Who accredits US universities and what does Trump want to change?
WASHINGTON, April 26 — US President Donald Trump issued an executive order this week targeting the non-government agencies that accredit universities and other higher-education institutions, saying that some promote diversity he considers to be a form of unlawful discrimination.
The order instructs Education Secretary Linda McMahon to consider terminating government approval of higher-education accrediting agencies that require colleges to show a commitment to having staff and students who are diverse with regard to gender, race and ethnic background.
How are US universities accredited?
The US federal government does not run any universities or colleges, nor does it accredit them. Instead, under the Higher Education Act of 1965, the education secretary 'recognises' various private educational associations, as well as some agencies run by state governments, that can accredit colleges through a peer review process if they meet criteria laid out by Congress.
The government has recognised more than 30 accrediting agencies, including regional agencies and agencies with a narrow focus on particular professional educational programmes. For example, a division of the American Bar Association is the main accrediting agency for law degree programmes in the US; the New England Commission of Higher Education accredits colleges in much of the Northeast, including Harvard University.
What does accrediting mean?
The Higher Education Act says that the main role of accrediting agencies is to ensure the quality of education received by students and to serve as a guarantor of the diplomas issued by accredited schools.
In order to receive Pell Grants or student loans disbursed by the US Department of Education, a student must generally enrol at an accredited or 'pre-accredited' institution. The department issues more than US$100 billion (RM438 billion) in grants and loans each year, according to the White House.
The law requires accrediting agencies to lay out clear standards and processes, and that they must assess a college or university by looking at student achievement, graduation rates, curricula, faculty, facilities and admissions practices, among other criteria.
What is Trump's criticism of accrediting agencies?
Trump, a Republican, has repeatedly criticised US universities for being bastions of what he calls anti-American, Marxist and 'radical left' ideologies, and has said accreditation agencies are partly to blame.
In his order, he criticised any agency that sought to promote diversity, equity and inclusion in its accreditation standards with regards to gender, race or ethnic background. He ordered the education secretary to eradicate those criteria within the bounds of existing law. He also ordered McMahon to see that accredited institutions support 'intellectual diversity' in their faculties, which many conservatives consider to be left-leaning.
Students demonstrate during a protest where some temporarily locked themselves to the gates to Columbia University's main campus in New York City. — Reuters pic
What powers does the education department have over accreditors?
Some of Trump's goals may require Congress to amend the law. The Higher Education Act says the education secretary is not permitted to establish additional criteria for accrediting agencies beyond those Congress included in the Higher Education Act. Nor is the secretary allowed to define or prescribe the standards used by an agency to assess a college's student achievement.
However, the law does allow accrediting agencies to adopt 'additional standards' beyond those laid out by Congress in making their accreditation decisions.
An accrediting agency must reapply for recognition by the education secretary at most every five years. If an accrediting agency fails to meet the criteria laid out in the Higher Education Act, the education secretary can terminate its recognition only 'after notice and opportunity for a hearing'.
What does the Higher Education Act say about diversity?
The law repeatedly refers to promoting various forms of diversity at US colleges. For example, the law requires institutions provide information for current and prospective students on 'student body diversity', including a breakdown of the gender and racial makeup of full-time students. The law also lays out grant programmes intended for women and other historically under-represented minority groups, and it states that 'underrepresentation of minorities in science and technological fields diminishes our Nation's competitiveness'. — Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
28 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Asian equities rally after China-US framework on trade
The US-China tariff deal boosted Asian markets, with Hong Kong and Shanghai among the best performers. (EPA Images pic) HONG KONG : Asian stocks rose today as investors welcomed a China-US agreement to lower trade tensions that stoked hopes the economic superpowers will eventually reach a broader tariff deal. After two days of high-profile, closely watched talks in London, the two sides said they had set up a framework to move towards a pact, following negotiations in Geneva last month that saw them slash tit-for-tat levies. The news provided some much-needed relief to markets after US President Donald Trump accused Beijing of violating that deal. The latest round of talks followed a phone call between Trump and his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping on Thursday. As well as tariffs, a key issue in the discussions was China's export of earth minerals and magnets used in a range of things, including smartphones and electric vehicle batteries, while Beijing was keen to see an easing of restrictions on its access to tech goods. US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick said he was upbeat that concerns over rare earths 'will be resolved' eventually, as the agreement is implemented. Xi and Trump must approve the framework first. 'We're moving as quickly as we can,' US trade representative Jamieson Greer told reporters. 'We would very much like to find an agreement that makes sense for both countries,' he added. 'We feel positive about engaging with the Chinese,' he added. Speaking separately to reporters, China international trade representative Li Chenggang expressed hope that progress made in London would help to boost trust on both sides. The deal, which was reached late yesterday, boosted Asian markets with Hong Kong and Shanghai among the best performers, while Tokyo, Sydney, Seoul, Wellington, Taipei and Manila were also up. However, analysts said investors would be keen to get a closer look at the details of the agreement. 