Ohio public health one of the worst funded in the country, faces further cuts in state budget
A new analysis of state public health systems shows Ohio's has some of the worst funding support in the nation, and that funding could go down even more in the newest state budget.
Using 2021 data from the State Health Access Data Assistance Center, the Health Policy Institute of Ohio found that the state spent $24 per person on public health, 'far less than most other states.'
'Overall, Ohio's investment in public health is lower than many other states at both the state and local levels,' the institute stated.
According to the data, only 12 states are worse than Ohio for state public health funding, with the worst being Missouri, at $6.54 per person in 2021. The highest ranked was the District of Columbia, at $370.56 in per-capita spending that year.
Public health involves everything from vaccine awareness and health education to food and water safety.
While health outcomes are influenced by clinical care like primary care check-ups, health behaviors and the social, economic, and physical environment make up a bigger part of the health outcome influences, according to policy briefs by the institute.
'Public health workers focus on stopping health problems before they start,' the HPIO stated in a recent policy brief. 'For example, public health workers prevent injuries and deaths by providing parents with information about how to correctly install infant car seats, distributing drug overdose reversal medication and raising awareness of senior fall prevention programs.'
Other public health roles include nurses at school-based health centers, restaurant inspectors, public assistance program nutritionists, epidemiologists who look at health trends like infant mortality, and workers who conduct home visits as part of the Help Me Grow program.
That program, along with infant vitality programs are portions of the state budget that may see cuts, even as public health advocates ask the state to support the sector more than it already does.
In the Ohio House's version of the state budget, $22.5 million would be cut from the Help Me Grow program in fiscal year 2027, representing a 26% reduction. Infant vitality programs would see cuts of more than $2 million each in 2026 and 2027, a nearly 10% cut. The programs, both housed under the Ohio Department of Children and Youth, are still awaiting final numbers, as the Ohio Senate takes up its budget discussions. A final draft will then be developed by both chambers, before it's sent to the governor by July 1.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The House version of the budget leaves local health department support unchanged, with that support set at the same $2.379 million the line item received in 2024 and this year. State funding for infectious disease prevention and control within the Ohio Department of Health will also receive relatively the same amount of funding as it received in 2024, though the House version drops the budget slightly from the estimated 2025 funding. The 2025 estimate by the state has funding at $5.2 million, and the House set funding for 2026 and 2027 at $4.9 million per year.
In Ohio, 2023 annual financial reports from the Ohio Department of Health and the Association of Ohio Health Commissioners showed 72% of local health department revenue comes from the local level, including local government funds, public health levies in some areas and fees. Federal funding distributed by the state makes up 16% of the revenue, 6% is from other state sources, and 5% comes from direct federal funding to local departments. Local health departments only receive 1% of their revenue via state subsidy, according to the data.
The Health Policy Institute's review of 2024 Ohio Department of Health data shows it receives half of its revenue from federal sources, 31% from the state and 19% came from the federal response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
With $979 million in state fiscal year 2024, the state used that revenue almost equally across three topics: disease prevention, implementation of the federal Women, Infant and Children (WIC) program, and services related to COVID-19 and other infectious diseases, according to an HPIO policy brief on public health basics. These three topics each took 22% to 23% in ODH expenditures.
Another 11% went to family and community health services, 6% went to maternal and infant vitality, 5% to administrative services, 4% to 'quality assurance' for long-term care facilities, 4% for public health preparedness information and 2% for 'other family and community health services' passed through local health districts.
Public health initiatives yield an average return on investment of $14 for every dollar spent, through improved health outcomes, reduced health care costs and increased productivity, according to the institute's public health analysis.
Among other policy recommendations, the instituted urged continued or even increased support for the federal Public Health Infrastructure Grant would be important to 'strengthen the public health workforce, foundational capabilities and data systems through the end of 2027.'
The public health sector has faced struggles like high turnover, high burnout rates in existing employees and a lack of adequate pay.
