
The hidden dangers of even moderate drinking and the need for moderation
It sounds macho, but there's science behind the idea that bigger men are better at holding their drink.
Size matters. A larger person absorbs more alcohol into their body tissue so that means that less goes to their brain, which is when you start to feel its effects.
Sex matters, too. It generally takes less alcohol for a female to get drunk than a male. This is due to a combination of factors. Women have lower body water content, which means the alcohol is more concentrated in their bodies. They also have fewer enzymes to help break down alcohol in the stomach, while their different hormones also can worsen intoxication. Other genetic factors, or the characteristics your parents pass down to you, also play a part in determining an individual's tolerance to alcohol.
But those aren't the only reasons it's hard to predict exactly how much alcohol you can safely drink.
It also depends on how long it will take for your body to process it and the amount of pure drinking alcohol (ethanol) that is in your drink. That is measured by alcohol-by-volume, or ABV, something you can normally find on the labels of cans and bottles.
In South Africa, a standard drink is assumed to contain about 15ml of pure alcohol (ethanol), which is typically found in one 340ml can of beer (4.5% alcohol-by-volume or ABV), 150ml of wine (12% ABV) or 40ml of whisky (40% ABV).
A useful guide to safer drinking is a blood alcohol content (BAC) calculator, which measures how much alcohol is in your blood at any given moment. The higher your blood alcohol content number, the more drunk you are.
For example, I weigh 85kg. An hour after drinking two glasses of wine, my blood alcohol content is about 0.03%, low enough for me to legally drive home. But if my wife, who weighs 61kg, drinks two glasses of wine over the same time, her blood alcohol content would be 0.056%, which is above the legal drinking limit.
While you may only feel really drunk at a blood alcohol content of about 0.1 grams per 100ml of blood (0.1%), drinking far less alcohol can have serious health risks.
No safe amount
In fact, the World Health Organization (WHO) has concluded that there is no safe level of alcohol, because it is a toxin that can cause cancer and damage to organs such as the liver, pancreas and heart, even at low levels. Many people are willing to tolerate a little extra risk for the enjoyment of it, but most don't fully appreciate how much risk they are taking on.
The Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction has produced an excellent report detailing the precise odds of cancer and other illnesses at different levels of consumption. For some conditions, like mouth and throat cancer, the risk is already 1½ times greater at just two drinks a day.
A 2025 report on alcohol and cancer risk from the US Surgeon General calculates that the total chance you'll develop alcohol-related cancers over your entire lifetime increases with the amount you drink. It found that about five more women and three more men out of every hundred will develop cancer if they consume two standard alcoholic drinks a day, compared to those who have less than one drink a week.
Heavy drinking
In a 2024 global report on alcohol and health, the WHO estimated that one-third of South African adults say they drink alcohol. But those that do drink consume a lot — an average of five drinks per day.
A study published in the South African Medical Journal in 2018 found that 43% of drinkers reported binge drinking, which the researchers defined as five or more drinks in one day. But, as the researchers note, these numbers are likely even higher due to the stigma of reporting drinking habits.
Young people are at especially high risk. Using figures from the South African Demographic and Health Survey, I calculated that more than 80% of 15- to 34-year-old males who drink, report that they drank more than five drinks in one day. The adolescent brain continues to develop until about the age of 25 years and, even if the drinking episodes are infrequent, binge drinking in young people can lead to long-term cognitive and psychological damage.
But it's the immediate effects of any heavy drinking that are most devastating for both the individual and society.
In a global analysis of alcohol and risk of injuries, researchers found that after having four or five drinks, you're at high risk of being either the cause or the victim of vehicle crashes, sexual or physical assault or murder.
The risk curve for alcohol is exponential, meaning that the rate of harm increases with every drink. A multi-country study found that the risk of fatal traffic injury can almost double with every 0.02% — about one drink — increase in blood alcohol content. In the Western Cape, 45% of victims of homicide were found to have a blood alcohol content over 0.05%, suggesting that homicide rates could be much reduced if heavy drinking were curtailed.
But every legal drink also contributes to jobs, tourism and taxes.
In fact, a ccording to a 2024 study published in the South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, if you disregard its harm, the liquor industry would contribute more than 2.5% to South Africa's gross domestic product, or GDP, which is the value of everything a country produces and sells in a year. But the oft-obscured point is that the net positive economic benefits of the industry occur at lower levels of consumption — higher levels cost the economy more than it gains.
Moderation
The findings present a dilemma for public health advocates in South Africa. On the one hand, we must inform the public that even one drink a day can have serious health consequences for an individual. On the other, drinking patterns here are so extreme that a call for such drastic reduction in drinking would be scoffed at.