'The US-China trade circus wrapped with what can only be described as a diplomatic tautology,' said Stephen Innes at SPI Asset Management. He called it 'a late-night announcement that both sides have 'agreed in principle on a framework to implement the Geneva consensus' – consensus that was…. already agreed upon weeks ago'. In addition, he warned that markets could run out of steam if nothing concrete came through. 'If the next headline doesn't come with something tangible, such as cargo ships loaded with rare earths or an actual rollback of tariffs, expect risk assets to start demanding more photo opportunities,' he wrote. 'Until then, this rally relies on faith,' he added. And Saxo chief investment strategist Charu Chanana said before the deal was announced that while there was some hope for the talks 'the era of easy wins – tariff pauses and minor concessions – is over'. 'What's left are deeper, more entrenched challenges: tech restrictions, rare earth supply chains, student visas, and national security-linked concerns. 'These are strategic disputes, unlikely to be resolved in a few rounds of meetings,' Chanana said. Still, she did say that 'trade uncertainty has clearly faded since the peak chaos of early April', when Trump unleashed a tariff blitz that hammered worldwide stock and bond markets. Yesterday's news also overshadowed the World Bank's slashing of its 2025 forecast for global economic growth to 2.3%, from the 2.7% predicted in January, citing trade tensions and policy uncertainty. It also said the US economy would expand 1.4% this year, half of its 2024 expansion.
The Sun
30 minutes ago
- The Sun
Nighttime curfew in LA as Trump vows to ‘liberate' city
LOS ANGELES: A nighttime curfew was in force in Los Angeles on Tuesday as local officials sought to get a handle on protests that Donald Trump claimed were an invasion by a 'foreign enemy.' Looting and vandalism has scarred the heart of America's second biggest city as largely peaceful protests over immigration arrests turned ugly after dark. 'I have declared a local emergency and issued a curfew for downtown Los Angeles to stop the vandalism, to stop the looting,' Mayor Karen Bass told reporters. One square mile (2.5 square kilometers) of the city's more-than-500 square mile area will be off-limits until 6am (1300 GMT) for everyone apart from residents, journalists and emergency services, she added. One protester told AFP the arrest of migrants in a city with large foreign-born and Latino populations was the root of the unrest. 'I think that obviously they're doing it for safety,' she said of the curfew. 'But I don't think that part of the problem is the peaceful protests. It's whatever else is happening on the other side that is inciting violence.' Small-scale and largely peaceful protests -- marred by eye-catching acts of violence -- began Friday in Los Angeles as anger swelled over ramped up arrests by immigration authorities. At their largest, a few thousand people have taken to the streets, but smaller mobs have used the cover of darkness to set fires, daub graffiti and smash windows. Overnight Monday 23 businesses were looted, police said, adding that more than 500 people had been arrested over recent days. Protests have also sprung up in cities around the country, including New York, Atlanta, Chicago and San Francisco. 'Provide protection' Trump has ordered 4,000 National Guard to Los Angeles, along with 700 active-duty Marines, in what he has claimed is a necessary escalation to take back control -- despite the insistence of local law enforcement that they could handle matters. A military spokeswoman said the soldiers were expected to be on the streets later Tuesday or some time on Wednesday. Their mission will be to guard federal facilities and to accompany 'federal officers in immigration enforcement operations in order to provide protection.' Demonstrators told AFP the soldiers 'should be respected' because they hadn't chosen to be in LA, but Lisa Orman blasted it as 'ridiculous.' 'I was here for the Dodger parade,' she said referring to the LA team's World Series victory. 'It was 100 times bigger. So the idea that the Marines here, it's a big show. The president wants a big show.' The Pentagon said the deployment would cost US taxpayers $134 million. Photographs issued by the Marine Corps showed men in combat fatigues using riot shields to practice crowd control techniques at the Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach. 'Behaving like a tyrant' Two dozen miles (40 kilometers) north, the sprawling city of Los Angeles spent the day much as it usually does: tourists thronged Hollywood Boulevard, tens of thousands of children went to school and commuter traffic choked the streets. But at a military base in North Carolina, Trump was painting a much darker picture. 'What you're witnessing in California is a full-blown assault on peace, on public order and national sovereignty,' he told troops at Fort Bragg. 'This anarchy will not stand. We will not allow an American city to be invaded and conquered by a foreign enemy.' California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat who has clashed with the president before, said Trump's shock militarization of the city was the behavior of 'a tyrant, not a president.' 'Sending trained warfighters onto the streets is unprecedented and threatens the very core of our democracy,' he said. In a live-streamed address, Newsom called Trump a 'president who wants to be bound by no law or constitution, perpetuating a unified assault on American tradition. 'California may be first, but it clearly will not end here.' In a filing to the US District Court in Northern California, Newsom asked for an injunction preventing the use of troops for policing. 'Incredibly rare' Trump's use of the military is an 'incredibly rare' move for a US president, Rachel VanLandingham, a professor at Southwestern Law School in Los Angeles and a former US Air Force lieutenant colonel, told AFP. US law largely prevents the use of the military as a policing force -- absent the declaration of an insurrection, which Trump again mused about on Tuesday. Trump 'is trying to use emergency declarations to justify bringing in first the National Guard and then mobilizing Marines,' said law professor Frank Bowman of the University of Missouri.