'Consistent delivery of these services across the state depends upon an adequate public health workforce,' the HPIO stated.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
4 days ago
- Politico
Proponent of Medicaid cuts set to brief House Republicans as they plot another megabill
Those staff-level meetings continue as House GOP leaders try to plot a way forward amid skepticism over whether another sprawling domestic policy bill is even possible given the difficulties Republicans had coming to agreement over the first one. House leaders discussed the topic with GOP chairs right before the chamber left for August recess, according to two Republicans granted anonymity to discuss the private gathering, tasking them with compiling lists of possible spending cuts and other ideas. What policies might be addressed in a second package is far from settled, though some House GOP factions are discussing further slashing Medicaid as well as possibly targeting Medicare funding. Blase was allied with conservative hard-liners earlier this year in pushing for significant cuts to Medicaid in the first GOP package. He was the initial author of a letter arguing for 'structural' changes to the program that Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) and 19 other hard-right members later sent to their House Republican colleagues. An RSC spokesperson declined to comment on Thursday's briefing. But a person granted anonymity to discuss plans in advance said the meeting is set to cover enhanced tax credits for Affordable Care Act health insurance premiums, which are due to expire at the end of the year, as well as rules governing the percentage of Medicaid expenditures covered by the federal government and reimbursed to states. The briefing will also cover the 340B drug discount program; proposals to even out Medicare payments for outpatient services, known as 'site neutral' payments; plans for expanding tax-advantaged Health Savings Accounts for medical expenses; and arrangements that allow employers to reimburse employees for insurance premiums and medical expenses with pre-tax dollars. Blase, who did not respond to a request for comment, served on the White House National Economic Council during Trump's first term. He and other conservative health wonks launched Paragon in 2021, and it has rapidly gained influence in GOP policy circles. Former Paragon staffers are now top health aides to Speaker Mike Johnson and President Donald Trump.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Republicans respond to data showing 10M will soon lose Medicaid coverage
(The Center Square) – Democrats are sounding the alarm over a new analysis showing that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will cause millions of Medicaid recipients to lose their current coverage. According to the Congressional Budget Office's newest estimate, Medicaid reforms in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will result in roughly 10 million people losing eligibility for their current health care plan by 2034. 'This latest analysis by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office confirms that the deeply unpopular One Big Ugly Law is also deeply unfair,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said in a response statement. 'The American people deserve better than this cruel Republican budget scam.' Republicans, however, have pointed out that the breakdown of the numbers offers a different perspective. Out of the 10 million affected, 5.3 million are able-bodied adults without dependents. Under the OBBBA, they could still remain on Medicaid, so long as they participate in work-related activities at least 80 hours per month. The work requirements would not apply to pregnant women; minors and seniors; foster youth under 26; Tribal members; the medically frail; those already meeting TANF or SNAP work requirements; caregivers with young dependents; or the currently and recently incarcerated. Another 3.7 million current Medicaid recipients set to lose coverage will still have access to some other form of government-sponsored health insurance. These individuals are primarily dual enrollees in Medicare and Medicaid, or those who are erroneously enrolled in Medicaid in more than one state. The former group would lose Medicaid but could retain Medicare, while the latter would be eligible to claim their Medicaid coverage only in their actual state of residence. The remaining 1 million impacted individuals are noncitizens who do not meet immigration status requirements for Medicaid enrollment. Those noncitizens have nonetheless received coverage under taxpayer-funded, state-sponsored Medicaid programs. 'The prolonged lie exacerbated by Democrats that 17 million individuals will lose health care coverage from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act has finally been dispelled,' House Committee on Energy and Commerce Chair Brett Guthrie, R-Ky., said Monday. 'It's easy to scare people with coverage loss estimates, but the facts are clear – the vast majority of these individuals are either choosing to lose coverage or aren't actually eligible for Medicaid, and nearly all are eligible for other forms [of] coverage.' Overall federal spending on Medicaid will still grow by 30% over the next decade, provided that Republicans refrain from further enrollee-reducing changes in another 'big, beautiful bill,' which GOP leaders are considering. Solve the daily Crossword
The Hill
6 days ago
- The Hill
HHS pilot program raises Democratic concerns over Medicare red tape
House Democrats are sounding the alarm and demanding more information about a new Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) demonstration they say will increase red tape by adding prior authorization requirements in Medicare. Led by Reps. Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.) and Ami Bera (D-Calif.), a group of 17 Democrats questioned why HHS would want to test adding prior authorization requirements in traditional Medicare when the Trump administration is touting efforts to reduce the practice in Medicare Advantage (MA). Traditional Medicare has rarely required prior authorization, but private MA plans have come under fire for relying on the controversial practice as a tool to increase profits. 'The Trump Administration publicly recognized the harm of prior authorization…And yet, not a week after these statements, CMS put forward a new proposal to increase the utilization of prior authorization in a type of health coverage that had seldom used the tactic before, replacing doctor's medical knowledge with an algorithm designed to maximize care denial in order to increase profits,' the lawmakers wrote in a letter to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz. The lawmakers are concerned about a new CMS pilot program to test a model targeting 'wasteful, inappropriate services in Original Medicare.' Under the model, CMS will partner with private companies, including some of the Medicare Advantage plans that are under fire for using prior authorization to deny a clinician's request to provide care. The model will require prior authorization for a list of outpatient procedures that the agency has flagged as vulnerable to fraud, waste and abuse, or inappropriate use. Participants will be rewarded based on the 'effectiveness of their technology solutions' for reducing spending on medically unnecessary or non-covered services. The lawmakers said they were concerned about creating perverse incentives that reward the companies that deny the most care. 'Prior authorization has long been abused, and it is bad for patients and providers,' the lawmakers wrote. An analysis of 2023 HHS data from KFF found about 81 percent of denials were partially or fully overturned after being appealed. 'The use of prior authorization in Medicare Advantage shows us that, in practice, [the demonstration] will likely limit beneficiaries' access to care, increase burden on our already overburdened health care work force, and create perverse incentives to put profit over patients,' the letter stated. The letter asked CMS for details on the pilot's scope, implementation plan and safeguards for beneficiaries. Meanwhile, the Trump administration is touting voluntary pledges they have received from the health insurance industry to streamline and reform the prior authorization process for MA plans. Lawmakers said the move shows the administration recognizes the harms of prior authorization. 'There's violence in the streets over these issues,' Oz said during an event announcing the industry pledges.