While there is no doubt that heavy drinking is both bad for society and bad for the economy, we don't need to smash the liquor industry to combat heavy drinking. But we must intervene to optimise its social and economic benefits.
Based on the best international studies, here are three ways we can reduce heavy drinking:
Limit the advertising and promotion of alcohol, which influences young people to drink heavily at a time when their brains are highly vulnerable. Advertising restrictions have been shown to work. It won't be easy, especially as the industry uses influencers on social media, but it must be done.
Close on-consumption liquor outlets (taverns and bars) at midnight, as required by the National Liquor Norms and Standards (2015). A modelling study commissioned by the DG Murray Trust, the organisation I head up, shows that, over a 20-year period, a midnight closure would reduce injuries and deaths by a factor of up to 15 compared to letting them stay open until 2am.
Introducing minimum unit pricing so that liquor cannot be sold extra cheaply in poorer communities, which bear the brunt of heavy drinking. The National Treasury has made proposals in this regard and is currently reviewing submissions received through public submissions. Its involvement is significant, because it gets to see both the income and expense side of the equation.
Inequality in South Africa is so severe that it's hard to make a dent in the armour-proofed vehicles of violence — crime, toxic masculinity, and the devaluation of human life. But we can starve them of their fuel, if our political leaders are informed and brave enough to act, to change our culture of heavy drinking in South Africa to one of moderation. DM

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

SowetanLIVE
8 hours ago
- SowetanLIVE
Five values that could change medical aid as we know it
You don't always see it in the fine print. But the values your medical aid holds at its core matter most when life happens. When the unexpected shows up, you need your medical aid to show up too. Following Sanlam's endorsement of Fedhealth as its preferred open medical scheme partner, Fedhealth and Sanlam have come together to ask: is there a better way? In response to this, the companies are on a mission to revitalise medical aid as we know it, with a reimagined scheme aimed at embodying five core values: affordability, customisation, inclusivity, simplicity and trust. So what do these values look like in real life? Meet five people whose stories show how the reimagined scheme aims to deliver what everyday South Africans really want from a medical aid. Thato, a 32-year-old IT consultant, didn't think he could afford medical aid — until he found out about a medical aid that will allow him to choose the features he wants and leave the ones he doesn't. Fedhealth and Sanlam's reimagined scheme uniquely offers: Backup day-to-day savings on its hospital plans that Thato can access if and when he needs to; flexi FED Savvy, SA's most affordable hospital plan for under-35s; and FED Savvy, A 25% discount on certain plans through its flexi FED Elect excess options. Wherever you are in life, affordability matters to everyone. That's why affordability for all members is a cornerstone of Fedhealth and Sanlam's new approach to medical aid. That's affordability rebooted. Jody, a 24-year-old freelancer, can only pay for what she needs, when she needs it. Nothing more. Nothing wasted. The scheme will allow her to upgrade any time of the year within 30 days of a life-changing event like pregnancy or a serious illness. That's customisation rebooted. Imran, a 28-year-old small business owner, has never really considered joining a medical scheme before. But now, as a self-employed father of two, he finally feels like medical aid is for him too. The reimagined scheme offers a variety of differently structured medical aid plans at varying price points, so Imran can pick a plan that suits his specific needs to a T. That's inclusivity rebooted.

IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
Prof Karim slams police ‘lawlessness' as vigilantes block foreigners from Durban hospital
Prof Salim Abdool Karim has condemned vigilante groups demanding to see IDs from people seeking medical care at Durban's Addington Hospital. Image: Picture:Zanele Zulu/Independent Newspapers World-renowned scientist Prof Salim Abdool Karim has vocally condemned police inaction at Durban's Addington Hospital, describing the scene of vigilantes illegally turning away foreign nationals seeking medical care as an instance of 'lawlessness.' According to the Independent on Saturday, the incident unfolded as the police stood by, witnessing the blockade without taking any action. Three and a half decades ago, Prof Karim protested against racial segregation at the same hospital, where medical services were indiscriminately divided along racial lines. Arriving back at Addington this week, he was confronted with a new form of segregation, this time along lines of nationality, as self-appointed immigration enforcers were halting people at the gates and denying entry to documented and undocumented foreigners alike, as well as South Africans lacking identification. Dr Raymond Perrier the director of the Dennis Hurley Centre and public health expert, Professor Salim Abdool Karim, outside Addington Hospital where they confronted vigilantes preventing foreigners from accessing medical care. Image: Supplied. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ 'These are individuals who have taken the law into their own hands,' Abdool Karim stated, "and who have been given that ability to do that by the police who deliberately did not arrest them.' He underscored the failure of law enforcement, likening their inaction to what was witnessed during the violent unrest of 2021, which resulted in over 300 fatalities. For the last two months, groups operating under the banner of March and March have assumed the role of gatekeepers, arbitrarily deciding who can enter Addington Hospital. Their presence has since extended to other hospitals in Gauteng. The vigilantes reportedly work in shifts to ensure continuous monitoring, denying entry to anyone without a South African ID. Prof Karim expressed concern over the legitimacy and motivations of these gatekeepers. 'I would not be surprised if these people are being paid to come and do this,' he said. His questions about the authorities' tolerance of such activities revealed a disheartening truth: 'The police are saying, you can do whatever you want to here.' Abdool Karim lamented the implications of this situation, which he sees as a symptom of a creeping lawlessness reminiscent of recent civil unrest. On his visit, he and Dr Raymond Perrier, director of the Denis Hurley Centre, confronted the gatekeepers, who asserted their authority to conduct citizen's arrests. 'What struck me was that they were highly organised,' Abdool Karim noted, describing the vigilantes as 'zealots' who remained unflinching in their role. Even when he attempted to assist a woman in accessing medical care, she had already complied with their demand for identification prior to his intervention. He emphasised that emergency medical care is a legal right, particularly for pregnant women and children under six, while treatment for undocumented individuals depends on available resources. Clarifying misconceptions about healthcare for foreigners, he stated, 'There is no country I know where a foreigner can come in and get free health care. They get health care, but it's not free,' advocating instead that decisions about who is treated should reside with the government and not vigilantes. 'What they're doing is illegal,' he asserted. 'It should never be allowed at all.' He believes that it is the responsibility of the government to address issues concerning foreigners in a humane manner while adhering to the Constitution and the law. Despite his upcoming trip to Japan, Abdool Karim and members of civil society have vowed to keep monitoring and challenging these unlawful actions. He stated, 'If anyone got turned away, I would make it my job to work with that person and get them into that hospital.' He reflected on the unspoken tension during his visit, suggesting that the presence of cameras appeared to deter potential violence from the gatekeepers. In an ironic twist, both he and Perrier were asked to show their IDs upon entry, a demand they resisted while instead questioning the vigilantes for their credentials, IOS stated. 'The protesters were saying that Karim and I didn't have a right to demand to see their IDs,' Perrier explained, noting their incredulity over the inaction from law enforcement, which has persisted for weeks. Foster Mohale, spokesman for the National Department of Health, condemned the protest actions undermining healthcare, urging law enforcement agencies to take steps against anyone violating the laws of the country. Meanwhile, the IOS reported that the Denis Hurley Centre, alongside other civic groups, are preparing a legal submission to the courts to compel police action, citing negligence in upholding their duties. IOL

TimesLIVE
13 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Five values that could change medical aid as we know it
You don't always see it in the fine print. But the values your medical aid holds at its core matter most when life happens. When the unexpected shows up, you need your medical aid to show up too. Following Sanlam's endorsement of Fedhealth as its preferred open medical scheme partner, Fedhealth and Sanlam have come together to ask: is there a better way? In response to this, the companies are on a mission to revitalise medical aid as we know it, with a reimagined scheme aimed at embodying five core values: affordability, customisation, inclusivity, simplicity and trust. So what do these values look like in real life? Meet five people whose stories show how the reimagined scheme aims to deliver what everyday South Africans really want from a medical aid. Thato, a 32-year-old IT consultant, didn't think he could afford medical aid — until he found out about a medical aid that will allow him to choose the features he wants and leave the ones he doesn't. Fedhealth and Sanlam's reimagined scheme uniquely offers: Backup day-to-day savings on its hospital plans that Thato can access if and when he needs to; flexiFED Savvy, SA's most affordable hospital plan for under-35s; and A 25% discount on certain plans through its flexiFED Elect excess options. Wherever you are in life, affordability matters to everyone. That's why affordability for all members is a cornerstone of Fedhealth and Sanlam's new approach to medical aid. That's affordability rebooted. Jody, a 24-year-old freelancer, can only pay for what she needs, when she needs it. Nothing more. Nothing wasted. The scheme will allow her to upgrade any time of the year within 30 days of a life-changing event like pregnancy or a serious illness. That's customisation rebooted. Imran, a 28-year-old small business owner, has never really considered joining a medical scheme before. But now, as a self-employed father of two, he finally feels like medical aid is for him too. The reimagined scheme offers a variety of differently structured medical aid plans at varying price points, so Imran can pick a plan that suits his specific needs to a T. That's inclusivity rebooted.