logo
Trump's Washington police takeover echoes history of racist narratives on urban crime

Trump's Washington police takeover echoes history of racist narratives on urban crime

April Goggans, a longtime Washington resident and grassroots organizer, said she was not surprised by Trump's actions. Communities had been preparing for a potential federal crackdown in the district since the summer of 2020, when Trump deployed National Guard troops during racial justice protests after the murder of George Floyd.
'We have to be vigilant,' said Goggans, who has coordinated protests and local civil liberties educational campaigns for nearly a decade. She worries about what a surge in law enforcement could mean for residents' freedoms.
'Regardless of where you fall on the political scale, understand that this could be you, your children, your grandmother, your co-worker who are brutalized or have certain rights violated,' she said.
Uncertainty about what's a safe environment raises alarms
According to White House officials, National Guard troops will be deployed to protect federal assets in the district and facilitate a safe environment for law enforcement to make arrests. The administration believes the highly visible presence of law enforcement will deter violent crime.
It is unclear how the administration defines providing a safe environment for law enforcement to conduct arrests, raising alarm bells for some local advocates.
'The president foreshadowed that if these heavy-handed tactics take root here, they will be rolled out to other majority-Black and Brown cities, like Chicago, Oakland and Baltimore, across the country,' said Monica Hopkins, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union's D.C. chapter.
'We've seen before how federal control of the D.C. National Guard and police can lead to abuse, intimidation and civil rights violations — from military helicopters swooping over peaceful racial justice protesters in 2020 to the unchecked conduct of federal officers who remain shielded from full accountability,' Hopkins said.
A history of denigrating language
Conservative lawmakers have for generations used denigrating language to describe the condition of major American cities and called for greater law enforcement, often in response to changing demographics in those cities driven by nonwhite populations relocating in search of work or safety from racial discrimination and state violence. Republicans have called for greater police crackdowns in cities since at least the 1965 Watts Riots in Los Angeles.
President Richard Nixon won the White House in 1968 after campaigning on a "law and order" agenda to appeal to white voters in northern cities alongside overtures to white Southerners as part of his 'Southern Strategy.' Ronald Reagan similarly won both his presidential elections after campaigning heavily on law and order politics. Politicians ranging from former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani to former President Bill Clinton have cited the need to tamp down crime as a reason to seize power from cities like Washington for decades.
District of Columbia Mayor Muriel Bowser called Trump's takeover of the local police force 'unsettling' but not without precedent. The mayor kept a mostly measured tone during a Monday news conference following Trump's announcement but decried the president's reasoning as a 'so-called emergency' and said the district's residents 'know that access to our democracy is tenuous.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India scours the globe for more oil ahead of Trump-Putin summit
India scours the globe for more oil ahead of Trump-Putin summit

Economic Times

time17 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

India scours the globe for more oil ahead of Trump-Putin summit

India's refiners are diversifying crude oil sources amid potential US pressure to curb Russian imports, spurred by President Trump's demands and tariff hikes. State processors are actively purchasing non-Russian crude from various global markets for September-October delivery. While private refiners may continue Russian imports, concerns over secondary sanctions are pushing some to explore alternative payment methods and smaller banks. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Refiners in India, the world's top importer of seaborne Russian crude, are scouring the globe for alternative supplies, hedging their bets ahead of a summit between the US and Russian Donald Trump, eager to gain traction in talks with Vladimir Putin, has demanded that India stop purchases of cut-price crude that fuels the Kremlin's 'the war machine,' and last week doubled tariffs on the country's goods as punishment. The move left refiners in the world's third-largest oil consumer looking to switch up their procurement state processors have bought large volumes of non-Russian crude this week for prompt September-October delivery, extending a buying spree spurred by an early threat by Washington. Indian Oil Corp . and Bharat Petroleum Corp . have taken cargoes from all corners of the market including the US, but also Brazil and the Middle spot market purchases comes on top of supplies from long-term sellers like Saudi Arabia, which is set to send about 22.5 million barrels of crude to India for September loading, traders said. India's monthly imports from Saudi last exceeded that level in September 2024, according to data from analytics firm meeting between Trump and Putin in Alaska on Friday will be closely watched by the industry, eager for clues as to whether the US will ease pressure on Russian sales — or crank it up. India has long had close ties to Russia and Foreign Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar will be traveling to Moscow next week with a delegation that's likely to include Petroleum Secretary Pankaj Jain, the most senior bureaucrat in the oil will hold talks with his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov on Aug. 21, according to a post on X by Russia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs on India has not been a significant importer of Russian crude, depending more heavily on the Middle East. All that changed in 2022, after the invasion of Ukraine and a $60-per-barrel price cap imposed by the Group of Seven nations that aimed to limit the Kremlin's oil revenues while keeping supplies flowing imports amounted to about 1.7 million barrels a day, or nearly 37% of the nation's overseas purchases, in mid-2025. They were mostly of Urals crude, a medium-density grade that can be interchanged with barrels from across the Middle East. While the total volume that India would need to find as replacement is significant, the task has been made less challenging in a market awash with oil after the return of OPEC+ barrels and softer demand from major economies such as now, Indian private refiners such as Reliance Industries Ltd. and Nayara Energy are still expected to continue buying Russian crude, some of which is procured via term contracts, even as state refiners hold back on spot purchases for loading in producers have already started to tout Urals more aggressively to Chinese buyers in response to the potential shift. Prices have been cut for offers of Urals for delivery in September to October, suggesting some of the oil was diverted from Indian importers who still want to take Russian crude are being met with hesitation from banking and logistics partners worried about the prospect of Trump's threat of so-called secondary sanctions on those supporting the trade. In light of such reservations, traders said some private players may increasingly look at buying more Russian crude using smaller banks, Chinese yuan and dark-fleet has warned he would impose 'very severe consequences' if Putin doesn't agree to a deal later this week, a threat that the oil market will struggle to fully quantify and prepare for. Oil-market observers have said that the Chinese may be wary of piling in on Russian crude — taking supplies that it doesn't desperately need due to ample flows from Iran — to avoid Washington's wrath.

