logo
Devil Wears Prada drummer Daniel Williams dies in San Diego plane crash; his last words: ‘I'm the co-pilot now'

Devil Wears Prada drummer Daniel Williams dies in San Diego plane crash; his last words: ‘I'm the co-pilot now'

Indian Express23-05-2025

Daniel Williams, the popular drummer for metalcore band The Devil Wears Prada, has died in a fatal plane crash in San Diego, on Thursday morning, according to TMZ. He was just 39. The family of Williams later spoke to the outlet, confirming the tragic incident. Reportedly, 42-year-old Dave Shapiro, the co-founder of Sound Talent Group (STG) and a popular music agent who was travelling on the same flight, also lost his life. The Federal Aviation Administration has yet to confirm the total number of casualties. However, according to reports, there were a total of six people travelling on the private jet.
Also read: Multiple fatalities after plane crashes in California's San Diego, 15 homes damaged in fire
The crash reportedly happened early Thursday morning in the Murphy Canyon area. The neighbourhood is famous for Navy housing. The small private jet, which could accommodate up to 10 people, lost engine control at around 3:45 AM and crashed into the residential area. The crash ended up engulfing several houses and parked cars in the area in flames. Some people on the ground also suffered injuries while trying to escape the flames, and a few were hospitalised for smoke inhalation.
According to Larry Williams, the father of Daniel Williams, he is confident that there are no survivors. However, the FAA has assured an investigation into the case, having not confirmed the number of deaths. STG later confirmed that three of the people onboard were their employees, including Shapiro. 'We are devastated by the loss of our co-founder, colleagues, and friends,' Sound Talent Group said in a statement to Billboard. 'Our hearts go out to their families and to everyone impacted by today's tragedy. Thank you so much for respecting their privacy at this time.' Shapiro worked with famous bands including Sum 41, Pierce the Veil, I Prevail and reportedly also owned a plane and a flying license.
Also read: Near-death experience, says TMC MP as Indigo flight to Srinagar faces turbulence, damage during storm
Devil Wears Prada, the band's official social media page, also paid tribute to Williams with a picture of him on his drum set and captioned it, 'No words. We owe you everything. Love you forever.' Williams had left the band a while ago (2005-2016), but he was a vital part—someone who played a big role in making the Christian metal-pop band a success. During his time, they released several hit albums like With Roots Above and Branches Below, Zombie EP, and Dead Throne. Just hours before the crash, Daniel had posted a photo to his Instagram story from inside the cockpit, jokingly writing, 'Hey. Hey… you… look at me… I'm the (co)pilot now.' The private jet took off from Teterboro Airport in New Jersey late Wednesday night, then stopped for a while to refuel in Wichita, Kansas, and was headed to Montgomery-Gibbs Executive Airport in San Diego.
In 2019, Williams survived a mass shooting in Ohio, after a gunman opened fire in Dayton's Ned Peppers bar. 9 people were killed and 27 were injured. Williams later took to social media to share, 'There was an active shooter in the bar I was in tonight. I am told that he had an AR-15. [My friend] and I are ok. I am so incredibly heartbroken for those affected by this. I have never been so scared in my life.' He added, 'I was in Ned Peppers. I'm still not sure exactly what happened. People were piling on top of each other to get out. It's all a blur. F***ing awful.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sunday book pick: The dangers of self-absorption in ‘Nothing But the Night' by John Williams
Sunday book pick: The dangers of self-absorption in ‘Nothing But the Night' by John Williams

Scroll.in

time20 hours ago

  • Scroll.in

Sunday book pick: The dangers of self-absorption in ‘Nothing But the Night' by John Williams

