It's a Scary World, but Investing Abroad Has New Attractions
It's easy to think of Europe as the investment that time forgot. Even after this year's strong performance, European investments have lagged far behind the U.S. for the past decade and more.
But it would be wrong to regard Europe as having been a disaster forever: Look backward, and it matched American stock returns for decades before the euro crisis and the rise of Big Tech in the U.S.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Florian Wirtz £116m transfer problem now unlikely as Liverpool trend set to continue
Liverpool are going with the Flo. After a few weeks haggling with Bayer Leverkusen, a deal for attacking midfielder Florian Wirtz has been agreed with the Reds paying £100million with a further £16m made up of achievable add-ons. Advertisement The transfer is expected to go through when the window reopens next week and will make Wirtz the most expensive player in Liverpool's history - the 21st person to assume such an accolade since the Second World War. While taking on such a mantle can weigh heavy on some shoulders, the Reds have a reasonably decent record in extracting full value from such purchases. Success, though, isn't necessarily guaranteed. READ MORE: Liverpool have no Florian Wirtz alternative as truth about transfer spend emerges READ MORE: Why Liverpool are unable to take part in Club World Cup despite initially qualifying Wirtz will oust Darwin Nunez as the club record transfer, with the Uruguayan having arrived almost three years to the day the deal for the 22-year-old Germany international was reached on Friday. Advertisement Liverpool committed to spending £85.3m on Nunez, who was largely viewed as a signing championed by then boss Jurgen Klopp rather than being aggressively pursued by the Reds' recruitment team. While by no means a failure, Nunez must be regarded as a qualified success at best. A total of 40 goals and 22 assists in 143 appearances, while playing his part in a Premier League title triumph, would be welcomed by most players. But there has always been a sense that more could have been achieved on a personal level, with the arrival of Arne Slot as head coach last summer highlighting his qualities don't necessarily match what is required from a Liverpool number nine at present. Few would be surprised if Nunez departed this summer. The same, though, cannot be said for the two record signings before the forward. Virgil van Dijk, taken from Southampton for £75m in January 2018, and Mohamed Salah, a £43.9m purchase from Roma six months earlier, remain key figures in the Liverpool squad with both strong contenders to be in the club's greatest XI of all time. Advertisement Andy Carroll, though, was another story of what might have been. His £35m signing came on the same day Luis Suarez arrived and Fernando Torres departed, and in many respects the odds were always stacked against the Newcastle United man as Suarez completely overshadowed his new team-mate. There were some flashes - scoring at Wembley in the FA Cup semi-final and final - but the arrival of Brendan Rodgers as boss brought an end to his time after barely 18 months. Forwards ruled the roost for a good 30 years. Torres had been a record buy in July 2007 when taken from Atletico Madrid, and flourished under Rafael Benitez before the ill-fated Roy Hodgson era accelerated his exit. Djibril Cisse was signed by Gerard Houllier but only arrived after Benitez was appointed, and never truly regained momentum after a horror leg break at Blackburn Rovers. Nevertheless, he did score a penalty in the Champions League final win over AC Milan, two goals in the UEFA Super Cup win over CSKA Moscow and netted in the FA Cup final against West Ham United. Emile Heskey was a key part of Houllier's treble-winning team of 2001, and while both Stan Collymore and Dean Saunders regularly found the target in the 1990s - the latter winning the FA Cup - that neither made it to a third season spoke volumes. Peter Beardsley, though, won two titles and an FA Cup as part of the attack-minded Liverpool side of the late 1980s. Advertisement Before Beardsley came a string of other successes, with Mark Lawrenson in 1981 and, throughout the 1970s, John Toshack, Ray Kennedy, David Johnson and, of course, Kenny Dalglish. All won multiple honours both home and abroad for Liverpool. And if the late 1960s saw two players in Tony Hateley and Alun Evans who, for differing reasons, weren't quite able to live up to expectations, the earlier purchases of Emlyn Hughes and Ian St John most certainly did, along with the club's first post-war record signing, Albert Stubbins. Wirtz, then, is following in the footsteps of some genuine Liverpool royalty both past and present. And history suggests he is more likely than not to leave a successful legacy. Anfield awaits.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Joshua Kimmich becomes first Bayern Munich player to break silence on Florian Wirtz to Liverpool
Joshua Kimmich has admitted that Bayern Munich are in desperate need of attacking reinforcements as the German giants reel from missing out on Florian Wirtz to Liverpool. On Friday, the Reds struck an agreement that could be worth a British record £116million for Bayer Leverkusen attacker Wirtz. Advertisement Bundesliga champions Bayern had initially been considered front-runners to sign Wirtz, only for Arne Slot and Liverpool to convince the 22-year-old to move to Merseyside. Wirtz informed the Reds of his decision in May, paving the way for Liverpool sporting director Richard Hughes to thrash out an agreement with Leverkusen counterpart Simon Rolfes, with Bayern - who had been confident of striking a deal themselves - disappointed. READ MORE: Liverpool braced for Andy Robertson transfer bid as Atletico Madrid consider move READ MORE: Liverpool goalkeeper set to complete Ajax transfer after signing new contract Advertisement It leaves Bayern on the lookout for recruits with club legend Thomas Muller released and winger Leroy Sane choosing not to renew his contract and instead sign for Turkish giants Galatasaray. And with Vincent Kompany's side competing in FIFA's new Club World Cup competition in the United States, Kimmich believes big name exits and Wirtz's decision leave Bayern light in attack. "You'll have to ask the club what their plans are," he said. "Of course, you have the feeling that we could do something – with Flo (Wirtz) not coming, with Leroy leaving, with Thomas leaving. 'I was surprised that he (Sane) is going to Turkey. I didn't expect that. But it's his decision and he'll have his reasons for it.' Advertisement Kompany wouldn't be drawn on transfers but sporting director Max Eberl previously made no secret of Bayern's disappointment at missing out on Wirtz and the need to spend in the transfer market. He said: "I am sure that we will have a competitive team - and that we will also have the finances under control." And on Wirtz, he added: ""If I'm honest, I don't know if we could have paid what Liverpool are apparently paying now. "Florian Wirtz is an outstanding player. We could have imagined signing him. But when a door closes, another opens. "The focus is on the squad we have here. We've brought along some young players, and now we've added two Germany internationals in Tom Bischof and Jonathan Tah, who have come in on free transfers. That's already a big step. 'We have a clear plan on how we want to implement things. But there's still a lot to do. I'm certain we will have a very strong squad."
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
James River Group Holdings, Ltd. (NASDAQ:JRVR) is largely controlled by institutional shareholders who own 80% of the company
Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, James River Group Holdings' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions The top 7 shareholders own 51% of the company Recent purchases by insiders Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. To get a sense of who is truly in control of James River Group Holdings, Ltd. (NASDAQ:JRVR), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 80% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk). Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute. In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of James River Group Holdings. Check out our latest analysis for James River Group Holdings Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. James River Group Holdings already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of James River Group Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too. Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. James River Group Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Gallatin Point Capital LLC, with ownership of 13%. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 10% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 6.6% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO Frank D'Orazio is the owner of 0.5% of the company's shares. We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat. While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily. The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group. Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in James River Group Holdings, Ltd.. In their own names, insiders own US$5.3m worth of stock in the US$268m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling. With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over James River Group Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders. While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for James River Group Holdings that you should be aware of. But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio