Jared Cannonier not playing analysts' 'reindeer games' ahead of UFC 319
Cannonier (18-8 MMA, 11-8 UFC), a former UFC title challenger, meets former Bellator standout Michael Page (23-3 MMA, 2-1 UFC) on Saturday at UFC 319. Page will be a small betting favorite in the fight, but his relative newness to the UFC has analysts like Joe Rogan talking more about him than when he was with the competition.
And because of that, "MVP" is having labels attached to him like the game's trickiest puzzle to solve.
Honestly, it sounds like Cannonier is over it. Very over it.
"Everyone wants the '-est' at the end of something – and if they ain't going for that, they want to be a 'GOAT,'" Cannonier told MMA Junkie and other reporters Wednesday at media day for UFC 319 (pay-per-view, ESPN, ESPN+), which takes place at United Center, where Cannonier and Page will be part of the main card.
"I really don't want to get into that pissing contest: 'Who's the biggest? Who's the bestest? Who's the baddest?' That's for everybody else to determine. I don't even want to go into that conversation. I feel like I would have to lessen myself to even think in that regard. So next question."
Once they do inevitably throw some label out, like Rogan did, that means Cannonier is inevitably going to get asked about it.
And that part, he's really over, as well as being underestimated by oddsmakers and bettors. He hasn't been really and truly favored since a knockout of Derek Brunson more than three years ago.
"If I wanted to let (people underestimating me) motivate me, I could, 'You see what they're saying about me? I'm gonna kick their ass!' You see how stupid I look saying that sh*t?" Cannonier said
"I'm a grown-ass man. I'm 41 years old. I don't play games. I don't join in any of the reindeer games. That's what I see. When I watch TV, those are reindeer games going on (with trash talking and online analysts). You guys ask me some of these questions about the reindeer games, I feel like I've got to lower my brain, lessen my thinking ability, become smaller – lessen how I even see myself to think like that and answer your questions."
Cannonier got back in the win column in February with a main event knockout of Gregory Rodrigues in the fourth round. The finish was his first in three years and got him a second straight post-fight bonus award. Prior to that, as part of a two-fight skid, he dropped a Fight of the Night bout to Caio Borralho.
Check out Cannonier's full media day interview above.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
9 minutes ago
- USA Today
Joe Rogan on UFC's Paramount deal: 'Sport is going to go f*cking hypernova'
Joe Rogan sees the UFC's deal with Paramount helping the sport grow exponentially. This week, the UFC signed a massive seven-year, $7.7. billion U.S. broadcasting rights deal exclusively with Paramount that will bring all 43 annual events to streaming on Paramount+, including select "marquee" events that will simulcast on Paramount's flagship network, CBS. With fans no longer having to pay for monthly pay-per-view events, Rogan thinks the viewership numbers will inevitably increase. "Through the roof," Rogan said in a recent episode of his "Joe Rogan Experience" podcast. "And it's a super smart move for Paramount. What a great move to not just have the UFC for seven years, but have it for free. How much does it cost a month? Let's say it's 10 bucks. That's crazy. That's a $120 a year, you could watch every UFC pay-per-view? Two UFC pay-per-views is, like, 140 bucks, right? Isn't it? Aren't they, like, $70? So you get all of them. Everything's free? That's incredible. This sport is going to go f*cking hypernova." Rogan, who Dana White confirmed will be sticking around, hopes the UFC doesn't sever its relationship with ESPN as he still sees value in having some aspects broadcasted there. "By the way, ESPN has everything, too. It's great. I'm kind of bummed out, and I hope they don't lose the relationship that they had with ESPN with all their MMA shows," Rogan said. "I hope they don't go, like, 'F*ck them, they went to Paramount.' I hope it's a mutually beneficial thing, like the UFC at least does some content still on ESPN. "Because I think that's also a big factor in pulling people from casual viewers that watch other sports that might occasionally watch a UFC fight and then they see, like, Dustin Poirier vs. Max Holloway and they're like, 'Holy sh*t,' and then they're hooked. Having that coverage on 'SportsCenter,' that sh*t's huge. Having those post-fight shows on ESPN+, that sh*t is huge for the real dorks like me. That's huge."
NBC Sports
22 minutes ago
- NBC Sports
Report: Odell Beckham Jr. 'has drawn interest,' plans to play in 2025
Some things require seeing to be believed. One such thing is the future playing career of receiver Odell Beckham Jr. He has been forgotten since being released by the Dolphins during the 2024 regular season. Recently, he reminded the world that he's still interested in playing, by responding to a fake report indicating that Beckham had retired. Boosting Beckham's claim is this report from Tom Pelissero of NFL Media/ESPN*, which looks and feels like a favor for an agent: 'Three-time Pro Bowl WR Odell Beckham Jr. has drawn interest from several teams and plans to play somewhere in 2025, per source. As OBJ posted himself, he is not retiring, and he continues to train in anticipation of being on the field soon.' If he has drawn interest from several teams, why isn't he on one? Two years ago, the Ravens surprisingly overpaid him $15 million guaranteed on a one-year deal, in a move that may have paved the way to get quarterback Lamar Jackson to agree to terms on a five-year contract. Last year, the Dolphins paid Beckham a fraction of that — and it never clicked. Healthy when released after the trade deadline, Beckham's name was not mentioned once as a candidate to join a contender during the playoff run. Now, nine months after he became a free agent, he's suddenly in demand? Again, we'll believe it when we see it. Beckham started his career with Hall of Fame numbers through three seasons. Then, the decline began. And while Beckham was on track to be the Super Bowl LVI MVP before his knee with a pre-torn ACL gave out, he hasn't had a 1,000-yard season since 2019, his first year with the Browns. Last year, he had nine catches for 55 yards in nine games. It had seemed to be a foregone conclusion that his time in the NFL had ended. Maybe it hasn't. Again, we'll believe it when we see it.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Report: Roger Goodell tells ESPN employees the NFL won't get involved with journalism
Pending regulatory approval (which seems to be hardly a given), the NFL eventually will own 10 percent of ESPN. That dynamic has raised obvious concerns that the NFL will parlay its partial ownership into the potential airing of grievances about ESPN's coverage of the league. As a result, the powers-that-be are trying to ease the worries of ESPN reporters and analysts who fear being micromanaged by The Shield. Most recently, that resulted in (according to Commissioner Roger Goodell communicating with ESPN employees at a town-hall meeting via a recorded message. Per the report, "Goodell emphasized to ESPN employees that the league would not get involved in the network's journalism." We have three points to make in response to that contention. First, what else is he going to say? "You'd better watch out?" It's a very real concern that the NFL will try to impose upon ESPN the same degree of conscious self-editing that NFL Network reporters and analysts have exercised for years. Second, it would be different if the NFL didn't already have a habit of complaining to broadcast partners about things said and written by their reporters and analysts. It absolutely happens. (And it may happen today, as a result of me pointing out that it absolutely happens.) The league surely has complained to ESPN at some point in the past about something that ended up on ESPN Radio, or any of the various ESPN networks. And that was before the league owned a piece of the business. It's naive to think the NFL will say nothing if/when someone on the ESPN payroll says something that someone at the league office doesn't like. Third, Jim Trotter. So while the league may not "get involved in the network's journalism," the league will surely have something to say in the aftermath of the exercise of it. Especially when it's time to renew the contracts of people who have a history of covering stories the league doesn't like and/or posing questions to the Commissioner that he doesn't appreciate. At a time when it's more important than ever to speak truth to power, this has all the earmarks of yet another situation where power will end up being spoken to truth. Not immediately. Not obviously. But inevitably.
