logo
I Tried To Fix Government Tech for Years. I'm Fed Up.

I Tried To Fix Government Tech for Years. I'm Fed Up.

Yahoo13-02-2025

When I helped create the United States Digital Service (USDS), it was not on my bingo board that it would become the U.S. DOGE Service a mere decade later. As a lifelong libertarian, the years I spent trying to make government more efficient at the Department of Veterans Affairs (V.A.) and USDS required a lot of patience. Now I'm fresh out.
We have been making tiny, barely perceptible "improvements," paid for with years of compromise and hand-holding in endless pointless meetings, and then celebrating this as success. I can't get Alana Newhouse's description out of my head: "Half the time our institutions feel like molasses, and the other half like concrete." I'm fed up with a government that can't implement its way out of a paper bag.
Apparently most of America is fed up, too.
I care deeply about trans people, immigrants, and others who are targets of so much hate right now. I do not support the harmful actions being taken against them. At the same time, I could not possibly care less that someone plugged in a server to create a new email list without a Privacy Impact Assessment. If no one ever adheres to FIPS 140-2 again—great, it's about time we took that "kick me" sign written in Mandarin off our back. Much of the current system hurts everyone and needs to go.
When I was chief technology officer of the V.A., a highlight of my career was persuading our inspectors general (I.G.) to allow cloud computing. At the time, most of our websites had business hours, and/or ran on servers that sat in mop closets under a fire sprinkler without backups. I wish I was exaggerating. Cloud would allow us to offer modern online services to America's 20 million veterans.
I spent countless meetings, demos, and lunch-and-learns overcoming I.G. arguments. One objection became a favorite interview question for new hires: "But how do you put the cloud in an evidence bag?" I cheekily baked cloud-shaped sugar cookies and distributed them—in evidence bags—around the office. More than two years later, the I.G. issued a memo approving the use of the cloud.
But you know what? I shouldn't have had to waste two and a half years of my life on this, while millions of veterans went without health care and other benefits they had earned. People in charge of regulating computers should know how computers work. They should even be good at computers.
As we got closer to launching a modern website, I was thwarted in a new and creative way. The Department of Labor bought the domain veterans.gov—the one we intended to use—and said they would only give it to us if they got to approve every page of our website.
Not going to happen. Beyond the delays this would add, the labor department sucks at websites. Their "My Next Move for Veterans," a multi-million-dollar website that every individual separating from the military is required to use, is one of the worst you could ever see. It tells veterans their primary skills are that they can "communicate by speaking" and "use [their] arms and/or legs together while sitting, standing, or lying down." Thanks for your service. If you don't believe me, look for yourself.
The White House got involved, requiring months of in-person mediation meetings. I was never able to get the domain back. (To this day, the labor department owns veterans.gov.) How exactly are we qualified to intervene in foreign wars if our processes can't even stop one agency from squatting on another's domain name?
Getting a government position description for a technologist approved—for what later became USDS—was even worse. On my first attempt, I posted a senior role for a graphic designer on USAJOBS. Human resources selected a candidate with multiple PhDs from the University of Phoenix with zero graphic design experience. I still lay awake at night and wonder: What would they have done if I approved that hire? How many other serious jobs are held by people with zero qualifications?
It took years of back and forth, questioning and fixing virtually every step of the hiring process with the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) before we hired our first qualified technologist. I recently learned, in Bureaucracy by James Q Wilson, about the "China Lake OPM Demonstration Project." Facing a dearth of technical talent, China Lake sought to streamline the process for hiring technologists into government—in 1979. How many generations should it take to update a position description?
I hope DOGE will obliterate the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) from space. This law, which was written in 1980—before computers were common in homes—requires that every government form, and every change to every government form, must go through the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). This office has no expertise in user research or form design. It has no ability to check whether a form is asking for information that the agency has already asked for 100 times or whether multiple agency forms ask for the same information in different ways (making it harder to reuse or cross-reference). Agencies self-report how many "burden hours" it takes to fill out their forms, and OIRA has no way to check this either.
Some of the most talented people I've ever worked with have spent years of their own getting OIRA to agree to, and write down, such novel concepts as "legal things are legal." I'm not kidding—OIRA issued guidance last year that agencies are allowed to get feedback from the public, something which has always been legal, yet threats of going to "PRA jail" for doing exactly this persist today.
As part of the aforementioned new website, I wanted to have one form "wizard" that would allow a veteran to enter their information once, and automatically apply for all the benefits for which they were eligible. OIRA told me that to do this, I would first have to submit every possible permutation of this wizard for approval—a request I would have found delicious to comply with, were there enough trucks on the planet to deliver that amount of paper.
The PRA creates dramatically more paperwork and makes agencies ask for the same information more times, and in more confusing ways. It also kills people. It took OIRA over a year to approve the addition of a single checkbox to a disability application form. This checkbox would enroll veterans with serious conditions like PTSD in health care for their disability. Instead, these veterans sat in a backlog of unprocessed paper health care applications. The I.G. of the V.A. may not know how to computer, but if you believe they know how to math, 307,000 veterans died in that backlog, waiting to enroll in the agency's health care that surely would have saved some of their lives.
The death toll continues: Transplant surgeons identified and approved life-critical form updates to the organ donation matching process in 2022, which OIRA is still sitting on today. OIRA has no medical expertise of any kind.
We were told this labyrinth of rules and regulations was required for democracy, fairness, and delivering services to a user base that couldn't exclude anyone. So we worked within the system. We respected it. We followed every rule or dutifully changed the rule before we moved forward.
The system blocked us from helping people at every turn. Yet today, it's totally rolling over in the face of actually harming our most vulnerable while people cheer on its collapse. The system is not coming to save you or anyone—because the system is not currently designed to do much of anything at all.
Let's fight for an America where you are free to live as yourself without fear—but let's not waste any time fighting to keep the status quo of molasses and concrete.
The post I Tried To Fix Government Tech for Years. I'm Fed Up. appeared first on Reason.com.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Docketwise Releases 2025 Immigration Report, Revealing Fluctuations in Processing Times, Case Outcomes, amid Policy Changes and AI Adoption
Docketwise Releases 2025 Immigration Report, Revealing Fluctuations in Processing Times, Case Outcomes, amid Policy Changes and AI Adoption

