Fiery showdown on cards
Sources said the Prime Minister is unlikely to respond in Parliament on these issues. However, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju asserted that the government will reply appropriately whenever a discussion takes place on Trump's ceasefire claims on the India-Pakistan conflict.
After the customary all-party meeting ahead of the session beginning on Monday, Rijiju said the government has sought the Opposition's cooperation in the smooth running of Parliament during the month-long session. There should be government-Opposition coordination in running Parliament smoothly, Rijiju told reporters after the meeting chaired by Union Minister J P Nadda. He said they heard the Opposition and ruling NDA alliance members patiently and hoped the upcoming session would be very productive. As many as 54 leaders of different parties and Independent MPs participated in Sunday's all-party meeting. 'We are very open to a discussion on important issues like Operation Sindoor. These are issues of great national importance. The government is not shying away and will never shy away, but is open to discussions within rules, conventions,' Rijiju asserted.
Noting that the government accords importance to 'niyam' (rules) and 'parampara' (conventions), he said the matters raised at the meeting would be taken up at the Business Advisory Committee of both houses, where a final decision would be taken. 'We have noted all the points. We have requested all parties (to ensure) the Parliament functions properly. Have to ensure coordination. It is the responsibility of all to help Parliament function,' he said.
Rijiju also said that the government has noted the demand for allocation of more time to parties with fewer MPs to speak in Parliament.' 'We will try and provide adequate time to all, including smaller parties,' he said.
On the Opposition's demand for PM Modi to make a statement on the Pahalgam attack and other issues, Rijiju said, 'I want to make it clear that the Prime Minister remains in Parliament except during foreign travel. Whenever Parliament functions, Cabinet ministers are present to respond to issues concerning their departments.'
Rijiju said the government is bringing 17 key bills, details of which would be provided soon. Topping the government's list is the Income-Tax Bill, 2025, which was introduced during the Budget Session on February 13. The Bill represents a major overhaul of the Income-Tax Act, 1961, aiming to simplify its language and structure.
Sources said even the BJP's allies want that there should be a discussion on Operation Sindoor to highlight the achievements of the government after delegations visited different nations.
After the meeting, Congress leader Gaurav Gogoi told reporters that his party sought PM Modi's statement on Trump's claims, 'lapses' which led to the Pahalgam attack and Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of poll rolls in Bihar. He said it was incumbent and moral responsibility of PM Modi to give a statement in Parliament on key issues raised by his party. 'We hope that the PM will fulfil his moral duty,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
17 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Govt agrees to 16-hour debate on Op Sindoor, Pahalgam attack in Lok Sabha
Government on Monday agreed to a 16-hour discussion on Operation Sindoor and Pahalgam terror attack in the Lok Sabha, and it is likely to be taken up next week, even as the opposition insisted that it should start this week itself and Prime Minister Narendra Modi must reply. At the meeting of the Business Advisory Committee, sources said government representatives noted that PM Modi is leaving on a foreign visit this week, and a debate when he is present in the House can be possible only next week. Opposition members protested that the government's agenda for this week did not mention their demand for a debate on the issue. They said the home minister and the defence minister should also be present. Some opposition members also called for a debate on the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in Bihar and the situation in Manipur. The Monsoon Session of Parliament began on Monday.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
17 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Mehbooba Mufti urges Rahul Gandhi to raise Muslim issues in Parliament