I have a soft spot for the debut works of major writers. It's so endearing to witness the writer struggle with all the things that every new writer does – the timelessness of the story, the individuality of language, and above all, to offer the reader a great reading experience. John Williams published his first novel, Nothing But the Night, when he was only 26. He went on to write three more novels – Butcher's Crossing (1960), Stoner (1965), and Augustus (1972). Stoner is his most well-known novel, while Nothing But the Night might actually be his weakest. Critics have often called Stoner a perfect novel, while Nothing But the Night is anything but. In fact, many reviews have criticised Williams for his baroque writing style and the aimlessness of the plot, and to boot, an annoyingly narcissistic protagonist. But to me, these are what make Nothing But the Night so eminently readable. The arc of the writer – from writing a mediocre novel to the perfect one – is here for the reader to witness. And what could be better than that? Father, father, father Nothing But the Night follows 24-year-old Arthur Maxley around an unnamed city in the course of a single night. He has yet to go to university but is lavishly supported by his family – he spends most of his time dozing and drinking. The novel opens with an elaborate description of a dream where he is 'weightless and unalive.' Arthur is a lone man on an island – he is disturbed about something and completely lonely. Despite his young age, his parents are absent from his world and he seems to have no real friends or a lover. He is haunted by something he had witnessed at home, an altercation of sorts between his mother and father. Like his hazy dreams, the reader is kept in the dark about the exact nature of the dispute. Instead, Williams stresses Arthur's hatred for his father. 'Father, Father, Father, he said to himself. What an ugly word.' But Arthur's hatred is mixed with curiosity. When his father turns up in the city after a long spell of foreign travels in South America, Africa, and India, he calls on his son to see him for dinner. Arthur's resentment soon gives way and he agrees. But he's a bundle of nerves. He has no qualms about enjoying his father's wealth but something about being summoned by him as though everything is normal irks him. The evening goes by trying to fend off a 'friend' who hopes to borrow $500 from Arthur to start a publishing company. Arthur's wealth is no secret and his friend urges him to ask his father for the money. When the fateful hour finally arrives, he realises the 'enormity of the moment' and it 'engulfs him like a wave.' The meeting is not pleasant and to make matters worse, a suspicious-looking woman claims to be a close companion of his father's. The absurdity of the hour reaches its peak. Arthur 'sees' his mother's outstretched arm reaching out for him from behind the haze of people at the hotel. Father / Mother? Unable to bear it any longer, Arthur flees the scene and is out on the road again. About this, William writes, 'Some unnameable power pushed him from one place to another, down paths he had no wish to travel…' It is on this path that Claire Higsic catches an 'unconscious corner of his eyes.' She is waiting for someone who is showing no signs of arriving and he has the entire night ahead of him. The two start drinking – champagne at first, and then brandy – and inevitably, the mood sobers up as the man starts regaling his woes. When Claire tries to compliment his hands, he shuts her up by saying that he is nothing more than a 'parasite.' Despite the obvious seduction of the moment, Arthur finds it impossible to relax. Claire offers to go back to her place, but the spatial familiarity, her beauty which is comparable to his mother, and her forthcoming attitude throw him off – something is not right about how the night is unfolding. Plus, he is hallucinating again. He can clearly see the scene from his childhood, only this time, it is his mother who is holding the gun. She is all set to use it. In a moment of anger and epiphany, Arthur wonders if he's got it all wrong. Was his resentment of his father all for nothing? If so, where is his mother and why is his father never home? Completely emasculated by his own childhood and this woman who's making him do as she pleases, Arthur lashes out at her in the ultimate show of masculinity. There is a lot of aimlessness in Williams's novel. For instance, Arthur never really realises the cause of his anguish, he wanders the streets without a destination in mind, he drinks without really savouring the taste. When he's presented with a chance of companionship – however temporary – he squanders it by falsely equating Claire's boldness to his mother's. In contemporary language, he's both a mama's boy and a daddy's brat. He exists in a suspended state of abandonment and betrayal, which, by the end of the novel, the reader suspects is of his own making. Nothing But the Night is not a perfect novel, and it does not have to be. But even at the early age of 26, Williams was preoccupied with the crisis of masculinity in the 20th century – a theme that he would revisit in his later novels. His debut novel perfectly portrays the oppressive mess of repression and self-absorption, and the dangers of indulging in these feelings for too long. Nothing but the Night, John Williams, Vintage.

Inside Malti's NY trip with Priyanka Chopra, Nick Jonas: Trying on makeup, feasting on ice cream, playing with friends
Inside Malti's NY trip with Priyanka Chopra, Nick Jonas: Trying on makeup, feasting on ice cream, playing with friends

Hindustan Times

timea day ago

  • Hindustan Times

Inside Malti's NY trip with Priyanka Chopra, Nick Jonas: Trying on makeup, feasting on ice cream, playing with friends