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Docketwise Releases 2025 Immigration Report, Revealing Fluctuations in Processing Times, Case Outcomes, amid Policy Changes and AI Adoption

Leading Immigration Case Management Platform Shares Data and Insights Shaping the Future of Immigration Law Practice AUSTIN, Texas, June 10, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Docketwise, the all-in-one immigration and case management software for immigration lawyers, has released its 2025 Legal Industry Report: State of Immigration, providing an in-depth look at the policy shifts, case data, and legal practice trends that defined U.S. immigration law in 2024. This report offers immigration attorneys a review of green card processing, naturalization approvals, asylum outcomes, court decisions, visa statistics, and the growing role of legal technology across the field. Authored by James Pittman, Co-founder of Docketwise and former immigration attorney, the report reflects Docketwise's continued investment in supporting immigration firms through software, client tools, and legal research. "Immigration lawyers are facing rising demand in a challenging environment characterized by historic policy changes, fluctuating approval rates, and lengthy processing times across every aspect of their practice," said James Pittman, Co-founder of Docketwise, an AffiniPay solution. "This report offers a data-backed view of where the trends are headed so that firms can adapt. Our goal is to help attorneys make informed decisions as they plan for the year ahead." Green Card Application Patterns The report examines green card application patterns across both employment-based and family-based categories. USCIS received more than 42,000 employment-based filings in Q1, approving fewer than 19,000. By Q3, approvals rose to over 36,000 while filings dropped by nearly half, indicating a backlog clearance rather than new demand. Processing times for green card applications also shifted, reaching their lowest in Q2 at 5.2 months before rising again to nearly 7 months by year's end. Family-based applications remained steady at more than 110,000 per quarter, with approvals peaking at over 113,000. Processing times gradually improved from 10.1 months to 7.7 months, but each quarter closed with more than 500,000 pending cases. Naturalization Filings Naturalization filings neared 1 million in 2024, with over 816,000 new citizens approved. Denials declined from nearly 12 percent in Q1 to just under 10 percent in Q4. Mexico led in total approvals, including India, the Philippines and the Dominican Republic. Asylum outcomes showed a clear link to legal representation as applicants with counsel were approved 52 percent of the time, compared to just 17 percent without. Denial rates for unrepresented applicants exceeded 80 percent. Immigration Court Cases Immigration courts resolved over 900,000 cases. One-third resulted in removal orders, and another third were terminated. More than 48,000 forms of relief were granted, and most respondents were male. H-2A and H-2B Visas H-2A and H-2B visas supported seasonal labor and H-1B, L-1, and E-2 visas continued to serve skilled workers and business roles. U and T visa numbers remained low as refugee admissions reached 100,034, falling short of the 125,000 cap with most coming from Africa, South Asia, and Latin America. The release of this report follows AffiniPay's introduction of its Kaleidoscope conference, a bespoke event curated for all legal and accounting professionals. The conference will take place September 2–4, 2025 in Austin, Texas, and tickets can be purchased online. Docketwise, an AffiniPay solution, will be at the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA)'s annual conference, June 18–21, 2025, in Denver, Colorado. To discuss the Immigration report in person, please visit Booth #107 at the AILA conference. To download the report, please visit here. About Docketwise Docketwise, an AffiniPay solution, provides best-in-class smart forms combined with a full suite of practice management and case tracking tools for immigration lawyers. From solo practitioners to law firms, tens of thousands of lawyers choose Docketwise for its straightforward approach to completing forms, personal customer support, and being an all-in-one case management solution to grow your practice. Docketwise is a part of the AffiniPay family of solutions that includes MyCase and LawPay. For more information, please visit View source version on Contacts Media Contact Keely LeonardDocketwise PR Director512-368-8988kleonard@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

5 Financial Planning Concerns That Are Totally Unique to Parents
5 Financial Planning Concerns That Are Totally Unique to Parents

