logo
Health Rounds: Older diabetes drugs appear to slow prostate cancer in small study

Health Rounds: Older diabetes drugs appear to slow prostate cancer in small study

Reuters21-05-2025
May 21 (Reuters) - (This is an excerpt of the Health Rounds newsletter, where we present latest medical studies on Tuesdays and Thursdays. To receive the full newsletter in your inbox for free, sign up here.)
A class of older drugs used to treat type 2 diabetes may also help slow the progression of prostate cancer, a small study suggests.
Prostate cancer patients with diabetes who were receiving a class of medications called thiazolidinediones, or TZDs, that target the protein PPAR-gamma, 'remained relapse-free during the period we followed them," study leader Dr. Lukas Kenner of Umea University in Sweden said in a statement. "This is a significant discovery.'
By targeting PPAR-gamma, the drugs help the body use insulin more effectively, reducing blood sugar levels. It has also been reported that PPAR-gamma can contribute to tumor growth and worse outcomes in some types of cancer.
Tracking 69 patients who underwent surgery for localized prostate cancer, including 49 with diabetes, the researchers found that 10 years later, the only ones remaining free of biochemical recurrence – that is, a rise in PSA levels without any other signs or symptoms - were the three with diabetes who had been taking PPAR-gamma-targeting TZDs.
In test tube experiments, researchers saw that the drug pioglitazone, sold as Actos by Takeda Pharmaceuticals (4502.T), opens new tab, not only inhibited prostate cancer cell division and growth but also drove a metabolic reprogramming of the cancer cells, weakening their ability to survive and spread.
'Our findings position pioglitazone and similar metabolic inhibitors at the forefront of emerging therapeutic strategies for prostate cancer,' the researchers concluded in a report published in Molecular Cancer, opens new tab.
However, they noted that larger, long-term studies are needed to fully determine the impact of TZDs "on the development and progression of prostate cancer and patient survival.'
A new study of women with breast cancer found that patients of African or South Asian ancestry have important genetic differences that are not seen in those of European descent, which should be taken into consideration when diagnosing and treating their disease.
People of European ancestry have accounted for nearly 80% of participants in genetic association studies, despite representing only 16% of the global population, which means most of what is known about risk, prevention, and treatment is based predominantly on European populations, the researchers said.
'Precision medicine has the power to revolutionize cancer care, but only if it works for everyone,' study leader Dr. Claude Chelala of Queen Mary's Barts Cancer Institute in the UK said in a statement.
As reported on Tuesday in Nature Communications, opens new tab, researchers analyzed genetic data and medical records from over 7,000 U.S. and UK women with breast cancer of African, South Asian and European ancestry.
They found that patients of African or South Asian ancestry tend to develop breast cancer and die at a younger age than women of European ancestry, suggesting that screening should start at earlier ages in these women. Women of South Asian backgrounds died 13 years younger and those of African ancestry 9 years younger, researchers found.
Their study also identified differences in mutation rates in genes linked to breast cancer susceptibility, which are used in genetic testing and influence treatment decisions.
Some women had genetic mutations that could have made their cancer resistant to certain treatments that they received, but this was not factored into their clinical management.
'If we fail to address blind spots in research, we risk widening health inequalities rather than reducing them,' Chelala said.
Standard tools for diagnosing delirium in the intensive care unit are inaccurate in Spanish-speaking patients, researchers reported, opens new tab at the American Thoracic Society 2025 International Conference, opens new tab in San Francisco.
Dr. Ana Lucia Fuentes Baldarrago of the University of California, San Diego undertook the study when she found Spanish-speaking ICU patients who were classified as not delirious showed clear signs of delirium when engaged in Spanish.
She had also encountered patients labeled as delirious who were simply unable to communicate effectively because they did not speak English.
In 63 ICU patients – 29 Spanish-speakers and 34 English-speakers – her team compared three delirium assessment tools.
Two are administered by providers: the English-language Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) for the ICU, and a Spanish-language version of the same tool.
The third tool was a new version of the Spanish-language tool designed by the researchers for family caregivers to complete. While the Spanish CAM is the gold-standard assessment for Spanish-speaking patients when administered by a Spanish-speaking provider, there are not enough bilingual providers available to administer it in the United States.
Traditional screening methods were not accurate in Spanish-speaking ICU patients when the patient and provider did not speak the same language, the researchers found.
Their new Spanish assessment for families to complete was comparable to gold-standard assessments and outperformed usual screening practices in detecting delirium.
'These findings underscore the urgent need to evaluate commonly used clinical tools in diverse populations, particularly among non-English-speaking patients who are frequently excluded from clinical trials,' Fuentes Baldarrago said
Spanish-speaking patients also had significantly higher odds of being subjected to physical restraints and deep sedation, and lower odds of receiving evidence-based, delirium-prevention interventions such as physical and occupational therapy, Fuentes Baldarrago said.
Her team hopes to conduct larger studies of their tool for families to evaluate whether its use can reduce misclassification and improve clinical outcomes.
(To receive the full Health Rounds newsletter in your inbox for free sign up here)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Women's science award backed by Royal Society criticised for allowing trans entrants despite landmark Supreme Court gender ruling
Women's science award backed by Royal Society criticised for allowing trans entrants despite landmark Supreme Court gender ruling

