universities may be able to reduce their endowment tax liability by expanding financial aid programs, which can lower the number of tuition-paying students counted under the law. What People Are Saying Princeton University Provost Jennifer Rexford said in the press release: "Through our increased investment in financial aid, we are making the transformative experience of a Princeton education more affordable for more students than ever." Nonresident AEI senior fellow Mark Schneider and research associate Christopher Robinson, wrote in a July 14 analysis: "The actual revenue generated by the endowment tax might differ from our estimates if universities alter their behavior. If some decide to expand student enrollment, that could lower their tax liability by reducing assets held per student. Taxable income would also be reduced if endowments adopt a variety of tax sheltering strategies, or if they decide that now is the time to realize capital losses on underperforming assets." What Happens Next The university's new financial aid program takes effect this school year, with classes starting in September, and first-year programming beginning later this month. Elsewhere, some top universities, such as Harvard, Yale, and Stamford are laying off staff and imposing hiring freezes, according to the Associated Press.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Russia Says Nations Plotting To Derail Trump-Putin Alaska Talks
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Russia has claimed that unnamed nations are orchestrating "titanic efforts" to disrupt the planned summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin set for August 15 in Alaska. Newsweek contacted the White House and NATO for comment via online forms on Sunday. Why It Matters The announcement of the meeting, a potential turning point in the Russia–Ukraine conflict, has heightened tensions. The stakes are significant, with implications for European security and the ongoing war. Kirill Dmitriev, Russia's investment envoy, alleged that certain unnamed countries are working to prolong the war, deploying disinformation and provocations to prevent progress toward a ceasefire or peace deal. U.S. President Donald Trump, right, and Russia's President Vladimir Putin in the Vietnamese city of Danang on November 11, 2017. U.S. President Donald Trump, right, and Russia's President Vladimir Putin in the Vietnamese city of Danang on November 11, 2017. JORGE SILVA / POOL / AFP/Getty Images What To Know Trump previously claimed that Russia and Ukraine were nearing a ceasefire agreement that could end the three-and-a-half-year conflict. While details of the deal have not been disclosed, it may involve Ukraine ceding substantial territory, a prospect opposed by many European nations. Dmitriev publicly accused undisclosed states of seeking to sabotage the summit with misinformation and destabilizing actions. "Undoubtedly, a number of countries interested in continuing the conflict will make titanic efforts to disrupt the planned meeting between President Putin and President Trump," Dmitriev said in a post in his Telegram account on Saturday, specifying that by efforts he meant "provocations and disinformation," Reuters reported, although he did elaborate further. The Kremlin confirmed that Trump and Putin will meet in Alaska to pursue a long-term resolution to the conflict, though both sides expect the process to be fraught. It will be the first time Putin has set foot in the U.S. for 20 years. Putin aide Yuri Ushakov, as reported by Reuters, said the two leaders will "focus on exploring ways to secure a long-term peaceful resolution to the Ukrainian crisis." He acknowledged that "this will clearly be a difficult process," but stressed that Russia intends to pursue it "actively and energetically." European leaders are voicing deep concern and have rallied behind Ukraine prior to the meeting, as per The Associated Press. They insist that any effective peace process must involve Ukraine and respect its territorial integrity. A coalition of EU countries emphasized that no deal should be forged at Kyiv's expense. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has also rejected proposals involving land concessions, deeming any peace deal excluding Ukraine "stillborn" and "unworkable," Indian newspaper The Economic Times reported. What People Are Saying As reported by Newsweek: President Donald Trump told reporters on Friday: "There will be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both." Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said: "We will not reward Russia for what it has perpetrated…The answer to the Ukrainian territorial question already is in the Constitution of Ukraine. No one will deviate from this—and no one will be able to. Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupier." U.K. Defense Secretary John Healey told reporters at NATO headquarters, as per Defense News: "There can be no negotiation about Ukraine without Ukraine. And Ukraine's voice must be at the heart of any talks." NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte to ABC News: "Next Friday will be important because it will be about testing Putin, how serious he is on bringing this terrible war to an end. "It will be, of course, about security guarantees, but also about the absolute need to acknowledge that Ukraine decides on its own future, that Ukraine has to be a sovereign nation, deciding on its own geopolitical future," Oleh Shamshur, senior fellow at the Eurasia Center at the Atlantic Council told Newsweek: "Concessions to Putin would be a prelude to new Russian aggression, which will be not limited to Ukraine and may target [NATO] Article 5 territory." Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an attack on any NATO territory is considered an attack on all members of the alliance, triggering a collective response. Yuriy Boyechko, founder of the charity Hope for Ukraine, told Newsweek: "Both Ukraine and their European partners must be a part of these talks between Trump and Putin, otherwise there is no way for lasting peace on the European continent." What Happens Next The summit is poised to be a high-stakes negotiation over the direction of the Ukraine conflict, amid swirling distrust and warning from European and Kyiv officials. With allegations of sabotage now surfacing, the likelihood of geopolitical friction—even before the leaders meet—could further increase.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
What Russia and Ukraine Are Demanding Ahead of Putin-Trump Alaska Meeting
