logo
Forget 10,000—This Is the Real Number of Steps You Need to Cut Risk of Early Death in Half

Forget 10,000—This Is the Real Number of Steps You Need to Cut Risk of Early Death in Half

Yahoo2 days ago
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links."
Researchers say that 10,000 steps may not be needed for 'better health.'
A recent study found that 7,000 steps a day may be enough to boost wellbeing.
Experts explain the findings and how walking may help mitigate disease.
If you've ever ended the day stressed out because you only managed to get 9,423 steps in instead of that oft-touted, magical 10,000, we've got good news: A recent study found that 7,000 steps may be all you need when it comes to cutting your risk of a slew of diseases, and even early death.
Published in The Lancet, researchers analyzed data from 57 studies across 35 cohorts, covering everything from heart disease to fall risk. They found that increasing your daily steps—especially from very low baselines—was linked to a lower risk of almost every major health outcome.
Meet the expert: Sean P. Heffron, M.D., a preventative cardiologist at NYU Langone
While that in and of itself isn't shocking, what's particularly notable here is that, in most cases, benefits leveled off around 7,000 steps per day. So, what's the deal with 7,000 steps—and does that mean 10,000 is overhyped?
What did the study find?
The study found that going from 2,000 to 7,000 steps per day was associated with: A 47% lower risk of early death in general, 25% lower risk of cardiovascular disease, 37% lower risk of cancer mortality, 38% lower risk of dementia, 22% lower risk of depressive symptoms, and 14% lower risk of type 2 diabetes. In other words, you don't have to hit 10,000 steps to get meaningful health benefits.
But why 7,000? Researchers found what's called an 'inflection point' in the data. That means risk for conditions like heart disease and early death kept dropping steadily until about 7,000 steps—and then, in many cases, started to level off. More steps were still beneficial, but the gains weren't quite as dramatic.
Sean P. Heffron, M.D., a preventative cardiologist at NYU Langone, tells Prevention that the study lines up with the recommendations he often gives his patients.
'It's a law of diminishing returns,' Dr. Heffron says, 'but honestly, you have a huge benefit going from nothing to anything. Certainly, zero to 7,000 is an enormous benefit.'
Dr. Heffron adds that '7,000 steps, prior to this study, actually felt to be representative of the [American Heart Association] recommended guideline of about 150 minutes of moderate intensity physical activity a week,' he said.
Where did 10,000 steps come from?
The 10,000-step goal may not actually have its roots in science, but rather marketing.
According to a 2019 study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, the number gained traction in the 1960s after a Japanese pedometer brand named Manpo-kei, or '10,000 steps meter,' capitalized on the round number. Since then, it's stuck around in fitness trackers and cultural consciousness alike, despite a lack of strong research backing it.
Such a large number can often feel like a daunting goal for people who aren't very active, even if the intention is to build up to it slowly. And when something feels insurmountable at first—even if it isn't—it can be difficult to get started. This new study is adding to the growing evidence that 7,000 steps may not only be a more realistic target, but one that has enough research behind it that proves definitive benefits.
Should anyone limit their walking?
Just because 7,000 is the sweet spot doesn't mean that you should throw in the towel at step 7,001. It just means that if it's difficult or unenjoyable for you to push yourself further, there may not be a huge benefit in doing so.
But if you're already hitting 10,000 steps a day, or if you like the idea of that nice, round number, go for it.
'I tell everyone: the more, the merrier. If it's something you can do, go for it. The benefit is there,' Dr. Heffron says. 'Going from [7,000 to 10,000 steps] is likely not too much of a time commitment.'
Setting manageable goals that don't feel so overwhelming that they discourage getting started is key. If you're beginning from a completely sedentary lifestyle, even aiming for 2,000 steps per day is better than nothing. And if you can eventually crank that up to 7,000—that's enough.
And, Dr. Heffron adds, that doesn't mean you have to set out just to walk. Any sort of physical activity can bring added steps and added health benefits. 'If you're enjoying it,' he says, 'go for it and get moving.'
You Might Also Like
Can Apple Cider Vinegar Lead to Weight Loss?
Bobbi Brown Shares Her Top Face-Transforming Makeup Tips for Women Over 50
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Report: NFLPA tells players they can still use smelling salts
Report: NFLPA tells players they can still use smelling salts