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Women's science award backed by Royal Society criticised for allowing trans entrants despite landmark Supreme Court gender ruling

A prestigious women's science awards backed by the Royal Society has been criticised for allowing transgender women to enter despite the landmark Supreme Court gender ruling. The L'Oréal-UNESCO For Women in Science UK awards gives £25,000 grants to five 'outstanding early-career women scientists' to further their research and boost female representation in the sector. But the awards - which is supported by the UK's national academy of sciences - has been criticised as it allows entries from anybody who 'identifies as [a] female postdoctoral level researcher'. Women's rights groups have criticised the move as 'unlawful' in light of April's Supreme Court ruling and said it harms women who have 'historically experienced discrimination because of their sex'. They have written to the Royal Society and L'Oréal urging them to amend the eligibility criteria to bring it in line with equality law ahead of the application deadline closing on 20 August. In April the Supreme Court ruled that sex in the Equality Act refers to biological women and men and not to self-identification or the possession of a gender recognition certificate (GRC). This means that women only shortlists or scholarships - known as 'positive action' discrimination and designed to address under-representation - must be for biological women only. The L'Oréal-UNESCO For Women in Science Programme has been running since 1998 and the UK awards were launched in 2007. It has supported dozens of the country's brightest researchers in the fields of science, engineering, maths and computer science. Under the title 'who is eligible?', a leaflet for the 2025 awards says: 'Candidates must identify as female postdoctoral level researchers.' Helen Joyce, director of advocacy at human rights charity Sex Matters, said that anti-discrimination law permits positive action such as all-women shortlists because 'women have historically experienced discrimination because of their sex'. She said of the awards: 'Since the For Women Scotland judgment in the Supreme Court in April, it's been clear that this entry criterion isn't just nonsense, it's unlawful. 'Making it even worse, the Royal Society - the UK's most prestigious scientific body - supports this programme. 'It's well past time world-famous institutions and companies gave up trashing their reputations with virtue-signalling gender nonsense, and brought themselves back in line with the law, and material reality.' The awards is supported by the Royal Society, which was founded in 1660 and is made up of many of the world's most eminent scientists. Past fellows and members include Isaac Newton, Charles Darwin, Albert Einstein, Dorothy Hodgkin and Stephen Hawking. Current fellows include naturalist and broadcaster Sir David Attenborough, inventor Sir James Dyson and Tesla founder Elon Musk, who has previously spoken out in favour of biological reality. The X owner narrowly escaped being expelled from the Royal Society earlier this year following a backlash by member over his comments and behaviour, as well as his role in the Donald Trump administration. A L'Oréal Young Talent Awards spokeswoman declined to comment on whether the eligibility criteria would be amended but said the applications would close tomorrow 'as planned'. She added: 'For almost 20 years, the L'Oréal - UNESCO Young Talent Awards have celebrated excellence in scientific research. Recognising and encouraging a rich pipeline of top talent is core to the programme's mission to foster a variety of perspectives that enrich problem solving and creativity in STEM.'