India among fastest growing economies: JSW chairman Sajjan Jindal
India among fastest growing economies: JSW chairman Sajjan Jindal

Business Standard

time19 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

India among fastest growing economies: JSW chairman Sajjan Jindal

JSW Group chairman Sajjan Jindal on Thursday countered US President Donald Trump's recent remarks on India, saying India is one of the largest and fastest growing economies in the world. Speaking at the listing ceremony of JSW Cement at the NSE here, Jindal said India is the fastest growing large economy and has a great future ahead, days after US President Donald Trump's remark of India being a dead economy. "We are going to see a great future for India, because India is growing, it's one of the largest, fastest growing large economies in the world. Whatever Trump may say, that doesn't matter. We are the fastest growing large economy in the world," Jindal said. Amid the trade policy negotiations, Trump had called India as a "dead economy" while expressing disappointment with New Delhi's posturing to continue buying cheap oil from Russia. "I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together," Trump had reportedly said. Stating that JSW Cement will grow fast as accelerated growth is in the DNA of the Group, he said, "we can't be conservative, we have to be aggressive and that's what India requires. India needs aggressive companies, India needs growth." Meanwhile, shares of JSW Cement Ltd listed with a premium of over 4 per cent against the issue price of Rs 147 on Thursday. The company's stock opened at Rs 153, up 4 per cent from the issue price on the BSE. Later, it jumped 5.23 per cent to Rs 154.70. At the NSE, it listed at Rs 153.50, a premium of 4.42 per cent. The company's market valuation stood at Rs 20,914.02 crore. The capital markets are not just about raising funds, it's about winning the trust of the investors, Jindal said and added that "in the long run, you don't need to take a big jump, but small steps and the investors are always with you." JSW Cement Managing Director Parth Jindal said that he was aiming to take the company to the top two in the industry. "... I have to dream to be in the top two and we all will dream to be in the top two and to build this company," he said. "We have just begun and I hope that we can create value for all our minority shareholders and take this company to its rightful place and be a big part of the future growth story of the JSW group," he said. He said that at present a lot of JSW group companies have the vision to go public, adding that," Now, I'm fully trained, fully ready and geared up to take all of you public as well.

Can Russia occupy parts of Ukraine the way Israel occupies West Bank?
Can Russia occupy parts of Ukraine the way Israel occupies West Bank?

First Post

time19 minutes ago

  • First Post

Can Russia occupy parts of Ukraine the way Israel occupies West Bank?

