I Tried To Fix Government Tech for Years. I'm Fed Up.
When I helped create the United States Digital Service (USDS), it was not on my bingo board that it would become the U.S. DOGE Service a mere decade later. As a lifelong libertarian, the years I spent trying to make government more efficient at the Department of Veterans Affairs (V.A.) and USDS required a lot of patience. Now I'm fresh out.
We have been making tiny, barely perceptible "improvements," paid for with years of compromise and hand-holding in endless pointless meetings, and then celebrating this as success. I can't get Alana Newhouse's description out of my head: "Half the time our institutions feel like molasses, and the other half like concrete." I'm fed up with a government that can't implement its way out of a paper bag.
Apparently most of America is fed up, too.
I care deeply about trans people, immigrants, and others who are targets of so much hate right now. I do not support the harmful actions being taken against them. At the same time, I could not possibly care less that someone plugged in a server to create a new email list without a Privacy Impact Assessment. If no one ever adheres to FIPS 140-2 again—great, it's about time we took that "kick me" sign written in Mandarin off our back. Much of the current system hurts everyone and needs to go.
When I was chief technology officer of the V.A., a highlight of my career was persuading our inspectors general (I.G.) to allow cloud computing. At the time, most of our websites had business hours, and/or ran on servers that sat in mop closets under a fire sprinkler without backups. I wish I was exaggerating. Cloud would allow us to offer modern online services to America's 20 million veterans.
I spent countless meetings, demos, and lunch-and-learns overcoming I.G. arguments. One objection became a favorite interview question for new hires: "But how do you put the cloud in an evidence bag?" I cheekily baked cloud-shaped sugar cookies and distributed them—in evidence bags—around the office. More than two years later, the I.G. issued a memo approving the use of the cloud.
But you know what? I shouldn't have had to waste two and a half years of my life on this, while millions of veterans went without health care and other benefits they had earned. People in charge of regulating computers should know how computers work. They should even be good at computers.
As we got closer to launching a modern website, I was thwarted in a new and creative way. The Department of Labor bought the domain veterans.gov—the one we intended to use—and said they would only give it to us if they got to approve every page of our website.
Not going to happen. Beyond the delays this would add, the labor department sucks at websites. Their "My Next Move for Veterans," a multi-million-dollar website that every individual separating from the military is required to use, is one of the worst you could ever see. It tells veterans their primary skills are that they can "communicate by speaking" and "use [their] arms and/or legs together while sitting, standing, or lying down." Thanks for your service. If you don't believe me, look for yourself.
The White House got involved, requiring months of in-person mediation meetings. I was never able to get the domain back. (To this day, the labor department owns veterans.gov.) How exactly are we qualified to intervene in foreign wars if our processes can't even stop one agency from squatting on another's domain name?
Getting a government position description for a technologist approved—for what later became USDS—was even worse. On my first attempt, I posted a senior role for a graphic designer on USAJOBS. Human resources selected a candidate with multiple PhDs from the University of Phoenix with zero graphic design experience. I still lay awake at night and wonder: What would they have done if I approved that hire? How many other serious jobs are held by people with zero qualifications?
It took years of back and forth, questioning and fixing virtually every step of the hiring process with the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) before we hired our first qualified technologist. I recently learned, in Bureaucracy by James Q Wilson, about the "China Lake OPM Demonstration Project." Facing a dearth of technical talent, China Lake sought to streamline the process for hiring technologists into government—in 1979. How many generations should it take to update a position description?
I hope DOGE will obliterate the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) from space. This law, which was written in 1980—before computers were common in homes—requires that every government form, and every change to every government form, must go through the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). This office has no expertise in user research or form design. It has no ability to check whether a form is asking for information that the agency has already asked for 100 times or whether multiple agency forms ask for the same information in different ways (making it harder to reuse or cross-reference). Agencies self-report how many "burden hours" it takes to fill out their forms, and OIRA has no way to check this either.
Some of the most talented people I've ever worked with have spent years of their own getting OIRA to agree to, and write down, such novel concepts as "legal things are legal." I'm not kidding—OIRA issued guidance last year that agencies are allowed to get feedback from the public, something which has always been legal, yet threats of going to "PRA jail" for doing exactly this persist today.
As part of the aforementioned new website, I wanted to have one form "wizard" that would allow a veteran to enter their information once, and automatically apply for all the benefits for which they were eligible. OIRA told me that to do this, I would first have to submit every possible permutation of this wizard for approval—a request I would have found delicious to comply with, were there enough trucks on the planet to deliver that amount of paper.
The PRA creates dramatically more paperwork and makes agencies ask for the same information more times, and in more confusing ways. It also kills people. It took OIRA over a year to approve the addition of a single checkbox to a disability application form. This checkbox would enroll veterans with serious conditions like PTSD in health care for their disability. Instead, these veterans sat in a backlog of unprocessed paper health care applications. The I.G. of the V.A. may not know how to computer, but if you believe they know how to math, 307,000 veterans died in that backlog, waiting to enroll in the agency's health care that surely would have saved some of their lives.