4 dishes insider says you mustn't order in any restaurant…including ‘bacteria breeding ground' you'll ‘feel hours later'
4 dishes insider says you mustn't order in any restaurant…including ‘bacteria breeding ground' you'll ‘feel hours later'

The Sun

time2 hours ago

  • The Sun

4 dishes insider says you mustn't order in any restaurant…including ‘bacteria breeding ground' you'll ‘feel hours later'

AN INSIDER has revealed the four dishes you should never order in any restaurant. So if you love going out for dinner with pals or have a date night coming up soon, you've come to the right place and will need to take notes. 6 6 A woman named Julia Besz has claimed that whilst enjoying a 'late-night cuppa' with her friend who owns a restaurant, he revealed the dishes you should 'never order anywhere.' Julia claimed that when she questioned the foodie about his claims, his responses 'knocked her sideways.' As a result, eager to share her insider friend's insight with others, Julia took to social media and acknowledged the dishes she will now be avoiding, leaving many open-mouthed. And according to the restaurant owner, these dishes should be avoided at 'any restaurant" - whether that's a chain or a posh place. Say goodbye to 'specials' First things first, according to this insider, 'specials that aren't tied to a clear seasonal ingredient' should be steered clear of. While the insider claimed that such dishes 'sound harmless', it turns out that this often means using ingredients that need to be used before they go out of date. Julia's insider friend explained: 'The sauce masks the age, the garnish distracts you - and by the time you've finished, you've basically paid top dollar for yesterday's leftovers.' Feeling fishy Secondly, if you don't want to spend hours on the loo after going out for a meal, you may want to avoid 'shellfish in places nowhere near the coast.' According to this insider, unless restaurants have daily deliveries and spotless storage, you're 'gambling with your gut' by ordering shellfish. For those looking to avoid a night hugging the loo, Julia's friend stressed: 'Most punters don't realise but the wrong handling turns a fancy seafood platter into a food poisoning time bomb.' Vietnamese restaurant in London shut down after 'DOG MEAT disguised as goat found in freezer by health inspectors' Not ice, ice, baby Not only can shellfish cause an upset stomach, but having ice in drinks can also cause issues - yes, you heard that correctly. Julia's restaurant owner bestie suddenly made summer cocktails feel much less Instagrammable, as he shared a warning over having ice in beverages. He stressed: 'If the ice machine isn't cleaned properly - and in busy spots, it often isn't - you're basically sipping on a chilled petri dish.' Load off the meat Last but not least, the restaurant owner revealed the 'shocker' that you will want to avoid when dining at buffets or all-you-can-eats. According to this source, chicken dishes in such locations are 'the perfect breeding ground for bacteria if temps aren't bang-on.' How to save money eating out THERE are a number of ways that you can save money when eating out. Here's how: Discount codes - Check sites like Sun Vouchers or VoucherCodes for any discount codes you can use to get money off your order. Tastecard - This is a members club where you pay to have access to discounts worth up to 50 per cent off at thousands of restaurants. It costs £4.99 a month or £34.99 for the year. Loyalty schemes - Some restaurants will reward you with discounts or a free meal if you register with their loyalty scheme, such as Nando's where you can collect a stamp with every visit. Some chains like Pizza Express will send you discounts for special occasions, such as your birthday, if you sign up to their newsletter. Voucher schemes - Look out for voucher schemes offered by third party firms, such as Meerkat Meals. If you compare and buy a product through then you'll be rewarded with access to the discount scheme. You'll get 2 for 1 meals at certain restaurants through Sunday to Thursday. Student discounts - If you're in full-time education or a member of the National Students Union then you may be able to get a discount of up to 15 per cent off the bill. It's always worth asking before you place your order. He warned that in such 'high-volume' restaurants, chefs often don't check temperatures like they should. As well as this, he claimed: 'You won't see it, but you'll feel it 12 hours later.' Foodies react Julia's TikTok clip, which was posted under the username @ has clearly left many open-mouthed, as it has quickly racked up 213,700 views and 467 likes. Many users agreed with Julia's insider friend and raced to the comments to share their thoughts. One person said: 'Never order off a specials board - it's simply the food that is going off that day and needs to be binned. They dress it up and mark up the price!!!' Whilst another added: 'Never order fish on a Monday, no deliveries in many places that day.' Unlock even more award-winning articles as The Sun launches brand new membership programme - Sun Club 6 6 6