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

5 Financial Planning Concerns That Are Totally Unique to Parents

Financial planning looks different for people at different stages of life and in different situations. For parents, every money decision must consider both their own needs and the current and future concerns of their children. For You: Check Out: According to Laura Cowan, an estate planning attorney and founder of 2-Hour Lifestyle Lawyer, 'It's not just about paying for diapers and daycare; it's about rebalancing how every financial resource is allocated.' From taxes to priorities, every major financial decision shifts when you become a parent. Here are five planning concerns that are uniquely challenging for parents. When raising kids, the early years are about managing cash flow and budgeting for daycare, medical costs and insurance, Cowan pointed out. These expenses just evolve as your kids age, she said, growing into costs like extracurriculars, tutoring, summer programs, braces — and eventually, college tuition. 'By the time they're young adults, you may be helping with first apartments, down payments or a wedding,' Cowan said. 'People without children do not have any of these financial concerns.' Parents need to regularly adjust their financial plan to reflect these evolving stages — without putting their own long-term goals at risk. Moreover, parents should plan for up to two decades of financial dependency, Cowan added, citing research showing that around 40% of young adults ages 20 to 34 still live at home. Learn More: Before children start school, parents often find that budgeting becomes harder and their savings rate drops significantly due to high child care costs, according to Ari Weisbard, a CFP, managing partner at Values Added Financial LLC, and principal attorney at the Law Office of Ari Weisbard. 'They shouldn't feel badly about that or think they're failing in any way,' he said. 'The key is to make sure the drop is temporary and that when the children enter public school, the new financial slack is used to catch up on needed savings.' Parents also often struggle to prioritize between saving for their kids' education and planning for their own retirement. But Cowan stressed, 'Retirement comes first. Your children can borrow for school; you can't borrow for retirement. If you deplete your savings trying to 'do right' by your kids, you may become a financial burden to them later.' Instead, focus on maximizing contributions to your retirement accounts first, Cowan advised. Once that's in place, you can begin contributing to a 529 plan or other college savings vehicle. Parents have a much stronger need to consider term life insurance and estate planning than non-parents, Weisbard said. 'Funds for raising their children and a clear guardian for their children, and trustee to manage the funds, matters much more for parents than for non-parents.' He recommended term life policies in the ballpark of $1 million to $2 million, if possible, for a term of at least 20 years. 'Thirty-year policies are more expensive and usually only necessary if there won't be a lot of other property — house, retirement savings — in the picture or if children are really spaced out in ages,' he said. While parents are not the only ones who need an estate plan, they do need to think about how any inheritance they leave can help set their children up for success. 'Many parents skip estate planning entirely,' Cowan said. 'They think they don't have enough money and fail to realize that estate planning is actually financial planning in disguise.' She pointed out that even a $50,000 inheritance can disappear quickly if spent on 'rent, takeout or impulse buys.' But if that money is placed in a trust, it can be used to fund college, start a business or buy a home. 'The wealthy don't just pass down money — they pass down structure. That's what helps keep them wealthy,' Cowan said. She recommended all parents use estate planning to put rules in place that help their kids use an inheritance to build a stronger future. 'Every parent should have a plan that protects their legacy and sets their kids up for success.'More From GOBankingRates 4 Things You Should Do When Your Salary Hits $100K If a Financial Advisor Doesn't Ask These 5 Questions in Your Consult, Keep Shopping 5 Steps to Take if You Want To Create Generational Wealth Robert Kiyosaki: 5 Money Habits of People Who Retire Early This article originally appeared on 5 Financial Planning Concerns That Are Totally Unique to Parents Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Feds respond to Virginia lawmakers' privacy concerns about airports' facial recognition screening
Feds respond to Virginia lawmakers' privacy concerns about airports' facial recognition screening