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Report: NFLPA tells players they can still use smelling salts

The NFL's ban on smelling salts and ammonia capsules comes with a massive asterisk. Players are still permitted to use them. Via Kalyn Kahler of the NFLPA sent the following message to all players on Wednesday night: "The NFL Players Association is aware of the memo issued by the league Tuesday regarding the use of smelling salts and ammonia capsules. We were not notified of this club policy change before the memo was sent out. To clarify, this policy does not prohibit player use of these substances, but rather it restricts clubs from providing or supplying them in any form. The NFL has confirmed this to us. If you have any questions, please reach out to your player director." (Emphasis in original.) The NFL didn't prohibit player use of smelling salts or ammonia capsules because it can't do so without collective bargaining. For now, it's a liability issue for the league. By preventing teams from supplying them, the NFL has an obvious defense if, for example, a player uses smelling salts or ammonia capsules to mask the symptoms of a concussion, returns to a game, and suffers a second concussion and a potentially serious brain injury because of it. If the league were truly concerned about the health and safety impact of using smelling salts or ammonia capsules, it would use all levers and leverage to persuade, and if necessary persude, the NFLPA to join in a mutual effort to prevent players from bringing and using their own. Unfortunately, the nature of collective bargaining isn't conducive to a single-issue win-win. If one side wants something, the other side will say, "What's in it for us?" In other words, "If you want us to agree to ban smelling salts and ammonia capsules, give us something in return." The better approach would be to truly appreciate and understand the health and safety issues associated with using smelling salts and/or ammonia capsules to clear the cobwebs from a brain that has been impacted by trauma. Both sides should want to stop using them. It's amazing, frankly, that it's taken the league so long to realize it's not a good idea to have them around. Now that the NFL is on board with banning them, the NFLPA should think less about parlaying this into a bargaining chip and more about whether it's in the best interests of the players to get them off the sidelines and out of the locker rooms. The problem is that neither side of any labor-management relationship thinks this way. It's always about getting something in return for whatever is being given up. On matters of player health and safety, the constant tug-of-war should yield to common sense.

Why nuclear is the center of the stock market's energy trade in 2025
Why nuclear is the center of the stock market's energy trade in 2025

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why nuclear is the center of the stock market's energy trade in 2025