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. With President Donald Trump's face-to-face meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin looming, there are still unanswered questions about how Ukraine will be involved, and whether the Republican can find a way to bridge the still-substantial distance between Kyiv and Moscow on a ceasefire deal. Trump said he would meet Putin in Alaska on August 15 for a "highly anticipated" summit. It will be the first time the Republican has met the Kremlin chief in person of his second term in office. Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov confirmed the meeting, saying on Saturday that the White House and the Kremlin would be "working vigorously hard" on the summit's agenda in the next few days. "The presidents will undoubtedly focus on discussing ways to reach a sustainable settlement to the Ukraine crisis," Ushakov said. The Trump administration is considering inviting Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky, U.S. media reported on Saturday. Many months of talks on a ceasefire deal for Ukraine have failed to yield an agreement inked by both Kyiv and Moscow. Ukraine agreed to a U.S. proposal in March, and Trump—historically reluctant to overly criticize Putin—has grown increasingly frustrated with the Kremlin chief. U.S. President Donald Trump, right, meets with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the G20 Summit in Hamburg, Germany, on July 7, 2017. U.S. President Donald Trump, right, meets with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the G20 Summit in Hamburg, Germany, on July 7, 2017. AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File What Does Trump Want? Trump, often known for to-and-froing, has been consistent in his calls for an end to the largest conflict on European soil since World War II. A substantial part of his foreign policy has been shaped by his desire to be known as both a dealmaker and a peacemaker. As Moscow increased its aerial assaults on Ukraine in recent months, Trump became more critical of the Kremlin, saying Putin was giving the White House "a lot of b*******." Trump has warmed to Ukraine since the infamous White House meeting with Zelensky in February, during which the president, along with several senior administration officials, berated the Kyiv leader in front of the world's cameras. But as Russia's reluctance to sign a deal continued, Trump greenlet more aid for Ukraine, including air defense supplies to defend the country from Russian attacks, and imposed a deadline of "10 or 12 days" for Russia to agree to a ceasefire deal in early August. This window closed on Friday, but the White House did not appear to institute new economic sanctions on Russia as threatened. "Putin is not interested in a true ceasefire," said Oleksandr Merezhko, the chair of Ukraine's parliamentary foreign affairs committee and a member of Zelensky's party. "He is using negotiations with Trump for only one purpose—to avoid serious sanctions, including secondary sanctions against those countries which buy Russian oil and gas," he told Newsweek. Russia's oil and gas industry is crucial to the country's economy, and Moscow was slapped with sanctions by Ukraine's backers after it launched its full-scale invasion of its neighbor in early 2022. Kyiv has also targeted Russian oil and gas facilities with long-range drone strikes in an attempt to curb the Kremlin's access to the resources propping up its military. Secondary sanctions target third-party buyers of Russian exports, like India and China. Trump became embroiled in a war of words with Russia's former President, Dmitry Medvedev, and deployed two U.S. Navy nuclear submarines after "highly provocative" statements from Medvedev. The former president is currently the deputy chair of Russia's Security Council and well-known for his inflammatory social media commentary. Where Does Ukraine stand? Ukrainian officials frequently say they are seeking an end to the war, but one that does not reward Russia or open the door for Moscow to restart attempts to seize territory from Kyiv. Ukraine has repeatedly said that ceding Ukrainian territory to Russia is off the table. It goes against the country's constitution, Zelensky said again over the weekend. "No one will deviate from this—and no one will be able to," Zelensky said in a post to messaging app Telegram on Saturday. "Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupier." Ukraine has consistently said it needs security guarantees, and not to be bound by any limits on the size of its military. Kyiv also does not want to be labeled a neutral state, but one firmly on the path to NATO and European Union membership. Ukraine's memorandum, presented by Kyiv officials during rounds of direct talks with a Russian delegation in Turkey earlier this summer, also said it sought a "full and unconditional ceasefire in the sky, on land and at sea." Furthermore, Kyiv has said an agreement needs to look at humanitarian issues, such as an exchange of all prisoners and the return of children taken from Russian-controlled areas of Ukraine. And Russia's Perspective? Russia's demands have remained far away from what Ukraine appears willing to accept. During direct talks in Istanbul in June, Russia offered up two proposals for a 30-day ceasefire. "The first one is about how to reach a truly lasting peace," Vladimir Medinsky, Russia's chief negotiator, said at the time. "The second part highlights the steps to be taken toward a real ceasefire." One option would have Kyiv withdraw from the eastern regions of Donetsk and Luhansk, collectively known as the Donbas, as well as the southern Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions of Ukraine. Russia declared it had annexed these four mainland Ukrainian regions in fall 2022. It does not fully control these regions, although it has captured much of Luhansk and Donetsk. Moscow annexed Crimea, to the south of the mainland, from Kyiv in 2014. The alternative, Russia said, would be for Ukraine to stop building up its military and halt military aid deliveries, while lifting martial law and opening up to elections. Elections are banned in Ukraine while martial law is in place. A more comprehensive peace agreement would come later, Moscow said, adding no foreign military personnel should be allowed in Ukraine. Russia has pushed for the recognition of its control over the annexed regions, and for Ukraine to abandon its hopes of joining NATO in favor of neutrality. Moscow has also said it wants Kyiv to limit the size of its military and put the Russian language on equal footing with Ukrainian. How Does Europe Fit In? The U.K., France, Italy, Germany, Poland, Finland, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen issued a joint statement on Sunday, reiterating their support for the "principle that international borders must not be changed by force." "We share the conviction that a diplomatic solution must protect Ukraine's and Europe's vital security interests," the governments said. European leaders have offered a "counterproposal" following a meeting between Putin and Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, The Wall Street Journal reported. This European plan rejected the idea Ukraine would cede territory it still holds in Donetsk and was presented to the U.S. on Saturday, according to the report.