Actor Priyanka Chopra and her husband-singer Nick Jonas, took a trip to New York with their daughter Malti Marie Chopra Jonas. They were also accompanied by Nick's brothers, Kevin Jonas, Joe Jonas and Franklin Jonas. Both Priyanka Chopra and Nick posted a bunch of pictures on Instagram. (Also Read | Heads of State trailer: Priyanka Chopra's MI6 agent Noel Bisset steals the show in Idris Elba-John Cena film, say fans) Priyanka, Nick Jonas and Malti spent a day with their family and friends in New York. In a photo, the couple was seen smiling as Malti played with Priyanka. They also took a walk by the river holding hands. Priyanka posted her photos as she enjoyed the sunset, posed with Malti and clicked a selfie with the Statue of Liberty. She shared a photo in which Malti sat on Nick's shoulder as he walked. The actor also shared a picture of Malti feasting on her ice cream as Joe looked at her. The toddler had some fun time in New York as she played with her friends and posed for a photo with a butterfly mural. In a few photos, Malti was seen applying makeup. She was also seen wearing nail extensions as Priyanka helped her. Sharing the photos, Priyanka simply wrote, "(Waving hand emoji) May (fairy and kiss mark emojis)." A post shared by Priyanka (@priyankachopra) A post shared by Nick Jonas (@nickjonas) Nick, in his post, shared photos with Kevin and Joe as they feasted on pizza and drinks. He also posted his photo from inside the recording studio. Priyanka, Nick, Joe and Malti posed for a photo as they walked on the streets of the city. Nick also posted a selfie with Priyanka from their Met Gala album. He shared a photo of the back of Priyanka. The singer also took Malti out as they watched a game. Sharing the photos, Nick wrote, "Greetings from me posting." Priyanka tied the knot with Nick Jonas in 2018 in Rajasthan. They had a traditional Christian wedding followed by a Hindu ceremony. They welcomed Malti through surrogacy in January 2022. Reportedly, Priyanka will star in SS Rajamouli's upcoming film alongside Mahesh Babu. Priyanka will also star in Heads of State alongside Idris Elba and John Cena. She is set to play a 19th-century Caribbean pirate in The Bluff. Fans will also see Priyanka in the highly anticipated web series Citadel 2. The second season, which was scheduled to release this year, has been postponed "to a spring 2026 debut".

Paramasivan Fathima Movie Review: This predictable film is ideologically inept and clumsily crafted
Paramasivan Fathima Movie Review: This predictable film is ideologically inept and clumsily crafted

New Indian Express

time2 days ago

  • New Indian Express

Paramasivan Fathima Movie Review: This predictable film is ideologically inept and clumsily crafted

Generally, filmmakers find it easy to dish out social issues if their films are set in a fictional world. This helps you stay away from offending any powerful person, organisation or community. It also creates a space for uninhibited discussions. But filmmaker Esakki Karvannan is disingenuous with things he presents as issues and lacks honesty in exploring them fully. Paramasivan Fathima introduces the fictional world of Subramaniyapuram and the towns split from it, namely Yokobpuram (predominantly Christian) and Sultanpettai (predominantly Muslim). The film begins with the narration that the rampant conversions are the reason for the split, and prospective grooms from both these towns die a day before their D-day. In parallel, we get glimpses of Paramasivan (Vemal) and Fathima/Tamilselvi (Chayadevi), teasing us with what could have happened to them even though the familiar stench of honour killing is discernible from a mile away. However, the film chooses to take a tiring 140 minutes to uninspiringly tell us the relation between the deaths and conversions. Putting itself on a high pedestal, the film claims to impart some noble message, but is off the target right from the beginning. It reeks of contrivance, especially with no villager in this film having anything to do except be bothered by religion. It could be said that communal flare-ups in Tamil Nadu are few and far in between when compared to cases of caste discrimination. However, the absence of an engaging fictional story cannot be blamed on the social fabric of the state. The film should have ideally explored how bigotry comes in the way of religious harmony in the 21st century rather than creating a fictional world filled with people, who seem to be straight out of the Middle Ages. The film also trivialises hunger and unemployment through Hindu characters coercing others in their community to not convert for "food and jobs" as though they aren't important enough for sustenance. The question is, what kind of pride should one take in a religion where one follower does not take care of another? Why will anyone not be grateful to someone from some other faith, who has taken it upon themselves to provide sustenance to live a dignified life? Also, it is important to note that the act of service done with an ulterior motive of converting more people to their religion cannot be brought under the umbrella term of 'service.' It is but a transactional relationship. Can an apathetic person judge when someone from his 'brethren' converts to another religion after receiving certain favours from them? No. Some scenes and dialogues reflect the 'rice-bag convert' condescension in social media, but this anger would have been better justified if it was targeted at those depriving the starving people of their 'rice bag'. 20th-century American psychologist Abraham Maslow would have created a five-tier needs hierarchy that treats physiological and safety needs as having paramount importance for a bare minimum decent life. Food and material requirements aren't nothing. I am duty-bound to remind such self-righteous people that the miracle stories of Lord Krishna filling his impoverished friend Kuselan's house with riches just for a morsel of puffed rice and Lord Jesus multiplying five bread loaves and two fishes to feed 5000 people are being taught to their respective followers even to this day to praise God's glory, generosity and magnanimity.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store