The death toll continues: Transplant surgeons identified and approved life-critical form updates to the organ donation matching process in 2022, which OIRA is still sitting on today. OIRA has no medical expertise of any kind.
We were told this labyrinth of rules and regulations was required for democracy, fairness, and delivering services to a user base that couldn't exclude anyone. So we worked within the system. We respected it. We followed every rule or dutifully changed the rule before we moved forward.
The system blocked us from helping people at every turn. Yet today, it's totally rolling over in the face of actually harming our most vulnerable while people cheer on its collapse. The system is not coming to save you or anyone—because the system is not currently designed to do much of anything at all.
Let's fight for an America where you are free to live as yourself without fear—but let's not waste any time fighting to keep the status quo of molasses and concrete.
The post I Tried To Fix Government Tech for Years. I'm Fed Up. appeared first on Reason.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
5 Financial Planning Concerns That Are Totally Unique to Parents
Financial planning looks different for people at different stages of life and in different situations. For parents, every money decision must consider both their own needs and the current and future concerns of their children. For You: Check Out: According to Laura Cowan, an estate planning attorney and founder of 2-Hour Lifestyle Lawyer, 'It's not just about paying for diapers and daycare; it's about rebalancing how every financial resource is allocated.' From taxes to priorities, every major financial decision shifts when you become a parent. Here are five planning concerns that are uniquely challenging for parents. When raising kids, the early years are about managing cash flow and budgeting for daycare, medical costs and insurance, Cowan pointed out. These expenses just evolve as your kids age, she said, growing into costs like extracurriculars, tutoring, summer programs, braces — and eventually, college tuition. 'By the time they're young adults, you may be helping with first apartments, down payments or a wedding,' Cowan said. 'People without children do not have any of these financial concerns.' Parents need to regularly adjust their financial plan to reflect these evolving stages — without putting their own long-term goals at risk. Moreover, parents should plan for up to two decades of financial dependency, Cowan added, citing research showing that around 40% of young adults ages 20 to 34 still live at home. Learn More: Before children start school, parents often find that budgeting becomes harder and their savings rate drops significantly due to high child care costs, according to Ari Weisbard, a CFP, managing partner at Values Added Financial LLC, and principal attorney at the Law Office of Ari Weisbard. 'They shouldn't feel badly about that or think they're failing in any way,' he said. 'The key is to make sure the drop is temporary and that when the children enter public school, the new financial slack is used to catch up on needed savings.' Parents also often struggle to prioritize between saving for their kids' education and planning for their own retirement. But Cowan stressed, 'Retirement comes first. Your children can borrow for school; you can't borrow for retirement. If you deplete your savings trying to 'do right' by your kids, you may become a financial burden to them later.' Instead, focus on maximizing contributions to your retirement accounts first, Cowan advised. Once that's in place, you can begin contributing to a 529 plan or other college savings vehicle. Parents have a much stronger need to consider term life insurance and estate planning than non-parents, Weisbard said. 'Funds for raising their children and a clear guardian for their children, and trustee to manage the funds, matters much more for parents than for non-parents.' He recommended term life policies in the ballpark of $1 million to $2 million, if possible, for a term of at least 20 years. 'Thirty-year policies are more expensive and usually only necessary if there won't be a lot of other property — house, retirement savings — in the picture or if children are really spaced out in ages,' he said. While parents are not the only ones who need an estate plan, they do need to think about how any inheritance they leave can help set their children up for success. 'Many parents skip estate planning entirely,' Cowan said. 'They think they don't have enough money and fail to realize that estate planning is actually financial planning in disguise.' She pointed out that even a $50,000 inheritance can disappear quickly if spent on 'rent, takeout or impulse buys.' But if that money is placed in a trust, it can be used to fund college, start a business or buy a home. 'The wealthy don't just pass down money — they pass down structure. That's what helps keep them wealthy,' Cowan said. She recommended all parents use estate planning to put rules in place that help their kids use an inheritance to build a stronger future. 'Every parent should have a plan that protects their legacy and sets their kids up for success.'More From GOBankingRates 4 Things You Should Do When Your Salary Hits $100K If a Financial Advisor Doesn't Ask These 5 Questions in Your Consult, Keep Shopping 5 Steps to Take if You Want To Create Generational Wealth Robert Kiyosaki: 5 Money Habits of People Who Retire Early This article originally appeared on 5 Financial Planning Concerns That Are Totally Unique to Parents Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Feds respond to Virginia lawmakers' privacy concerns about airports' facial recognition screening