Mufti said the Muslims who chose to remain in India during Partition did so because of the faith they had in the secular leadership of the Congress party from Mahatma Gandhi to Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru Press Trust of India Srinagar Jammu and Kashmir Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) chief Mehbooba Mufti on Monday urged Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi to raise the issue of alleged Muslim victimisation across the country in the Monsoon session of Parliament, which started on Monday. In a post on X, she alleged that Muslims are being pushed into increasingly desperate situations under the pretext of targeting "Bangladeshis" and "Rohingyas". Disturbing media reports have even suggested that some were forced into the sea in attempts to expel them from India, she added. "Deeply disturbed by the ongoing victimization, dispossession and disempowerment of Muslims on a daily basis - I have written to Rahul Gandhi ji urging him to raise this critical issue in the upcoming Parliament session," Mufti said in the post on X. She said in an environment "increasingly marked by hate and fear", many have "lost hope and feel utterly helpless". "At this moment he stands as a rare source of hope for those who feel forgotten and voiceless," the PDP president said. In the letter to Gandhi, the former chief minister of the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir said while the horrific Pahalgam attack, Operation Sindoor and other critical security matters are expected to dominate discussions, she hopes the Opposition, especially the INDIA bloc, raises the "growing concern of Muslim victimisation across the country". "As you rightly highlighted during your visit to Assam the large scale demolition of thousands of Muslim homes is deeply troubling. "The latest development the SIR being conducted in Bihar appears to be yet another systematic effort to dispossess, disempower, and ultimately disenfranchise Muslims, effectively erasing their presence both symbolically and literally," Mufti said, referring to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. Mufti said the Muslims who chose to remain in India during Partition did so because of the faith they had in the secular leadership of the Congress party from Mahatma Gandhi to Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru. "Today as the bearer of that legacy the responsibility falls on your shoulders to uphold and defend the secular and democratic values enshrined in our Constitution," she said. "When Hindus who are minorities in neighbouring countries like Pakistan or Bangladesh are targeted our nation rightly expresses outrage and the Union government intervenes. But when Muslims are targeted within our own country there is an unsettling silence a fear that prevents many from speaking up," she added. The PDP chief said as a politician from the only Muslim majority region that "chose to join the Indian Union largely due to the vision and secular character of your great-grandfather", she feels "extremely helpless" at times. "Placing great hope in your leadership I urge you to continue speaking up for a minority that is being steadily marginalised and pushed to the fringes of Indian society," she wrote in the letter. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
17 minutes ago
- First Post
How India should approach Dalai Lama's succession issue
India is displaying extraordinary strategic patience with China, the CTA and Tibetan Buddhists have been expecting India to greenlight the succession and reincarnation outlined by the Dalai Lama read more After a weeklong celebration of his 90th birthday, His Holiness the Dalai Lama is in Leh preaching and relaxing. Did India miss an opportunity to test, if not reset, its Tibet policy over the succession of the Dalai Lama? Ahead of Foreign Minister S Jaishankar's first visit to China after the Galwan clashes and pro forma normalisation of bilateral relations, China noted that 'Tibet-related issues, including the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama, are a thorn in India-China relations.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Beijing's pincer attacks came in quick barrages from its embassy in Delhi and the Foreign Ministry in Beijing before and after the Dalai Lama's 90th birthday, ignoring Tibet's history, religion, and traditions and letting its invasion and occupation of Tibet in 1950 do the speaking. India's silence is due to China's military and economic power and Delhi's constraint to reset its Tibet policy. This has allowed Beijing to salami slice in East Ladakh, freeze progress on border settlement, and act adversarially during Op Sindoor. The Sikyong (President) of the Central Tibetan Administration (Government in Exile), Penpa Tsering, had offered ideas on succession last year. On 2 July, in a recorded video statement, His Holiness Dalai Lama Tenzin Gyatso said that the Gaden Phodrang Trust, the offices of the Dalai Lama, and the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) will search and find his successor, which Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiran Rijiju endorsed: 'No one has the right to interfere or decide who the successor will be; only he or his institution has the authority to make the decision.' China immediately protested Rijiju's statement, warning India against interfering in its internal affairs at the expense of bilateral relations. Delhi did not push the matter further. India's