Nuclear energy stocks have been on a tear in 2025. Shares in the space are far outpacing peers in the broader energy sector. AI and support from the Trump White House are big tailwinds for nuclear. Nuclear energy stocks got a big boost this week after US Transportation Secretary and interim NASA administrator Sean Duffy announced plans to expedite a nuclear reactor on the moon. The comments sent stocks such as Oklo, Nucor and Nano Nuclear Energy jumping, with the gains extending into Wednesday's session. But it's more than seemingly one-off comments that's boosting nuclear stocks this year, and the alternative power source has become the hottest energy trade out there in 2025. Nuclear power has come sharply into focus in recent years, with advocates including Tesla CEO Elon Musk and, more recently, the Trump White House. A quick look at the energy sector reveals that nuclear energy is outpacing its peers. The VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) is up almost 50% year-to-date, compared to the Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU), which is up 13%, and the Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE), which is down about 1% this year. Nuclear energy is riding the AI wave It's hard to examine the growth of nuclear energy stocks in 2025 without talking about the role of nuclear in the AI boom. AI demand has continued to skyrocket as companies have doubled down on capex plans in the space. Dizzying demand for data centers has created an equally enormous need for power. Goldman Sachs predicts that data center power demand will increase 165% by 2030. That's sparked a search for alternative power sources to support the continued growth of data centers and AI. "It was easy and fast to reactivate nuclear reactors to meet the growing demand for clean energy from data centers," said Alexander Lis, chief investment officer at Social Discovery Ventures. "Other energy sources were either less clean, like coal, or longer to build, like wind or solar." Lis added that his firm considers this demand to be sustainable, as "many big tech companies have already announced their plans to use nuclear energy for their data centers." Last September, Constellation Energy said it would reopen Three Mile Island, with Microsoft set to purchase the power power generated by the site. Eric Schiffer, chairman and CEO of The Patriarch Organization and a nuclear energy investor, echoed this sentiment, highlighting the role that it may play in helping the US achieve AI dominance. "China [is] far more equipped right now from an energy platform perspective," he stated. "Nuclear is a critical piece to ensure we're staying at pace. You can't lose this race over an energy constraint." An under-the-radar Trump trade Schiffer and others believe that Trump's focus on AI will benefit nuclear energy stocks in the near term. "The Trump administration's policy priorities to support AI advancement and the unleashing of American innovation has been centered around a deregulation focus and a markets-driven all-of-the-above energy strategy," said Jeff Le, managing principal at consulting firm 100 Mile Strategies. "It includes an audacious goal of quadrupling US nuclear energy capacity to 500 gigawatts by 2050." Le added that Trump's recent executive orders put "nuclear reactor licensing, fuel reprocessing, and domestic production, at the top of its 'Energy Dominance' agenda." The cumulative effect of already soaring demand for power from AI and Trump's turn away from renewables in the search for alternative power sources means nuclear has been a big winner this year. Importantly for investors, Schiffer thinks this bullish period will continue for another 18 months or so. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

From one Dragon to another as SpaceX Crew-10 prepares to return to Earth
From one Dragon to another as SpaceX Crew-10 prepares to return to Earth

Digital Trends

time26 minutes ago

  • Digital Trends

From one Dragon to another as SpaceX Crew-10 prepares to return to Earth

NASA astronaut Anne McClain and three of her colleagues are spending their last evening aboard the International Space Station (ISS) after a five-month stay in orbit. McClain, fellow NASA astronaut Nichole Ayers, Japanese astronaut Takuya Onishi of JAXA, and Russian cosmonaut Kirill Peskov of Roscosmos, are part of SpaceX's Crew-10 and are set to return to Earth inside Crew Dragon Endurance shortly after midday on Thursday — assuming the weather conditions are suitable at the splashdown site off the coast of Florida. Recommended Videos McClain and her Crew-10 colleagues have spent the last week showing the ropes to Crew-11, who arrived aboard another Crew Dragon spacecraft. The American astronaut posted a striking image on X on Wednesday, taken from one of the Dragon spacecrafts and showing the other one, with Earth directly below and an aurora in the far distance. 'Dragon Endurance and Crew-10 are settled in for our last night aboard the Space Station,' McClain wrote in her post. 'When there are two crews aboard during handover, we get this unique view from the zenith-docked Dragon looking down at the forward-docked Dragon. Tomorrow, Crew-10 will strap ourselves into this Dragon and head home. But tonight, one more breathtaking view.' Dragon Endurance and Crew-10 are settled in for our last night aboard @Space_Station. When there are two crews aboard during handover, we get this unique view from the zenith-docked Dragon looking down at the forward-docked Dragon. Tomorrow, Crew-10 will strap ourselves into this… — COL Anne McClain (@AstroAnnimal) August 6, 2025 In another post on X, McClain said she found it hard to believe that her time in orbit was 'coming to a close already,' adding, 'What a great trip this has been.' In their five months aboard the ISS, Crew-10 spent much of their time conducting science research in microgravity. The work included an investigation into how radiation and gravity environments at different orbital altitudes affect plant growth — important for future long-duration crewed missions to deep space — and a look at how cells sense gravity, with the findings possibly leading to therapies for treating muscle and bone conditions. They also captured images of simultaneous lightning events at the top of two thunderstorms, with scientists using such data to study various weather conditions in Earth's upper atmosphere. The research can help to better protect communication systems and aircraft while improving atmospheric models and weather forecasts.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store