A Credential Authentication Technology unit. (Photo courtesy of the Transportation Security Administration) Identification screening technology that launched during the pandemic to reduce airport check-in times has helped improve security and travelers' experiences, but carries a privacy concern stemming from the capture and storage of passengers' photos. Virginia lawmakers, privacy advocates and others have questioned how images of citizens are used and stored, and how peoples' rights are being protected. The Transportation Security Administration said in a Thursday announcement that the images captured on the airport screening technology known as Credential Authentication Technology (CAT-2) 'are never stored' or 'used for any other purpose than immediate identification.' House Communication, Technology and Innovation Committee Chair Cliff Hayes, D-Chesapeake, said tools like CAT-2 are helpful, but safeguards are important to protect civil liberties and privacy as the technology advances. 'Travelers deserve both speed and security when it comes to travel, but it's not at the expense of their privacy,' Hayes told the Mercury. CAT-2 was first tested at Ronald Reagan Washington Airport in August 2020. Since then, TSA said it has been using the cameras carefully in conjunction with the research from the National Institute of Standards and Technology standards. The administration said CAT-2 allows TSA officers to scan a traveler's photo identification card and capture a real-time photo of them, too. Once the images of the traveler are confirmed, that person is able to proceed for further screening. CAT-2 also includes a plexiglass shield to minimize contact between TSA officers and travelers, and uses a secure Internet connection allowing the units to verify that an individual is ticketed for air travel, eliminating the need to show a boarding pass. Passengers who do not wish to participate in the facial matching process can opt out in favor of an alternative identity verification process, TSA said. The CAT-2 screens are being updated with language that notifies travelers they may decline having their photo taken. Hayes said after the technology was piloted in Virginia, he visited multiple airports including Dulles and Norfolk International, and declined to use the technology. To TSA's credit, Hayes said, he had no problem being screened. Officers identified him manually using his identification card and boarding pass. Hayes said he hopes the procedures and policy governing the photos will be codified to ensure travelers' privacy remains a priority and that their photos won't be stored or used beyond screenings. 'What's to prevent that from changing and then all of a sudden, a different administration or depending who's overseeing it, they could change that policy,' Hayes said. 'It needs to be codified, I believe, and absent the lack of any federal law, I think the states need to begin to address that, just as we did with the Consumer Data Protection Act.' The Act provides residents certain rights that shield personal data collection by businesses. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX


Newsweek
7 hours ago
- Newsweek
IRS Issues Reminder of June Tax Deadline for Millions: What To Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Internal Revenue Service has reminded quarterly taxpayers that their second deadline of the year is approaching on Monday, June 16. Why It Matters Most employees pay their taxes on the annual deadline every April, but freelancers, small business owners and anyone else earning money that hasn't been subject to federal withholdings may have to submit quarterly payments four times a year. Filing and paying your taxes on time means you can avoid penalties. What To Know Federal taxpayers who earn income not subject to withholding—such as self-employment earnings, gig work, interest, dividends, capital gains, rental income, or 1099 payments—may need to make estimated tax payments during the year, the IRS says. Taxpayers—including sole proprietors, partners, and S corporation shareholders—who expect to owe at least $1,000 in taxes for the year are generally required to make estimated tax payments. Corporations must do the same if they anticipate a tax liability of $500 or more. Individual taxpayers earning money through gig work, freelance services, or the sale of goods may also need to pay estimated taxes, even if they receive a Form 1099-K. This includes those who also work regular jobs and have their income taxes removed via W-2 throughout the year by their employer. Internal Revenue Service sign at the IRS Building in Washington, DC, on March 14, 2018. Internal Revenue Service sign at the IRS Building in Washington, DC, on March 14, 2018. GETTY Form 1099-K reports of payments received for goods or services through payment cards (like credit, debit, or gift cards) and third-party platforms, such as payment apps or online marketplaces. To figure out your federal quarterly estimated tax payments, you'll need to estimate your adjusted gross income, taxable income, deductions, credits, and total taxes for the 2025 calendar year. If your income drops or increases throughout the year, you can adjust your quarterly payments as you go. Form 1040-ES includes an Estimated Tax Worksheet to guide you through the calculation. The June 16 deadline applies for income earned between April 1 and May 31st. How To Pay Quarterly Taxes Electronic payment is the fastest, safest, and most convenient way to pay, the IRS says. Taxpayers have several options, including: IRS Online Account or Direct Pay – Pay directly from a checking or savings account, or use a credit/debit card or digital wallet. Payment processors may charge a fee for card payments. – Pay directly from a checking or savings account, or use a credit/debit card or digital wallet. Payment processors may charge a fee for card payments. Electronic Federal Tax Payment System (EFTPS) – A secure federal payment system for individuals and businesses. – A secure federal payment system for individuals and businesses. Check or Money Order – Made payable to "United States Treasury" and submitted with Form 1040-ES. – Made payable to "United States Treasury" and submitted with Form 1040-ES. IRS2Go App – The official mobile app of the IRS for secure payments and resources. Further Payment Deadlines There are two further payment dates for 2025 taxes this year. The next is on September 15, 2025, for taxes payable for June 1 to August 31,and the final is on January 15, 2026 for income earned between September 1 to December 31.