‘I was on a cocktail of antidepressants and prescription drugs. It nearly cost me my sanity'
‘I was on a cocktail of antidepressants and prescription drugs. It nearly cost me my sanity'

Telegraph

time3 hours ago

  • Telegraph

‘I was on a cocktail of antidepressants and prescription drugs. It nearly cost me my sanity'

As a junior doctor in her mid-thirties, working an average of 80 hours a week while raising young children, Cathy Wield found herself both burnt out and attempting to deal with suppressed childhood trauma. 'As a child, my parents lived overseas, and I was sent away to boarding school from the age of nine,' recalls Wield, now 65. 'I hated it, and managed to bury the memories of what was a very difficult and traumatic time for me. But when my eldest child won a place at the Royal Ballet School, it meant she would be boarding. I was already exhausted and memories from my childhood started to surface.' Feeling she was in the midst of an emotional crisis, Wield booked a GP appointment. Little did she know that this would precipitate a cascade of dozens of prescription medicines for more than two decades, and as detailed in a memoir, Unshackled Mind, it would ultimately leave her with permanent thyroid and nerve damage. It began initially with a simple antidepressant. But this pill led to suicidal ideations – a known risk in some people who take SSRI medications – and following a spell in hospital, Wield found herself being prescribed dozens of drug cocktails at a time, from antidepressants to antipsychotics and sleeping pills. Her prescription records reveal that over a seven year period, she was prescribed 33 different psychiatric medications. In the throes of side effects which left her barely able to function, Wield was in no position to question the treatment she was getting. 'I was a zombie,' says Wield. 'The side effects were unbelievable. I lost my sexual function because of the drugs and just felt totally numb most of the time, but when I reported these symptoms, I was just told, 'Oh no, that's your depression.' I experienced weight gain, constipation, a condition called postural hypertension which means dizziness when getting out of a chair. I had several head injuries as a result of that. But no doctor at any stage during these years looked and said, 'The problem is the drugs.' It just never entered their heads.' Wield's case is a particularly acute example of the problems of polypharmacy, when people are prescribed more than five different medications at the same time. The issue has been highlighted through studies which have linked polypharmacy to a greater risk of hospitalisation, adverse drug reactions, falls, and reduced quality of life. In one paper, focusing on Liverpool University Hospital Foundation NHS Trust, adverse reactions to prescription medications were a cause of 16.5 per cent of all admissions, with researchers suggesting that the problem could be costing the NHS as much as £2 billion per year. 'We have seen a significant increase in the number of treatments prescribed over the previous two decades,' says Dula Alicehajic-Becic, a consultant NHS pharmacist. 'In England alone, more than one million people take 10 or more medications per day.' So why does this happen? The risks of taking too many pills Wield says that all the years of medication have left her with a permanently damaged thyroid due to treatment with lithium, a drug commonly prescribed for mood disorders, as well as small fibre neuropathy, chronic damage to the small nerve fibres which branch out from the brain and spinal cord to the rest of the body. She says that it manifests as a painful, burning sensation in her feet. 'My feet burn if they're warmed,' she says. 'So through the hot summer I have to put them in bowls of cold water, and I have to use ice slippers during the night which I keep in a freezer near the bed.' According to NHS psychiatrist Dr Louise Bundock, who works at the UK's only drug deprescribing clinic, helping stop medications they no longer need, adverse effects relating to mental health medications that mimic psychiatric symptoms are often perceived as the patient's condition worsening, prompting the prescribing of yet more drugs. 'In the worst cases they end up on multiple medications with multiple new psychiatric diagnoses, sometimes being admitted to a psychiatric hospital, and significant effects on their ability to function in all areas of their life, losing jobs, losing relationships and unable to take part in life in the way they did previously,' says Bundock. 'Often the individual themselves believe that they have become very mentally unwell, sometimes for decades.' Polypharmacy has also been identified as a specific risk in older adults over the age of 65. While more than half of people in this age group have at least two medical conditions meaning medicines are necessary, too many pills can increase risk of dizziness, sudden drops in blood pressure when a person stands up, and confusion, which can all lead to falls and fractures. According to Deborah Gompertz, a GP and deputy honorary secretary of the British Geriatrics Society, the balance can be delicate as older people metabolise medications less well, as their kidneys and liver may be less adept at excreting them, meaning they can be more affected by certain drugs. 