Free Malaysia Today
37 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Nighttime curfew in LA as Trump vows to ‘liberate' city
LAPD officers lined the street as curfew went into effect after days of protests in response to federal immigration operations in Los Angeles. (AFP pic) LOS ANGELES : A nighttime curfew was declared in Los Angeles on Tuesday as local officials sought to get a handle on protests that Donald Trump claimed were an invasion by a 'foreign enemy.' Looting and vandalism has scarred the heart of America's second biggest city as largely peaceful protests over immigration arrests turned ugly after dark. 'I have declared a local emergency and issued a curfew for downtown Los Angeles to stop the vandalism, to stop the looting,' Mayor Karen Bass told reporters. One square mile (2.5 square kilometers) of the city's more-than-500 square mile area will be off-limits between 8pm and 6am for everyone apart from residents, journalists and emergency services, she added. One protester told AFP the arrest of migrants in a city with large foreign-born and Latino populations was the root of the unrest. 'I think that obviously they're doing it for safety,' she said of the curfew. 'But I don't think that part of the problem is the peaceful protests. It's whatever else is happening on the other side that is inciting violence.' Small-scale and largely peaceful protests – marred by eye-catching acts of violence – began Friday in Los Angeles as anger swelled over ramped up arrests by immigration authorities. At their largest, a few thousand people have taken to the streets, but smaller mobs have used the cover of darkness to set fires, daub graffiti and smash windows. Overnight Monday 23 businesses were looted, police said, adding that more than 500 people had been arrested over recent days. Protests have also sprung up in cities around the country, including New York, Atlanta, Chicago and San Francisco. 'Provide protection' Trump has ordered 4,000 national guard troops to Los Angeles, along with 700 active-duty marines, in what he has claimed is a necessary escalation to take back control – despite the insistence of local law enforcement that they could handle matters. A military spokeswoman said the soldiers were expected to be on the streets later Tuesday or some time on Wednesday. Their mission will be to guard federal facilities and to accompany 'federal officers in immigration enforcement operations in order to provide protection.' The Pentagon said the deployment would cost taxpayers US$134 million. Photographs issued by the Marine Corps showed men in combat fatigues using riot shields to practice crowd control techniques at the Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach. 'Behaving like a tyrant' Two dozen miles (40 kilometers) north, the sprawling city of Los Angeles spent the day much as it usually does: tourists thronged Hollywood Boulevard, tens of thousands of children went to school and commuter traffic choked the streets. But at a military base in North Carolina, Trump was painting a much darker picture. 'What you're witnessing in California is a full-blown assault on peace, on public order and national sovereignty, carried out by rioters bearing foreign flags with the aim of continuing a foreign invasion of our country,' he told troops at Fort Bragg. 'This anarchy will not stand. We will not allow federal agents to be attacked, and we will not allow an American city to be invaded and conquered by a foreign enemy.' California governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat who has clashed with the president before, said Trump's shock militarisation of the city was the behavior of 'a tyrant, not a president.' 'Sending trained warfighters onto the streets is unprecedented and threatens the very core of our democracy,' he said. In a filing to the US district court in Northern California, Newsom asked for an injunction preventing the use of troops as any kind of policing force, and demanding they be confined to guarding federal buildings. District Judge Charles Breyer scheduled a hearing on the motion — which charges Trump and defense secretary Pete Hegseth have violated the US Constitution — for Thursday. 'Incredibly rare' Trump's use of the military is an 'incredibly rare' move for a US president, Rachel VanLandingham, a professor at Southwestern Law School in Los Angeles and a former US Air Force lieutenant colonel, told AFP. US law largely prevents the use of the military as a policing force – absent the declaration of an insurrection, which Trump again mused about on Tuesday. Trump 'is trying to use emergency declarations to justify bringing in first the national guard and then mobilising marines,' said law professor Frank Bowman of the University of Missouri.