Foreign Ministry said, 'India does not take any position or speak on matters concerning faith and religion but will continue to uphold freedom of religion.' Rijiju also clarified he was echoing feelings of Tibetans, speaking for himself and not the government. It is India's moral and cultural right and responsibility to prevent China from usurping Tibetan Buddhism from its homeland. On 6 July, his birthday, the Dalai Lama said he would reincarnate in a free country and live to be 130 years old, adding his reincarnation could be found in Ladakh, Dharamsala, or Arunachal Pradesh. Prime Minister Modi congratulated the Dalai Lama on his birthday. China protested against PM Modi's greetings, fired volleys at the US for endorsing the Dalai Lama, and issued its own interpretation of succession, asserting China's prerogative to anoint the 15th Dalai Lama. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The problem in reincarnation is the longevity of regency when leadership may be exercised by the Sikyong, CTA, or a Council of Elders. Secondly, long overdue is a reset in India's Tibet and One China policy. India accepted Tibet as part of the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 2003 for China accepting the international border in Sikkim. Neither the delineation of the LAC nor the Political Framework for a Border Resolution 2005, which skips delineation, has materialised; but instead, China has been salami slicing in East Ladakh. Further, it never implemented autonomy (Dalai Lama's Middle Path) for Tibet but indulged in wholesale Sinicisation of Tibet (69 per cent of people in Tibet are non-Tibetan Buddhists). Delhi has many reasons to reconsider its Tibet policy. It cannot do so on its own and needs a willing strategic partner like the US. The US Tibet Policy Act (2002) was amended in 2020 to the Tibet Policy and Support Act, which is complemented by the Resolve Tibet Act (2024), which has several important issues, including reincarnation and Tibet not being the TAR (Tibet Autonomous Region) created in 1965. The CTA, which shifted from Lhasa to Dharamsala in 1959, will next year be releasing the new map of Tibet highlighting this cartographic fraud. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Next, the boundary issue. While Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh Pema Khandu, who attended the Dalai Lama's birthday, has said that his state has a border with Tibet, not China, US Congressional legislation of 2020 has recognised the McMahon Line as the boundary between 'Arunachal Pradesh, which belongs to India, and China,' refuting Beijing's claim on South Tibet. Tsering and his predecessor, Lobsang Sangay, have consistently said Tibet, not China, has a border with India and recalled the name of the Indo-Tibetan Border Police, advising India to desist from using TAR. The CTA and Tibetan Buddhists have been expecting India to greenlight the succession and reincarnation outlined by the Dalai Lama. India strategist and China expert Pravin Sawhney has said that the Dalai Lama has raked up sensitive issues for China, which could open a Pandora's box and even lead to war even as Delhi seems unable and unwilling to reset its Tibet policy. Jaishankar had told ANI last year, 'I don't want war with China; it has five times larger economy'. Tibetans outside and inside Tibet are likely to be disappointed by India's silence. Tsering says, 'India is our parent. We're nobody without India.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Calling His Holiness 'honoured guest and spiritual leader' is one thing; backing his succession plan is quite another. Given Tibet's geo-strategic vitality, Beijing squashing its autonomy, and blatantly violating its treaties and agreements with Delhi, India can and should have taken a more nuanced position on the succession issue. For starters, the Dalai Lama can be awarded the Bharat Ratna, which is supported by about 100 sitting MPs, and his birthday can be commemorated during the monsoon session of Parliament. The Tibet issue was raised as a Private Member's Bill earlier by Sujeet Kumar, a member of the Biju Janata Dal, who was requested to withdraw it. The 'thorn' has existed since 1962; still, India has been lured into normalising relations with just 'cosmetic disengagement' not vacation of encroachment by China. Jaishankar said in 2024, '[It is] impossible to normalise ties without the situation at the border being resolved, including demobilisation of troops that amassed there in 2020.' China is unlikely to de-escalate, but we keep talking like it does over the boundary question without settling the issue. India is displaying extraordinary strategic patience with China. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The author is former GOC IPKF South Sri Lanka and founder member Defence Planning Staff, now Integrated Defence Staff, Ministry of Defence. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