'We want to optimise the treatment of their long-term conditions, keeping them safe, and helping them to live independently in the community, while still minimising risk of falls, hospitalisation, and potentially death,' she says. How many prescription pills is too many? Researchers and clinicians are keen to emphasise that in many cases, a drug cocktail is both appropriate and necessary. For example, the recommended treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder is a 'triple therapy' of three inhaled medications. However, there are some classes of prescription pills which carry greater risks, such as sedatives and anticholinergic drugs, particularly when people are taking more than five medicines. Anticholinergics can be prescribed for everything from overactive bladder to managing symptoms of Parkinson's disease. 'The higher the anticholinergic burden, the more at risk you are from a fall or confusion,' says Gompertz. For people taking psychiatric medications, Bundock says it is also key to be aware that symptoms such as increased anxiety, worsening low mood, obsessive and compulsive behaviours, suicidal thoughts and even hallucinations can actually be side effects of mental health medications such as antidepressants or sleeping tablets. Why is overprescribing happening? The good news is that overprescribing has been recognised nationally as a problem, but the reasons for it are multi-faceted and complex. Alicehajic-Becic suggests that some clinicians may overestimate the benefits and underestimate the risks of certain medications, while the increasing prevalence of over 65s with multiple health conditions can make it difficult for doctors to strike the balance of trying to manage chronic illnesses while keeping medication load manageable. Gompertz points out that some patients question why a doctor is removing one of their medications or reluctant to prescribe them an additional pill, often assuming that it is due to cost saving rather than concerns of side effects. Alicehajic-Becic says that the issue can also occur because older people with more than one health condition can be seeing multiple consultants. 'Health records are also not uniformly shared, hence information pertinent to a new prescription may not be available in real time,' she says. 'Payments are also given to providers to achieve a certain target, such as cholesterol lowering, which incentivises prescribing.' However when it comes to mental health, Wield feels that doctors need to stop being so quick to medicalise what she describes as 'normal distress'. 'When I look back to that first time when I sought help from the GP, I just needed time to recuperate,' she says. 'I was overwhelmed, overtired and I just needed support, and I wanted to talk to somebody. If I'd had simple talking therapy, I think I would have been fine. Instead, it's cost the NHS a huge amount of money and resources, and personally impacted myself, my family, and my career.' What can you do? Gompertz says that anyone taking multiple medications should be having a structured medicine review at least every six to 12 months, but in some cases, for example medicines like blood thinners, a review should be carried out on a three monthly basis. 'It's something that adult children with an elderly parent can be aware of,' she says. 'If you notice that your mum and dad have got a build-up of their medication at home, it could be an idea to talk to whoever's prescribing those medications for your parents. And if the person themselves feels they're getting side effects or not tolerating them, it's important to have that conversation.' When it comes to psychiatric medications, Bundock advises people to be aware of the possible side effects listed in the accompanying leaflets in the medication box, provided by the drug company. For people who have been on a number of these drugs for a period of time, it is also important not to stop them too abruptly. 'The longer someone has been on a mental health medication, the more important it becomes for it to be stopped slowly,' she says. 'Because there is the possibility of injury to the nervous system from these medications being stopped too fast.' Wield has now been mostly medication-free since 2018. These days she only takes three pills – a hypertension drug, a hayfever tablet and thyroid hormone replacement drug called levothyroxine. But decades of inappropriate polypharmacy have had a lasting impact on her life. 'I'm very fortunate that my husband stuck with me, because it was very, very difficult for our children growing up to have their mother in that state. And with my career, I did manage to return to work and become a specialist in emergency medicine, but I was not able to complete my training and progress to become a consultant. So it's had a huge impact on us financially as well.' Despite her experience, Wield says she's not interested in blaming any individuals for what happened to her, but she is determined to keep raising awareness to try and drive greater systemic change. 'It's driven me to become an activist to try and stop this happening to anybody else,' she says. 'I really do think the prescribing system and doctor's training needs to be addressed so that this doesn't happen to other people.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store