
Democrats slam Republicans over handling of Epstein files
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries leaned into Republicans' reluctance to release the files as emblematic of their instinct to 'protect the lifestyles of the rich and shameless, even if that includes [sexual offenders].' A more challenging piece of Democrats' strategy is to tie the Epstein controversy to the recent 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' a sweeping, $3.4 trillion piece of legislation that Republicans passed earlier this month. Democrats argue that the tax breaks and reforms to Medicaid and food stamps will strip cash from the lower and middle classes and transfer it to the richest Americans.
They say the law will make tens of millions pay more for healthcare and that veterans, kids and seniors will go hungry. Epstein, a former New York billionaire financier, is the type of person Trump and Republicans are hellbent on protecting, the Democrats claimed. They hope it will be a winning message to turn voters against Republicans in the midterms because they're choosing to protect the powerful. 'The reality is that it's all connected,' Jeffries said of the Epstein scandal and Trump's domestic policy agenda. 'And what billionaires, what well connected donors, what elite people are they trying to protect?'
'Republicans are focused on their billionaire donors,' the Democrat continued. 'That was the centerpiece of the one big, ugly bill, and it's what explains Republican refusal to release the Epstein trials.' The second most powerful House Democrat, Whip Katherine Clark, similarly said Wednesday morning that the Republican base's concerns over the Epstein files could lead them away from the party. 'The Epstein case has helped their own base see what's going on, that this is a con job that they were never the center of the work that they are going to do here,' she said. 'If you don't already have a lot of wealth and power, you are not getting any attention from this Republican Party.'
The House will break for August recess on Wednesday afternoon to head back to their districts for over a month. While on the road, Republicans will tout the Trump-backed bill. So will Democrats, but they are going to focus how the bill benefits billionaires like the late Epstein. If the scandal is not handled properly, and the files are not released, the GOP will faces consequences in the 2026 midterms, Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina warned this week.
'So I think the files should be released. Let the light of day, let the sun shine through. And that's the best way to get past it,' Tillis, who is not running for re-election, said. 'This is going to be an issue all the way through next year's election,' he added. Rep. Pete Aguilar of California, the third most powerful House Democrat, cut against others in his party, downplaying the need for a strategy on the Epstein files because 'everybody knows that it's real.'
'We don't need a strategic vision for it, because the American people can just turn the TV on and see how the White House and Republicans continue to protect the rich and powerful,' he told the Daily Mail. 'I think it would surprise people like, how much folks are paying attention,' Aguilar added. Aguilar's comments demonstrate that some rank-and-file Democrats may not take Jeffries' marching orders on linking Epstein to the Big Beautiful Bill.
Republicans, meanwhile, have also been calling for transparency on the files, though their push to release all the Epstein-linked files contrasts with the White House calling for a selective release. House Majority Whip Tom Emmer, R-Minn., called the push to force release of the files a 'non-issue' during an Axios event Wednesday 'If it was so important, then why weren't Democrats clamoring for this for the four years under Biden?,' Emmer asked.
But that view is out of step with a fleet of Republican House members who are pushing for more transparency about who participated in Epstein's trafficking of underage girls. The difference has caused friction in the House. Speaker Mike Johnson shortened the workweek to shield some GOP members from having to vote against the release of the financier's files.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
State Department could soon ask visa applicants to pay up to $15,000 to enter the US
The US State Department is proposing a significant new requirement for business and tourist visa applicants, potentially demanding a bond of up to $15,000 to enter the United States. This move could render the process unaffordable for many prospective visitors. A notice, due for publication in the Federal Register on Tuesday, outlines a 12-month pilot programme. Under this scheme, individuals from nations identified as having high visa overstay rates or deficient internal document security controls could be compelled to post bonds of $5,000, $10,000 or $15,000 when applying for a visa. The programme, set to commence within 15 days of its formal publication, is deemed essential to shield the US government from financial liability should a visitor fail to adhere to their visa terms. The notice specifies that "Aliens applying for visas as temporary visitors for business or pleasure and who are nationals of countries identified by the department as having high visa overstay rates, where screening and vetting information is deemed deficient, or offering citizenship by investment, if the alien obtained citizenship with no residency requirement, may be subject to the pilot program." The specific countries affected will be listed once the initiative begins. Citizens of countries participating in the Visa Waiver Programme would be exempt from the bond requirement, and waivers could also be granted based on an applicant's individual circumstances. While visa bonds have been mooted previously but never implemented, the State Department had traditionally discouraged them due to the administrative burden and potential public misperceptions. However, the department now asserts that this prior stance "is not supported by any recent examples or evidence, as visa bonds have not generally been required in any recent period."


Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Morning Joe hosts' absence from show allegedly due to Trump merger
Morning Joe stars Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough's absence from their hit show this summer hints at a secret war with MSNBC bosses over Donald Trump and upcoming merger, it is claimed. More than one third of the episodes broadcast since Memorial Day have been missing one of the husband-and-wife hosts. Mediaite writer Colby Hall has multiple theories as to what is going on. He speculated that the power couple's absence may be icy cold revenge for MSNBC taking their show off the air in the wake of a July 2024 assassination attempt on Donald Trump. Hall said the decision - taken to try and avoid a huge gaffe by the anti-MAGA pair after the president was almost killed - may have 'widened' an existing rift between them and MSNBC bossts. Brezezinski and Scarborough may also be exploiting their power to 'leverage their stature within the network,' Hall believes, while also conceding the three hour daily show is likely tiring. 'But it's hard to ignore the timing,' Hall added 'With MSNBC's realignment on the horizon and talent contracts under review, Joe and Mika's extended absences feel like a flex - a reminder that Morning Joe doesn't work without them,' Hall stated. MSNBC is currently preparing to split from NBCUniversal to become part of an entirely new company, Versant, made up of other Comcast channels. The piece also pointed out pair have been missing many shows despite the pace of political news coming out of Washington, DC . Of the 49 Morning Joe episodes that have aired since May 26, Brzezinski has been away for 26 while Scarborough has been absent for 18. 'Most of their peers, Rachel Maddow aside, still show up five days a week,' Mediaite reported. 'Joe and Mika may be relaxing poolside, and fair enough,' the report concludes. 'But their absence sends a message. The only question now is whether MSNBC is listening - and how they plan to respond.' Hall said the Morning Joe stand-ins have failed to deliver 'fire-and-ice dynamic' that their viewers enjoy. Moreover, 'their absence sends a message,' Hall wrote at a point. 'When stars act like they own the show, it's often because they do - and they know it,' he said. He added how 'it's hard to ignore the timing' of the two's absence given MSNBC currently being in the process of weighing contracts - and their worth - for MSNBC's realignment. Morning Joe was first broadcast in 2007 and quickly became a hit with MSNBC viewers. Brzezinski, a liberal, and conservative Scarborough became vocally anti-Trump during the president's first term in office.


Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
'Squeaky clean' top Democrat's SECRET WIFE breaks silence to reveal the shameful scandal he's kept hidden for 36 years
The former North Carolina governor running for Senate had a 'secret' divorce and began dating his second wife while she was still married, Daily Mail can reveal. Roy Cooper, 68, is at the top of Democrat politics, and was even tipped to replace Joe Biden as a presidential candidate last year and was on the shortlist to be 's 2024 running mate.