Russia has reportedly proposed taking military and economic control of areas it has occupied in Ukraine – a scheme that would mirror Israel's approach to the West Bank. The proposal was put forth in a meeting between US envoy Steve Witkoff and Russian representatives. But what do we know about such a plan? Russian President Vladimir Putin welcomes US President Donald Trump's Special Envoy Steve Witkoff during a meeting in Moscow, Russia. The proposal was said to be made in meeting between Witoff and Russian officials. Reuters Is Russia planning to emulate Israel's plan in the West Bank? There are reports that Russia has proposed doing so to the United States in a meeting between US envoy Steve Witkoff and Russian representatives. The report comes ahead of the meeting between US President Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. It also comes after Trump held a call with several European leaders including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who will not take part in the summit. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But what do we know about the proposal? Let's take a closer look: What we know about proposal Russia's proposal mirrors Israel's plan in the West Bank. Moscow under this scheme would take military and economic control of areas it has occupied in Ukraine. However, these areas would be run by a separate governing body. 'The answer to Ukraine's territorial question is already in the constitution of Ukraine,' the Ukrainian president said in a Saturday video statement on Telegram. 'Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupier.' However, such a plan would theoretically allow Ukraine to retain its formal sovereignty – thereby providing a legal workaround to Ukraine's Constitution, which mandates holding a national referendum when it comes to ceding territory. Witkoff, who is also Trump's envoy to West Asia, is said to back this plan. Thus far, Trump has been focused on a 'land swap' as a way of resolving the war – on which he has received pushback from Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelenskyy and European leaders. 'It'll just be like Israel occupies the West Bank,' an unnamed source with ties to the US National Security Council (NSC) told The Times. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'With a governor, with an economic situation that goes into Russia, not Ukraine. But it'll still be Ukraine, because … Ukraine will never give up its sovereignty. But the reality is it'll be occupied territory and the model is Palestine,' the source added. It remains unclear if the plan calls for Ukraine to get back the territory at some point. The Trump administration has decried this report as fake news. 'This is total fake news and sloppy reporting by The Times, which clearly has terrible sources. Nothing of the sort was discussed with anyone at any point,' White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said. Volodymyr Zelenskyy has previously said that there is no question of Ukraine handing over its territory to Russia. However, their previous words point to something else entirely. The Trump administration has repeatedly said that Ukraine expecting to get back its land from Russia is 'unrealistic'. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth in February said, 'We must start by recognising that returning to Ukraine's pre-2014 borders is an unrealistic objective. Chasing this illusionary goal will only prolong the war and cause more suffering'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In May, US Senior Director for Counterterrorism Sebastian Gorka, said 'the Trump administration lives in the real world.' 'We recognise the reality on the ground,' he added. 'No. 1, that's the beginning because we're not utopianists and we're not human engineers. We're not some kind of pie-in-the-sky believers in utopia.' 'We recognize the reality on the ground and we have one priority above all else, whether it's the Middle East or whether it's Ukraine. It's to stop the bloodshed. Everything else comes after the bloodshed has been halted.' However, European leaders have repeatedly said that Ukraine needs to be part of any peace process and no talks about land being handed over can occur for a ceasefire without Kyiv. A number of European leaders during the call yesterday with Trump and Zelenskyy said the goal was to get a ceasefire between Russia and the Ukraine. They said the ceasefire is simply a first step and that Ukraine needs to play any part in a peace deal. They also said Europe's concerns must be taken into account. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We have made it clear that Ukraine will be at the table as soon as there is a follow-up meeting,' German Chancellor Friedrich Merz told reporters in Berlin alongside Zelenskyy. ' President Trump wants to make a ceasefire a priority,' he added. Any territorial exchange in Ukraine 'must only be discussed with Ukraine', French President Macron added after the call. 'Trump was very clear on the fact that the US wants to obtain a ceasefire at this meeting in Alaska,' Macron said. 'We must continue to support Ukraine, and when I say 'we', I mean Europeans and Americans,' he added. 'We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force,' the leaders said in a statement on Saturday. 'The current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations.' The West Bank Israel seized the West Bank from Jordan during the 1967 war – also known as the Six- Day War when it fought and defeated its neighbours Egypt, Syria, and Jordan. The land lies to Israel's east – on the West Bank of the River Jordan from which it gets its name – spans 5,628 square kilometres. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It is surrounded by Israel to its north, west and south. It also borders Jerusalem – which houses sites sacred to Muslims, Christians and Jews and is a flashpoint for internal violence. While the West Bank is home to millions of Palestinians, it is also home to nearly half a million Israeli Jews. Israel over the years has built 'settlements' on the West Bank. Many of these have sprung up under the Benjamin Netanyahu regime, which has made their construction 'a priority'. Israel seized the West Bank from Jordan during the 1967 war – also known as the Six- Day War when it fought and defeated its neighbours Egypt, Syria, and Jordan. AFP However, the settlements remain illegal under international law. Even the United States, a staunch ally of Israel, does not recognise the legality of these settlements. The International Court of Justice ruled in July that the occupation of the West Bank was illegal and said that it violated Palestinians' right to self-determination. It said Israeli policy in the territories constituted 'systemic discrimination' based on religion, race or ethnic origin, and that Israel had already effectively annexed large parts of the territory. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store