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Feds respond to Virginia lawmakers' privacy concerns about airports' facial recognition screening

A Credential Authentication Technology unit. (Photo courtesy of the Transportation Security Administration) Identification screening technology that launched during the pandemic to reduce airport check-in times has helped improve security and travelers' experiences, but carries a privacy concern stemming from the capture and storage of passengers' photos. Virginia lawmakers, privacy advocates and others have questioned how images of citizens are used and stored, and how peoples' rights are being protected. The Transportation Security Administration said in a Thursday announcement that the images captured on the airport screening technology known as Credential Authentication Technology (CAT-2) 'are never stored' or 'used for any other purpose than immediate identification.' House Communication, Technology and Innovation Committee Chair Cliff Hayes, D-Chesapeake, said tools like CAT-2 are helpful, but safeguards are important to protect civil liberties and privacy as the technology advances. 'Travelers deserve both speed and security when it comes to travel, but it's not at the expense of their privacy,' Hayes told the Mercury. CAT-2 was first tested at Ronald Reagan Washington Airport in August 2020. Since then, TSA said it has been using the cameras carefully in conjunction with the research from the National Institute of Standards and Technology standards. The administration said CAT-2 allows TSA officers to scan a traveler's photo identification card and capture a real-time photo of them, too. Once the images of the traveler are confirmed, that person is able to proceed for further screening. CAT-2 also includes a plexiglass shield to minimize contact between TSA officers and travelers, and uses a secure Internet connection allowing the units to verify that an individual is ticketed for air travel, eliminating the need to show a boarding pass. Passengers who do not wish to participate in the facial matching process can opt out in favor of an alternative identity verification process, TSA said. The CAT-2 screens are being updated with language that notifies travelers they may decline having their photo taken. Hayes said after the technology was piloted in Virginia, he visited multiple airports including Dulles and Norfolk International, and declined to use the technology. To TSA's credit, Hayes said, he had no problem being screened. Officers identified him manually using his identification card and boarding pass. Hayes said he hopes the procedures and policy governing the photos will be codified to ensure travelers' privacy remains a priority and that their photos won't be stored or used beyond screenings. 'What's to prevent that from changing and then all of a sudden, a different administration or depending who's overseeing it, they could change that policy,' Hayes said. 'It needs to be codified, I believe, and absent the lack of any federal law, I think the states need to begin to address that, just as we did with the Consumer Data Protection Act.' The Act provides residents certain rights that shield personal data collection by businesses. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store